logo
Pixel 10 Pro Launch Dates Are Later Than Expected

Pixel 10 Pro Launch Dates Are Later Than Expected

Forbesa day ago

Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Ewan Spence
Google may be inviting a small pool of influencers to an early preview of the Pixel 10 and Pixel 10 Pro; however, the rest of the world might have to wait an extra week to see the latest Android-powered flagships.
Initial reports suggested an event on Aug 13, but signs now point to a Made By Google event one week later.
The new details come from the team at Android Headlines. The event will now take place on Wednesday, Aug 20, with the announced hardware going on retail sale on Thursday, Aug 28. While plans may change, Google is expected to announce four new handsets.
The flagship Pixel 10 Pro and the larger Pixel 10 Pro XL will undoubtedly be the backbone of the four phones launched. These will come with the highest spec camera, memory, and storage options, tailored to Google's mobile artificial intelligence vision. Google's third foldable, the Pixel 10 Pro Fold, will follow last year's trend and continue to be part of the main line of Pixels.
The only non-Pro handset is the Pixel 10, and that might be the most interesting Pixel in terms of positioning and market impact, as I've noted previously:
"While the headlines will no doubt focus on the extra features in the Pixel 10 Pro and the larger display of the Pixel 10 Pro XL, the Pixel 10 may have the heaviest impact on the market. The camera's hardware and software will be pushed to the limit, the latest version of Android will steer the conversation around mobile AI towards Google's vision, and the issue of the longevity of mid-range handsets will remain a point of discussion."
The proposed dates of Aug 20 for launch and Aug 28 for availability would put the Pixel 10 launch one week later than last year's Pixel 9 family; 2024's Made By Google event was held on Aug 13, with retail releases on Aug 22 for the Pixel 9 and Pixel 9 Pro XL—he Pixel 9 Pro was delayed to Sept. 4.
Now read more about the impact of the Pixel 10 and Pixel 10 Pro smartphones on the Android market...

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why The Trump Vs Musk Public Meltdown Matters
Why The Trump Vs Musk Public Meltdown Matters

Bloomberg

time38 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Why The Trump Vs Musk Public Meltdown Matters

The breakup between the world's most powerful politician and the world's richest man is playing out in a manner befitting an era of hyperreality: with stunning speed, wild recriminations, and in public via television and their own social media platforms. President Donald Trump and Elon Musk, who just last week stood together in the Oval Office to proclaim their lasting friendship, traded barbs and insults in real time on Thursday. Proclamations of sadness, ingratitude and disappointment by the men soon devolved into an exchange of threats. Senior Editor Bill Faries joins Caroline Hepker and Tom Mackenzie on Bloomberg Radio to discuss what happened and why it mattered. (Source: Bloomberg)

Trump-Musk Feud Fallout: DJT Fell 8% As Trump's Fortune Slides By $200M
Trump-Musk Feud Fallout: DJT Fell 8% As Trump's Fortune Slides By $200M

Forbes

time40 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Trump-Musk Feud Fallout: DJT Fell 8% As Trump's Fortune Slides By $200M

Shares of Trump Media and Technology Group, the parent company of the president's Truth Social platform, fell by more than 8% on Thursday and wiped more than $200 million from President Donald Trump's net worth, as the president publicly clashed with billionaire Elon Musk—whose personal fortune nosedived nearly $27 billion amid a selloff in Tesla shares. Truth Social's parent company, Trump Media and Technology group's shares fell by 8% amid the ... More Musk-Trump feud. The stock price of Trump Media and Technology Group, which trades on Nasdaq under the DJT ticker, dropped by 8.04% on Thursday to $20.12. The social media company's shares began the day slightly in the red, but fell steeply in afternoon trading as Musk alleged, without evidence, that Trump's name was on the 'Epstein files,' and backed calls for his impeachment. Musk's side of the feud mostly played out on the billionaire's social media platform, X, while the president used his Truth Social platform to respond, where he threatened to 'terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts.' Amid the intense social media feud, several users reported on Downdetector that the TMTG-owned platform was inaccessible to them, with the President's personal feed appearing blank with the message 'No Truths.' According to our estimates, President Donald Trump's net worth stood at $5.4 billion early on Friday, after dropping around $202 million amid Thursday's selloff. Despite this, the president's fortune remains more than double what it was at the start of 2024. In after-hours trading, Trump Media's shares briefly slumped to $19.30. However, signs of a potential truce between Musk and Trump have triggered a slight recovery in the premarket. In early trading on Friday, the social media company's share price went up around 1.15% to $20.35. Tesla has also seen a recovery, with the electric vehicle maker's stock price rising by 4.55% to just below $298.

Why Apple's VisionPro won't make XR headsets mainstream
Why Apple's VisionPro won't make XR headsets mainstream

Fast Company

timean hour ago

  • Fast Company

Why Apple's VisionPro won't make XR headsets mainstream

Major announcements around the VisionPro headset are expected next week and may even confirm tantalizing rumors that a lighter model of the high-end XR device is coming next year. Whatever Apple reveals at WWDC, we can expect another round of analyst predictions that this time, mass adoption of head-mounted displays is finally happening. As Apple, Meta, and other major players continue to struggle with taking the technology mainstream, it's worth addressing the virtual elephant in the room: There's reason to suspect that XR headsets' barrier to success isn't just about cost, headset weight, lack of content, eye strain, or other frequently cited issues. Neuroscience suggests that the sensory experience of XR can't compensate for the value of sharing a physical environment with our screens—especially when it comes to how we form knowledge and memory. Experiments with XR for Full-Time Computing About 10 years ago, I started spending long sessions in VR (4–8 hours daily over several weeks) to see how it might affect my sense of time and attention. I began with the HTC Vive, which was comfortable and fun. Later, I tested the Apple VisionPro with a full virtual workstation of monitors and displays. I was curious whether XR could improve focus and research. It felt like a very different thing to use VR all day, versus a brief demo in a museum or Apple showroom. Early on, I had to stand and move constantly throughout the day. It was exhausting, though it made for a great workout (SUPERHOT was one of my favorites). But this kind of motion-based interaction didn't translate well to daily work tasks. Tossing data around in 3D like in Minority Report might make for compelling cinema, but it's far less practical over time. When the VisionPro arrived, I was excited to use it while seated. A friend set me up with a massive virtual workspace, and I genuinely appreciated the focus it provided when I was digging into something new—say, reading a dense Wikipedia article. Still, when I set up my home office last year, I chose two large physical monitors at eye level and a sit/stand desk. As enjoyable as VR was, the process of setup and adjusting the space took more time and energy than docking a laptop. And even though I was initially thrilled to be in a virtual workspace, I found myself feeling more distant from the real world. I wanted to go outside more, and didn't feel like looking at any screen at all by day's end. I also noticed the difference in eye strain from screens so close to my face. I prefer to work near a window where I can shift my gaze into the distance. That rhythm of looking away and refocusing helps me process thoughts—especially after encountering something new. The Trouble With Losing Touch I asked my colleague Dr. David Sisson, a neurophysiologist, why XR adoption hasn't matched media hype. He reminded me that audio and visual inputs—the primary senses XR taps into—aren't the full picture. Then there's the matter of touch in XR. 'Without touch, there's no 'intimacy.' You're not really interacting with what's going on,' David told me. 'You can hit a ball—and hear the 'crack' in VR—but you're not feeling anything other than a little jerk in the controller that makes you feel like there's some inertia happening.' In short, headsets deprive us of the tactile and physical context that supports memory formation. Contrast that with playing a console game: you're anchored in a physical space, hands on colorful controllers, with the screen at a distance. If you're like me, you vividly remember not just the game, but the exact couch you sat on and the friends or family who played with you. The Neuroscience of Virtual Experience This sense of 'placeness' goes beyond just touch. As David explained, '[C]hemical senses are not a part of [the VR experience] . . . There's a well-considered idea, a linkage between olfaction, smell between memory—that you're living that out of the [VR] picture entirely.' Attempts at incorporating virtual smells into XR exist, but it's unclear whether they're effective—or even desirable. Recent research supports what French literature has long told us: smell powerfully evokes memory. Studies show scent not only enhances recall but may also support learning across other sensory areas. While XR devices like VisionPro do re-create home and office setups and allow for vast screen real estate, they lack a true sense of location. Evolution shaped our brains to operate differently depending on whether we're traveling or at home. Researchers call this the encoding specificity principle —our memories link closely with the environment where they were first formed. With a headset on, our minds don't fully orient to a place, and so we never quite settle in. Apple offers a vast virtual workspace you can take on the go, but that benefit comes at the cost of the sensory richness and physical grounding of a real-world setup. Neuroscience, not just practicality, suggests that working in a physical space—with monitors, windows, textures, smells, and distance—offers deeper engagement and memory retention. Putting the 'Pro' in VisionPro To be clear, XR headsets excel in specific contexts like rehabilitation or short bursts of fully embodied interaction, where body motion tracking is vital. Some content creators might find immense value in a distraction-free, multiscreen virtual studio. But that's not a mass-market audience. XR evangelists may continue promoting VisionPro as the breakout device, but we—and Apple, for that matter—should remember that 'Pro' isn't just branding. It reflects the narrow set of advanced use cases that justify immersion. For most of us, computing still works best in a physical world that engages all five senses. And that's not something XR can replicate—at least, not yet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store