Govt, opposition spar over CISF deployment in House
While Congress president and leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge alleged that the marshals were drawn from the CISF and police force, deputy chairman Harivansh asserted that they were not CISF personnel but 'Parliament Security Service'.
Harivansh also criticised the Opposition leader for releasing his letter to the Chair to the media. '… Such communication between constitutional functionaries must remain confidential,' he added.
Kharge had last week raised the issue of CISF personnel being deputed as marshals in the Upper House and shot off a letter to the deputy chairman, objecting to their presence.
'We are astonished and shocked at the manner in which CISF personnel are made to run into the well of the House when the members are exercising their democratic right of protest… We expect that in future CISF personnel will not come trooping in the well of the House when members are raising important issues of public concern,' Kharge wrote in the letter dated August 1. He read out the content of the letter in the House on Tuesday as well.
Harivansh said the House witnessed several disruptions over the course of the week and added that despite repeated appeals by the Chair, several members violated the provisions of Rule 235 and Rule 238, disrupting the House.
'We members should self-introspect whether such actions enhance the dignity and decorum of the House,' he said.
However, the Opposition did not relent.
Kharge said: 'If CISF or any paramilitary force has been called inside the house to silence our voice, it is highly objectionable and violates the core values of democracy… We are protesting democratically, and this is our right.'
Kharge made a reference to late BJP leaders, Arun Jaitley and Sushma Swaraj, who had referred to disruptions as part of democratic process.
DMK member Tiruchi Siva recalled that even after Bhagat Singh threw a bomb in the Central Legislative Assembly, Vitthal Bhai Patel did not allow security forces to enter the house.
Hitting at Kharge, parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju said the leader of Opposition had attempted to 'mislead' the house.
'Only marshals can enter the House. That day there were only marshals. LoP is misleading and putting forth wrong facts. When a misleading letter is written or a wrong fact is presented, what action needs to be taken?' Rijiju questioned.
On the charge of CISF personnel being deployed, Rijiju said, 'They have to be brought from somewhere.. either they have to go through some exams or can be on deputation. It has been explained by the Chair that all those have been from the parliament security staff and part of it.'
Leader of the House JP Nadda also criticised the Opposition for disrupting the proceedings of the house. '…I have been in the opposition for over 40 years and I would say take tuition from me on how to work as the opposition… it has only been 10 years…You'll be there for another 30 to 40 years,' he said, taking a swipe at the Opposition.
People aware of the matter said that for the first time this session, CISF has been posted across Parliament without any assistance from the Parliamentary Security Service (PSS). The duties of PSS have been transferred to CISF, which includes the role of marshals inside Parliament.
PSS was an inhouse security unit within Parliament. They were not people from police or any other paramilitary forces but were posted permanently within the complex. Until last year, the perimeter of Parliament complex was guarded by Central Reserve Police Force and Delhi police. But following a security breach of 2023, a security survey was conducted and the Parliament security was handed to CISF, which took over the security arrangements at the complex in January 2024.
'In the previous three sessions (after CISF's induction), PSS officials were posted along with CISF personnel and were assisting them at every corner... after more than a year, the entire security including marshal duties were handed to CISF this time. For Marshal duty, a separate CISF team has been set up within the complex. They enter the house only when they are called inside by the Speaker or the authorities. PSS personnel are not involved in any security related work anymore,' an official aware of the matter said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Nirmala Sitharaman withdraws Income Tax Bill in Lok Sabha; new Bill to be introduced on Aug. 11
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Friday (August 8, 2025) withdrew the Income Tax Bill, 2025, in the Lok Sabha, and the government will come out with an updated version of the legislation after incorporating changes suggested by the Select Committee. A new version of the Income Tax Bill will be introduced in the Lok Sabha on August 11. The updated version of the Income Tax Bill, according to sources, will incorporate most of the recommendations of the Select Committee. "To avoid confusion by multiple versions of the Bill and to provide a clear and updated version with all changes incorporated, the new version of the Income Tax Bill will be introduced for the consideration of the House on Monday," sources said. The Select Committee, chaired by Baijayant Panda, had suggested a host of changes in the Income Tax Bill, which was introduced in the Lok Sabha on February 13. Soon after its introduction in the Lower House, the Bill, which will replace the six-decade-old Income Tax Act, 1961, was referred to the Select Committee for scrutiny. The 31-member Select Committee had made some suggestions on the Bill. They also favoured continuing tax exemption on anonymous donations made to religious-cum-charitable trusts in the new law, besides suggesting that taxpayers be allowed to claim TDS refund even after the ITR filing due date without paying any penal charges. The government in the new Bill has exempted non-profit organisations (NPOs) from taxing anonymous donations received by purely religious trusts. However, such donations received by a religious trust that may also have other charitable functions, like running hospitals and educational institutions, will be taxed as per law, as per the Bill.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Sitharaman withdraws Income Tax Bill in Lok Sabha; new Bill to be introduced on Aug 11
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Friday withdrew the Income Tax Bill, 2025, in the Lok Sabha, and said the government will come out with an updated version of the legislation after incorporating changes suggested by the Select Committee. A new version of the Income Tax Bill will be introduced in the Lok Sabha on August 11. The updated version of the I-T Bill, according to sources, will incorporate most of the recommendations of the Select Committee. 'To avoid confusion by multiple versions of the Bill and to provide a clear and updated version with all changes incorporated, the new version of the Income Tax Bill will be introduced for the consideration of the House on Monday,' sources said. The Select Committee, chaired by Baijayant Panda, had suggested a host of changes in the Income Tax Bill, which was introduced in the Lok Sabha on February 13. Soon after its introduction in the Lower House, the Bill, which will replace the six-decade-old Income Tax Act, 1961, was referred to the Select Committee for scrutiny. The 31-member Select Committee had made some suggestions on the Bill. They also favoured continuing tax exemption on anonymous donations made to religious-cum-charitable trusts in the new law, besides suggesting that taxpayers be allowed to claim TDS refund even after the ITR filing due date without paying any penal charges. The government in the new Bill has exempted non-profit organisations (NPOs) from taxing anonymous donations received by purely religious trusts. However, such donations received by a religious trust that may also have other charitable functions, like running hospitals and educational institutions, will be taxed as per law, as per the Bill.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Japanese manga One Piece's ‘Jolly Roger' flag becomes a real-life protest symbol in Indonesia; take a look
Over the past month, a familiar skull-and-crossbones motif from a Japanese anime has appeared across Indonesia — not in cosplay conventions, but in the streets, on car windows, and painted on alley walls. The pirate emblem from popular anime One Piece, carried by the show's protagonist Monkey D. Luffy, has been repurposed as a rebellious symbol in the world's third-largest democracy, rallying against government policies just weeks before their Independence Day on August 17. One Piece's 'Jolly Roger' flag has turned into a real-life protest symbol The flood of flags came after President Prabowo Subianto urged Indonesians to proudly raise the national red and white flag ahead of Independence Day. Instead, some have opted for Luffy's banner — a decision many see as a direct challenge to the state, a sign of discontent with what is said to be an increasingly centralised government. In February, thousands of Indonesians took to the streets to protest against budget cuts and legislative changes to allow the military a bigger role in government A movement under scrutiny Not everyone has embraced the pirate banner. Deputy House Speaker Sufmi Dasco Ahmad, widely seen as one of Prabowo's closest allies, denounced the displays. 'We must collectively resist such actions,' he had said earlier last week. Member of the People's Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia, Firman Soebagyo of the Golkar Party, went even further, suggesting that flying the flag could amount to treason. Yet the president's office has taken a softer stance. On Tuesday, State Secretary Minister Prasetyo Hadi said the president had 'no objection' to the flags as a form of 'creative expression.' His office said in a statement, 'However, it should not be used to challenge or diminish the significance of the red and white flag. The two should not be placed side by side in a way that invites comparison or conflict.' Online, the movement has found fertile ground. Netizens have embraced the imagery, sharing photos of the flag and dissecting its layered meaning. Posts spread not only the visual symbol, but also the political undertones behind raising it — turning the Jolly Roger into a viral emblem of dissent. Why the Jolly Roger resonates One Piece, created by Eiichiro Oda in 1997, has become one of the most successful franchises in history, selling over 520 million manga copies and running for more than 1,100 anime episodes. Its appeal in Indonesia is immense, where anime fandom runs deep. In the series, Monkey D. Luffy's crew flies the Jolly Roger as a declaration of freedom and defiance against injustice. For some Indonesians, that symbolism cuts close to home. Many protestors draw a direct connection between the anime's themes and Indonesian citizens' fight for a true democratic state instead of the current facade. Whether the wave of pirate flags fades after August 17 or continues as a form of protest, remains to be seen. But in spite of what happens in the future, it's clear that One Piece has sailed far beyond entertainment in Indonesia. Here, Luffy's banner is no longer just a fictional icon, it's a statement of rebellion — a purpose most art yearns to serve.
