Greyhound ban gathers pace: Compensation plan; rehoming strategy revealed
However, Peters said compensation will not extend to payouts for not being able to race any more, or for assets accrued by those involved in the sport which will become redundant.
Greyhounds chase a lure at Cambridge Raceway in January. Photo / Yvette Bodiam
He said just like saddle makers lost money when transport changed from horseback to cars, 'change is inevitable and that's the point'.
'It won't be compensation for not being able to do dog racing anymore but in dealing with the dogs as they're being rehomed – that cost,' Peters said.
It's estimated about 1500 ex-racing dogs will need to be rehomed when the sport ends in July next year, although the exact time it'll take to rehome all dogs isn't known.
Edward Rennell is the CEO of Greyhound Racing NZ and has announced plans to fight the Government's plan to ban the sport in the High Court.
Greyhound Racing New Zealand (GRNZ) CEO Edward Rennell suggested it would cost $40 million to look after greyhounds for a period of three years post the end of racing.
In June, he said that was a cost that would need to be fronted by the taxpayer.
'Current rehoming costs are met by GRNZ, funded by revenue from racing. There will be no racing after July 2026, so rehoming costs post-closure will have to be funded from alternative sources,' Rennell said.
The committee's compensation plan means the TAB – now operated by international sports betting and gambling company Entain – will be asked to help pay for rehoming rather than the taxpayer.
Peters said new laws may be introduced which would effectively force the TAB – which earns millions from greyhound racing – to help pay for rehoming costs.
'Bear in mind of course that if there was universality and acceptance, legislation may not be required.'
Peters said GRNZ's three-year estimate to rehome dogs was a pessimistic outlook and he was confident the job could be done much quicker.
Any recommendations made by the committee would need to be considered by Cabinet before any decisions are made.
Co-ordinated rehoming strategy
SPCA chief science officer Dr Arnja Dale. Photo supplied.
The committee also wants a shake-up of the current greyhound rehoming model with the creation of a single entity to co-ordinate efforts to get dogs adopted.
GRNZ currently co-ordinates greyhound rehoming under its 'Great Mates' programme.
The programme has contracts with various agencies, including adoption kennels in Feilding known as Nightrave Greyhounds.
The Herald understands the committee wants to reorganise and expand rehoming efforts by:
Establishing a single, co-ordinated rehoming programme.
Use common branding for all advertising.
Introduce a standard set of welfare and contractual arrangements.
Increase the number of locations where dogs can be viewed.
The SPCA's chief scientific officer Arnja Dale told the Herald her agency 'absolutely supports' improving rehoming efforts.
'It's really critically important that we have consistent standards and policies that govern the rehoming and that there's a central port, so essentially a central website where all the greyhounds are listed for adoption,' she said.
Dale backed moves to ask the TAB to help fund rehoming costs providing the industry also pitched in.
'We support it if Greyhound Racing New Zealand and their millions and millions in reserves help support that as well,' she said.
The SPCA is willing to be involved in a future greyhound rehoming drive and Dale is 'confident New Zealanders will stand up' and help with adoptions when the need arises.
'When we made a call out [for adoptions] when Covid-19 got to New Zealand, we got thousands of animals into homes over a very short period of time,' she said.
Greyhounds as Pets spokesperson Daniel Bohan
Daniel Bohan from Greyhounds as Pets – NZ's oldest adoption charity – told the Herald he backs a co-ordinated approach to rehoming.
'Greyhounds as Pets would support any initiative to co-ordinate rehoming efforts at a national level and apply effective, consistent marketing and adoption policies across all agencies,' he said.
In terms of funding rehoming, Bohan said he supports any plan that treats all stakeholders 'fairly and equitably'.
Court action looms
GRNZ is going to court next month in an attempt to overturn the Government's plans to ban the sport.
Rennell claimed in May a judicial review of the proposal would expose the Government's 'cavalier attitude' in the lead-up to its decision.
GRNZ's High Court application will argue political leaders rushed the decision and failed to consult industry before making the call to end the sport.
'This is an injustice to greyhound breeders, owners, trainers and all other industry participants, as well as a dereliction of duty to New Zealanders,' Rennell said.
Rennell told the Herald it was 'deeply cynical' and 'hypocritical' to ban greyhound racing in NZ while accepting millions in revenue from Australian dog races.
He said if a ban does proceed, it must be implemented with 'impeccable fairness' to those who will lose their incomes.
Peters pushed back on claims the industry wasn't consulted, saying there have been three separate reviews of the sport – including the 2017 review by High Court Judge Rodney Hansen – which found 1140 dogs were euthanised in just four years.
Peters, who was Racing Minister in 2017, said at the time the Hansen report findings were 'disturbing and deeply disappointing'.
That was followed by another review by Sir Bruce Robertson in 2021 which found issues with data recording, animal welfare and industry transparency. At the time, then Racing Minister Grant Robertson put the industry on notice.
In 2023, a Racing Integrity Board report found the industry was making 'slow progress' in five out of 15 key areas including bringing down injury rates.
Peters told the Herald he regrets having to make the call to end the sport but said the industry had 'failed to meet their requirements'.
He said it was 'breathtaking' to claim the decision was rushed given the longstanding issues identified in multiple reports over consecutive years.
'To say that we're [the Government] being cavalier, is to be perhaps looking in the mirror.'
Michael Morrah is a senior investigative reporter/team leader at the Herald. He won News Journalist of the Year at the 2025 Voyager Media Awards and has twice been named reporter of the year at the NZ Television Awards. He has been a broadcast journalist for 20 years and joined the Herald's video team in July 2024.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Govt forces Sport NZ to ditch transgender guidelines as NZ First threatens funding cut
In 2023 coalition negotiations, National and NZ First agreed to ensure publicly funded sporting bodies supported fairness that wasn't compromised by gender-based rules. Sport NZ chief executive Raelene Castle released a statement this morning. Photo / Photosport Last year, former Sports Minister Chris Bishop asked Sport NZ to review the guidelines. It's understood Sport NZ completed the review recently and offered new draft guidelines for current Sports Minister Mark Mitchell to assess. In a letter to Sport NZ on Tuesday, Mitchell said the policy in the coalition agreement meant Sport NZ should 'no longer have guiding principles published and should leave that decision-making and judgment up to individual sports and community organisations'. 'The Government has a role in making sport accessible to all New Zealanders by creating opportunities, not in providing principles as to who should be included and how,' he said. In her statement, Castle said the guiding principles had been removed from Sport NZ's website and advised sporting organisations to 'make their own decisions on the participation of transgender people in community sport'. Castle declined to be interviewed. In April last year, Sport NZ reported to the Government it had no evidence of a code-specific policy position or set of rules that prohibited fair competition. However, anecdotal reports and specific cases had prompted public debate, such as weightlifter Laurel Hubbard and mountain biker Kate Weatherly, who had both competed against women. NZ First leader Winston Peters wants to see fairness prioritised in community sport. Photo / Mark Mitchell Speaking to the Herald, Peters referenced both examples as he explained his party opposed inclusion being prioritised over fairness in sport. 'We faced all sorts of woke nonsense about how we couldn't do this and it was unfair,' he said. 'The very point that we're pushing is fairness.' Peters then claimed he would seek to pull funding from codes that didn't comply. 'We're saying to the sports out there, 'Well, if you want to ignore it, don't expect public or taxpayer funding'.' He affirmed his intention to cut all public funding for any sporting codes that didn't align with the Government's position. Peters also claimed Mitchell agreed with his position. Peters' threat would likely turn heads at New Zealand Cricket, given it allowed trans women to compete in female competitions at a community level. New Zealand Rugby's head of community rugby participation, Mike Hester, said its policy was still being developed, but the organisation believed 'ideally allowing people to play in the gender with which they identify'. Netball NZ required transgender women to provide documentation proving gender reassignment and hormone therapy before allowing them to play. Umpires had the discretion to assess whether a player's actions aligned with safety expectations. Mark Mitchell is the Minister for Sport. Photo / Mark Mitchell While Peters might want to cut funding, the relevant legislation might stop him. The Sport and Recreation New Zealand Act 2002 said the minister – Mitchell – could not direct Sport NZ in relation to the allocation of funds. The Government retained the ability to change legislation and determine the level of funding Sport NZ received. In the event a sporting code didn't align with the Government's position, it's understood Mitchell could reiterate his expectations to Sport NZ. Adam Pearse is the deputy political editor and part of the NZ Herald's press gallery team based at Parliament in Wellington. He has worked for NZME since 2018, reporting for the Northern Advocate in Whangārei and the Herald in Auckland.
Scoop
14 hours ago
- Scoop
NZ First Signals Change To Foreign Buyers Ban Could Be Announced This Year
, Acting Political Editor NZ First leader Winston Peters says he expects an announcement "soon" clearing the way for wealthy foreign investors to buy high-value houses in New Zealand. But he insists the foreign buyers ban - which prevents most foreigners from purchasing existing houses - will remain in place, unchanged. "We're talking about investment. We're changing those rules and what goes with them. You have to be patient - and we'll tell you what the details are," Peters told reporters on Wednesday. "But the Foreign Buyers Act is not changing." During coalition negotiations, NZ First blocked National's proposal to allow foreigners to buy houses worth more than $2 million, contingent on a 15 percent tax. But Peters - who helped introduce the ban in 2018 as part of the Labour NZ First coalition - later said he was open to revisiting the rules "for the right investor". A spokesperson on Wednesday said discussions were ongoing about the appropriate investment threshold but suggested it would be "substantial". "New Zealand First is pursuing consultation on the matter and is looking at the government being able to make an announcement by the end of the year." Any proposed changes would need to create jobs and benefit the wider economy without disrupting the housing market, the spokesperson said. Speaking later at Parliament, Peters told reporters they would not have to wait very long for an announcement. "I'm not the one totally in control of the answer, but I would imagine by the end of 2025," he said. Peters repeatedly stated that "the foreign buyers ban will remain" but said investment rules could be changed to allow those investing "millions of dollars" to buy a house at a certain cost - "and that cost is not $2 million". "We're talking about investors. They're bringing billions to this economy," he said. "They're not buyers." Back in October, Peters told NewstalkZB he would consider changes for the "right person with the right investment" - but it would need to be far more than "a lousy $20 million". Addressing reporters on Wednesday, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon confirmed the timeline outlined by Peters but declined to shed any light on the "ongoing coalition negotiations". "When we're ready to talk about it, we will," Luxon said. "You've heard what Winston said... and that's a fair reflection of where things are at." Luxon has previously conceded National set its $2m threshold "too low" and suggested $5m or $6m would be more reasonable. ACT leader and associate finance minister David Seymour - who's responsible for the Overseas Investment Act - told reporters he would support any progress on the issue. "I'd be there with bells on, because I think allowing our friends around the world to come to our country, bring their money and live here is generally - there's exceptions - but generally a win-win for New Zealand." In April, the government made changes to the Active Investor Plus Visa - the so-called 'golden visa' - easing the path for wealthy foreigners to gain residency through investment. Immigration New Zealand last month confirmed it had received nearly 200 applications since the changes were introduced.
NZ Herald
15 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon tight-lipped amid speculation of foreign buyers ban change
The Herald understands no proposal has yet been put before Associate Finance Minister David Seymour, who has responsibility for the Overseas Investment Act . But it's unlikely changes to loosen the current ban would face resistance from Seymour, who has been critical of the measure . Luxon on Wednesday said there were 'ongoing conversations' and confirmed to the Herald that he was also working to make an announcement this year. He would not detail what threshold he would like set, but has previously suggested about $5 million, which would be an increase from National's 2023 policy of allowing foreigners to buy houses worth $2m and more and taxing that sale at 15%. 'We've got ongoing conversations as we work together in our coalition in the way that we do, and when we're ready to talk about it, we will,' Luxon said. 'When we come out with an answer, you will hear about it and we'll be very clear about it all. But for right here, right now, we've got ongoing conversations.' He said Peters' comments were a 'fair reflection of where things are at'. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon was tight-lipped on Wednesday about policy to allow foreign investors to purchase residential property here. Photo / Mark Mitchell Peters on Wednesday afternoon said the 'Foreign Buyers Act is not changing'. The legislation amended in 2018 to classify residential houses as sensitive, and therefore not open to purchase from overseas people, is the Overseas Investment Act. NZ First said the rules would change for investors bringing millions to New Zealand's economy. 'They're investors, they're not buyers. You're not going to get a house key just by walking into the country in the way that other parties believed,' Peters said. 'If you're investing millions of dollars, seriously, we look at you having the right to back it up with the buying of a house in New Zealand at a certain cost. That cost is not $2m.' NZ First kiboshed National's foreign buyer's tax during the 2023 coalition negotiations and Peters repeated on Wednesday that it was 'fiscally never going to work'. The National-NZ First coalition agreement makes reference to the ban when it says: 'Tax relief will be progressed as set out in National's Tax Plan, but will not include a repeal of the foreign buyer's residential property ban, with income tax reductions coming into force from July 1, 2024.' NZ First leader Winston Peters says the rules will change for investors bringing millions to New Zealand's economy. Photo / Mark Mitchell Seymour told the Herald that if NZ First changed its historical position, 'there wouldn't be any complaints from me'. 'I'd be there with bells on, because I think allowing our friends around the world to come to our country, bring their money, and live here is generally – and there are exceptions – but generally, a win-win for New Zealand.' In an interview with the Herald this week, Peters denied his party was 'softening' its approach. 'The idea that for $2m you could come into this country and get a key and that's your investment was a nonsense,' Peters told the Herald. 'We said so before the election. We also debunked the costings for it, and were joined not long after that by economists who said that New Zealand First was right. 'We're saying if you're coming here with millions of dollars to invest in this country, then yes, you could buy a house, and we're setting the terms for that.' Jamie Ensor is a political reporter in the NZ Herald press gallery team based at Parliament. He was previously a TV reporter and digital producer in the Newshub press gallery office. In 2025, he was a finalist for Political Journalist of the Year at the Voyager Media Awards.
