Thousands of People Mistakenly Told They Had Won Lottery
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Thousands of lottery players were told they had won potentially life-changing sums of money―only to be informed later that extra zeros had mistakenly been added to their prizes.
Gamblers who had planned to buy new homes or splash out on lavish vacations were informed they had won only a fraction of the sum they had initially been told was about to hit their bank accounts.
One winner was informed he had won the equivalent of almost $125,000, only to discover later that it was closer to $12.50.
The incident happened in Norway on Friday after the state-owned lottery company Norsk Tipping made an error calculating the prizes, which had to be converted from euros into Norwegian kroner. None of the mistakenly inflated prizes were paid out.
Newsweek has contacted Norsk Tipping for comment via email.
The logo of Norwegian lottery company Norsk Tipping next to the Eurojackpot logo on a smartphone display in Oslo, Norway.
The logo of Norwegian lottery company Norsk Tipping next to the Eurojackpot logo on a smartphone display in Oslo, Norway.
AMANDA PEDERSEN GISKE/NTB/AFP via Getty Images
Why It Matters
Norsk Tipping, which the Norwegian Ministry of Culture administers, texted some 47,000 customers on Monday to apologize for the incident. The firm has not disclosed exactly how many people were told incorrect prize details, saying only that "several thousand" players were affected. Minister of Culture Lubna Jaffery said the error was "totally unacceptable."
The Norwegian Gambling Authority has launched an official review to assess whether any of the country's gambling laws were broken. Norsk Tipping CEO Tonje Sagstuen apologized and resigned following the furor.
What To Know
The prize mistake occurred when the results were announced for the Eurojackpot game on Friday.
Norsk Tipping receives the prize amounts from Germany in euros and coverts them to Norwegian kroner. However, the winnings were converted to cents and then mistakenly multiplied by 100, instead of being divided by 100, the company said in a statement, blaming a "manual coding error."
Ole Fredrik Sveen, a 53-year-old culinary school teacher, was among those who thought his life was about to change. While on holiday in Greece, he received a notification that he had won 1.25 million kroner (about $124,789), The Guardian reported. His joy lasted about 15 minutes before turning to suspicion as he looked online and saw many other big wins being reported. Sveen was right to be cautious because it turned out he had won 125 kroner (about $12.49).
"At first you're ecstatic and happy about the message you got that says you won 1.2m kroner," he told The Guardian. He added, "You could have been really unlucky and spent a large amount of money then found out it wasn't true. But thankfully we kept our heads cool and realized it wasn't meant to be this time."
When asked what he planned to do with his more modest winnings, he replied: "You don't get too much Champagne for that money. It's more like a glass of prosecco or crémant than Champagne."
This incident isn't the first time lottery organizers have drawn the public's ire.
In February 2024, John Cheeks sued Powerball over a $340 million prize after the American lottery listed his chosen numbers on its website as a winning combination. However, the company said the numbers had not been drawn but had accidentally appeared on the site as it was undergoing developmental testing.
In 2022, Powerball was mocked online after a technical problem prevented numbers from being drawn for a record-breaking $1.9 billion prize.
Other lottery players have been more fortunate. A Virginia man won $250,000 on a $2 bet in 2022 after dreaming that the unlikely number sequence 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 would come up. A man in Florida, meanwhile, credited his pregnant dachshund with his good luck after he won $2 million from a ticket he bought while taking a different route than usual because of his pet's needs.
What People Are Saying
Vegar Strand, Norsk Tipping's managing director, texted customers on Monday: "Thousands of Norwegians were mistakenly informed that they had won a large prize in the Eurojackpot. This was a mistake that affected many and which we take very seriously. We deeply regret what has happened, and on behalf of us at Norsk Tipping, I would like to apologize to everyone affected by this. We are incredibly sorry to have disappointed so many."
Tonje Sagstuen, Norsk Tipping's CEO, said: "I am terribly sorry that we have disappointed so many, and I understand that people are angry with us. I have received many messages from people who had managed to make plans for holidays, buying an apartment or renovating before they realized that the amount was wrong. To them I can only say: Sorry! But I understand that it is a small consolation."
What Happens Next
Officials are reviewing the incident. Norsk Tipping will likely seek a permanent CEO following Sagstuen's resignation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Four Jobs Where Wages Are Outpacing Inflation
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Wages have largely lagged behind inflation over the past few years, a shortfall attributed to a post-pandemic price surge the effects of which continue to reverberate through the economy. According to a new study by financial services firm Bankrate, inflation has risen 22.7 percent while Americans' wages have only grown 21.5 percent since January 2021. This has resulted in a current wage-to-inflation gap of -1.2 percent, meaning that income has on the whole failed to keep pace with overall price increases. Why It Matters The disparity between wages and inflation means most Americans—even those who have received bumps in their paychecks—are effectively seeing a drop in their in overall purchasing power. However, while some industries lag well behind, researchers found that certain professions have seen their pay keep up with, even outpace, price hikes since the pandemic. What To Know Bankrate drew on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics—specifically the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Employment Cost Index (ECI)—to measure sector-specific wage growth against inflation since 2021, and found that four industries have seen wages rise faster than prices over this period. Earnings in the accommodations and food services category have risen the fastest since 2021, climbing 27.5 percent and exceeding inflation by 4.8 percent. Next is leisure and hospitality, where wage growth has created a 4.1 percent lead over inflation. Health care and social assistance follows with a 1.7 percent wage-to-inflation gap, while retail earnings have outpaced price increases by 0.5 percent. Elise Gould, senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute and an expert in wage dynamics, told Newsweek that areas such as leisure and hospitality "experienced much faster wage growth coming out of the pandemic because of the sheer numbers of jobs lost and the need for employers to scramble to attract and retain workers." These effects, she said, were more pronounced for those at the lower end of wage distribution, who required more "enticement" from employers to return to less-compensated, face-to-face roles—bargaining power that was reinforced by the financial supports put in place by policymakers during the pandemic. Ahu Yildirmaz, President & Chief Executive Officer of the nonprofit Coleridge Initiative, which assists governments in using data for policymaking, said that the sectors where wages have kept up "not only faced intense competition for workers, but they also started from relatively lower wage levels." "That means percentage increases appear larger and more noticeable," he told Newsweek, adding that health care is a "bit of a special case," given funding support during the pandemic "helped reinforce wage gains, adding to the upward pressure." A trader works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Monday, August 18, 2025. A welder carries steel at the site of a construction of a housing project, Thursday, July 31, 2025, in... A trader works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Monday, August 18, 2025. A welder carries steel at the site of a construction of a housing project, Thursday, July 31, 2025, in Portland, Maine. More Richard Drew / Robert F. Bukaty/AP Photo In contrast, wages for those in manufacturing, professional and business services, financial activities and construction have slipped noticeably behind inflation. Education has fared the worst, with a 17.9 percent rise in pay trailing inflation by 4.8 percent. Educators have long suffered from the gap between income growth and inflation. According to the National Education Association's most recent annual report, average starting teacher salaries underwent their largest increase in 15 years in 2024. However, the labor union said that, when factoring in inflation, average teacher wages have "actually decreased by an estimated 5.1 percent over the past decade." "Education has lagged the most because even though teacher shortages persist, institutions face far more rigid pay structures," Yildirmaz told Newsweek. "School systems can't easily adjust prices or salaries in the way private employers can, so teacher pay scales tend to move slowly and remain constrained." Gould noted that the inability of wages to keep up has also been a function of the rapid inflation seen between 2020 and 2022, which reached an annualized rate of 9.1 percent in June 2022. This has been attributed to a mix of factors including pandemic-era supply chain shocks, post-lockdown demand surges, as well as the Russian invasion of Ukraine which drove up energy and food prices. What People Are Saying Martha Gimbel, executive director of the Yale Budget Lab, told Bankrate: "A wage increase is something you earn. Inflation is something that happens to you. It feels unfair to people that their hard-earned wage increase is getting eaten up by something that's not their fault." Ahu Yildirmaz, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Coleridge Initiative, told Newsweek: "Looking ahead, demographics and immigration will play a critical role in shaping labor supply. At the same time, the pace of AI adoption will influence demand. In service industries where human interaction is harder to automate wage pressure is likely to remain elevated. By contrast, in sectors more exposed to automation, wage growth may be more restrained." What Happens Next? Bankrate believes wage growth is on pace to match post-pandemic inflation by the third quarter of 2026, at which point its wage-to-inflation index will rise above zero. According to latest CPI report from the BLS, inflation accelerated 0.2 percent in July from June, and is up 2.7 percent on a 12-month basis. The core CPI, which excludes the volatile food and energy categories, increased by 0.3 percent for the month and is up 3.1 percent from a year ago. Most forecasts assume that inflation will remain broadly at this level for the remainder of 2025, the IMF forecasting annual inflation to hold steady at 3.0 percent on average this year. However, experts believe this will depend significantly on the extent to which the effects of President Donald Trump's tariffs are passed onto consumers.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
No Tax on Social Security for Seniors? Trump Tax Policies Explained
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump pledged to end taxes on Social Security as part of the GOP's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' signed into law on July 4. The exact wording of the law actually stipulates a $6,000 tax deduction for individuals aged 65 and older, likely raising the number of seniors who won't pay taxes on Social Security to 88 percent. Currently, 64 percent of seniors already don't pay taxes on Social Security benefits. Why It Matters Seniors who rely on Social Security are at an increased risk of poverty. While more than 70 million Americans receive benefits each month, about one in three adults aged 65 and older are living below the poverty level, according to ConsumerAffairs. If taxes no longer apply to Social Security earnings, seniors will have more income to cover basic living expenses such as housing, transportation and health care. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during an event at the Kennedy Center on August 13, 2025 in Washington, D.C. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during an event at the Kennedy Center on August 13, 2025 in Washington, To Know What is the One Big Beautiful Bill? Trump's massive tax and spending package was nicknamed the "One Big Beautiful Bill" and makes changes across a wide range of policy areas. While the law extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts, it also eliminates taxes on tips and overtime, and increases funding for immigration enforcement and defense. However, to accomplish that, the bill also cut nearly $1 trillion from Medicaid and lowered food assistance. When was the bill passed? Trump signed OBBBA on July 4, just a day after the House of Representatives narrowly approved the legislation 218—214. Since then, critics have sounded the alarm on the law's newly imposed 80-hour-per-month work requirements on many adults receiving Medicaid and the expansion of SNAP work rules to more beneficiaries. The law also gets rid of many clean energy tax credits that were available under President Joe Biden. How does the bill impact senior citizens? As it concerns seniors, one of the most pressing issues is whether or not the bill actually translates into no taxes on Social Security. The law's $6,000 tax deduction for Americans aged 65 and older means couples filing jointly can reduce taxable income by up to $12,000, with the benefit available from 2025 to 2028. Since the threshold for income is $25,000 for individuals and $32,000 for couples before benefits get taxed, OBBBA effectively will raise the percentage of seniors who don't pay taxes on Social Security to 88 percent, according to the White House. Because low-income retirees have already been tax-exempt, however, the law provides tax relief to middle and upper-middle class seniors. To get the full $6,000 deduction, single filers must have a modified adjusted gross income under $75,000, while married couples must be below $150,000. "This new deduction is not an "above-the-line" deduction, so it does not lower your AGI nor MAGI, and therefore does nothing to reduce the taxable amount of your Social Security benefits. But it still lowers your total taxable income," Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek. "In practice, seniors will calculate AGI and MAGI just as they always have, and a corresponding percentage, 0 percent to 85 percent, of their Social Security benefits will be added to their taxable income. Then they will subtract standard or itemized deductions, just as they always have, but now will receive an additional $6,000 deduction per taxpayer." When will the changes begin? The deduction starts for the tax year 2025, so seniors will be able to claim it when they file next year. As of today, the deduction is only available until 2028, at which point it would need to be reauthorized by Congress. "The provisions are retroactive and already in effect for 2025," Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek. "Now is the time to work with a financial adviser who understands these rules and can run simulations on how it affects your plan." What People Are Saying The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities said in a statement: "The Trump Administration has been peddling false and exaggerated claims about the harmful Republican megabill's effects on the taxation of Social Security benefits, including in a blast email from the Social Security Administration. The new law doesn't help most low- and middle-income seniors, and it depletes the Social Security trust funds faster. Moreover, the Administration's misleading claims shouldn't distract from how the law's deep cuts to health care and food assistance will leave millions of seniors with low incomes worse off." The White House said in news release on July 21: "The largest tax cut in history for working- and middle-class Americans—including No Tax on Tips, No Tax on Overtime, and No Tax on Social Security—is now the law of the land, along with unprecedented tax relief for small businesses, farmers, workers, and families." Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "The deduction is set to expire in 2028. Whether it stays or goes will depend on the political climate. Expect this to be used as a political talking point in upcoming elections, with both sides dangling senior tax savings as a way to win votes." What Happens Next Seniors will start benefiting from the tax deduction in 2026, but experts are warning that it could further escalate Social Security's funding problems, as the agency is set to run out of money for full benefits by 2033. "While this certainly could benefit some seniors, it could further escalate problems with solvency," Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek. "With Social Security's funding scheduled to encounter a shortfall in the next few years, worries over further additions for existing beneficiaries and future ones, while certainly good for those individuals, could further complicate the long-term viability of the program. Legislators will have to examine how these tax benefits can be balanced down the line to accommodate present and future enrollees."
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Woman Thrifts Designer Top for $13, Stunned When She Discovers Retail Value
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A thrift-store fashionista has offered a glimpse of what she believes might be her "craziest" find of recent times. Roms Mason, from London in the U.K., took to her TikTok, @relovedwithroms, to reveal the bargain she stumbled upon while browsing the rails of an RSPCA charity shop in Stoke Newington. Mason has a keen eye for spotting designer pieces in thrift stores. and has cultivated a significant following on social media through her love of fashion. "Growing up, I used fashion and clothing as a way to show my personality," Mason told Newsweek. "Obviously, at 13, I didn't have a lot of money, so buying designer items secondhand and for low prices was the only way to build a designer wardrobe." In more-recent times, resale platforms such as Vinted and eBay have given Mason even more of an opportunity to hone her craft and eye for a good bargain. "My recent best finds are a Prada bag for £20 on Vinted and a Issey Miyake Pleats Please jacket for £20," Mason said. "I also look for brands with distinct quality and styles. I find it quite easy to tell by touch and the feel of a material if it might be something special." The demand for secondhand apparel is on the rise. Statista says that the global secondhand apparel market was estimated to be worth $227 billion in 2024, with that figure forecast to rise to $379 billion by 2027. Videos like the ones Mason shares online are only likely to further increase the number of people heading out to thrift designer bargains. This most-recent find is a prime example of that: a JW Anderson chevron knit top that normally retails for £683 ($922) but was on sale for just £10 ($13) at the RSPCA store. "My wardrobe is quite monochrome, so I tend to look through black and white pieces first and go from there," Mason said. From the moment she laid her hands on it, Mason could tell the top was the real deal. "It's super thick so, as soon as I touched it, I knew it was good quality," she said. However, Mason was shocked when she looked at the label and realized who had designed it. "Jonathan Anderson is one of the most-influential designers of this century; his work with Loewe was revolutionary. I'm chuffed [excited] to own a piece from his personal brand," Mason said. While this kind of thrift-store find might be a surprise to most, Mason said that Stoke Newington is a "creative hub" in London, so it is not a huge shock to find something like this here. As for how the garment ended up there, she said that "it could be anything from an original sample to just someone's unwanted fashion item." Given the disparity between the retail price and what she purchased it for, it would be understandable if Mason chose to sell the top on at a handsome profit, but she is unsure. "It will depend if I wear it or not! I normally keep things for about a year, and if I don't reach for it often, I would sell it on to a more-loving home," Mason said. "However, just because the retail value is £600, that doesn't necessarily mean I'd be able to sell it for anything close to that." Though this does standout as one of her best thrift-store finds of recent times, Mason said she has found even-better bargains. "My best finds overall are probably a Pleats Please dress for £6 or a Christian Dior top for $5 when thrifting in America," she said. "I love to thrift in different countries and places—you never know what you're going to find!" Mason may also be on the lookout for designer goods, but she said she hopes her videos inspire others to realize that "fashion isn't exclusive to the 'wealthy' and is also not limited to designer brands." "Style is so deeply personal," Mason said. "It can reflect your political and ethical beliefs; you also don't need to be wearing 'expensive' or designer clothing to be considered fashionable."
