logo
2 jaw-dropping 'Superman' cameos made DC fans thrilled

2 jaw-dropping 'Superman' cameos made DC fans thrilled

USA Today6 days ago
James Gunn's new DC Universe launched this week, with his Superman movie hitting theaters to positive reviews and audience fanfare. This is the first time audiences have been able to see and enjoy David Corenswet as the blue, red, and gold-clad superhero, along with Nicholas Hoult as Lex Luthor and Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane.
MORE SUPERMAN: James Gunn is Sam Raimi's heir apparent
As is the case with a lot of comic book movies, Superman had both post-credit scenes and a couple of fun cameos thrown in.
WARNING: Spoilers for the new Superman ahead! Proceed at your own risk!
The first cameo we get is none other than John Cena as Peacemaker. The wrestler-turned-actor reprised his role from Gunn's 2021 version of The Suicide Squad. In Superman, Peacemaker joined a talk show after the people of Metropolis turned on Superman following the reveal of the true nature of the message sent from his parents when he arrived on Earth.
The second cameo is at the very end of the movie, as Supergirl returns to pick up her dog, Krypto. Milly Alcock (House of the Dragon) plays Superman's cousin and is the lead for the next DC Universe movie with Supergirl, which is scheduled to release June 26, 2026.
Fans loved the Superman cameos
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Superman' Is MAGA Kryptonite
‘Superman' Is MAGA Kryptonite

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

‘Superman' Is MAGA Kryptonite

I've grown to dislike the word assimilation. When we talk about immigration, the better word is adoption, and it took a superhero movie to help me understand why. That movie is 'Superman.' Like virtually everything else in America, 'Superman' got caught up in the culture war. In the days before the movie's release, its director, James Gunn, warned that not everyone would love his film. 'I mean, Superman is the story of America,' Gunn told a British newspaper. 'An immigrant that came from other places and populated the country, but for me it is mostly a story that says basic human kindness is a value and is something we have lost.' Let's pause for a moment. From the beginning, the Superman story has been a story of an interstellar immigrant who becomes so fundamentally decent and courageous that he is the fictional ideal of 'truth, justice and the American way.' So when Gunn says that his story is about 'basic human kindness,' the first thought I had was, 'Yeah, sounds like he made a Superman movie.' Cue the outrage on the right. In a segment on Fox News, the chyron read 'Superwoke.' Jesse Watters, a Fox News host, joked that Superman was going to wear an MS-13 cape. Another Fox News host, Greg Gutfeld, said that Gunn was trying to build 'a moat of woke, enlightened opinion around him.' (When it comes to MAGA bodies of water, I think I prefer 'moat of woke' to 'Gulf of America.') A popular X account called End Wokeness, which has 3.7 million followers, posted a headline with part of Gunn's quote about immigration and kindness and wrote, 'Hollywood literally never learns.' What should Hollywood learn? That kindness and decency are for suckers, and the best place for Superman isn't with his family in Kansas or in his Fortress of Solitude, but rather behind a fence, trapped in Alligator Alcatraz? I saw the movie on opening night. I have a longstanding tradition — I see every new superhero movie as soon as I can, on the biggest screen that I can. I enjoyed every second of it — it was funny, it was fun, and it absolutely celebrated decency and kindness. But as the credits rolled, I had a single dominant thought: 'Superman' is a movie about adoption, and if adoption is woke, then consider me woke. I'm going to share spoilers, so you might want to save this newsletter and read it after you watch the movie, but one of the pivotal revelations of the movie is that Superman learns that he wasn't sent to Earth to serve humanity, but to rule over us all and to preserve the Kryptonian race by forming a harem of human women. In most versions of the Superman story, including the 1978 Christopher Reeve 'Superman' and the 2013 Zack Snyder version, 'Man of Steel,' the titular character is sent from the dying planet Krypton explicitly to help and protect us. Superman's parents are good and decent people who love their son. That's what you believe at the start of this movie as well. To calm him in times of crisis, Superman watches a partial video clip salvaged from the wreck of his spacecraft that seems to depict his parents as kind beings who direct him to serve the people of Earth. But the movie's villain, Lex Luthor, and his allies recover the rest of the footage — in which Superman's parents direct him to conquer Earth — and share it with the rest of the world. All at once, he loses his sense of self. A mob gathers in Metropolis, and the same people he's loved and served now scream for him to go. So he flies away, back home to Kansas, to his adopted family. In many versions of the Superman story, his earthly father dies when Superman is a child. In this version, his father and mother are still very much alive. They embrace him, and his father tells him that only Superman can define his character. He is not destined to follow the path his biological parents set. In a confrontation between Superman and Luthor, just when Luthor is trying to treat him as inherently dangerous and inescapably alien, Superman responds with a passionate declaration: 'They've always been wrong about me. I love. I get scared. But that is being human, and that's my greatest strength.' In the movie, Superman did everything we could ever ask of an immigrant. He assimilated. But had he been adopted? By his family, yes, but what about by his nation? Think for a moment of the immigrant experience. If you're a child, you come without your consent. You find yourself in a place that you've never known. Even if you're an adult, and you want to make America your home, you start out in a state of isolation and vulnerability. Is it any wonder that new immigrants often create or seek out ethnic enclaves? From the Irish and Italian quarters of cities in the 19th century to the barrios of the 20th and 21st centuries, immigrants can ease into their new life by holding onto remnants of the old. We look at immigrants and often demand that they assimilate. Be like us, we say. Conform to our culture. And that's usually an easy ask — after all, adult immigrants want to be here. They want to participate in American life. For children, assimilation tends to happen quickly. Immigrant children who grow up in America quickly become more American than they are Mexican or Nigerian or Polish. Assimilation doesn't mean abandonment. There are millions of patriotic Americans who are also proud of their national heritages. When the waters of the Chicago River turn green on St. Patrick's Day, we celebrate with Irish Americans. Should Mexican Americans experience any less joy on Cinco de Mayo? When I served in Iraq, I served with immigrant soldiers who expressed pride in their homelands but fought in one uniform under one flag, and no one in our squadron ever questioned where their ultimate loyalties lay. But if we ask immigrants to assimilate, then our nation has its own obligation. We must adopt them. If we want immigrants to love us, then it is our sacred obligation to love them back. Nations can't love immigrants like adoptive parents love their children, but there is a parallel — a nation can tell a person, 'You are one of us.' That doesn't mean that we open our borders to anyone who wants to come. Of course we should regulate the flow of immigrants into our country. Too many people arriving too quickly can overwhelm social services, strain local economies and create the conditions for rivalry and conflict that destabilize our politics. But our default posture should be one of open arms. We should take immense pride that people want to come here. And we should welcome as many as we can reasonably absorb. This is our national heritage, marred though it is by sometimes-long periods of backsliding. This is all very personal to me. I'm an adoptive father of an immigrant daughter. And when I watched 'Superman,' my mind went back to one of the most important and touching moments of our lives. In 2010 — when America felt like a kinder nation — my family and I traveled to an orphanage in Ethiopia to pick up our Naomi, our beautiful, precious daughter. Families who have adopted internationally know that there are really two adoptions that take place — one is personal and one is national. I'll never forget either. The personal adoption happened when a nurse handed Naomi to us. Courts had already declared us to be her parents, but the adoption process is long and grueling, and you can legally become a child's parent before you've even met. It doesn't seem real until that moment when you first hug your child, and she hugs you back. That's a moment that imprints on every adoptive parent's heart. When you adopt a child overseas, America also adopts her as a citizen. When we adopted Naomi, she didn't just become a member of our family; she also became an American. But that's a cold legal fact. How can a nation love? A nation loves through its people. In the movie, Superman can't truly feel whole again until he feels the love of his neighbors. When did this nation love our Naomi? On Day 1. After the five of us left Ethiopia — we'd also brought our two older kids — we arrived at J.F.K. in New York about as tired and emotional and jet-lagged as a family could be. I was nervous about Customs. The paperwork for international adoptions can be astonishingly complex, and the slightest mistake can lead to very long delays. I walked up to a very serious-looking immigration officer and handed him a pile of documents. He went through them carefully and looked up. But he didn't look at me. He looked at Naomi, and his serious expression changed to a smile that radiated tenderness and warmth. 'Hello, little one,' he said. 'On behalf of the United States of America, welcome home.' Some other things I did Before I get into all this, I want to thank you. Last week, my newsletter was about the plight of young men in America, and I want to thank you for flooding my inbox with thoughtful, heartfelt and kind messages. I can't respond to them all, but I read them all, and you gave me much to reflect upon. I'm amazed at the depth of your knowledge and wisdom, and many of you shared powerful personal stories. Please keep your thoughts coming. Your words make me a better columnist and a better person. On Sunday, I wrote about the Epstein files, and the astonishing spectacle that we're witnessing as MAGA is tearing itself apart, and expressing concerns — serious concerns — about President Trump. Why would the Epstein files cause this chaos? The Epstein story mattered so much in MAGA circles because it was a key element in their indictment of America's so-called ruling class. Trump's appeal to the Republican base isn't just rooted in his supporters' extraordinary affection for the man; it's also rooted in their almost indescribably dark view of the American government. Why are they so keen to burn it all down? Well, if you believe your government is populated by people so depraved that they'd participate in and cover up the systematic sexual abuse of children, then you wouldn't just want them out of office; you'd want them prosecuted, imprisoned and maybe even executed. And you'd want all the power you'd need to make that happen. And if you believe that the ruling elites would abuse children, then they'd certainly be the kind of people who'd gin up a Russia hoax or try to steal an election in 2020. People who are that terrible are capable of anything. And if you wonder why MAGA turned on the F.B.I. and the Department of Justice, well, it's not just about the Russia investigation or the F.B.I. search of Trump's home in Mar-a-Lago. MAGA America also believed the F.B.I. was protecting pedophiles to preserve the status quo. On the right, the Epstein story became the thinking man's version of the QAnon conspiracy theory — the idea that American society was led by a gang of cannibalistic pedophiles. Whereas QAnon was rooted in the imaginary revelations of a shadowy figure who claimed Q security clearance, at least the Epstein story was rooted in some very grim, very real facts. On Saturday, we published my conversation with Michelle Cottle about Elon Musk's idea for a third party. My conclusion was simple: Musk has a good idea, but he's not the right person to execute it. Besides, wouldn't it be easier if the parties healed themselves? French: Well, of the third-party ideas, one part of the concept of the America Party is actually smarter than a lot of the other third-party ideas. I would then say Elon Musk is exactly the wrong person to implement it because he has a bipartisan sense of revulsion now. Because he has taken on Donald Trump and taken on MAGA. So a lot of Republicans really hate him. And when he switched from being a green techno-futurist to being Donald Trump's wealthiest acolyte, the left turned on him. So he's in many ways the least appealing person possible to start a third party because he's alienated both wings. He's been driven out of both wings. Cottle: He's a uniter, David. He's united everyone against him. French: Yes. It's the uniting against is the problem. However, this idea that we're not trying to sweep away everything, but win targeted races, so that there is a third party to contend with in the Senate, so that you can't have atrocities like the big, beautiful bill that just passed, where you can have some independent voices — I think there's actually some real promise to that idea. In part because it doesn't depend on, as many third parties do, with the man on the white horse coming in with all the fame and all the resources and triggering the last thing we need, which is yet another kind of populist revolution. Thank you for being a subscriber If you're enjoying what you're reading, please consider recommending it to others. They can sign up here. Browse all of our subscriber-only newsletters here. Have feedback? Send me a note at French-newsletter@ You can also follow me on Threads (@davidfrenchjag).

The Emmys Snubbed ‘House of the Dragon' Again
The Emmys Snubbed ‘House of the Dragon' Again

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The Emmys Snubbed ‘House of the Dragon' Again

Much like Lucerys Velaryon flying from Dragonstone never to be heard from again, House of the Dragon left the 2025 Emmy nominations announcement with just six honors in makeup, hairstyling, and visuals. While we spent the day mourning the snubs of Andor's Diego Luna, the former Emmy juggernaut's lack of an awards presence flew completely under the radar … and without much pushback from fans. It's no secret that House of the Dragon season 2 did not live up to audience expectations. Disappointing its audience isn't exactly new for the HBO fantasy franchise. Game of Thrones season 7 featured ineffective and deflated resolution to years of exceptional buildup. Still, the Emmys celebrated Thrones's farewell season with a record 32 nominations in a single year. Heck, it even won Outstanding Drama Series. House of the Dragon? Not so much. It was clear from season 2's mix of budget restraints and a stretched-out story that viewers were simply not feeling enthusiastic about Game of Thrones's continued world-building. Even with acting on par with (or even better than) some of the nominees in the Drama categories, leads Emma D'Arcy and Olivia Cooke were't nominated by the Emmys for the first season either. Despite being nominated for Outstanding Drama Series, House of the Dragon left the 2023 Emmys (hosted in 2024) with just one win in Fantasy/Sci-Fi Costumes. Just a few years ago, the talk of Hollywood was whether House of the Dragon or The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power would win the fantasy-TV wars. Now it seems that both series have lost. Rings of Power received one just nomination this year for Outstanding Special Visual Effects—notably alongside the Dune prequel, Dune: Prophecy. Maybe these fantasy prequels just aren't panning out as well as Hollywood hoped. Good luck, A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms. You Might Also Like Kid Cudi Is All Right 16 Best Shoe Organizers For Storing and Displaying Your Kicks Solve the daily Crossword

Netflix just added one of the most deliriously entertaining action-thriller movies ever made — and I'm not ashamed how much I love it
Netflix just added one of the most deliriously entertaining action-thriller movies ever made — and I'm not ashamed how much I love it

Tom's Guide

time4 hours ago

  • Tom's Guide

Netflix just added one of the most deliriously entertaining action-thriller movies ever made — and I'm not ashamed how much I love it

When I discovered that Netflix was becoming the new streaming home for 'Wanted' this week, I was going to declare it one of 'ultimate guilty pleasure' watches, but on reflection, I'm not even slightly sorry about adoring this loud-and-brash action-thriller movie that plays out like a graphic novel come to life. This is a movie where elite assassin in training Wesley Gibson (James McAvoy) can curve bullets around corners, shoot the wings off a common household fly and smack his smarmy best friend (played by Chris Pratt) in the face with a keyboard, only for the cascading keys to spell out 'f**k you' in midair (the second 'u' is represented by one of the guy's teeth). It's awesome! Released in 2008, and inspired by the comic book series of the same name by Mark Millar, it's punky, garish, immature and absolutely packed with cinematic style. The stacked cast list also includes Angelina Jolie, Morgan Freeman and rap artist Common. There was talk of a sequel around release in the late 2000s, which sadly never materialized, but that's OK because 'Wanted' remains one of the most endlessly rewatchable movies I've ever seen. And now that it's on Netflix, you're going to want to drop everything and get on board for this nonstop wild ride. Wesley Gibson (McAvoy) is stuck in a rut — working a dead-end office job, being cheated on by his girlfriend and suffering from regular panic attacks. He seems like a complete no-hoper until he learns that his estranged father has been murdered, and the person responsible for killing his dad now has Wesley in his crosshairs. Discovering he possesses unique and very lethal abilities, Wesley joins an underground society of assassins known as The Fraternity. Trained by the underground group's expert leaders, Fox (Jolie) and Mr. Sloan (Freeman), Wesley's life takes an unexpected turn, and he soon becomes the ruthless killer he was born to be. But as he adjusts to (and starts to enjoy) his new life as an expert assassin, he also uncovers a deeper conspiracy. The term 'like a comic book come to life' gets thrown around a lot — most recently with 'Superman' — but 'Wanted' truly does feel like the pages of a graphic novel have been converted to film. This is not a world of gritty action or grounded set-piece moments; it's the stuff of youthful wish fulfillment. In 'Wanted,' everything is heightened. The bullets fly regularly and with serious ferocity, and to add even more excitement to the mix, they curve in midair to make physically impossible trick shots possible. Every movie of mayhem is a complete joy, and oozes with flair and slick style. There's no doubt that the movie's extremely juvenile attitude will alienate some viewers, but this isn't a movie concerned with offending. It's nonstop immaturity all the way through, and it asks you to get on board with that or shut up and go watch something else. It's the type of movie that shows not one, but two, middle fingers to anybody who calls it 'a bit over the top.' I can't even pretend there's deeper substance beyond the gleeful violence and the screenplay laced with profanity. 'Wanted' certainly isn't deep, but it's seriously good fun nevertheless. And if you can embrace the chaos, it offers nonstop thrills that will have you fist pumping through sheer excitement. While none of its A-listers are exactly challenged with the material, McAvoy, Jolie and Freeman make for a solid trio of leads, and each member of The Fraternity is given their moment to shine. Or in McAvoy's case, their moment to stop being a loser and start kicking some butt. "Wanted" doesn't gently cross over the line into overkill; it speeds in a supercharged sports car across it, laughing all the way to its next target. 'Wanted' is one of those movies that I turn to when I want completely mindless entertainment, and that's certainly no criticism. It knows exactly what it is, and it plays to its intended audience near perfectly. So, if you're after cinematic escapism that will have you grinning like a child from the drop, look no further. Just don't let any actual children watch with you. Seriously, this is one ultra-violent and very crude action-thriller movie. Looking for more Netflix watches? Here's a guide to everything new being added to the streaming service in July 2025, as well as a roundup of all the new to Netflix movies with 90% or higher on Rotten Tomatoes, for subscribers looking to watch a critically acclaimed effort. Watch "Wanted" on Netflix now

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store