Minibus medics sent to answer 999 calls as 'underinvestment and understaffing' hits ambulance service
Scotland's 'overstretched' ambulance service is sending minibuses out to deal with emergency calls, it has been revealed.
Patient transport vehicles (PTV) were dispatched to 320 999 calls last year, sparking fears of 'life threatening' consequences.
The vehicles are designed to take patients to and from routine healthcare appointments, but statistics show they are now responding more regularly to far more serious calls.
The transport vehicles carry less life-saving technology than ambulances and are crewed by staff with less medical training than paramedics.
The ambulance service has said PTVs are only ever sent to emergencies after an assessment has been made by a first responder that it is suitable to do so.
However, campaigners have hit out at the situation, stating the pressures the service and its staff are already under could exacerbate any risks.
Pat McIlvogue, Unite industrial officer said: 'It can be appropriate for patients to be taken to hospitals in patient transport vehicles (PTVs) after assessment.
'The real issue is though that due to lengthy hospital delays and the acute stresses on the system by the time patients receive care assistance then their health situation may have deteriorated significantly.
'Staff should not be put in the awful position of making a decision about either transporting a patient to a hospital or waiting for an emergency back up which could take too long due to patient handover times for ambulances at hospitals.
'It really is a vicious and dangerous circle that many of our frontline health care professionals face.
'Any marginal improvements in ambulance waiting times or the use of PTVs in an emergency situation we need to remember is coming from a position of record high levels.
'The problem still remains that there is underinvestment and understaffing in our health and emergency services.'
Figures released under Freedom of Information show patient transport vehicles attended 320 'emergency incidents' in 2024-25.
This was slightly lower than the 376 incidents they were despatched to a year earlier and less than half of the massive 696 times they were sent to emergencies in 2022-23.
However, the numbers are still far higher than they were in the four year period between 2018-19 and 2021-22. None of those years saw the vehicles attend more than 260 emergencies.
Scottish Conservative shadow public health minister Brian Whittle MSP said: 'These alarming figures lay bare how overstretched Scotland's ambulance service is after years of chronic mismanagement by the SNP.
'It is concerning these vehicles are being used in emergency situations, including when patients are suffering cardiac arrests.
'Yet this is the life-threatening reality for many Scots, after years of mismanagement by nationalist health secretaries who've pushed frontline care beyond breaking point.
'Patient safety must always be the top priority, but this crisis is only getting worse on the SNP's watch.
'Neil Gray needs to cut the bloated bureaucracy in our health service and prioritise getting resources to the frontline.'
Explaining its use of PTVs in its FOI response, the SAS said: 'The Scottish Ambulance Service will always dispatch an emergency ambulance for patients who require an ambulance intervention and/or monitoring on route to hospital.
'Patient Transport Vehicles only attend emergency incidents after clinical assessment through our Integrated Clinical Hub or clinicians at scene, who have identified that a patient requires further assessment at hospital, it is safe and appropriate for the patient to travel by this method and not necessary for an emergency ambulance to transport them to hospital.'
The service also said that PTV's 'will and have been tasked to cardiac arrests where they are the closest resource'. However, it said the number of these deployments is less than five annually.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
34 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer facing challenge to intervene on assisted dying vote after more than 50 Labour MPs demand Commons delay
Sir Keir Starmer is facing a major challenge for his government to intervene and delay a vote on assisted dying to go ahead on Friday this week. A group of more than 50 Labour MPs have this weekend written to the Leader of the House Lucy Powell asking her to intervene and postpone this Friday's final third reading vote on Kim Leadbeater's assisted dying bill in the Commons. Instead they are demanding that the government provides more parliamentary time to scrutinise a bill which will bring 'fundamental changes' to healthcare in England. The move marks a serious split over the issue among Labour MPs and in effect is a challenge to Sir Keir who is in favour of assisted dying. Even though the bill is a free vote as a conscience issue for MPs, it is now becoming a dividing line in the Labour parliamentary party. Sir Keir and the government have consistently insisted they are 'neutral' on the issue which has been the subject of a private members bill and have attempted to take a 'hands off' approach to it. But Labour MPs including Paul Waugh, Torcuil Crichton, Florence Eshalomi, Jess Asato, Adam Jogee, Polly Billington, Debbie Abrahams, Dawn Butler, Antonia Bance, Anna Dixon, Paul Frith, Daniel Francis and dozens of others now believe the limited private members bill procedure is not good enough for an issue which will deliver huge change. The letter to Ms Powell, seen by The Independent, says: 'On Friday, Members will debate and vote on perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations. 'This is not a normal Bill. It alters the foundations of our NHS, the relationship between doctor and patient, and it strips power away from Parliament, concentrating it in the hands of future Health Secretaries. 'MPs will be arriving at Westminster on Friday morning without sight of the final version of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill.' They noted: 'The sponsor of the Bill [Ms Leadbeater] has proudly stated that it has received more time in Parliament than some Government Bills have. And yet; MPs have had the opportunity to vote on just 12 of 133 amendments tabled at Report Stage. 'Just fourteen percent of MPs have been afforded the opportunity to speak in the chamber on this Bill Several movers of amendments haven't been able to speak to the changes they have laid.' One of the amendments not voted on was a protection against people with anorexia and other eating disorders being subject to assisted dying put forward by Labour MP Naz Shah. Even though Ms Leadbeater had indicated she would agree to the late provision, despite rejecting similar amendments before, it did not come up for a vote. The letter went on: 'Despite this, the Bill has been radically changed from the one presented to MPs at Second Reading in November. As it stands today, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill is now longer than the Government's Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill with a staggering 64 clauses and two schedules. 'The fact that such fundamental changes are being made to this Bill at the eleventh hour is not a badge of honour, it is a warning. The private member's bill process has shown itself to be a woefully inadequate vehicle for the introduction of such a foundational change to our NHS and the relationship between doctor and patient. 'New Clause 2 was added to the Bill last Friday with a sizable majority. Such a profound alteration to this Bill at the last minute reflects the discomfort uniting the House about the current format of this Bill and the desire to further amend it to protect vulnerable people.' They added: 'This is no longer about debating the abstract principle of assisted dying. The Bill before Parliament has created real concern with medical experts and charities. MPs and the Government should listen to their expertise. 'We implore you as the Leader of the House to allocate more Parliamentary time to the scrutiny of this Bill, the valid concerns that Members have about its implementation, and the consequences it could have on vulnerable populations.' However, supporters of the Bill have complained about delaying tactics used by opponents. On Friday Lib Dem MP Christine Jardine, one of the Bill's sponsors, made a point of order claiming opponents were 'hiding in the lobby toilets' during votes, to delay the Bill's progress. The Independent has approached Ms Leadbeater for comment. Other signatories to the letter include Labour MPs Antonia Bance, Florence Eshalomi, Richard Baker, Neil Coyle, Gurinder Singh Josan, Dan Francis, James Frith, Anna Dixon, Siobhan McDonagh, Katrina Murray, Julie Minns, Scott Arthur, John Grady, Richard Quigley, Debbie Abrahams, Tom Collins, Bell Ribeiro-Addy, Catherine Atkinson, Rachael Maskell, Kenneth Stevenson, David Baines, David Smith, Sarah Smith, Sean Woodcock, Kirsteen Sullivan, Laurence Turner, Polly Billington, Josh Newbury, Kate Osamor, Patricia Ferguson, Jonathan Davies, Ruth Jones, Katrina Murray, Paul Foster, Adam Jogee, Blair McDougall, Naz Shah and Valerie Vaz.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
My father died in a care home and all I got was denials and excuses
The situation at The Firs care home in Nottinghamshire, which was shut down in April, is dreadful for patients, families and staff ('How did it get to this?' What happens when care in a residential home breaks down, 7 June). But the Care Quality Commission (CQC) is not the only body to blame for failings like this. It can't investigate individual complaints – this is mostly down to the local government and social care ombudsman (LGSCO), but also the parliamentary and health service ombudsman (PHSO). It depends on who funds the care; in theory the same care home could be dealing with two ombudsman staff unaware of each other. Both are equally damned on Trustpilot with overwhelmingly negative reviews. My dad died two days after he had been moved to a home for palliative care. So much went wrong on that awful day, with staff who didn't care and with no involvement with any senior staff. I complained to the manager and then the company headquarters. I received many denials and excuses, one of which was so clearly untrue that I thought I'd caught them out. I told the PHSO everything. I waited for eight months, only to have every ridiculous excuse parroted back to me as a reason for not investigating. I don't believe the LGSCO would have been any better. The care home company knew I had complained and had time to prepare for an investigation, which never came. All I did by complaining was show what it could get away with. Other homes in the same organisation have been graded as inadequate or requiring improvement, with poor staffing levels and attitudes to patients especially marked. So criticise the CQC, but don't spare either and address supplied Your article made me cry. My parents (90 and 92) have, since February, suffered deterioration in their health such that both now need full-time care. Three of the four local-authority-provided 'rehab' places have so far been utterly woeful. The home that my father is currently living in is disastrous for a person in his position. My sister and I are desperately trying to sort an alternative for him, but it takes time and every day he is there is a day too long. And as for whistleblowing, we tried that when a carer was verbally abusive to my mother. The difficulties we are having moving her because of her record of 'very difficult behaviour' are not and address supplied
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Lucy Letby supporter claims neo-natal unit where baby serial killer worked was 'not fit for purpose'
The Countess of Chester Hospital's neo-natal unit was 'not fit for purpose' before Lucy Letby started murdering babies, a former nurse who worked there has claimed. Michele Worden said redundancies led to a loss of senior staff and plumbing issues created a 'perfect storm' for care failings. The former advanced nurse practitioner left the Countess after being made redundant in 2007, four years before Letby started working and eight years before her killing spree began. She told the Nursing Times that when the unit was downgraded in around 2006 and stopped caring for very premature babies under 27 weeks, senior nurses were replaced with junior staff who were asked to care for infants 'above their capabilities [and] training.' She said: 'It wasn't just the neonatal unit that wasn't fit for purpose, the whole maternity and paediatric and gynaecology… was not fit for purpose. 'The problems with the sewage and blocked sinks were not just [on] the neonatal unit, it was on the labour ward, it was all over.' Ms Worden said she believed the situation at the Countess of Chester was 'no different' to other NHS hospitals where maternity scandals have been uncovered in recent years. 'Hopefully Lucy will be exonerated,' she said. 'Chester is no different than Shrewsbury, Nottingham, Morecambe Bay. Women and children's healthcare has never been a high priority.' Letby, 38, is serving 15 whole life terms after being convicted of the murder of seven babies and attempted murder of seven more, including one baby girl she tried to kill twice. Plumber Lorenzo Mansutti, estates manager at the Countess, was the only witness called by Letby in her defence at her Manchester Crown Court trial. He admitted drainage problems were a 'weekly' issue at the hospital's 50-year-old Women's and Children's Building and told the jury that he remembered an incident when raw sewage backed up into sinks in the intensive care nursery. But he said it was a 'one off' and insisted that at no point were staff unable to wash their hands because the hospital had 'backup' portable handwashing units on site. The problem was not logged as a formal incident, so no exact date for the incident could be found. Letby's trial heard that none of the seven babies who died collapsed due to a bacterial infection associated with poor sewage. Cheshire police are continuing to investigate the former nurse and last year confirmed they had questioned her in prison in connection with more baby deaths. But, following a presentation from 14 international experts in February, who claim none of the babies were murdered but died due to poor care, there has been a continued chorus of people questioning the safety of her convictions. Letby has twice applied and been refused leave to appeal, but her new legal team have submitted a file of evidence to the Criminal Cases Review Commission, the body that investigates potential miscarriages of justice, in a last ditch attempt to get her convictions overturned. They claim the testimony of lead prosecution expert Dewi Evans was biased and that he changed his mind over the method of murder of one of the children murdered by Letby, a boy known as Baby C. Dr Evans has denied this and the Court of Appeal has already dismissed claims he was not suitably qualified or lacked independence. Yesterday it emerged that Dr Evans, who has been subjected to intense trolling online from Letby supporters, had been involved in an online row with one of them - an anonymous statistician who Dr Evans accused of being motivated by a sexual attraction to Letby. According to the statistician, Dr Evans wrote: 'You seem very intense, and it's not unusual for men to have the hots for pretty young blonde females. A nursing uniform is a turn-on for some by all accounts. 'I would suggest you need to get out more, find yourself an available pretty young blonde female, with/without nursing credentials. But one who doesn't go to work intent on murdering her patients.' The statistician said it was 'absurd' to say he believed Letby was innocent because she was 'blonde and pretty' and insisted he had come to that view after reviewing the transcripts of the trial.
