‘10.6 years': Dire reality for Aussies revealed in State of Housing System report
A median-income household now needs to save for 10.6 years just to afford a deposit and start a whole new challenge of servicing a new mortgage, the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council's annual State of the Housing System 2025 report shows.
It notes that mortgage repayments continue to increase faster than incomes, and affordability continues to deteriorate though at a slower pace compared with 2023.
About 50 per cent of median household income was needed to meet repayments for new mortgages in 2024, according to the report.
It does not look good for renters either, as 33 per cent of median wages are needed to meet rental costs in new leases.
Rental stress has affected more than 50 per cent of lower-income renter households in 2023. Sixty per cent of these households also experienced stress the year before, showing how persistent the issue is.
Only 14 per cent of new homes sold in 2023-2024 were affordable for the median-income household, the lowest on record.
NSW residents have drawn the short straw, as new mortgages and home deposits remain the least affordable in Australia, whereas the Northern Territory has the most affordable mortgages and home deposits.
Rents in regional Queensland were the least affordable, but rents in Canberra were the most affordable.
New housing supply is the lowest in a decade, and the 1.2 million target for new houses to be completed during the Housing Accord period will not be met – even under optimistic economic estimates, the report says.
No state or territory will meet their target, and supply is insufficient to meet underlying demand.
The report has called for systemic reform, government support measures and industry innovation to address the issues, but the NSW government says it is heading in the right direction.
'The Minns Labor government inherited a system that was working against achieving the Housing Accord targets. It was also never assumed that, given macroeconomic conditions and the costs of construction, it would be a straight line between now and mid-2029,'
Minister for Planning and Public Spaces Paul Scully said.
'We are turning around the system. Planning approvals are 15 per cent faster today than they were in March 2023, the number of applications lodged is up 28 per cent on the same time last year, and NSW has the most homes under construction in the country.
'There are thousands more homes and DAs being finalised that are embracing our planning reforms such as the Housing Delivery Authority and the low and mid-rise policy. We're building a pipeline that will actually deliver homes.
'The State of the Housing System report shows us that we have our work cut out for us, but as a government we've got our priorities right.'
Weak supply has been attributed to a lack of commercial feasibility – it costs more for developers to build than what they would earn selling it.
Elevated costs, labour shortages, high financing are all constraining supply but should be easing, the report says.
Property Council chief executive Mike Zorbas said the report showed the need to increase
productivity in the construction sector, simplify planning systems and encourage investment.
'The alarm bell continues to sound on national housing supply,' Mr Zorbas said.
'The sad fact is that many Australians feel that homeownership is out of reach.
'We have seen the federal and state governments co-ordinate their efforts on boosting supply,
but more must be done.
'Our skills and planning systems are not yet match fit for this century.
'More than 30 per cent of the cost of a new home is government taxes and charges.
'East coast states have daft foreign investment taxes that are barbed wire to overseas
institutions that want to send their money to help Australian companies build the assets our
cities need.
'The least cost answer for indebted states is to modernise our planning systems and put
measures in place to boost the proportion of skilled workers coming into the country.
'We need to bring forward federal environmental approvals and force power and water
providers to stop delaying the delivery of new homes, industrial and commercial assets that our communities need as they grow.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
23 minutes ago
- News.com.au
‘Sickens me': Damning review exposes childcare safety crisis
A scathing review has found children's safety had been compromised by systemic failures, chronic underfunding and outdated practices in Victorian childcare centres, prompting urgent calls for sweeping reform. The Rapid Child Safety Review, released on Wednesday, recommended creating a powerful new watchdog and overhauling the troubled Working With Children Check (WWCC) regime. The review, led by former South Australian premier Jay Weatherill and public servant Pamela White, handed down 22 recommendations and urged the Victorian government to enact them within 12 months. It followed allegations Melbourne childcare worker Joshua Brown sexually abused babies and toddlers, prompting at least seven further reports of alleged or proven abuse by people with WWCC clearances since July. Mr Brown is believed to have worked at 24 childcare centres over his career and is facing 73 charges, including 28 of producing child abuse material, 24 of transmitting child abuse material, 13 of sexually touching a child under 16 and three of sexual penetration of a child under 12. His alleged offences triggered a major public health alert, with the parents and guardians of more than 2000 children advised to have them tested for sexually transmitted infections as a precaution. The review's 22 recommendations focus on preventing predators from entering the system, quickly identifying and excluding them if they do, and ensuring they can never work with children again. Key measures include: â—�Establishing a National Early Childhood Worker Register covering all staff with regular contact with children, including casual workers. â—�Overhauling the Working With Children Check and Reportable Conduct schemes to allow unsubstantiated but credible allegations to trigger refusal or suspension. â—�Strengthening the independence and powers of the Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) regulator, including unannounced inspections of all services at least once a year. â—�Improving physical safety in centres through initiatives such as a 'four eyes' staffing rule and trials of closed-circuit television for regulatory purposes. â—�Enhancing transparency and workforce support, including mandatory child safety training and clearer guidance for reporting concerns. Premier Jacinta Allan apologised to families and committed to implementing all 22 recommendations. 'This sickens me as premier, it also sickens me as a mum,' Ms Allan said. 'I will do everything in my power as Premier to make sure child safety comes first, that's why we're announcing a child safety overhaul.' Victoria will establish a new independent regulator to oversee childcare centres, more than doubling compliance inspections and administering the new Early Childhood Workforce Register. The Social Services Regulator will also be strengthened, consolidating the WWCC, Reportable Conduct Scheme, and Child Safe Standards under one roof with expanded powers to proactively assess risks. 'We are already banning personal devices in childcare rooms to protect children, and work to establish a statewide register of childcare workers is underway,' Ms Allan said. 'We will do everything we can to make sure safety comes first. The government is also calling on the Commonwealth to implement national reforms, including a 10-year strategy for the ECEC system, higher penalties for non-compliance, and the creation of a national Early Childhood Worker Register. The Premier and Cabinet were briefed on Monday, and ministers will meet Friday to discuss immediate action.
SBS Australia
43 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
Diplomatic breakdown or 'consistent' behaviour? Where the Australia-Israel relations stand
Australia-Israel relations, historically steadfast, appear to be quickly deteriorating. After becoming one of the first countries to recognise Israel in 1949, shortly after its inception, Australia has regularly described itself as a "friend of Israel". On Tuesday evening, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu branded Prime Minister Anthony Albanese a "weak politician" who "betrayed Israel" and "abandoned" Australia's Jewish community, in a post on X. Responding to the attack, Albanese told reporters in Adelaide on Wednesday he treats foreign leaders "with respect" and didn't take Netanyahu's description of him as "weak" personally, as diplomatic relations between the leaders deteriorate. "He has had similar things to say about other leaders," Albanese said. "What I say is that Israel, increasingly, there is global concern because people want to see an end to the cycle of violence that we have seen for far too long. That is what Australians want to see as well." While such treatment from Israel against one of its long-time allies may seem uniquely harsh, some experts do not consider it an outlier. Martin Kear, from The University of Sydney's Department of Government and International Relations, told SBS News: "The Israeli government never accepted the diplomatic push for a two-state solution, and it will do everything in its power to hamper any realistic progress along those lines." Relationship 'the worst it has ever been' Australia and Israel's recent tit-for-tat visa cancellations could amount to the "lowest diplomatic relationship" between the countries, Kear said. Simcha Rothman, a politician in Israel's fringe national religious party known as Religious Zionism, was due to start a speaking tour in Australia but was denied entry into the country. The party is part of Netanyahu's governing coalition. In an interview earlier this year with Britain's Channel 4 News, Rothman denied Palestinian children in Gaza were dying of hunger due to Israel's limitations on food and aid. When asked by a reporter why Israel won't let Palestinian children flee to Israel, he replied: "Because they are our enemies." "They are our enemies and according to international treaties about refugees in the time of war, you don't let them conquer your country with refugees." Opposition leader Sussan Ley accused the government of playing fast and loose with Australia's historically close ties with Israel. "This is an elected member of the Israeli parliament, and it's a very unusual thing to refuse a visa. I haven't seen explanations from Tony Burke that actually explain what is going on here," she said. Liberal senator James Paterson called the bilateral relationship between the two countries "the worst it has ever been since the creation of the state of Israel following World War II." Following Rothman's visa cancellation, Israel's foreign minister, Gideon Sa'ar, announced a decision to revoke the visas of Australian representatives to the Palestinian Authority (PA). He said it was in direct response to Australia's recognition of a Palestinian state and for refusing entry to Israeli figures. Experts say the move — earlier described as "unjustified" by Foreign Minister Penny Wong — could complicate Australia's efforts to help form a blueprint for statehood with local Palestinian politicians. Israel's visa retaliation 'unjustified' Although it may appear Netanyahu is singling out Australia — rarely mentioning Albanese by name or making direct comment on Australia's foreign policy — an international relations expert said this reflects a broader pattern of behaviour. Jessica Genauer, senior lecturer in international relations at Flinders University, told SBS News: "This is quite consistent with the way that Benjamin Netanyahu has responded to other countries around the world, in particular Western countries; countries that have traditionally been allies of the United States, deciding to recognise a state of Palestine." "We've got the UK, France, and then also Canada, who've said that they would be recognising a Palestinian state in September [at the United Nations General Assembly], and we've had criticism from Benjamin Netanyahu in those cases as well," she said. Notably, in August last year, Israel revoked the diplomatic status of eight Norwegian diplomats serving the occupied Palestinian Territory after it recognised a Palestinian state months earlier. Finance Minister Katy Gallagher told the ABC on Tuesday: "At a time when we need more diplomacy and more dialogue between countries, it is a disappointing decision. We're not surprised necessarily by it," speaking of Israel's visa retaliation against Australia's PA representatives. "We saw similar steps taken against other countries, for example, Norway, when a decision was taken about recognising Palestine. But our view is this is unjustified, and we need more talk, more diplomacy, more channels in for discussion than we've needed before," she said. Position 'consistent' with Palestinian statehood Revoking visas for people the Australian government has raised concerns about around this topic is also not new. In 2017, Australia blocked the visa of prominent Palestinian activist, Bassem Tamimi , just hours before he was due to travel, citing that "members of the public will react adversely to [his] presence in Australia regarding his views of the ongoing political tensions in the Middle East". LISTEN TO Kear said Rothman's visa cancellation this week is a move broadly in alignment with the stated goal of pushing for a two-state solution. "This is a person who doesn't recognise Palestinians exist at all, and there should never be a Palestinian state," he said, speaking of Rothman. While liberal democracies like Australia are required to "respect a variety of views within the public arena", Genauer said it's "entitled to say that they do not want extreme or divisive elements within the borders of their own territory". "Australia is wanting to take a little bit stronger stance towards Israel and exert pressure where they can, I think, out of concern for the ongoing humanitarian situation in Gaza," she said. Rothman has told Israeli broadcaster Arutz Sheva he believes the visa decision wasn't made because of him, but about the state of Israel. "It's not banning me, it's banning Israel, it's banning Israelis, and it's banning Jewish people from having debate or discourse in Australia, which is terrible," he said. Rothman claims the email he received from the Australian government states his visit would cause "unrest among the Muslim community in Australia". "The Australian government is trying to appease terror, and appeasing terror never worked and it never will work. We learned this the hard way on October 7th [2023]. Sadly, apparently, the government of Australia did not learn this lesson," he said. Kear said he believes Rothman's response is consistent with the "traditional ultranationalist playbook where any criticism of Israeli politics or policies is deemed as being inherently antisemitic, where Israel is the epitome of Judaism, which is highly contested within the Jewish world". "I don't think it's a general reflection of what's happening in Australia at all."
ABC News
43 minutes ago
- ABC News
'Thriving Kids' and a fresh growth target: The new NDIS announcements explained
The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) has transformed the lives of its participants, but hard questions about the scheme's future are again being asked. On Wednesday, Disability and NDIS Minister Mark Butler made several announcements on the future of the $48 billion scheme, aimed at moderating its future growth. It follows figures that again show children, particularly those with autism, continue to make up a large proportion of participants, and reminders the scheme is on track to outstrip the defence budget. Do you have a story to share? Email Mr Butler told the National Press Club the federal government would tip $2 billion into "Thriving Kids", a new program outside the NDIS aimed at supporting children with mild to moderate developmental delays and autism. He said he wanted the program to be up and running by July next year. "Diverting this group of kids over time from the NDIS is an important element of making the scheme sustainable and returning it to its original intent. Access and eligibility changes will be made to do that once [it] is fully rolled out," the minister said. "Children who are enrolled in the NDIS now or become enrolled before that time will remain on the scheme subject to its usual arrangements." Mr Butler said Thriving Kids was a "refocusing", not a complete replacement, of what the 2023 NDIS Review called "foundational supports" — a tier of services outside the scheme for those with less profound disabilities, run by the states in settings such as schools, childcare and health services. Instead, it appears the program would be one significant part of those foundational supports. It is also unclear at this stage how it will be delivered. Mr Butler also flagged further reforms to the scheme that would be implemented once the government hits its 8 per cent per annum growth target. He said a new growth target could be set at around 5 or 6 per cent — closer to the forecasts for aged care and Medicare. The states and territories would need to agree to any new target. Mr Butler suggested the new reforms could include further fraud crackdowns, "pricing discipline" and a "more rigorous evidence base for supports". Those reforms would involve "the deepest collaboration with the disability community", he added. Mr Butler said the government would also look at creating a new Medicare item for bulk-billed three-year-old health checks to pick up any developmental concerns. According to the latest NDIS quarterly report, approximately 11 per cent of all kids between five to seven years of age were on the scheme at the end of June this year — 13.7 per cent of boys and 6.4 per cent of girls. Of the scheme's roughly 740,000 participants, about 23 per cent were younger than nine and 40 per cent had a primary diagnosis of autism, the report showed. There has always been a larger number of kids on the scheme compared to other age brackets. "Overall, the rate of participation in the NDIS rises steeply from birth, peaking at approximately 12 per cent at age six. The rate then declines steadily to around 1 per cent in the age band 35 to 40, before rising gradually to 2.5 per cent by age 65," the quarterly report said. That's due to the early intervention pathway for kids under nine, which aims to lessen the impact of their disability by providing support at the earliest possible stage. The big issue for the scheme's financial sustainability, though, is that many kids have stayed on the NDIS after their intervention period ends. While the NDIS was originally designed for Australians with profound and lifelong disability, the lack of options elsewhere — especially for kids — has seen the scheme grow faster than expected. When the NDIS was introduced, state and territory services shut down, leaving parents today with little other options if they want to get support for their child. Mr Butler said some kids were not getting the best support and others were being "overserviced". The vast majority of all people with disability are not on the NDIS — the scheme's 740,000 overall participants make up about 14 per cent of the 5.5 million estimated people with disability in Australia. The NDIS is now more expensive than Medicare and is set to overtake spending on defence next year. March's budget showed it was projected to surpass $64 billion by 2029. The Albanese government has made various changes to the scheme as it chased its 8 per cent annual growth target. Mr Butler told the Press Club that even under that scenario, the NDIS would still hit $105 billion per year — and increase its share of GDP by 0.5 per cent — over the coming decade. The scheme was growing at 10.8 per cent in June this year, according to the most recent quarterly report, compared to about 20 per cent when the first Albanese government was elected in 2022. Mr Butler said reducing the scheme's growth was "not just a question of budget sustainability", but also one of social licence. Until now, foundational supports — that tier of supports outside the scheme for those with less profound disabilities — were seen as the single biggest piece of work that would help to make the scheme sustainable in the future. States and territories agreed to split the costs of foundational supports in 2023, but negotiations over a funding deal have stalled. That uncertainty has caused concern in the disability community, with participants and their families worried about the future of their supports. Participants have also been contacting the ABC in recent months, reporting sudden cuts or reviews of plans.
