&w=3840&q=100)
How India-Pakistan sporting ties have nosedived after Pahalgam terror attack
India-Pakistan sporting ties have worsened after the Pahalgam terror attack. This has led to India's withdrawal from Central Asian Volleyball event and calls for complete cricket boycott. Social media handles and YouTube channels of several prominent Pakistanis have also been banned in India. read more
India-Pakistan sporting ties have faced a major setback following the terror attack in Pahalgam on 22 April, which resulted in the tragic death of 26 innocent tourists. This incident has seriously affected the relationship between the two countries across all industries, and sports is no exception.
India withdraws from Central Asian Volleyball event
Recently, the Pakistan Volleyball Federation (PVF) confirmed that India has pulled out of the Central Asian Volleyball event scheduled for 28 May in Islamabad. Abdul Ahad, an official from PVF, said India was planning to send a 30-member team, including 22 players, but has now cancelled their participation.
'The Indian Volleyball officials have informed the regional body that their government has cancelled the NOC issued to them for the tournament after the incident in Pahalgam. It is disappointing to know India has withdrawn from the championship and they will be replaced either by Afghanistan or Sri Lanka,' Ahad was quoted as saying by news agencies.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Pakistani social media accounts face ban in India
But the tension is not limited to volleyball alone. Several Pakistani social media accounts, especially those belonging to well-known former cricketers including Shoaib Akhtar, have been banned in India. Even YouTube channels of Pakistani cricket experts and former players are facing a similar ban after the attack.
Calls grow in India to boycott Pakistan in cricket
Moreover, calls to boycott Pakistan in major cricket events have become louder in India. Prominent cricket personalities like former India captains Sourav Ganguly and Mohammad Azharuddin, and ex-KKR batter Shreevats Goswami have openly suggested not playing against Pakistan in ICC tournaments. Jay Shah is the current president of the International Cricket Council (ICC).
'100 per cent, this should be done. Strict action is necessary. It is no joke that such things happen every year. Terrorism cannot be tolerated,' Ganguly said when asked if India should completely cut off cricket ties with Pakistan.
India's cricket ties with Bangladesh under threat
The cricket ties with other nations might also be affected. There are reports suggesting that the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) may cancel India's tour of Bangladesh, which is scheduled for August of this year. The reason behind this is linked to increased tension after the Pahalgam attack, particularly after controversial remarks from a retired Bangladesh army officer suggesting Bangladesh should capture India's northeastern states if India attacks Pakistan.
'If India attacks Pakistan, Bangladesh should occupy seven states of North-East India. In this regard, I think it is necessary to start a discussion on a joint-military system with China,' Maj Gen (retired) ALM Fazlur Rahman said in a post on Facebook. A Times of India report later claimed that India might reconsider their upcoming tour of Bangladesh.
Uncertainty looms over Asia Cup 2025
Even the Men's Asia Cup 2025, which India was supposed to host, is now under threat and could possibly be cancelled if tensions continue. Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) chairman Mohsin Naqvi is the current president of the Asian Cricket Council (ACC). India are the defending champions having defeated Sri Lanka in the previous edition in 2023.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
18 minutes ago
- Economic Times
UFC 316: Preview, betting odds and predictions; Merab and Patchy Mix, top picks
TOI-Online Merab Dvalishvili, Dana White and Sean O'Malley. Photo via UFC/YouTube (screengrab) Every big UFC event comes with a swirl of questions, but UFC 316 feels especially charged. At the heart of it is whether Sean O'Malley has done enough — changed enough — to handle the relentless pressure of bantamweight champion Merab Dvalishvili in their highly anticipated rematch. The first fight wasn't close. Dvalishvili came forward like a storm and never let O'Malley breathe, let alone strike cleanly. Since then, O'Malley's made some noticeable changes behind the scenes. Different training partners, a shift in personal habits, a clear focus. But even the most polished version of O'Malley still has to deal with the same problem: Dvalishvili doesn't slow down. He breaks fighters with volume, cardio, and suffocating control. If you're betting this one, the value's in Merab by decision at -160. He's not a finisher, and O'Malley's durable enough to survive. But surviving isn't winning, and this matchup still tilts Merab's way. The co-main has its own kind of gravity. Kayla Harrison is a two-time Olympic gold medalist stepping into the UFC title picture — not in theory, not 'one day,' but right now. She's fighting Julianna Peña, a veteran who's already pulled off one of the biggest upsets in UFC history when she beat Amanda Nunes in 2021. Peña thrives as the underdog, and she's tough, but toughness alone doesn't neutralize judo throws and top pressure. Harrison will likely get her to the ground, and once she does, the finish is coming — either with strikes or a submission. You can bet Harrison by sub at +130 or by TKO at +275, but the smarter route might just be to take the double chance (submission or TKO/DQ) at -175 and cover both lanes. The only concern? Harrison didn't look great on the scales. If Peña can drag it into the fourth or fifth, things might get interesting. Further down the card, there are a few spots worth watching. Vicente Luque vs. Kevin Holland is the kind of fight that screams chaos on paper, but there's reason to believe it lasts a bit. Luque's a grinder with sneaky grappling, and Holland's no slouch off his back. They've both had quick finishes in the past, but this matchup looks like it could stretch into the second half. Over 1.5 rounds at -175 feels like the right call. Then there's Mario Bautista taking on Patchy Mix. Bautista's a hard-nosed, versatile fighter who knows how to win ugly. But Mix, a former Bellator champ, is stepping into the UFC while still in his athletic prime — and it shows. His past mistake, gassing out against Juan Archuleta in 2020, seems to have reshaped his entire approach. If he stays off the fence and sticks to the game plan, he should get it done. Mix at -180 on the moneyline is the play — not flashy, just solid. The most unpredictable of the bunch might be Kelvin Gastelum vs. Joe Pyfer. Pyfer's bigger, more powerful, and on the way up. Gastelum, though, has been through the fire and doesn't go away easily. Pyfer might win, but Gastelum's toughness makes a decision more likely than a finish. If you're leaning toward safety, bet the fight to go the distance at nearly even money (-105) and walk away without trying to predict which version of each guy shows up. Altogether, it's a card with more questions than answers — which is often when value appears for bettors. The matchups at the top have drama. The ones beneath are full of risk-reward. And by Sunday morning, we'll know whether the talk of change, redemption, and fresh starts were just fight-week noise — or something more.
The Print
33 minutes ago
- The Print
Rahul slams EC's ‘unsigned' rebuttal of his Maharashtra poll rigging charge—'show voter rolls'
Earlier in April this year, ECI sources termed similar claims made by Rahul in the United States—first, in his address before the Indian diaspora in Boston, and second, at Brown University—as 'absurd'. In a social media post, the Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition (LoP) retorted that responses to 'serious questions' through 'unsigned, evasive notes' were unbecoming for a constitutional body such as ECI. 'Evasion won't protect your credibility. Telling the truth will,' Rahul posted on X. New Delhi: Not for the first time, Rahul Gandhi clashed with the Election Commission of India (ECI) Saturday over his allegation of 'industrial scale-rigging' during the Maharashtra assembly elections. The ECI indirectly clapped back at the Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition, reiterating that his charges were 'absurd', on the same day. However, this time, Rahul countered on X, saying: 'If you have nothing to hide, answer the questions in my article and prove it by: Publishing consolidated, digital, machine-readable voter rolls for the most recent elections to the Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabhas of all states, including Maharashtra.' He also demanded the release of CCTV footage from inside the polling booths recorded from 5 pm on the counting day before the Maharashtra assembly election results. But, ECI is not required to do what he says under the law. In December 2024, the Centre amended the Conduct of Election Rules, effectively removing electronic footage—earlier open to public inspection—from the polling process by stamping it out from the definition of 'election papers'. On earlier occasions, Rahul Gandhi has represented the amendment as indicative of the ECI becoming 'compromised'. In opinion pieces published in different languages in different newspapers, the LoP Saturday repeated the allegations he has been making against the ECI for some time now. Rahul laid out a 'step-by-step' playbook of election rigging in his pieces. 'Step 1: Rig the panel for appointing the Election Commission. Step 2: Add fake voters to the roll. Step 3: Inflate voter turnout. Step 4: Target the bogus voting exactly where BJP needs to win. Step 5: Hide the evidence,' he wrote. Sharing his write-up on X, Rahul also appealed to people to go through the 'evidence', judge for themselves, and demand answers. 'Because the match-fixing of Maharashtra will come to Bihar next, and then anywhere, the BJP is losing.' Assembly elections are due in Bihar later this year. The LoP, through his writing, also sought to substantiate his allegation of rigging in the Maharashtra assembly polls by raising questions on the increase in registered electors in the state from 9.29 crore during the LS polls to 9.70 crore during the assembly polls. 'A crawl of 31 lakh in five years, then a leap of 41 lakh in just five months,' Rahul wrote. 'So incredible was this leap that the registered voter total of 9.70 crore was even greater than the 9.54 crore adults in Maharashtra according to the government's own estimates.' He also raised suspicions about the rise in total voter turnout between 5 pm and the final figures released by ECI, calling the huge difference a major red flag. 'The polling turnout at 5 pm was 58.22 percent. Even after voting closed, however, [the] turnout kept increasing more and more. The final turnout was reported only the next morning to be 66.05 percent … The unprecedented 7.83 percentage point increase is equivalent to 76 lakh voters—much higher than previous Vidhan Sabha elections in Maharashtra,' Rahul stated. Hours after the piece came out, the ECI, without naming anyone, relayed through its sources that 'defaming the poll panel after receiving an unfavourable verdict from the voters is absolutely absurd'. The ECI sources said the rise in total voter turnout is not abnormal in the slightest way and that Rahul's allegations about the electoral rolls had no substance. 'After the finalisation of the electoral rolls for the Maharashtra election, as against the 9,77,90,752 (over 9.77 crore) electors, only 89 appeals were filed before the first appellate authority—the district magistrate concerned—and only one was filed before the second appellate authority—the state chief electoral officer,' according to the sources. Therefore, the ECI sources added, it was amply clear that the Congress or any other political party had no grievance before the Maharashtra assembly elections, which it supervised in 2024. Asserting that the ECI has replied to all the allegations levelled by the Congress earlier on 24 December 2024, the ECI sources added that over one lakh booth-level officers of Maharashtra are waiting for the 'wild allegations' to turn into 'at least one single real appeal before district magistrates' in line with the election laws that exist to avoid discrepancies in the list of electors. (Edited by Madhurita Goswami) Also Read: Time to 'retire lame horse'—Rahul Gandhi hints at massive revamp of MP Congress unit
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Bengaluru Stampede: 5 cops suspended; 2 KSCA officials resign; CM raises compensation to ₹25 Lakh
Bengaluru Stampede: Bengaluru skies lit up with firecrackers on Tuesday, June 3 — as if Diwali had come to the city early — after Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) clinched the IPL trophy for the first time in 18 years. Within a day, however, the celebrations spiralled into a tragic stampede killing 11, leading to the suspension of five senior police officers, transfer of one Karnataka government official. As per the latest developments, Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has increased the compensation for the families of those who lost their lives in the Chinnaswamy Stadium tragedy to ₹ 25 lakh each from the earlier ₹ 10 lakh per family. Here's what we know so far: Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah's political secretary K Govindaraj was suspended, while Hemanth Nimbalkar, Karnataka's Additional Director General of Police (Intelligence) was transferred. Bengaluru City Police Commissioner B. Dayananda was among five senior police officers suspended in connection with the incident, three of whom are IPS officers. Fans stand next to abandoned shoes and a fallen barrier following a stampede outside the M. Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru Not just the Karnataka government officials, but RCB heads also bore the brunt of the deadly stampede that injured over 40 others after fans thronged outside Bengaluru's Chinnaswamy Stadium on Wednesday, June 4. On Friday, a city court remanded four individuals — including Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) Head of Marketing and Revenue, Nikhil Sosale — to 14 days in judicial custody in connection with the fatal stampede. Apart from transferring officials, the Karnataka government on Saturday ordered a Criminal Investigation Department (CID) investigation into the stampede case. As part of the investigation, CID officials visited the office of the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) to gather preliminary information on the matter, ANI reported. As per ESPNCricinfo, top senior officials of the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA), secretary A Shankar and treasurer ES Jairam, have resigned from their posts, citing "moral responsibility" for the stampede. They submitted the resignations to the president of the board, Raghuram Bhat. The brutal stampede also left its footprints on social media. Following the tragedy, angry netizens, who were once all praise for Virat Kohli, demanded that the cricket icon be put behind bars. Royal Challengers Bengaluru's Virat Kohli (L) holds the Indian Premier League trophy aloft alongside teammates outside the M. Chinnaswamy Stadium as they celebrate with fans winning the Indian Premier League (IPL) title, in Bengaluru on June 4, 2025. At least 11 people were killed in a stampede on June 4, as a tightly packed crowd celebrated the victory of their home cricket team in the Indian city of Bengaluru, the state's chief minister said. Social media users even clashed with each other over #ArrestKohli trending on X, as many users claimed the stampede was because of the organisers' failure.
