logo
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon tight-lipped amid speculation of foreign buyers ban change

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon tight-lipped amid speculation of foreign buyers ban change

NZ Herald6 days ago
The Herald understands no proposal has yet been put before Associate Finance Minister David Seymour, who has responsibility for the Overseas Investment Act . But it's unlikely changes to loosen the current ban would face resistance from Seymour, who has been critical of the measure .
Luxon on Wednesday said there were 'ongoing conversations' and confirmed to the Herald that he was also working to make an announcement this year.
He would not detail what threshold he would like set, but has previously suggested about $5 million, which would be an increase from National's 2023 policy of allowing foreigners to buy houses worth $2m and more and taxing that sale at 15%.
'We've got ongoing conversations as we work together in our coalition in the way that we do, and when we're ready to talk about it, we will,' Luxon said.
'When we come out with an answer, you will hear about it and we'll be very clear about it all. But for right here, right now, we've got ongoing conversations.'
He said Peters' comments were a 'fair reflection of where things are at'.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon was tight-lipped on Wednesday about policy to allow foreign investors to purchase residential property here. Photo / Mark Mitchell
Peters on Wednesday afternoon said the 'Foreign Buyers Act is not changing'. The legislation amended in 2018 to classify residential houses as sensitive, and therefore not open to purchase from overseas people, is the Overseas Investment Act.
NZ First said the rules would change for investors bringing millions to New Zealand's economy.
'They're investors, they're not buyers. You're not going to get a house key just by walking into the country in the way that other parties believed,' Peters said.
'If you're investing millions of dollars, seriously, we look at you having the right to back it up with the buying of a house in New Zealand at a certain cost. That cost is not $2m.'
NZ First kiboshed National's foreign buyer's tax during the 2023 coalition negotiations and Peters repeated on Wednesday that it was 'fiscally never going to work'.
The National-NZ First coalition agreement makes reference to the ban when it says: 'Tax relief will be progressed as set out in National's Tax Plan, but will not include a repeal of the foreign buyer's residential property ban, with income tax reductions coming into force from July 1, 2024.'
NZ First leader Winston Peters says the rules will change for investors bringing millions to New Zealand's economy. Photo / Mark Mitchell
Seymour told the Herald that if NZ First changed its historical position, 'there wouldn't be any complaints from me'.
'I'd be there with bells on, because I think allowing our friends around the world to come to our country, bring their money, and live here is generally – and there are exceptions – but generally, a win-win for New Zealand.'
In an interview with the Herald this week, Peters denied his party was 'softening' its approach.
'The idea that for $2m you could come into this country and get a key and that's your investment was a nonsense,' Peters told the Herald.
'We said so before the election. We also debunked the costings for it, and were joined not long after that by economists who said that New Zealand First was right.
'We're saying if you're coming here with millions of dollars to invest in this country, then yes, you could buy a house, and we're setting the terms for that.'
Jamie Ensor is a political reporter in the NZ Herald press gallery team based at Parliament. He was previously a TV reporter and digital producer in the Newshub press gallery office. In 2025, he was a finalist for Political Journalist of the Year at the Voyager Media Awards.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cabinet Ministers Defend Hiking Board Fees For Crown Bodies
Cabinet Ministers Defend Hiking Board Fees For Crown Bodies

Scoop

time3 hours ago

  • Scoop

Cabinet Ministers Defend Hiking Board Fees For Crown Bodies

Cabinet ministers are defending a move to hike board fees for Crown bodies by up to 80 percent, insisting those in the roles are overseeing billions of dollars - not just "beer and skittles." Labour says the decision proves the government is out-of-touch with the cost-of-living crisis and has accused it of trying to sneak the news by the public. A Cabinet document, quietly uploaded online on Monday, shows ministers agreed to lift the maximum annual fee for chairs of governance boards from $90,000 to about $162,000. The "Cabinet Fees Framework" is not binding but provides guidance to ministers when deciding compensation for those on a range of bodies, such as royal commissions and ministerial inquiries. Speaking on Tuesday, Luxon said public sector fees had become completely "out of whack" with private sector rates and needed a reset. "We need to make that a little bit more competitive, so that we can actually attract good talent," he said. Luxon said paying more to ensure "really good governance teams" could save billions in the long run. Finance Minister Nicola Willis echoed the point, stressing that New Zealanders deserved value for money. "This isn't beer and skittles. This is billions of dollars of public money. We need the very best people making governance decisions about it." Public Service Minister Judith Collins told reporters that the updated fees still fell short of private sector rates - around 80 percent of the going rate. "A lot of people who are experienced directors don't want to do these jobs in the public sector because they know they're going to lose money," she said. Collins said she did not think the public would be worried by the news. "One of the problems is that we've had an underperforming public service that's taken a hell of a lot of taxpayers' money, and so it is very important that we have the right people in charge of that." Hipkins accuses government of 'twisted priorities' Labour leader Chris Hipkins said the decision revealed the government's "twisted priorities" at a time when households were doing it tough. "They're saying that board members can get up to 80 percent increases in their pay, whilst nurses and teachers are being told to settle for 1 pecent or less," he said. "They've said everyone needs to tighten their belts - apparently except for the people who they hand-picked to put on public sector boards." Hipkins rejected the idea that higher fees were necessary to attract quality candidates, calling it "absolute nonsense." He said many public appointees had altruistic motivations and were already sitting on "very well paid directorships" in the private sector as well. "They're not doing it for the money," Hipkins said. Hipkins accused the government of trying to "slip this [announcement] out quietly" without scrutiny. But Luxon denied any secrecy: "It's normal practice... how it's been communicated." Hipkins does not appear to have issued a media release as Public Service Minister in 2022 when the then-Labour Cabinet agreed to a smaller 10 percent increase in fees. In November, State Owned Enterprises minister Paul Goldsmith did publish a release about a similar but separate move to increase director fees for 22 Crown-owned companies.

Electoral Amendment Bill passes its first reading in Parliament
Electoral Amendment Bill passes its first reading in Parliament

RNZ News

time11 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Electoral Amendment Bill passes its first reading in Parliament

The government argued the bill would bring in changes that would make it faster to count votes after election day. Photo: NZ ELECTORAL COMMISSION Legislation banning prisoner voting and same-day voting has passed its first reading. The House heard spirited speeches both for and against the changes on Tuesday afternoon. Government parties argued the bill would overhaul outdated electoral law and make it faster to count votes after election day. The opposition described the Electoral Amendment Bill as a dark day for democracy, saying the changes would make it harder for people to vote. The legislation is now off to Select Committee, having passed with support from National, ACT and New Zealand First. The legislation does not apply to persons who have committed a crime but are detained in a hospital or secure facility. In 2020, the Labour government amended the law so that only people serving a term of three or more years were disqualified. The National-led coalition government had earlier signalled the change back . ... More to come Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Letters to Editor: polytechs, learning spaces, right to vote
Letters to Editor: polytechs, learning spaces, right to vote

Otago Daily Times

time13 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Letters to Editor: polytechs, learning spaces, right to vote

Cause for concern The government's announcement that it will abolish the long established right of special votes by people who enrol after the voting period has started is cause for concern. About 150,000 special votes were cast in the last general election and they strongly favoured left-wing parties. The coalition government should not be allowed to stack the electoral deck in this fashion as it is a serious assault on the democratic process. Bill Southworth Port Chalmers Something borrowed Golly, National is taking on Ingrid Leary's retirement village proposals as theirs. The ideas cupboard in the National camp must be almost bare. Maybe it's true then, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Robyn Bridges Roseneath Learning spaces Well said Bridget Davidson (principal of Otago Girls' High School) ''open-plan or not - the quality of teaching and learning remains if the school culture and relationships are rich and strong, and the thirst for learning and knowledge is there'' (ODT 22.7.25). Learning spaces vary from single-cell classrooms, open-plan/flexible, outdoors (on and off a school's campus), and spaces designed to support specialist subject learning (such as science laboratories, technology workshops, music studios, gymnasiums and all-weather turf). Each learning space has its purpose and contributes to broad and deep learning. Evidence affirms that positive school culture and relationships, along with effective teachers are the most influential factors that promote learning across learning (subject) areas. So much rich learning would be utterly constrained if we think single-cell classrooms are the magic bullet for student learning and achievement. Margie Campbell-Price Dunedin Crossing swords and turning around opinions Since crossing swords with Jean Balchin several years ago I have come to enjoy reading her column. I have re-visited the archive, however, and her memory (Opinion ODT 14.7.25) has played a scurvy trick - she did more than question Captain Cook's ''sainthood'', holding him largely responsible for all the ills of colonisation. And I certainly said if that was the best she could do I'd have failed her first-year history at Otago. I did not hazard a guess as to her likely fate at Oxford though I'd have undoubtedly sought her out for further tuition. Curious and even opinionated students are the lifeblood of universities. However, all that aside, I mainly want to reassure her, as a member of the distinguished club of School Certificate failures, that I have never considered falling at one of the hurdles along the way has much significance ... And may I add that I am delighted to know that Ms Balchin is planning to work on Truby King and the Plunket Society. I hope Ms Balchin will keep up her column while she works away on Sir Truby and Plunket. Erik Olssen Dunedin The Gaza blues Re the response to my own letter re the council writing a letter to a political party offering support. If Heinke Matheson had read my letter closely she would have seen that at no time did I actually mention any war by name. Nor was I addressing any personal feelings on any war, nor did I mention a political party. I was addressing the issue of Dunedin city councillors using their democratically elected positions to support a political party response. Councillors are not elected on the basis of party affiliation or the actions of a political party unless it affects the citizens of Dunedin. Council represents the citizens of Dunedin who voted for them to devote themselves to the running of our city regardless of their personal political and religious views. Discussing a world event is out of council business. Asking councillors to publicly vote on an issue of political, religious and moral grounds in any situation is putting peer pressure on a councillor. Any such vote should be done in a private and anonymous way. Lynne NewellDunedin [Abridged - Editor.] Winston fooled Winston Peters' statement to Israel (ODT 23.7.25) is misplaced and misinformed: he and foreign affairs ministers from 27 other countries have fallen for the ruse. The demand for an immediate unconditional permanent ceasefire and a return to the previous compromised UN and humanitarian aid, is naive. Israeli conditions for a ceasefire are reasonable: free the hostages and remove the perpetrators. It's not, and never has been, Israeli aggression that is the issue. It's not Israel taking and holding hostages, it's not Israel intentionally shooting civilians gathering for food, it's not Israel selling the aid, after taking it from civilians. Israel does not use civilians as shields. Israel did not build tunnels and purchase arms, using financial aid given to house, feed and educate civilians. Unfortunately 28 countries are now on the wrong side of history. Tony VinkAndersons Bay [Abridged - Editor.] Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store