&w=3840&q=100)
'That incident revved up the group': Gill-Crawley spat sparked team meeting and shift in England's attitude, reveals Carse
As per Brydon Carse, the Gill-Crawley spat was the trigger that sparked England's comeback in Lord's Test. Images: Reuters
England fast bowler Brydon Carse has revealed a secret team meeting was called after Day 4 of the Lord's Test against India in which the players and management decided to adopt a change in their on-field behaviour. Carse says the meeting was called after India, under the captaincy of Shubman Gill, started to get aggressive with their mental games and on-field behaviour.
The first major on-field incident of the ongoing five-match Test series between India and Ben Stokes-led England took place on Day 3 of the third match at Lord's when Gill got into an argument with English opener Zak Crawley over time wasting. On Day 4, Siraj gave an aggressive send-off to Duckett, for which he was later fined by the ICC, and India were also seen using time-wasting tactics towards the end.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
England meeting sparks better performance
In an exclusive interview with Mail Sport, Carse has revealed that the whole English team had a meeting after the end of the fourth day's play, where it was decided that they needed to put on a more aggressive tone on the field and it was the Gill vs Crawley incident that had sparked the change.
'That incident at the end of day three probably revved up the whole group, and we had that discussion at the end of day four,' Carse told Mail Sport. 'And I think the common thing was that sometimes, as an English cricket team, we can come across a little bit too nice, whereas the opposition are very quick to get stuck into us.
'So it was just brilliant that the whole team bought into that. We want to be aggressive and give it a good crack. We want to play the game in the right spirit, but still be up for a bit of a fight and a challenge.
Also Read | Anjum Chopra Exclusive: 'Shubman is India's captain, let's be there to help him succeed'
Carse admitted that the change in nature allowed the English players to perform better. 'When you're out on that field and you've got 10 other blokes all fighting your corner, I'm definitely one that won't shy away from something like that. It certainly gets your beans going and your emotions going, but it's also important in those situations to control it.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Not everyone is an admirer of Bumrah's availability algorithm
A disclaimer to open — this is not a roast of Jasprit Bumrah or a slur on his achievements or his abilities. Bumrah is one of Indian cricket's modern greats, a tri-format giant, with an impressive haul of wickets, from a superb set of performances leading to a superb set of numbers. Over 2024-25, Bumrah was outstanding in a largely un-outstanding BGT series for India. He is an self-starter elite sportsman, the thinking man's fast bowler, a jewel of the Indian game etcetc. Jasprit Bumrah smiles as he celebrates the dismissal of England's Jamie Smith on the third day of fourth Test. (AP) Acknowledged, no? Properly respectful and all? What's happening around Bumrah now though is a tug-of-war of brand persona and performance impact from the recently concluded England v India Test series. Bumrah produced two impressive first-innings fifers in it but without his usual sledgehammer impact. His series concluded with 14 wickets in 119 overs @25 econ 3.04. His work-load management mismatch – India winning the two Tests he skipped for fear of aggravating back strain – has caused a social media sniper exchange with BCCI's timed leaks about its future strictness against 'picking and choosing.' The science first. The latest studies, circa 2022, around lumbar stress fracture in elite cricket fast bowlers present a range of bone-density readings on specific spinal regions, that bowlers like Bumrah – and his medical team - are required to keep tabs on, following Bumrah's back surgery in 2023. In this series, Bumrah was handled as carefully as possible and the questions raised are cricketing, with no prior knowledge of his latest medical reports. In Leeds, with England chased 373 to win in the second innings, Bumrah bowled more overs than the other quicks – 19 to Mohammed Siraj's 14. The English batters chose, as Ben Duckett said, to 'limit his (Bumrah's) impact' by opting to bat conservatively against him. Bumrah bowled in short spells, the longest four overs. His last over in Leeds was the 65th of the innings, England 286-4, trailing by 81. After the match, criticism of the profligacy of the other Indian bowlers occupied more attention and sidestepped the question of whether their No.1 bowler could have bowled more. Bumrah was not going to play in the second Test a few days later, anyway. Surely captain Shubman Gill did not lose track of who was available in his final roll of the dice? Surely Bumrah wanted to grab the ball from Gill's hand and take a shot? There is no explanation why he did not or was not bowled on the evening of June 24 when the Lord's Test began on July 10. After Leeds, it was soundly being argued that at 0-1 down – with Edgbaston only beginning on July 2 – playing Bumrah would give India a better shot at 1-1. Rather than face 0-2 at Lord's when Bumrah returned. However, what if the bone density readings recommended rest. Fine. The Headingley euphoria sidestepped the question about Bumrah's availability. The series had many examples of players putting their body on the line. Ben Stokes bowled himself to a standstill and a grade three muscle tear. What Rishabh Pant (broken foot) or Shoaib Bashir (broken finger) or Chris Woakes (dislocated shoulder) chose to do regardless of how that would impact them later. Muscle tears and fractures are not the same as spinal stress fractures. The question of putting career at long-term risk over short-term team gain is only answered by the players' individual view of his situation. Then came the Oval release. At 3.10pm on August 1, just before the start of day two of the final Test, the BCCI's X handle posted that Bumrah had been 'released' from the squad. 'Released' means a cricketer can leave the venue. At the Oval, Bumrah was not seen anywhere on TV unlike previously. He may have been addressing medical issues but we don't know. 'Released' meant taking the choice to step away from his junior teammates, who would have lapped up 'Jassi bhai's' advice on lengths, lines and the various ticks and tells of the English batters in the most bowler-friendly conditions of the series. Mentor in the backroom instead of magician on the field. An image suddenly popped up. Photos of Anil Kumble, arm in sling, after shoulder surgery, at the India camp in Chennai before the start of the 2001 India-Australia series, working with the bowlers. It was Kumble and his mates, Javagal Srinath and Venkatesh Prasad who first banded the bowlers together into a tight unit. Their idea was to be senior buddies, counsellors and gurus of the kind they had not found when they came into the Indian team in the Kapil Dev era. India's bowling brotherhood, set up by Kumble & Co in the early 2000s, has kept paying forward – Zaheer Khan, Ashish Nehra, Irfan Pathan,nIshant Sharma, Mohammed Shami and then onto Bumrah himself. The Oval 'release' doesn't automatically mean Bumrah sees himself as a cut above his peers. Or indeed that he hollers at his juniors frustrated at their over-dependence on his wicket-taking. But to disengage from a young pack growing in strength and confidence is to deprive himself of their energy, joy and camaraderie. His availability algorithm has also quelled the possibility of Captain Bumrah even before the ascent of Gill. A Test captain only available for three Tests across a staggered random time-line is undesirable and unfeasible. One clear misstep has also taken place in Bumrah's name. After the series, the first visual of five on Bumrah's Instagram post of Tuesday features him back to camera with words: 'We take back great memories from a highly competitive and enthralling Test series. Looking forward to what's next'. While trying to put persona and performance in lockstep, Bumrah's management team's first choice in Instagram is a solo shot of a cricketer who didn't have the most important role to play in that come-from-behind series result. That's like an over-eager photo bomb.
NDTV
20 minutes ago
- NDTV
"He Did Cross The Line": Ex India Star's Big Verdict On Shubman Gill's Captaincy
India captain Shubman Gill has been on the receiving end of some massive praise from fans and experts, following his breathtaking tour with the bat in England. Gill raised his stocks in the five-match rubber against England, smashing 754 runs to emerge as the leading runscorer in his debut series as captain. Speaking on Cricbuzz, former India wicketkeeper Dinesh Karthik showered heaps of praise on Gill, saying that the young batter silenced all of his doubters. Karthik also noted the changes made by Gill in his batting technique, as well as the way he dealt with the media pressure during the lengthy tour. "He's been aggressive at times; sometimes he did cross the line. I think he'll change that about himself to an extent. I hope he doesn't change it too much. But most importantly, the way he handled the English media [he did it very well]. Walking into this series, people were asking - Shubman Gill, away from India, his record can be better. And he said, 'I want to be the best batter across both teams'. It's one thing to have confidence, but you've got to back that up with skill. He came prepared. There was a vulnerability in his batting [against] the ball coming back in. He found a way to work on his technique and counter it," said Karthik. Karthik suggested that Gill should get a lot of credit for the way he batted in the second Test, saying that his 430-run aggregate in the contest at Edgbaston was the most defining moment of the series. "What was the defining part of what he achieved was the hunger and determination. That 269 and the hundred he got at Edgbaston, the amount of time he batted was astounding," he added. Gill's next assignment as captain will see India take on West Indies for two Tests, starting October 2. Before that, he will be leading North Zone in the upcoming Duleep Trophy.
Hindustan Times
20 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
David Warner called 'clown' for trying to 'get into Joe Root's head' ahead of Ashes: 'Obviously trying to...'
After the conclusion of the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy between England and India, all eyes are on the upcoming marquee Ashes. Ben Stokes' England and Pat Cummins' Australia will battle it out for the urn in the five-match series, and one cannot wait for the spectacle to begin on November 21 in Perth. The contest is still three months away, but the mind games have begun with former Australia opener David Warner trying to get under the skin of Joe Root. David Warner had spoken about Joe Root's weakness heading into the Ashes. (AFP/PTI) Root, who has 39 Test tons to his name, is yet to score a hundred Down Under and ahead of the Ashes, Warner revealed the one weakness ailing the right-hander. However, Moeen Ali has not taken kindly to Warner's comment on Root, labelling him a 'clown.' Midway through the fifth and final Test between India and England at the Oval, Warner spoke about Joe Root and how he will have a tough time, especially against Josh Hazlewood. "He's just being Warner. He's a bit of a clown, to be honest with you. He's obviously trying to get into Rooty's head—which he won't. He's not up for the whole banter thing. It's just Warner, isn't it?' Moeen said on the Beard Before Wicket podcast. Moeen Ali then spoke about India also failing to rile Root up with their sledging tactics, and hence, Warner's comment will bear fruit. In the Oval Test against India, Root uncharacteristically lost his cool after Prasidh Krishna had some words to say. Also Read: Harry Brook rejects Gautam Gambhir's choice of naming him Player of the Series: 'I didn't score as many runs as Root' 'Rooty's scored so many runs now, he's been through the whole thing, and it won't affect him. India tried it, and it just didn't work—clearly didn't—because he scored loads of runs. But yeah, there are some players you can do that to, and others you can't," said Moeen Ali. What did Warner say? Recently, Warner spoke about Joe Root's record Down Under as he spoke about his failure to score a Test century in Australia. He likened the right-hander's batting stance to a "surfboard" and how it will make him vulnerable to Josh Hazlewood's inswingers. "The way that he brings down his bat playing on Australian wickets, it can bring him undone, and I've seen it in the past. I think he will have nightmares before he gets over there about Josh Hazlewood. A bit like me and Broady," Warner said on the sidelines of the Hundred. "Joe is a hell of a cricket player, look at the runs he has scored, the second leading run-scorer in the world. But I'm sure he'd like to score a hundred in Australia. It's one that has eluded him. I think that will be on his mind, so we will have to wait and see," he added. Stuart Broad also jumped in Root's defence, saying Hazlewood has dismissed Root just three times in Tests.
