Rise Mzansi's Zibi wants 'spineless' Motshekga dismissed for defending 'rogue' SANDF chief Maphwanya
Maphwanya has come under fire over his controversial trip to Iran, where he reportedly urged stronger military ties between South Africa and the Middle Eastern nation.
President Cyril Ramaphosa believes Maphwanya's remarks risk straining Pretoria's diplomatic relations with Washington.
Rise Mzansi raised the matter during a media briefing in Johannesburg on Monday. While Ramaphosa is displeased with the SANDF chief's remarks, Motshekga has come to his defence.
It's understood that Motshekga authorised Maphwanya's visit to Iran last year, before South Africa was in the bad books of the United States.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
14 hours ago
- IOL News
Cyril Ramaphosa's Ignorance: A Symptom of South Africa's Governance Challenges
SANDF Chief General Rudzani Maphwanya with President Cyril Ramaphosa at the Pretoria Military Sports Club. Image: Jacques Naude/African News Agency (ANA) Clyde N.S. Ramalaine South Africa's foreign policy is under siege, not from foreign powers, but from the fragmentation of its own State centre. The controversy over SANDF Chief General Rudzani Maphwanya's visit to Iran is more than a military misstep; it exposes fractures in governance, civil–military discipline, and institutional coherence. That a senior military officer could conduct politically charged diplomacy without the President's knowledge signals a State adrift, where factionalism, ideological signalling, and individual prerogatives dictate the nation's global posture. Maphwanya's visit lies at the intersection of foreign policy confusion, eroding civil–military discipline, and structural governance weaknesses. By bypassing diplomatic channels and publicly articulating solidarity with a sanctioned state, he blurred the line between military command and political advocacy. The episode raises fundamental questions: Who truly directs South Africa's foreign engagements? Does the President still control the levers of statecraft entrusted to him? In my assessment, General Rudzani Maphwanya's statements in Iran exceeded the bounds of military neutrality. And straddled overreach. By declaring that 'South Africa and Iran have common goals,' condemning Israel's actions in Gaza and the West Bank, criticising U.S. sanctions, and framing his visit as delivering a 'political message' at 'the best possible time,' he stepped directly into the political and ideological arena. These were not neutral observations or ceremonial remarks; they aligned with Iran's foreign policy positions and implicitly endorsed its strategic narratives. While some may argue he was 'merely articulating South African policy,' the timing, specificity, and ideological tenor suggest otherwise: this was a deliberate straddling of political space. In doing so, Maphwanya undermined the constitutional role of the Presidency and DIRCO, blurring the line between defence leadership and foreign policy-making, and raising urgent questions about civil-military discipline and the ability of the state centre to assert control over high-ranking officials acting on the international stage. Civil–Military Boundaries Shattered By convention, defence chiefs remain neutral, executing policy rather than shaping it. Maphwanya's public alignment with Iran undermined this principle, encroaching on the exclusive domain of the Presidency and DIRCO. Military neutrality safeguards against politicisation of the armed forces and ensures civilian oversight. The contradiction between Maphwanya's emphasis on neutrality in SA Soldier, Volume 32, No. 4 (2025), and his actions in Iran may suggest deliberate signalling. Domestically, it reassured the ANC's pro-Palestinian and nationalist base that senior military leadership aligns with ideological positions championed within party structures. Internationally, it signalled to Tehran that South Africa's military is willing to engage beyond formal diplomatic channels, potentially bypassing the Presidency and DIRCO. The general's confidence may reflect awareness of Minister Motshekga's backing, particularly her dismissive stance toward perceived American deference. By straddling the political space with ministerial support, Maphwanya tests the boundaries of presidential authority, raising questions about civilian control over the armed forces. This is not merely a lapse in protocol but a visible assertion of institutional autonomy, where senior officials act in alignment with factional or ideological allies rather than under the unified command of the Commander-in-Chief. When considered alongside Lt. General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, the KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner's July 6 statement, a pattern emerges: senior security officials asserting independent positions. Individually, each may seem isolated, but collectively, they indicate persistent strain on institutional discipline and oversight. This dynamic suggests the State centre—the Presidency and Cabinet—is increasingly challenged by high-ranking officials operating with their strategic calculus. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Mixed Messaging and Diplomatic Risks Mixed messaging amplified the damage. Ramaphosa urged caution, Motshekga defended the visit, and the military chief effectively freelanced policy in Tehran. These contradictory signals create openings for external actors to exploit South Africa's internal dissonance. Iran is under sweeping US sanctions. Any appearance of military endorsement risks being interpreted as a strategic pivot, with billions in AGOA trade benefits hanging in the balance. Beyond economic stakes, the timing compounded the risk: the Israel–Hamas war sharpened global ideological divides, and Iran's accession to BRICS added symbolic weight to the visit. While some Global South states may applaud Pretoria's independent posture, symbolic gains come at the cost of trade, investment flows, and currency stability vital to South Africa's fragile economy. The Centre Not Holding At the heart of the crisis is the divergence between the Presidency and Defence Minister Angie Motshekga. Presidential spokesperson Vincent Magwenya described the visit as 'ill-advised,' emphasising Ramaphosa neither knew of nor sanctioned it, and reiterating that foreign policy is the sole domain of the Presidency and DIRCO. By contrast, Motshekga insisted 'all protocols were duly observed' and defended Maphwanya, dismissing concerns as undue deference to America. When Minister Motshekga asserts that 'all protocols were observed,' this implies that the President, DIRCO, and all relevant structures within the state's diplomatic apparatus were duly informed and that established procedures governing high-level international engagements were followed. This contradiction reveals more than bureaucratic tension. DIRCO's absence, the sidelining of South Africa's ambassador in Tehran, and the conflicting narratives suggest parallel centres of power within the state. Authority is fragmented, ministerial prerogatives clash with the Presidency, and accountability is obscured. There is, however, an alternative reading. Perhaps Ramaphosa and Motshekga are performing a calculated balancing act. The Presidency's rhetoric of caution appeals to Western partners concerned about sanctions and AGOA eligibility, while Motshekga's defiance speaks to the ANC's domestic base, where suspicion of Western pressure runs deep. Even if intentional, this 'good cop/bad cop' choreography carries real risks: the absence of coherent coordination allows foreign influence to seep in, institutions are undermined, and the Presidency appears weak at home and abroad. Institutional Tensions and Governance Failures Ramaphosa's claimed ignorance is a constitutional red flag. Either the reporting lines failed, or the trip was deliberately concealed. Both scenarios weaken civilian supremacy over the military, a cornerstone of democratic governance. Maphwanya's rhetoric, echoing partisan ANC positions on Israel and Palestine, threatens to drag the SANDF into factional politics. Unchecked, this sets a precedent for 'parallel diplomacy,' where provincial governments, municipalities, SOEs, and the military pursue independent foreign agendas. For a middle-power state, multiple competing voices erode credibility, trust, and negotiating leverage. South Africa risks becoming a cacophony of internal agendas broadcast to the world, with each actor signalling its alignment. Domestic Political Dilemmas The Democratic Alliance's call for a court-martial underscores a constitutional imperative: the military must remain neutral. Ramaphosa faces a dilemma. Disciplining Maphwanya would reaffirm civilian supremacy but risk alienating ANC hardliners and pro-Palestinian constituencies. Inaction normalises military autonomy and chips away at presidential authority, sending a signal that the chain of command can be disregarded without consequence. Strategic Incoherence and Policy Vacuums Beyond the immediate controversy, the episode exposes a broader malaise: South African foreign policy is a patchwork of ideological impulses, factional agendas, and reactive positioning, managed from a State centre increasingly unable to assert coherent authority. Policy vacuums invite unauthorised actors to step in. Maphwanya's initiative broadcast positions never sanctioned by the Presidency or DIRCO, creating inconsistent diplomatic signalling. Symbolic alignment with sanctioned states may appeal to ideological allies but risks alienating Western governments critical to trade, investment, and economic stability.
IOL News
16 hours ago
- IOL News
Parliamentary committees to question Lamola and Motshekga over SANDF chief's controversial Iran visit
Major-General Rudzani Maphwanya during recent visit to the DRC. Image: SANDF The parliamentary Committees on Defence and International Relations and Cooperation plans to engage with Minister Angie Motshekga and Ronald Lamola over comments made by SANDF Chief, General Rudzani Maphwanya during his recent visit to Iran. This will be after President Cyril Ramaphosa has scheduled a meeting with Maphwanya. Maphwanya caused a storm last week when it emerged that during a visit to Tehran he pledged 'common goals' with Iran and claimed his trip carried 'a political message'. His trip, sanctioned by Motshekga, took place amid tensions between South and the US with President Donald Trump imposing a 30% tariff on South African goods. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Defence and Military Veterans, Dakota Legoete, and the Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on International Relations, Supra Mahumapelo, noted with concern Maphwanya's remarks during his visit to Iran. Legoete and Mahumapelo also noted with alarm that the Department of International Relations and Cooperation has publicly distanced itself from the General's comments while the Presidency described the visit as 'ill-advised'. They said the committees will have a joint meeting to engage with Lamola and Motshekga on the issue. Legoete said it was evident that there was a worrying lack of coordination between defence diplomacy and South Africa's official foreign policy. 'This disjuncture exposes potential misalignment and cohesion in the country's approach to international relations,' he said. Legoete added that the Department of Defence should draw long-term lessons from these events and ensure thorough alignment, going forward. He further stressed that the committee awaits the outcome of engagements between Ramaphosa in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the SANDF, Motshekga and SANDF leadership. 'These engagements must demonstrate unity, strength and synergy in how South Africa conducts itself on the international stage.' Legoete reiterated the committee's stance that 'the SANDF must remain a professional and apolitical institution, focusing squarely on its constitutional mandate to safeguard the Republic, while steering away from statements in the political domain'. Last Thursday, the Presidency said Ramaphosa was unaware about the 'ill-advised' visit by Maphwanywa to Iran. Ramaphosa's spokesperson Vincent Magwenya stated that Ramaphosa did not sanction Maphwanya's visit as Motshekga approved the travel. 'As much as the president is the appointing authority and the commander in chief, he does not get involved in supervising the general's travel. That process sits with the minister. So the President did not know.' Both the Department of International Relations and Cooperation and Defence have distanced themselves from Maphwanya's remarks, citing that Ramaphosa and Dirco were custodians of foreign policy.
Eyewitness News
17 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Rise Mzansi claims CoJ bomb squad, Presidential Working Group making little progress in tackling poor service delivery in city
JOHANNESBURG - There are claims that both the Johannesburg bomb squad and the Presidential Working Group have made minimal progress in tackling poor service delivery in the city. The latter body was established by President Cyril Ramaphosa earlier this year following his complaints about poor service delivery in Johannesburg. ALSO READ: • CoJ denies service delivery initiative driven by upcoming G20 Summit • City of Johannesburg rolls out service delivery operation in Sandton ahead of G20 summit The working group's mandate is to support the city's administrative and political teams in effectively implementing solutions. Rise Mzansi spokesperson, Mabine Seane, said that little had been achieved so far. "The bomb squad and Presidential Johannesburg Working Group have clearly failed to make an impact on the service delivery needs of Joburgers; and such an admission must be made. Johannesburg needs new leaders with a plan, not comrades with a plate. We therefore call on Johannesburg residents to hold the council and the mayoral committee to account in the 2026 local government elections."
