logo
What Can Mid-Size Businesses Do About Climate Change?

What Can Mid-Size Businesses Do About Climate Change?

Forbes07-04-2025

Co-Founder and Director at Cool Effect, Dee Lawrence is backed by decades of experience in the carbon credit industry.
Maybe shareholders are pressuring you, employees are asking questions or you've just been handed sustainability responsibilities in human resources. Whatever the reason, taking meaningful action on climate change as a mid-size business can feel overwhelming. How can your business mitigate climate change in a meaningful way?
First, define your objectives. Are you trying to achieve net zero, a science-based target or do you wish to plant trees or protect local waterways? Does your corporate philanthropy align in some way that provides direction toward climate solutions? If you oversee the supply chain, does it provide some clues about areas where you may want to concentrate to reduce emissions or waste?
Aligning sustainability with your core business strategy also helps engage stakeholders. If customers and investors see a clear link between your climate efforts and your business mission, they'll be more likely to support your initiatives. Look for industry benchmarks and best practices to help guide your decision-making.
Once you've aligned your climate goals with business strategy, here's how to get started in taking meaningful action as a mid-size business.
The simplest way to cut emissions is to use less energy. Implement a 'lights out' policy in the office. Then review the source of your electricity. Historically, all power came from coal, gas or burning other fossil fuels. That's no longer the case, so contact your power company or do the research to see if there is a greener alternative. Green power can substantially cut business emissions.
It's an easy decision if you understand that burning a pound of coal releases approximately 2.07 pounds of CO2 per hour, depending on the type of coal burned. When coal is transported across the country, the dust blows into land and water ecosystems, leading to crop, water and air pollution with toxic elements. Yet, coal still accounts for about 16% of U.S. electricity.
With 90% of new electricity generation capacity coming from solar and wind, simply requesting renewable energy increases demand and accelerates the rate of adoption.
Beyond electricity, consider other ways to improve efficiency. Upgrade office lighting to LED bulbs, install motion sensors in infrequently used areas and invest in energy-efficient appliances. If your business has a fleet, transitioning to hybrid or electric vehicles can significantly reduce emissions.
Beyond energy, small operational changes add up. Offer meatless food choices at company events and lunches, optimize employee commuting and improve office recycling. Encourage employees to reduce waste while traveling, such as reusing towels and keeping bedding unchanged during hotel stays.
Look at procurement policies as well. Can you source office supplies and equipment from sustainable vendors? Can packaging materials be minimized or switched to recyclable options? Sustainable purchasing decisions contribute to long-term impact.
Consider implementing a Green Team within your organization—an employee-led group focused on sustainability initiatives. This can help engage staff, generate new ideas and ensure follow-through on green policies.
Travel is skyrocketing, both for personal and business use, with the International Air Transport Association projecting that a record 5.2 billion passengers will take to the skies in 2025. Air travel emissions are surging, and while airlines are supporting the development of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF), SAF production remains minuscule in comparison to the demand for jet fuel. Limit business travel to essential trips. Virtual meetings have become standard practice and can often replace in-person visits. If travel is necessary, prioritize direct flights and economy class to reduce per-person emissions.
If you must travel, compensate for that travel by purchasing high-quality carbon credits that fund carbon projects reducing emissions by planting trees, turning waste into energy or managing forests, among other activities. However, not all carbon credits are created equal and quality can be difficult to assure, so reduce risks by looking for credits with integrity ratings. Some carbon credits provide additional benefits beyond carbon mitigation or sequestration that fit well with corporate policies. If the project is community-based, understand how the community has been engaged in the project and how they benefit from the project.
Purchasing carbon credits for air travel is a measurable way to determine your impact on climate, it's easy to communicate internally and credits can be budgeted for. The quality of the credits you purchase is important, as consumer travel programs are the second most scrutinized for greenwashing.
If you do purchase carbon credits for air travel, depending on the quantity, a contract may be involved. It will be important that you ask that the credits purchased be retired to prevent resale. Payment terms will often be shorter than the typical 60-day procurement terms. Price can vary according to the project type and issuance date. Ask about middleman fees, if any.
Now that you've taken these small steps in getting started, ensure progress by tracking and measuring your sustainability efforts. Set benchmarks and key performance indicators (KPIs) related to energy use, waste reduction and emissions. Regularly reviewing your impact will allow you to identify areas for improvement. Are your energy savings meeting expectations? Are employees engaged in sustainability initiatives?
Transparency builds trust. Sharing updates with employees, customers and investors not only demonstrates accountability but can also inspire others to take action.
The only way we will solve the climate problem is by coming together to take small actions that cumulatively can have an impact. No business can do everything, but every business can do something. Start with what's feasible, build momentum and expand your efforts over time. The path to sustainability is a journey, and the most important step is the first one.
Forbes Nonprofit Council is an invitation-only organization for chief executives in successful nonprofit organizations. Do I qualify?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Speaker Johnson hopes Musk and Trump can 'reconcile' their differences after public fallout
Speaker Johnson hopes Musk and Trump can 'reconcile' their differences after public fallout

CNBC

time11 hours ago

  • CNBC

Speaker Johnson hopes Musk and Trump can 'reconcile' their differences after public fallout

House Speaker Mike Johnson said Sunday that he hopes President Donald Trump and Elon Musk can "reconcile" after their public fallout last week. "There's a lot of emotion involved in it, but it's in the interest of the country for everybody to work together," the Louisiana Republican said on ABC News' "This Week." Johnson said that he has not spoken with Musk about the GOP-led "big, beautiful bill" since last Monday. Musk last week went on a rant against the multitrillion-dollar spending package that narrowly passed the House, calling it a "disgusting abomination" that would lead to exploding federal deficits. On Sunday, Johnson brushed aside the Tesla's CEO's criticisms of the bill. "I didn't go out to craft a piece of legislation to please the richest man in the world, what we're trying to do is help hardworking Americans," he said. The spending bill is now with the Senate. Musk's vocal opposition to the legislation was in part what triggered the public clash between Trump and the billionaire SpaceX founder, CNBC previously reported. The two men have not spoken since their feud, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Sunday on "Fox Sunday Morning Futures," adding that she doesn't think Trump "intends to." Trump also told NBC News' Kristen Welker on Saturday that he was not interested in repairing his relationship with Musk following their spat, signaling that their rift could be irreversible. Musk was the largest donor of the 2024 presidential campaign, and his super PAC spent roughly $200 million to propel Trump to the White House. In the midst of Musk's criticisms against the bill, he threatened to "fire all politicians who betrayed the American people." But Trump warned Saturday that Musk would pay "very serious consequences" if he funds Democratic candidates challenging Republicans who support the bill. Johnson, a loyal Trump ally, echoed the president's remarks, saying it would be a "big mistake" if Musk were to back Democratic candidates.

Something Bold Is Coming From Alfa Romeo: New Stelvio Coming?
Something Bold Is Coming From Alfa Romeo: New Stelvio Coming?

Miami Herald

time13 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Something Bold Is Coming From Alfa Romeo: New Stelvio Coming?

Alfa Romeo, like Maserati, isn't in a good place right now. The Stellantis-led marque is in dire need of a turnaround plan with the world's fifth-largest automaker confirming that a major strategy review is in the pipeline for the Italian marques, spearheaded by a new CEO. Wasting no time putting that plan into action, Alfa Romeo has announced a big reveal is set to take place on June 10, 2025, at 4:30 PM CEST (10:30 AM EDT) with the following post shared on it social media accounts: "A new chapter is about to begin. Bold, unexpected, unmistakably Alfa Romeo." So, what is the premium Italian brand cooking? It's no secret that Alfa Romeo is working on the next-generation Stelvio, its best-selling model. Despite being hit by an issue concerning the switch to a hybrid powertrain, the timing's just right. The eight-year-old Stelvio is aging, and the automaker needs to entice fans with a new model. The next-gen Stelvio will use Stellantis' STLA Large platform, which underpins the unpopular Dodge Charger Daytona EV – an architecture flexible enough to cater to both pure EV and hybrid setups. The switch from the previous all-electric powertrain plan to hybrid isn't as easy as flicking a switch, though. That said, we don't expect any powertrain details if this is indeed the new Stelvio, only a look at its new design, which was recently shared via the following patent images. But if it's not a new model, then what else could the teaser be referring to? As you can see in the single teaser provided, the imagery shows the Alfa Romeo badge with a glowing red equilateral triangle. Alfanatics will recognize the triangle from Autodelta, Alfa Romeo's historic racing division. Could Alfa Romeo be about to announce a return to motorsport? Or could it be ready to launch a performance model that harkens to classic Alfas that Autodelta worked on. Whatever Alfa Romeo's planning, we only have a couple of days to find out. So stay tuned. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Could Trump fail on tax bill? Why going 'big' doesn't always work out as planned
Could Trump fail on tax bill? Why going 'big' doesn't always work out as planned

USA Today

timea day ago

  • USA Today

Could Trump fail on tax bill? Why going 'big' doesn't always work out as planned

Disputes inside the GOP about parts of Trump's major tax bill threaten approval in the Senate and past compromises reached by the Republican-led House. Show Caption Republicans begin debate in the narrowly divided Senate with factions seeking to increase spending cuts or curbing tax breaks, which threaten the compromise needed for approval back in the House. Trump's billionaire adviser Elon Musk complicated the debate by urging lawmakers to kill the bill. Congressional leaders insist approval is still possible despite the fissures in the narrow Republican majorities in each chamber and the unified opposition of Democrats. WASHINGTON – Will President Donald Trump 's 'big beautiful bill' go bust? The second-term president's highest-priority legislation is under attack from some Senate Republicans – and from his former billionaire adviser Elon Musk – for costing too much. Complaints are also mounting from Republicans who are opposed to cutting Medicaid health insurance and other popular programs used by many Americans, especially as a way to help pay for tax breaks that would benefit some of the country's highest-income earners. With Republicans holding the slimmest of majorities in both chambers of Congress and with Democrats showing no sign of wanting to help Trump notch a major win to begin his new administration, lawmakers from Trump's own party are sounding apprehensive about threading the needle before their self-imposed July 4 deadline to get something to the president's desk for signature into law. 'We're anxious to get to work on it," Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-South Dakota, told reporters earlier in the week as Republicans and Musk started publicly airing their complaints about the effort. Adding to the challenge: Some of the very House GOP members who last month voted in favor of their 1,100-page version of Trump's tax and policy plan started finding faults of their own that they say meant they'd probably have been a 'no' if they had the chance to do it again. Presidents often aim high to start terms Presidents often try in their first year to build on the momentum of their elections to get major legislation approved. For Joe Biden, it was an infrastructure bill. For Barack Obama, it was overhauling healthcare insurance. For George W. Bush, it was overhauling public education. Trump leapt into action in 2025 with an unprecedented pace of executive orders: 157 through May 23. When he turned to legislation, he persuaded Republican congressional leaders to package all his priorities into one bill, rather than splitting taxes and border security into two different bills, to complete the debate in one fell swoop. Lawmakers often shy away from piling too much into one bill because each contentious provision spurs its own opposition. But faced with the prospect of unanimous Democratic opposition, Trump opted for a strategy that focuses on GOP priorities such as tax relief and border security while personally lobbying reluctant Republicans to stay in line. 'Americans have given us a mandate for bold and profound change,' Trump told Congress in a speech March 4. 'I call on all of my Republican friends in the Senate and House to work as fast as they can to get this Bill to MY DESK before the Fourth of JULY,' he added in a social media post about three months later, on June 2. Musk opposition makes waves Trump's efforts worked in the Republican-led House, which after several days of negotiations and an all-night floor debate voted 215-214 in favor of a plan that had the full backing of the White House. Getting the measure through the Senate - even with the GOP in charge needing just a simple majority of 51 votes - is proving to be its own elusive challenge. Musk, the former head of Trump's bureaucracy-slashing Department of Government Efficiency, spent this past week unloading on the House-passed bill for spending too much money. He called the legislation "pork-filled" and a "disgusting abomination," and urged lawmakers to "KILL the BILL." While Musk's barrage ignited a war with Trump and left many Republicans cringing, deficit hawks in the GOP said they appreciated the world's richest man also pushing for deeper spending cuts from the U.S. government. "I welcome people like Elon Musk that try to hold our feet to the fire," said Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Missouri. "We often disappoint our voters when we don't do the cuts that we campaign on, when we're not fiscally responsible." But Rep. Don Bacon, R-Nebraska, who served in the Air Force for 30 years, said the division between Trump and Musk wasn't a good look for his party, especially when it's trying to advance the primary piece of legislation on the president's agenda. "It's just not helpful," Bacon said. "When you have division, divided teams don't perform as well." 'The opposite of conservative': Sen. Paul on bill Several pockets of Republican senators have voiced concerns about the House-passed legislation. Each group has their issue that they want addressed, and each one presents a hurdle for Trump and GOP leaders like Thune as they try to cobble together a winning 51-vote coalition that can also make it back through the House for another final vote. The Senate factions include one group seeking to cut more spending because the Congressional Budget Office said the House-passed plan would add $2.4 trillion to the debt over the next 10 years. Others are worried about cutting Medicaid, the federal health insurance program for low-income families. And another handful of senators say they are worried about the House-passed bill rolling back renewable energy tax credits for solar, wind, geothermal and nuclear energy. "There are many of us who recognize that what came out of the House was pretty aggressive in how it seeks to wind down or phase out many of the energy tax credit provisions," said Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska. "I happen to think that we've got tax policies that are working to help advance our energy initiatives around the country, as diverse and as varied as they are. Wouldn't we want to continue those investments? 'This bill is the opposite of conservative, and we should not pass it,' added Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, in a June 4 social media post that raised concerns about the nation's debt limit. Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley is one of the outspoken Republicans taking issue with the House-passed bill's provisions that would cut nearly $800 billion during the next decade from Medicaid and, according to the Congressional Budget Office, cost 7.8 million people their health insurance. "I don't want to see rural hospitals close and I don't want to see any benefits cut in my state," Hawley said. Trump and his allies contend spending cuts of $1.6 trillion are the most ever approved in a House bill and that the tax cuts will spur economic growth to offset the costs. Trump got personal this week in calling Paul's ideas 'crazy' in a social media post and said the people of Kentucky 'can't stand him.' House Speaker Mike Johnson, a staunch Trump ally, told reporters June 4 that few people are going to like everything in an 1,100-page bill. But the Louisiana Republican said the measure he helped craft in the House was carefully calibrated to gain wide support. "I hope everybody will evaluate that – in both parties, and everybody – and recognize, 'Wow, the benefits of this far outweigh anything that I don't like out it,'" Johnson said. Senate dropping local tax deductions would be 'radioactive': Rep. Lalota Any changes made by the Senate will force another vote in the House before the bill can become law - and that's where the math can get tricky. Republican senators are talking about tinkering with a key compromise that Trump and Johnson signed off on in the House that raised the federal deduction for state and local taxes (SALT) from $10,000 to $40,000 for people earning less than $500,000 per year. That provision is important to GOP lawmakers from high-tax states such as California, New York and New Jersey who supported the House bill that passed through the 435-seat chamber by only a one-vote margin. The Senate aims to cut back that provision. But Rep. Nick Lalota, R-New York, told reporters on June 4 that revisiting the tax issue "would be like digging up safely-buried radioactive waste." House members scouring through the bill they voted on weeks ago are also finding unfamiliar provisions in the version that they say they would have opposed. For example, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Georgia, said in a social media post June 3 that the Senate needs to strip out language she hadn't noticed earlier that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence. Rep. Mike Flood, R-Nebraska, said he opposed a section that aims to hinder federal judges from enforcing their court orders. Trump sought the provision to prevent judges from blocking policies largely spelled out via his executive orders. Senate could drop contentious provisions House members risked supporting Even though Republicans control both chambers of Congress, the Senate could drop or fail to approve contentious parts that GOP House colleagues in competitive districts already went out on a limb to support. It's happened many times before - with sizable political consequences. The concept even has a name: Getting BTU'd. That refers to a 1993 House vote on a controversial energy tax during the first year of Bill Clinton's presidency based on British thermal units. House Democrats lost 54 seats in the 1994 election – and control of the chamber for the first time in 40 years – in part because of supporting the BTU tax that the Senate never debated. John Pitney, a political science professor at Claremont McKenna College, has said a book about such votes could be called 'Profiles in Futility.' Another example was the 2009 American Clean Energy and Security Act, a bill which Obama supported as president that aimed to limit the emissions of heat-trapping gases from power plants, vehicles and other industrial sources. The Democrat-controlled House narrowly approved the measure 219-212 but the Senate never took it up. Critics said it would raise the cost of energy. The Competitive Enterprise Institute, a non-profit libertarian think tank that opposed the measure, counted 28 House Democrats from coal states who lost their seats in the 2010 mid-term election after voting for the bill. Fast forward to 2025 and Republicans are the ones facing a similar dynamic. Musk, who contributed about $290 million of his personal fortune to help Republicans including Trump win last November, slammed House lawmakers who voted for the president's legislative package.'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong,' Musk wrote June 3 on social media. But House Republicans who voted for the legislation, including some who also demanded deeper spending cuts when it was in their hands, said they're not worried about the package falling apart and coming back to haunt them. They say that's because they did fight for more budget cuts. "This wasn't a hard vote. It was hard going through the process to get more, and you can always do better," said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-South Carolina. "But look at what Donald Trump 's done, the great things that are contributing to cutting the deficit." Rep. David Schweikert, R-Arizona, who represents a competitive toss-up district, noted that he's introduced multiple bills to trim federal spending. "If Mr. Musk wants to be helpful, what he should do is start to understand that those of us in a 50-50 district who have shown up with actual policy solutions that offset every penny of this bill," he said. Leaving Washington for the weekend, Trump told reporters aboard Air Force Once on June 6 that he wasn't worried about Musk and that he remained confident he'd get "tremendous support" in the Senate to pass the bill. 'I don't know of anybody who's going to vote against it," the president said, before adding: "Maybe Rand Paul." For his part, Johnson told reporters June 4 that he wasn't concerned about House Republicans losing seats in 2026. Predicting that the Senate would find the necessary votes on the president's tax bill, the speaker said he expects Americans will see the benefits of Trump's efforts before the next election. 'Am I concerned about the effect of this on the midterms? I'm not," Johnson said. "I have no concern whatsoever. I am absolutely convinced that we are going to win the midterms and grow the House majority because we are delivering for the American majority and fulfilling our campaign promises."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store