logo
Tariffs, Tantrums And Ego: Ex-Diplomat Explains Why Trump Is Fuming At India

Tariffs, Tantrums And Ego: Ex-Diplomat Explains Why Trump Is Fuming At India

India.com2 days ago
New Delhi: Former diplomat Vikas Swarup says punitive U.S. tariffs on India have a political trigger. He claims President Donald Trump is angry that New Delhi has not acknowledged his self-declared role in defusing tensions with Pakistan after May's military flare-up.
A former High Commissioner to Canada and noted author, Swarup spoke to ANI about what he sees as the real reasons for the trade pressure. He says US-India ties remain strategic, while Washington's current relationship with Pakistan is a short-term and tactical deal driven by money.
Trump's Reasons
Swarup lists two main factors. One is India's presence in BRICS, which Trump views as an anti-American grouping.
'We have to understand why these tariffs have been imposed... One, Trump is not happy with India because we are a member of BRICS... he has got this notion that BRICS is an anti-American alliance which is hell-bent on creating an alternative currency to the dollar... he feels that India should not be a member of the BRICS,' he said.
The second is India's refusal to give Trump credit for a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after Operation Sindoor in May. New Delhi has always maintained that the truce was arranged directly between the militaries of both countries at Pakistan's request.
Trump has said 'almost 30 times' that he prevented a nuclear disaster in South Asia. 'He is miffed that India has not acknowledged his role; whereas, Pakistan has not only acknowledged his role but has even nominated him for a Nobel Peace Prize,' Swarup said.
Operation Sindoor Context
Operation Sindoor was India's answer to the April Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 civilians. Indian forces struck nine terror hubs in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Over 100 terrorists were killed. Pakistani military and civilian areas were avoided.
Swarup says the United States is using tariffs as leverage to push its demands on agriculture, dairy and GM crops. 'This is part of his pressure tactics to get India to sign on the dotted line on the maximalist demands that the United States is making... We have not caved in,' he said.
Trump and the Nobel Ambition
Swarup describes Trump as a dealmaker who sees himself as a peacemaker. 'Look at the number of conflict situations that he has mediated in... He feels that the biggest one of these was the India and Pakistan one because these two are nuclear powers,' he said.
Trump wants to match and surpass Barack Obama, the only U.S. president to win the Nobel Peace Prize while in office. 'He has made no secret of his longing for that Nobel Peace Prize. He is hoping that if he could not get it for these, if he is able to bring about a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, then that might be his ticket,' Swarup said.
Pakistan's US Access
Swarup says India is not responsible for Washington's recent lean toward Islamabad. He credits Pakistani lobbying and strategic messaging. 'Pakistan, through some intermediaries, has gotten the ear of the U.S. president,' he said.
He points to two visits by Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir to Washington and a deal over Pakistan's 'oil reserves'. He also highlights Pakistan's push to become a regional crypto hub. In April, a Trump-backed cryptocurrency venture signed a letter of intent with Pakistan's crypto council.
'All these things have led to Trump having a softer approach towards Pakistan,' Swarup said.
Short-Term Tilt
Swarup calls the U.S.-Pakistan relationship temporary and transactional. He says the U.S.-India partnership is deeper. 'I call it a storm, not a rupture. You just have to wait out the storms. All storms eventually pass,' he said.
He warns that U.S. alignment with Pakistan also means closer alignment with China, Washington's key competitor.
Tariff Politics
Trump has called India a 'Tariff King', but Swarup says the United States now holds that title. 'Our average tariff is about 15.98 percent. The U.S. tariff today is 18.4 percent... tariffs are bringing in money... But the issue is that eventually, who will pay for these tariffs? American consumers,' he said.
He warns higher costs will fuel U.S. inflation.
He defends India's refusal to give in. 'India is too large, too proud a country to become a camp follower of any other country. Our strategic autonomy has been the bedrock of our foreign policy right from the 1950s,' he says.
Indus Waters Tensions
Swarup also highlights Pakistan's reaction to India's suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty. He says Islamabad is heavily dependent on those rivers and uses nuclear threats to attract global attention.
'They are deliberately provoking nuclear blackmail,' he tells ANI.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Manipur Governor gets additional charge of Nagaland after La Ganesan's death
Manipur Governor gets additional charge of Nagaland after La Ganesan's death

Indian Express

time18 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Manipur Governor gets additional charge of Nagaland after La Ganesan's death

Following Nagaland Governor La Ganesan's death, Manipur Governor Ajay Kumar Bhalla has been given the additional charge of discharging those functions. The Rashtrapati Bhavan made the announcement Saturday evening. La Ganesan, a veteran organiser for the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and one of BJP's longest-serving leaders in Tamil Nadu, died in Chennai Friday. Bhalla, who was formerly Union Home Secretary, was appointed Manipur governor in December 2024, less than two months ahead of President's Rule being imposed in the state in February this year. He had been the Union Home Secretary when the ongoing conflict in the state had begun on May 3 2023, and with the imposition of President's Rule — which has now been extended for another six months — is effectively in charge of administering the state. While there has been a significant decrease in active violence between Manipur's Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities — the last major cycle of violence between the two communities was in November last year — there is yet to be a breakthrough in dialogue between representatives between of the two communities, and they are currently not in talks with each other. Under his charge, the government in Manipur has aimed to address several key challenges in the state. This includes a call for people on both sides to surrender arms and ammunition looted from the state's armouries and an attempt to open up the state's highways for free movement of both communities through areas where the other community is in the majority. While the former was met with limited success, the latter misfired, with the state witnessing violence on the first day itself. The government is also currently trying to facilitate the resettlement of people displaced by the conflict. As Union Home Secretary, he oversaw the security situation after the scrapping of Jammu and Kashmir's special status in 2019, and the anti-CAA protests across the country. He was the chief nodal officer overseeing the COVID-19 lockdown.

US team scraps visit, trade talks with India stuck on agri hurdle
US team scraps visit, trade talks with India stuck on agri hurdle

Indian Express

time18 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

US team scraps visit, trade talks with India stuck on agri hurdle

The India-US negotiations for a trade deal, which began in February after Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited the United States, have come to a halt, and the US negotiators' scheduled visit to India later this month stands cancelled, a source aware of the development told The Indian Express. The breakdown in trade talks assumes significance as US President Donald Trump has announced 50 per cent tariff on Indian products, the highest on any country globally. While 25 per cent tariff has already come into effect, government officials have said the levy of another 25 per cent – for Russia oil trade — could depend on 'how geopolitical events unfold'. The Indian Express had first reported on August 8 that the negotiations for a trade agreement had hit a pause, and the arrival of the US trade team was uncertain, as no formal communication had been received from their side. The deal has been stuck over India's long-standing stance of protecting farmers in every trade agreement. The US, under Trump, is prioritising market access for its agricultural products. In his Independence Day speech on Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi reiterated that India would not compromise on the well-being of its farmers, fisherfolk and cattle keepers, amid the standoff with the US over access for American products in India's agriculture and dairy market. On August 7, too, after Trump announced the additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, Modi had said that he would not compromise 'even if it entailed paying a very heavy personal price'. The geopolitical factor The uncertainty over when the tariffs on India could ease may drag on, as Trump's high-stakes talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin did not result in a Russia-Ukraine ceasefire. However, Trump said he and Putin had made progress during the meeting in Alaska. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has warned that the secondary tariffs on India could increase if 'things don't go well' during the Trump-Putin talks. 'I think everyone has been frustrated with President Putin. We expected that he would come to the table in a more fulsome way. It looks like he may be ready to negotiate. And we put secondary tariffs on the Indians for buying Russian oil. I could see, if things don't go well, then sanctions or secondary tariffs could go up,' Bessent said in an interview with Bloomberg earlier.

Donald Trump conveys Putin's demand for more Ukrainian territory to Zelensky: Report
Donald Trump conveys Putin's demand for more Ukrainian territory to Zelensky: Report

Mint

time18 minutes ago

  • Mint

Donald Trump conveys Putin's demand for more Ukrainian territory to Zelensky: Report

WASHINGTON/MOSCOW/KYIV (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Saturday Ukraine should make a deal to end the war with Russia because "Russia is a very big power, and they're not", after hosting a summit where Vladimir Putin was reported to have demanded more Ukrainian land. In a subsequent briefing with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, a source familiar with the discussion cited Trump as saying the Russian leader had offered to freeze most front lines if Kyiv's forces ceded all of Donetsk, the industrial region that is one of Moscow's main targets. Zelenskiy rejected the demand, the source said. Russia already controls a fifth of Ukraine, including about three-quarters of Donetsk province, which it first entered in 2014. Trump also said he had agreed with Putin that a peace deal should be sought without the prior ceasefire that Ukraine and its European allies, until now with U.S. support, have demanded. Zelenskiy said he would meet Trump in Washington on Monday, while Kyiv's European allies welcomed Trump's efforts but vowed to back Ukraine and tighten sanctions on Russia. The source said European leaders had also been invited to attend Monday's talks. Trump's meeting with Putin in Alaska on Friday, the first U.S.-Russia summit since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, lasted just three hours. "It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up," Trump posted on Truth Social. His various comments on the meeting will be welcomed in Moscow, which says it wants a full settlement - not a pause - but that this will be complex because positions are "diametrically opposed". Russia's forces have been gradually advancing for months. The war - the deadliest in Europe for 80 years - has killed or wounded well over a million people from both sides, including thousands of mostly Ukrainian civilians, according to analysts. Before the summit, Trump had said he would not be happy unless a ceasefire was agreed on. But afterwards he said that, after Monday's talks with Zelenskiy, "if all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin". Monday's talks will evoke memories of a meeting in the White House Oval Office in February, where Trump and Vice President JD Vance gave Zelenskiy a brutal public dressing-down. Zelenskiy said he was willing to meet Putin. But Putin signalled no movement in Russia's long-held positions on the war, and made no mention in public of meeting Zelenskiy. His aide Yuri Ushakov told the Russian state news agency TASS a three-way summit had not been discussed. In an interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity, Trump signalled that he and Putin had discussed land transfers and security guarantees for Ukraine, and had "largely agreed". "I think we're pretty close to a deal," he said, adding: "Ukraine has to agree to it. Maybe they'll say 'no'." Asked what he would advise Zelenskiy to do, Trump said: "Gotta make a deal." "Look, Russia is a very big power, and they're not," he added. Zelenskiy has consistently said he cannot concede territory without changes to Ukraine's constitution, and Kyiv sees Donetsk's "fortress cities" such as Sloviansk and Kramatorsk as a bulwark against Russian advances into even more regions. Zelenskiy has also insisted on security guarantees for Kyiv, to deter Russia from invading again in the future. He said he and Trump had discussed "positive signals from the American side" on taking part, and that Ukraine needed a lasting peace, not "just another pause" between Russian invasions. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said the most interesting developments of the summit concerned security guarantees - inspired by the transatlantic NATO alliance's Article 5. "The starting point of the proposal is the definition of a collective security clause that would allow Ukraine to benefit from the support of all its partners, including the USA, ready to take action in case it is attacked again," she said. Putin, who has hitherto opposed involving foreign ground forces, said he agreed with Trump that Ukraine's security must be "ensured". "I would like to hope that the understanding we have reached will allow us to get closer to that goal and open the way to peace in Ukraine," Putin told a briefing where neither leader took questions. "We expect that Kyiv and the European capitals ... will not attempt to disrupt the emerging progress..." For Putin, the very fact of sitting down with Trump represented a victory. He had been ostracised by Western leaders since the start of the war, and just a week earlier had faced a threat of new sanctions from Trump. Trump also spoke to European leaders after returning to Washington. Several stressed the need to keep pressure on Russia. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said an end to the war was closer than ever, thanks to Trump, but added: "... until (Putin) stops his barbaric assault, we will keep tightening the screws on his war machine with even more sanctions." A statement from European leaders said "Ukraine must have ironclad security guarantees" and that no limits should be placed on its armed forces or right to seek NATO membership - key Russian demands. Some European politicians and commentators were scathing. "Putin got his red carpet treatment with Trump, while Trump got nothing. As feared: no ceasefire, no peace," Wolfgang Ischinger, former German ambassador to Washington, posted on X. "No real progress – a clear 1-0 for Putin – no new sanctions. For the Ukrainians: nothing. For Europe: deeply disappointing." Both Russia and Ukraine carried out overnight air attacks, a daily occurrence, while fighting raged on the front line. Trump told Fox he would postpone imposing tariffs on China for buying Russian oil, but that he might have to "think about it" in two or three weeks. He ended his remarks after the summit by telling Putin: "We'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon." "Next time in Moscow," a smiling Putin responded in English. Trump said he might "get a little heat on that one" but that he could "possibly see it happening". (Additional reporting by Kanishka Singh, Trevor Hunnicutt, Jeff Mason, Lidia Kelly, Jasper Ward, Costas Pitas, Ismail Shakil, Bhargav Acharya, Alan Charlish, Yuliia Dysa, Pavel Polityuk, Gwladys Fouche, Dave Graham, Paul Sandle, Joshua McElwee, Andreas Rinke, Felix Light and Moscow bureau; Writing by Kevin Liffey, Mark Trevelyan, Joseph Ax and James Oliphant; Editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan and Gareth Jones)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store