UAE Golden Visa vs. US Trump Card 2025: What they offer and which one is right for you
TL;DR
UAE
offers a flexible, fast, and renewable 10-year residency visa with broad eligibility across investors, talents, entrepreneurs, and students.
The
Trump Gold Card
is a proposed $5 million investment-based US. residency program promising permanent residence and eventual citizenship, but it is not yet officially launched.
UAE's real estate investment threshold is around $545,000 with no job creation required, while the US. program requires a $5 million investment aimed at economic impact without strict project mandates.
UAE's visa process is typically faster and less bureaucratic; the US. program involves complex immigration procedures and awaits legislative approval.
UAE currently has no personal income tax; the US. tax structure for
Gold Card
holders is expected to include global income taxation, though specifics are not yet confirmed.
As competition among nations for global talent and capital intensifies, the UAE and the United States have taken two starkly different approaches to long-term residency. The UAE has quietly expanded its Golden Visa into one of the most inclusive and flexible programs in the world.
Meanwhile, US. President
Donald Trump
has proposed a high-stakes reboot of American investor immigration: the so-called 'Gold Card', or Trump Card, priced at $5 million and pitched as a fiscal fix for America's mounting debt.
Which model better serves the ambitions of global investors, entrepreneurs, and professionals?
1. What each program offers?
UAE Golden Visa
:
A 5- or 10-year renewable residence visa for investors, professionals, academics, creatives, top students, and even humanitarian workers. No sponsor required. Full freedom to live, work, and study anywhere in the UAE. Eligible applicants can include spouses, children (regardless of age), and unlimited domestic workers. You can live abroad and retain the visa.
Trump's 'Gold Card' (US.)
:
Announced in 2025 but not yet launched, the Gold Card proposes permanent US. residency for a $5 million direct investment, not tied to any specific business or job creation mandate. Unlike the EB-5 visa, this plan emphasizes economic contribution via capital and taxes, with a pathway to eventual citizenship. Trump claims the program would help the US. reduce its deficit and create jobs indirectly.
While the UAE's Golden Visa is fully operational and expanding in scope, the US. Gold Card remains conceptual, and would likely require Congressional approval.
Winner: UAE - for certainty, clarity, and diversity of eligibility.
US. - still under proposal and subject to legislative hurdles.
2. P
roperty-based entry: Which is more accessible?
UAE
:
Invest AED 2 million (~USD 545,000) in property — off-plan, mortgaged, or completed — from approved developers, and you qualify for a 5-year Golden Visa. Co-ownership is allowed. There is
no job creation requirement
, and mortgages are permitted if sourced from specific UAE banks.
US. (EB-5 legacy; Trump Gold Card doesn't mandate real estate)
:
EB-5 requires $800,000 (in a Targeted Employment Area) or $1.05 million elsewhere, tied to a project that must create at least 10 full-time jobs. The Gold Card, in contrast, does not require investment in real estate or any project at all, the funds would go directly to the government.
Winner: UAE - lower threshold, faster approvals, fewer conditions.
3. Efficiency check: who cuts through the red tape?
UAE:
Application can be submitted digitally via platforms like the Dubai REST App or through the General Directorate of Residency.
In-principle approvals sometimes issued within 48 hours. Full process can take as little as 2–4 weeks depending on the emirate.
US. Gold Card:
Still under proposal. While Trump claims it would be 'faster' than EB-5, no timeline is formalized. Legal experts say it would need legislative backing, and implementation could take months, or longer, post-approval.
Winner: UAE - for an existing, fully functioning process.
4. Lifestyle perks and tax burdens: Who has the edge?
UAE
:
No personal income tax. No capital gains tax. No inheritance tax. Residents are not taxed on worldwide income.
Highly developed infrastructure, safety, and air connectivity. Strong expat networks, especially for Indian and regional professionals.
US.
:
The Gold Card proposal does not clarify tax obligations. However, US.
Green Card
holders are typically subject to global income taxation by the IRS. Trump's team has emphasized the tax benefits to the US., suggesting that Gold Card holders will be contributing significant tax revenue.
Access to elite healthcare, education, and global markets remains a major pull.
Winner: UAE - on taxation and operational clarity.
US. - potentially valuable for access to institutions and business scale, but with more fiscal burden.
5. Political intention: What's the bigger picture?
UAE
:
Originally launched in 2019 for real estate investors, the Golden Visa has evolved into a national strategy for talent retention and diversification. Now includes 10+ categories, such as scientists, doctors, engineers, elite students, content creators, humanitarian workers, and more. This marks a deliberate shift toward meritocracy and innovation.
US. Trump Gold Card:
Described as a revenue-generating mechanism, aimed at high-net-worth individuals who would 'pay taxes, spend money, and create jobs,' not through mandated projects, but via economic presence. Trump has framed it as part of a larger plan to reduce the national debt. However, the plan is tightly linked to Trump's political platform and could face strong scrutiny in Congress.
Winner: UAE - neutral, technocratic, future-oriented.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Is it legal? How to get Internet without paying a subscription?
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
US. - economically ambitious, but politically entangled.
6. Family benefits and flexibility: Who gives you more freedom?
UAE:
Golden Visa holders can sponsor their spouses, children of any age, and unlimited domestic workers. Importantly, no minimum stay requirement, you can maintain the visa even if living abroad. Family members can remain even if the main holder passes away.
US. Gold Card:
Includes spouse and unmarried children under 21.
Green Card holders can travel abroad, but absences over six months may invite scrutiny, and stays beyond a year can complicate residency status.
Winner: UAE, for greater flexibility and peace of mind.
7. Passport power and travel freedom
UAE:
The
Emirati
passport ranks among the strongest globally, offering visa-free or visa-on-arrival access to 184 countries as of 2025. This includes the entire GCC, much of Europe (Schengen Area), Southeast Asia, and parts of South America, making it a strategic advantage for regional and global mobility.
US.:
The US. passport allows visa-free or visa-on-arrival access to 182 countries, covering most of Europe, the Americas, East Asia, and Oceania. It remains a powerful travel document with high global recognition and ease of movement.
Winner: UAE by a narrow margin, both passports are globally respected, but the UAE edges ahead in the latest rankings.
8. Residency rights vs. Citizenship path
UAE:
Golden Visa is a residency-only program, there is no automatic path to citizenship, even after a decade. Emirati citizenship is rare, granted by exception, usually to extraordinary individuals. Golden Visa holders can reside and work long-term but remain foreign residents.
US. Gold Card:
Offers a formal pathway to US. citizenship — typically 5 years of permanent residency followed by naturalization eligibility. If approved, cardholders would have full citizen rights, including voting, US. passport, and benefits.
Winner: US. - for those seeking second nationality or political participation.
UAE - better for those wanting permanent base without nationality change.
9. Eligibility scope and inclusiveness
UAE
:
The Golden Visa now covers over 10 distinct categories, from real estate investors to humanitarian workers, high-GPA students, medical professionals, engineers, content creators, and even e-sports athletes. It reflects the UAE's intent to build a knowledge economy by attracting talent across all layers of society, not just capital.
US. Gold Card
:
Currently positioned exclusively for ultra-high-net-worth individuals with a $5 million threshold. No provisions yet for students, professionals, or talents without capital. The underlying premise is capital injection, not sectoral contribution.
Winner: UAE - for broader societal integration and sectoral diversity.
Final word:
The UAE Golden Visa is an evolving, inclusive, and functioning residency platform, designed to attract not just capital, but global talent across sectors, with speed, tax advantages, and minimal bureaucracy.
The US. Gold Card, by contrast, is a bold and untested fiscal concept. While its $5 million price tag signals exclusivity, its real value lies in access to US. institutions and eventual citizenship, if and when it becomes law.
In truth, the programs aren't competing for the same person, they're serving different ambitions. The UAE is building a future-ready society. The US., through Trump's lens, is trying to bankroll its present.
FAQs:
Q What is a golden visa?
It is a long-term residency permit for investors, professionals, or talents in a country.
Q How long does it take to get residency in UAE and US?
UAE residency can be granted within weeks; the US process usually takes several months to years.
Q Can I work and study with these visas?
Yes, both UAE golden visa and US green card allow work and study.
Q Can my family join me?
Both programs allow family sponsorship, but eligibility and duration vary.
Q Will I have to pay taxes as a resident?
UAE currently has no personal income tax; US residents are generally taxed on their worldwide income, though specifics on new visa programs remain unconfirmed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
30 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump reignites feud with London Mayor Sadiq Khan, calls him ‘nasty person'
US President Donald Trump, on Monday (July 27), took a swipe at London Mayor Sadiq Khan, calling him a 'nasty person' who has done a 'terrible job' during a news conference in Scotland. On being asked by a reporter if he would come to London in September for a state visit, Trump said, 'I'm not a fan of your mayor. I think he's done a terrible job.' 'The Mayor of London… a nasty person,' he said, reigniting his feud with Khan. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, visibly caught off guard, interjected, describing Khan as his 'friend'. 'He's a friend of mine, actually,' he said. Despite Starmer's defence, Trump remained critical, stating, 'I think he's done a terrible job. But I would certainly visit London.' 🚨🎥 WATCH: Donald Trump says Sadiq Khan is a 'nasty person' who has done a 'terrible job' as London Mayor Starmer: 'He's a friend of mine actually' — Politics UK (@PolitlcsUK) July 28, 2025 Khan's response to Trump's jibe In a statement issued later on Monday (July 28), a spokesperson for Khan said the mayor was 'delighted that President Trump wants to come to the greatest city in the world'. 'He'd see how our diversity makes us stronger, not weaker; richer, not poorer. Perhaps these are the reasons why a record number of Americans have applied for British citizenship under his Presidency,' the spokesperson further added. Trump and Khan have had a turbulent past with the two indulging in war of words on several occasions. In a podcast recorded before Trump's re-election in November 2024, Khan accused the incoming president of targeting him because of his ethnicity and religion. 'It's personal, let's be frank. If I wasn't this colour skin, if I wasn't a practising Muslim, he wouldn't have come for me,' he said. The London mayor, during Trump's first term, called out the US president over his stance on immigration and travel ban targeting Muslim-majority nations. In return, the US president accused Khan of doing a 'very bad job on terrorism', calling him 'very dumb' and a 'stone cold loser'. (With inputs from agencies)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
30 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India overtakes China to become world's top smartphone maker for the US
India has overtaken China to become the leading exporter of smartphone devices sold in the United States, driven by Apple Inc's decision to scale up iPhone assembly in the country. Shipments from India accounted for 44 per cent of the US market in the quarter ending June 2025, according to data from Canalys. Vietnam, home to most of Samsung Electronics Co's production, ranked second. In contrast, China's share of estimated shipments plummeted from over 60 per cent a year ago to just 25 per cent. Apple's India manufacturing push The shift is a result of Apple increasing its manufacturing capacity in India, alongside broader efforts by smartphone makers to 'frontload device inventories amid tariff concerns,' Canalys researchers wrote. The number of smartphones manufactured in India more than tripled compared to the same period last year. Although Apple's iPhone shipments to the US fell by 11 per cent, this decline was attributed to earlier-than-usual bulk shipments. India-made iPhone output rises to $22 bn Apple assembled iPhones worth $22 billion in India in the 12 months ending March, marking a nearly 60 per cent rise from the previous year. Most of these devices were produced at Foxconn Technology Group's facility. Tata Group's electronics arm, which recently acquired Wistron Corp and oversees Pegatron Corp's operations, has also become a major supplier. Trump seeks manufacturing jobs in US Apple and other technology companies have been gradually moving production away from China to reduce risks associated with tariffs and rising geopolitical tensions. India and Vietnam have become prominent alternatives in this strategy. This shift has drawn criticism from US President Donald Trump, who has been urging firms to bring manufacturing jobs back to the United States. Despite its global diversification, Apple continues to manufacture most of its iPhones in China and has no smartphone production in the US. However, the company has committed to hiring more domestically and investing $500 billion in the US over the next four years. China disrupts Apple's India expansion efforts Apple's shift towards India has not gone unnoticed by Chinese authorities. The Chinese government has reportedly taken steps to undermine Apple's competitive advantage abroad. Around a year ago, it delayed approvals for machinery Apple needed to import for iPhone production in India. In a more recent move, Chinese Customs indefinitely withheld machines required for retrofitting assembly lines to manufacture the forthcoming iPhone 17. Additionally, Beijing pressured Foxconn to withdraw over 300 Chinese engineers and technicians from its facilities in India. These experts were initially deployed to assist with technology transfer and worker training.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
30 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Iraq's PM Al-Sudani seeks closer US ties while keeping armed groups at bay
The prime minister of Iraq has kept his country on the sidelines as military conflicts raged nearby for almost two years. This required balancing Iraq's relations with two countries vital to his power and enemies with each other: the US and Iran. The feat became especially difficult last month when war broke out between Israel, a US ally, and Iran and the US struck Iranian nuclear sites. Mohammed Shia al-Sudani said he used a mix of political and military pressure to stop armed groups aligned with Iran from entering the fray. In an exclusive interview with The Associated Press, Al-Sudani explains how he did this, how he plans to keep these groups in check going forward and as he seeks a second term why he wants to get closer to the Trump administration, even as he maintains strong ties to Iran-backed political parties that helped propel him to power in 2022. Staying on the sidelines as Israel and Iran traded blows After Israel launched airstrikes on Iran and it responded by firing missiles at Tel Aviv, armed groups in Iraq attempted to launch missiles and drones toward Israel and at bases in Iraq housing US troops, al-Sudani said. But they were thwarted 29 times by Iraqi government security operations that he did not detail. We know that the (Israeli) government had a policy and still does of expanding the war in the region, al-Sudani said. Therefore, we made sure not to give any justification to any party to target Iraq." Al-Sudani said his government also reached out to leaders in Iran "to urge them toward calm and to make room for dialogue and a return to negotiations." The future of the US presence in Iraq is in flux The US and Iraq last year announced an agreement to wrap up the mission of an American-led coalition in Iraq fighting the Islamic State and in March al-Sudani announced that the head of IS in Iraq and Syria had been killed in a joint Iraqi-US operation. The first phase of the coalition's drawdown was supposed to be completed by September 2025, but there has been little sign of it happening. Al-Sudani said the US and Iraq will meet by the end of the year to arrange the bilateral security relationship between the two countries. He also hopes to secure US economic investment in oil and gas, and also artificial intelligence which he said would contribute to regional security and make the two countries great together." A variety of militias sprung up in Iraq in the years after the 2003 US invasion that toppled former autocratic leader Saddam Hussein. And since the war between Israel and Hamas began in October 2023, sparking regionwide conflicts, an array of pro-Iran armed factions have periodically launched strikes on bases housing US troops. Al-Sudani said the presence of the coalition forces had provided a justification for Iraqi groups to arm themselves, but that once the coalition withdrawal is complete, there will be no need or no justification for any group to carry weapons outside the scope of the state." The fate of Iran-backed militias in Iraq is unclear One of the most complicated issues for al-Sudani is how to handle the Popular Mobilization Forces, a coalition of mostly Shiite, Iran-backed militias that formed to fight IS. This coalition was formally placed under the control of the Iraqi military in 2016, although in practice it still operates with significant autonomy. The Iraqi parliament is discussing legislation that would solidify the relationship between the military and the PMF, drawing objections from Washington. The State Department said in a statement last week that the legislation would institutionalise Iranian influence and armed terrorist groups undermining Iraq's sovereignty. Al-Sudani defended the proposed legislation, saying it's part of an effort to ensure that arms are controlled by the state. Security agencies must operate under laws and be subject to them and be held accountable," he said. Indications of weak state authority In recent weeks, a series of drone attacks have targeted oil facilities in northern Iraq's semiautonomous Kurdish region. Kurdish regional authorities accused groups in the PMF of carrying out the attacks. Authorities in Baghdad disputed this, but haven't assigned blame. Al-Sudani called the attacks a terrorist act and said his government is working with Kurdish authorities and coalition forces to identify those responsible and hold them accountable. Just as the drone attacks have called into question Baghdad's control over armed groups, so has the case of Israeli-Russian researcher Elizabeth Tsurkov, who went missing in Iraq in 2023. Her family believes she is being held by the Iraqi militia Kataib Hezbollah, and there have reportedly been US-mediated negotiations to negotiate her release. Al-Sudani did not name the group responsible for Tsurkov's kidnapping, but he pushed back against the idea that his government has not made serious efforts to free her. He said his government has a team dedicated to finding her. We do not negotiate with gangs and kidnappers, he said, but the team has been in discussions with political factions that might be able to help locate her. Rebuilding relations with Damascus Relations between Iraq and the new government in Syria have been tenuous since the fall of former President Bashar Assad in December, after a lightning offensive led by Sunni Islamist insurgents. Syria's interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa was formerly known by the nom de guerre Abu Mohammed al-Golani. He once joined the ranks of al-Qaida insurgents battling US forces in Iraq after the US-led invasion in 2003. Al-Sharaa still faces a warrant for his arrest on terrorism charges in Iraq. Al-Sharaa has since broken with al-Qaida and has fought against the Islamic State. Al-Sudani said his government is coordinating with the new Syrian government, particularly on security matters. We and the administration in Syria certainly have a common enemy, ISIS, which is clearly and openly present inside Syria, he said. Al-Sudani said his government has warned the Syrians against the mistakes that occurred in Iraq after Saddam's fall, when the ensuing security vacuum spawned years of sectarian violence and the rise of armed extremist groups. In recent weeks, sectarian violence in Syria has shaken the country's fragile postwar recovery. Al-Sudani called for Syria's current leadership to pursue a comprehensive political process that includes all components and communities. We do not want Syria to be divided," he said. "This is unacceptable and we certainly do not want any foreign presence on Syrian soil, apparently alluding to Israel's incursions into southern Syria.
