
6 Investor Predictions For AI In 2025
Investment and analysis money cash profits. Successful investor or entrepreneur making investing ... More plans. Financial consulting, investment and savings. Vector illustration.
That are we likely to see as we continue to integrate the results of LLMs into the business world?
There are certain overarching trends and patterns that experts are pointing to in gaming out the next few years of the AI revolution. For example, there's the tremendous need for data (which we'll talk about a little later). There's the need for energy, which is prompting new interest in nuclear power, and other means of sourcing the juice needed for new data centers and systems.
Then there are other sorts of changes getting recognized as investors prepare to take on the rest of 2025, and build strategy for successive years.
In a recent presentation at Imagination in Action, Ulrike Hoffmann-Burchardi, the CIO for Global Equities at the UBS Chief Investment Office, pointed to some interesting predictions for the AI market.
The first of her predictions was that AI data center spending would hit $4 billion by 2027, and exceed spending on other general purpose data centers. She listed three reasons. One relates to Jevin's paradox, where innovations mean more of the new technology gets used. Another contemplates training and scaling laws in the industry. The third centers around inference.
'We're not just doing one-shot inferencing,' she said. 'We are now simulating different decision paths, and trying to find out what the best solution is going to be - that takes a lot more compute.'
Another of Hoffmann-Burchardi's predictions is that, in the race to feed AI engines, synthetic data will help. That's going to help address the problem of needing original data to give systems something to train on. It also alleviates some issues around intellectual property and data ownership that come with using human data for AI ends.
Hoffmann-Burchardi hinted at continuing gains for AI hardware, while cautioning that some forms of hardware have incredible staying power, like the GPU, that has remained a popular format for over a decade.
This corresponds to some of Hoffmann-Burchardi's writing in a report in February where she talked about hardware trends.
'The release of Groq 3 by xAI on 17 February marked another proof point of hardware scaling laws,' she wrote. 'Groq 3 was trained on 100,000 NVIDIA H100 GPUs and, based on xAI's claims, it surpasses leading models from OpenAI and DeepSeek in areas such as mathematics, science, and coding, while it already achieved top rankings on the HuggingFace chatbot leaderboard. The capex spent by xAI for the development of its models confirms our view that the AI race will keep pushing the frontier of hardware spending.'
In other analysis, Hoffmann-Burchardi suggested that AI margins will actually go up.
'The reason for that is that these companies are their own best customers,' Hoffmann-Burchardi said. 'They use AI in order to lower costs and increase efficiency.'
As ballast, she pointed to news from a recent earnings call where a big company saved $260 million, or 2.6% of net income, by using GenAI to upgrade 30,000 job applications.
Hoffmann-Burchardi also cited Google estimating that 25% of their codebase is now written by AI. That will increase, she suggested.
'You'll see more and more of that,' she said.
Going back to Hoffmann-Burchardi's February report on global equity strategy, we have the assertion that China will get a significant amount of market share for Internet stocks:
'China's internet companies—from Alibaba, Baidu, ByteDance, to Tencent—have shown an impressive cadence of algorithmic innovation in developing efficient large language models since 2023. These models can be used to enhance the user experience, improve ad targeting, and personalize content, potentially leading to higher revenue. Further automation through AI agents can drive operational costs lower, setting up for an inflection in operating margins.'
Responding to questions from the audience, Hoffmann-Burchardi talked about two options – decreasing cost by letting people off, and improving revenue. If companies can find ways to improve revenue, she suggested, they won't just use AI for productivity – they'll find completely new ways of doing business, and that may allow people to keep their jobs.
'GPUs are ideally suited for parallel processing, especially if the algorithm, the transformer algorithm, is starting to evolve. Yes, there will be some competition (but) we believe (that) five years from now, GPUs will still be the dominant AI chip.'
'We actually think any industry, any company can re-invent itself for AI. You need just two things. You need an AI-first mindset. You need some proprietary data, … any company will have a chance to become a leader in its space.'
'AI is reinventing the way business is done at a speed that is accelerating, and that may be even difficult for us to fully understand.'
Those are some of the investing predictions around the AI world this year. Look for more as we continue to demonstrate what's coming out of MIT conferences and events, and other sources like professional blogs by AI experts, as well as the biggest news stories of the year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lawyers could face ‘severe' penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns
The High Court of England and Wales says lawyers need to take stronger steps to prevent the misuse of artificial intelligence in their work. In a ruling tying together two recent cases, Judge Victoria Sharp wrote that generative AI tools like ChatGPT 'are not capable of conducting reliable legal research." 'Such tools can produce apparently coherent and plausible responses to prompts, but those coherent and plausible responses may turn out to be entirely incorrect,' Judge Sharp wrote. 'The responses may make confident assertions that are simply untrue.' That doesn't mean lawyers cannot use AI in their research, but she said they have a professional duty 'to check the accuracy of such research by reference to authoritative sources, before using it in the course of their professional work.' Judge Sharp suggested that the growing number of cases where lawyers (including, on the U.S. side, lawyers representing major AI platforms) have cited what appear to be AI-generated falsehoods suggests that 'more needs to be done to ensure that the guidance is followed and lawyers comply with their duties to the court,' and she said her ruling will be forwarded to professional bodies including the Bar Council and the Law Society. In one of the cases in question, a lawyer representing a man seeking damages against two banks submitted a filing with 45 citations — 18 of those cases did not exist, while many others 'did not contain the quotations that were attributed to them, did not support the propositions for which they were cited, and did not have any relevance to the subject matter of the application,' Judge Sharp said. In the other, a lawyer representing a man who had been evicted from his London home wrote a court filing citing five cases that did not appear to exist. (The lawyer denied using AI, though she said the citations may have come from AI-generated summaries that appeared in 'Google or Safari.') Judge Sharp said that while the court decided not to initiate contempt proceedings, that is 'not a precedent.' 'Lawyers who do not comply with their professional obligations in this respect risk severe sanction,' she added. Both lawyers were either referred or referred themselves to professional regulators. Judge Sharp noted that when lawyers do not meet their duties to the court, the court's powers range from 'public admonition' to the imposition of costs, contempt proceedings, or even 'referral to the police.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
United Airlines Turns Off Starlink Access Amid Interference Concerns
PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing. United Airlines' plans to retrofit its entire regional fleet with Starlink connectivity have hit a roadblock, at least temporarily. United first started rolling out Starlink access using a free-with-ads model in May, becoming one of a select club—including Hawaiian Airlines and the boutique air carrier JSX—to offer flyers access to SpaceX's satellite broadband service. Its speed and performance proved a hit with PCMag when it debuted, and United announced plans to install Starlink in its entire two-cabin regional fleet by the end of 2025. However, Starlink has been turned off on almost two dozen Embraer E175 regional jets, according to air industry publication The Points Guy. The issue stems from static interference between the antennas that pilots use to communicate with air traffic controllers and Starlink's antennas. United confirmed the reports in a statement, saying that this type of radio interference is 'fairly common with any new airline Wi-Fi provider' and that the issues are not a flight safety risk. 'We expect the service to be back up and running on these aircraft soon,' a spokesperson said. According to The Points Guy, roughly a third of the impacted planes have already had a fix applied. United doesn't expect to cancel any flights as a result of the issue and will instead wait until each aircraft's scheduled maintenance to fix the interference issue. Though Starlink may be off the table for many domestic fliers, at least in the short term, United has introduced new ways for travelers to distract themselves in recent weeks. The Chicago-based carrier announced earlier this week that it's bringing the streaming-audio service Spotify to the on-demand entertainment displays of over 680 of its aircraft, offering 'specially curated versions of Spotify's most popular playlists.' The new Spotify integration will replace the 'Audio' option on the home-screen menu of those displays.


TechCrunch
22 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Lawyers could face ‘severe' penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns
The High Court of England and Wales says lawyers need to take stronger steps to prevent the misuse of artificial intelligence in their work. In a ruling tying together two recent cases, Judge Victoria Sharp wrote that generative AI tools like ChatGPT 'are not capable of conducting reliable legal research.' 'Such tools can produce apparently coherent and plausible responses to prompts, but those coherent and plausible responses may turn out to be entirely incorrect,' Judge Sharp wrote. 'The responses may make confident assertions that are simply untrue.' That doesn't mean lawyers cannot use AI in their research, but she said they have a professional duty 'to check the accuracy of such research by reference to authoritative sources, before using it in the course of their professional work.' Judge Sharp suggested that the growing number of cases where lawyers (including, on the U.S. side, lawyers representing major AI platforms) have cited what appear to be AI-generated falsehoods suggests that 'more needs to be done to ensure that the guidance is followed and lawyers comply with their duties to the court,' and she said her ruling will be forwarded to professional bodies including the Bar Council and the Law Society. In one of the cases in question, a lawyer representing a man seeking damages against two banks submitted a filing with 45 citations — 18 of those cases did not exist, while many others 'did not contain the quotations that were attributed to them, did not support the propositions for which they were cited, and did not have any relevance to the subject matter of the application,' Judge Sharp said. In the other, a lawyer representing a man who had been evicted from his London home wrote a court filing citing five cases that did not appear to exist. (The lawyer denied using AI, though she said the citations may have come from AI-generated summaries that appeared in 'Google or Safari.') Judge Sharp said that while the court decided not to initiate contempt proceedings, that is 'not a precedent.' Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW 'Lawyers who do not comply with their professional obligations in this respect risk severe sanction,' she added. Both lawyers were either referred or referred themselves to professional regulators. Judge Sharp noted that when lawyers do not meet their duties to the court, the court's powers range from 'public admonition' to the imposition of costs, contempt proceedings, or even 'referral to the police.'