Every Woman The Late John F. Kennedy Ever Loved
A look at John F. Kennedy's relationships
John, born in 1917, was the first Roman Catholic to be elected president. He served for two years before he was fatally shot and killed in Dallas, Texas, in 1963, leaving behind his wife, Jackie, and their two kids. And while their family and relationship might have seemed picture perfect on the outside, there were several different hurdles that the Kennedys faced, including a stillborn birth, a miscarriage, affairs and more—all of which were heavily publicized and discussed in the media. However, not everything discussed was true, and as of publication, the relationships below are the ones that historians believe to be accurate.
Jackie Kennedy Onassis (1953 to 1963)
John and Jackie—whose last name was Bouvier at the time—met in 1952 when he was a senator and she was a reporter. They fell in love, got engaged and married a year later.
Flash forward to 1955 when the couple suffered a tragic miscarriage, which was then followed a year later by their daughter Arabella being stillborn. John wasn't even present forthe birth as he was on a yacht at the time, and Jackie was reportedly so mad she almost divorced him, but her sister Lee Radziwill talked her out of it.
Following that, Jackie and John welcomed three children together–Caroline Kennedy, John F. Kennedy Jr. and Patrick Bouvier Kennedy—the latter of whom died after just two days in 1963.
"After the death of Patrick, the other agents and I noticed a distinctly closer relationship, openly expressed, between the president and Mrs. Kennedy," Jackie's secret service agent, Clint Hill, wrote in his 2012 memoir, Mrs. Kennedy and Me. 'Prior to this, they were much more restrained and less willing to express their close, loving relationship while out in public. The loss of Patrick seemed to be the catalyst to change all that."
The couple remained together until John's death in 1963. Following that, Jackie married a man named Aristotle Onassis in 1968, with whom she remained until her death in 1994. She was 64 at the time, and died from cancer.
"Jackie Kennedy Onassis was a model of courage and dignity for all Americans and all the world," former President Bill Clinton said in a statement at the time. "More than any other woman of her time, she captivated our nation and the world with her intelligence, her elegance and her grace. Even in the face of an impossible tragedy, she carried the grief of her family and our entire nation with a calm power that somehow reassured all of us who mourned."
John, Jackie, Arabella and Patrick are all buried next to each other at Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia and historians now believe that Jackie did know about her husband's affairs.
Joan Lundberg (1956 to 1960)
Joan Lundberg was a flight attendant who met John in 1956 and then became close to him after the death of Arabella left him feeling isolated from the rest of his family. She became pregnant in 1958; however, John mailed her some money to terminate the pregnancy. Their relationship ended in 1960 after he was elected president.
'The trauma of his [John] death was devastating on many levels," her son Zachary Hitchcock. said, per People. 'She lost a friend, a companion— the mere mention of John F. Kennedy would bring her tears. There was a lot of love and a lot of sadness and a lot of loss.
'The relationship encompassed friendship, romance, intellect—she adored him. They had an adventure together. It's funny how this girl from Racine, my mom, made an impact. She always spoke of him with fondness and affection. She loved, respected and missed him dearly."
Lundberg died in 1983 from cirrhosis of the liver. She was 49.
Judith Exner (1960s)
Judith Exner and John dated for two and a half years before officially ending things in 1962. They met after she served as a middleman for JFK and Frank Sinatra's mobster friend Sam Giancana. She then went on to claim that John got her pregnant and insisted she have an abortion.
'For the past 25 years, I have been terrified to tell the truth about my relationship with Jack Kennedy. In fact, I've gone to great lengths to keep the truth from ever coming out, which is probably the only reason I'm alive today,' Exner told People in a late 1980s interview. 'With the exception of Sinatra, all the key figures involved in my story have been murdered.'
Exner then died in 1999 at age 65 from breast cancer, and to this day, people still wonder if her and John's mob ties are what led to his murder.
Mary Pinchot Meyer (1961)
Mary Pinchot Meyer was the sister-in-law of Washington Post executive editor Ben Bradlee, who was believed to have had an affair with John at some point in 1961.
"Why don't you leave suburbia for once — come and see me — either here — or at the Cape next week or in Boston the 19th," John reportedly wrote in a letter to Meyer, which was sold at auction in 2016. "I know it is unwise, irrational and that you may hate it — on the other hand, you may not—and I will love it.
'You say that it is good for me not to get what I want. After all of these years, you should give me a more loving answer than that. Why don't you just say yes?"
Meyer was shot and killed in October 1964 and several people believe that the Kennedy family orchestrated her death to keep the affair from coming out and destroying their legacy.
Mimi Alford (1962)
Mimi Alford was a White House intern in 1962, and in her 2012 memoir Once Upon a Secret: My Affair With John F. Kennedy and Its Aftermath, she detailed that she and the president had an 18-month-long affair that ended after he shared that he wasn't willing to end his marriage. At the beginning of it all she was 19 and he was 44.
'It may be hard to accept that a chaste teenage girl can end up in bed with the President of the United States on her fourth day in the White House,' Alford wrote. 'Living with a secret had stunted me emotionally, and I realize now that my letters were only tentative steps at understanding. Taking complete control would demand intense self-reflection, and not just beginning and ending with my time at the White House.
'This book represents a private story, but one that happens to have a public face. And I do not want the public face of this story—the one where I will be remembered solely as a presidential plaything—to define me.'
Alford is still alive and lives in New York City. She is 82 years old.
Marilyn Monroe (1962)
John's affair with Monroe (The Seven Year Itch and Gentlemen Prefer Blondes) is one of the most talked-about relationships throughout all of history. It started when she gave him a rather seductive performance of 'Happy Birthday' in May 1962. After that, the rumors began to spiral, and when Monroe died in August of that year, people began to wonder if John and his brother Robert 'Bobby' F. Kennedy had anything to do with it.
"It was pretty clear that Marilyn had sexual relations with both Bobby and Jack," biographer James Spada said, per People. He also claimed that Monroe met John in 1954 and when he grew tired of her, he passed her on to his brother Robert in the spring of 1962.
There are also reports that Monroe and Robert were heard screaming at each other on the night of her death, but those were never proven.
'The Kennedy's could not risk this coming out, because it could have brought down the President,' Spada said in that same People article. 'But the cover-up that was designed to prevent anyone from finding out that Marilyn was involved intimately with the Kennedy family has been misinterpreted as a cover-up of their having murdered her.'
For more couples content, keep scrolling!
Brad, Ben, Chris: A Look Back at Gwyneth Paltrow's Fascinating Relationship History
Pamela Anderson's Full Relationship Timeline—From Rock Stars to Rumored Flame Liam Neeson
Surprise! Zac Brown, 46, is Engaged to Jewelry Designer Kendra Scott, 51: All About Their Whirlwind Romance
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Amid Drastic Weight Loss Accusations, People Are Now Claiming Serena Williams Wants To Glorify European Beauty Standards, And It's Absurd
Serena Williams's body transformation is under scrutiny once again, and it's really getting out of hand. Conversations around Serena's weight change began last month, when she shared a few gym selfies that showed off her washboard abs, toned arms, and a noticeably thinner figure. View this photo on Instagram After the tennis star posted the images, several commenters accused her of using Ozempic, while others claimed she looked completely unrecognizable: Related: But despite the remarks, Serena also had a ton of people supporting her and calling out the criticism: And although many fans flooded her comments with positivity, unfortunately, it didn't stop others from continuing to spread negativity by attacking her physical appearance. On Sunday, the 43-year-old mother of two did what any woman would do if she saw a mirror while really feeling her outfit — she took a mirror selfie and shared it with the world. But the selfies seemed to trigger some people on the internet. View this photo on Instagram Related: There were those who brought up Ozempic again... ...while others believed Serena was trying to adhere to Eurocentric beauty standards like being slim and blonde, while also feeding into Hollywood's stereotypical ideals for women. Related: The conversations around Black women and hair have always been complicated for many non-Black people, when it's really pretty simple. Women in general love trying new hairstyles, but Black women in particular seem to receive the most backlash simply for expressing themselves. Whether it's the frequency at which we switch between styles, the colors we wear, the hair that we add or remove from our heads, the accessories we wear in them, or the actual look of the hairdos, it's often viewed under a negative light until someone else does it. It happened when Serena first hit the court sporting colorful beads in her hair, and it's still happening today with blonde hair that she's been rocking for over a decade. But alleging that Serena wearing a specific hair color is a form of "white appropriation" is just weird and harmful. I also believe this way of thinking is rooted in ignorance, in the sense that someone who isn't familiar with how deep-rooted experimentation with hair in the Black community is, and how it was once used to signify status, a way to take a political stance, and more. Before I go on a tangent, let's get back to Serena! Outside of the backlash, the Olympian also had a string of supporters who rallied behind her: Related: It almost feels like a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" situation because she was scrutinized for her physical build the majority of her career, because she was "bigger" than other women in the sport. Now that she's smaller, she's still being criticized. And while Serena has yet to address the negativity, I feel it's important to shine a light on these discussions that happen around women's bodies in hopes of changing the way we approach them. Now, I know people like to use the excuse that celebrities "signed up" to be judged, but there has to be a line. They are still human at the end of the day. They don't deserve hate or to live up to the ideas of them that you've created in your mind. So, can we all please try to practice discernment and kindness a little more? Also in Celebrity: Also in Celebrity: Also in Celebrity:
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Some call the Sussexes' Netflix deal a demotion - but the company still sees them as a power couple
While we're all desperate to know what this new deal is really worth in dollars and pounds, one thing I can tell you for certain is that Prince Harry and Meghan want us to know they're delighted that Netflix again wanted to get a deal done. "Absolutely over the moon" is how it was described to me. But they'll also be aware of the attention it'll attract as we all try to pick apart what it means. Firstly because of that ongoing fascination in how they're making money since stepping away from royal life and losing financial support from the King, but also because of the recent reports that Netflix were intending to cut ties. Yes this is a different type of deal from their original one in 2020. Some have argued that a "first look deal" looks like a demotion from what they previously signed up to. With no real clarity on how much their original deal was worth, and no numbers being publicly thrown around this time, that is hard to judge. But talking to those who know something about these kinds of deals you do get a sense it could potentially be more lucrative than it looks on face value. With first look deals, yes there is often financial commitments from the likes of Netflix to get that first exclusive look at projects and first refusal. But there could be other significant monetary incentives for the Sussexes to sign. For example, when the Obamas signed a first look deal with Netflix, the streaming service agreed to pay the operational costs for their production company "Higher Ground". Could it be that Netflix are also now covering the costs of Archewell Productions? It's stating the obvious to say that Harry and Meghan continue to divide opinions, some wanting to watch their programmes from a place of respect and fondness, others as a reason to grumble about them. But signing on this latest dotted line shows Netflix still sees them as a power couple, who attract significant attention and are worthy of investment, whatever that really adds up to.
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
When late-night missed calls from your kid send you into panic mode — and the ‘emergency' turns out to be a login code
There's a special kind of panic reserved for parents who wake up to five missed calls from their kid at 2 AM. Your heart doesn't just skip a beat—it does a full Olympic floor routine complete with back handsprings and a dismount that lands you bolt upright, fumbling for your phone with shaking hands. After ten years of co-parenting and nearly two decades of motherhood, I've mastered the art of sleeping with one ear open and my phone perpetually charged next to my pillow. My kids know the rules: you don't rapid-fire call Mom unless you're literally on fire or being kidnapped. So when I see those missed calls lined up like dominos of doom, my brain immediately cycles through every worst-case scenario faster than you can say 'emergency room.' Car accident. Mental health crisis. Arrest. (Though let's be honest, if bail money was needed, they'd probably call their stepdad first—I'm off the hook there.) The possibilities are endless and terrifying, each one more catastrophic than the last. But here's the thing about parenting teenagers in 2025: nine times out of ten, that 'emergency' is actually a two-factor authentication code for Disney+ that I received in my email while they're trying to binge-watch something at their friend's house. Welcome to the modern parenting rite of passage nobody prepared us for. The great authentication panic of our time I'm not alone in this particular brand of heart palpitations. A recent TikTok from mom Meredith Thornton perfectly captured this phenomenon—waking up to multiple missed calls from her 18-year-old son Van, only to discover he needed a Microsoft code. The video has racked up over 5 million views because, apparently, we're all living the same chaotic life. The comments section reads like a support group for parents with streaming-service-induced PTSD: 'Girl!! 11 messages from my son asking about Roblox code and I'm thinking he been kidnapped,' shared Nikki1725, who clearly understands the struggle. The_Dolly_Mama summed it up perfectly: 'Panic, Relief, Rage.' That's the emotional trifecta right there—the full journey from terror to thank-God-you're-alive to are-you-kidding-me-right-now. My personal favorite came from MJMax, who shared: 'You ever get the 'MOM' else just MOM and you try to call back in a panic and your fingers can't move fast enough and you finally get ahold of them and they ask how long they air fry onion rings.' Because apparently kitchen emergencies can't wait until morning. Even Microsoft 365's official account chimed in with 'No bc we get it ,' proving that somewhere in their corporate offices, there's probably a parent who designed those 12-minute code expiration times just to torture us. Related: Toddler calls 911 for 'emergency donuts'—you won't believe how dispatch responded The photo that says it all What really gets me about Thornton's video is her contact photo for Van—it's still him as a little kid. She clarified in the comments that he's 18 now, but he'll always be that little to her. I felt that in my soul. My almost-20-year-old is still saved in my phone as a 9-year-old with a mop of curls snuggling his little sister. Every time I try to update it, I just… can't. That's my baby calling, even when he's six-foot-four and asking for the Hulu password. When technology fails our anxiety The irony isn't lost on me that we have all this amazing technology—smartphones that can do everything except make a decent cup of coffee—yet nothing will ever compare to the reliability of a corded landline for middle-of-the-night emergencies. Remember that sound? That hearty, heart-stopping ring that could wake the neighbors three houses down? You knew exactly where that phone was, and when it rang at 2 AM, you didn't have to wonder if your ringer was on or if your phone was buried somewhere in the couch cushions. Now we're at the mercy of silent modes, Do Not Disturb settings, and phones that somehow end up in the refrigerator. (Don't ask.) Related: Parents back classroom phone bans—but here's why many moms still feel uneasy The emergency bypass: A parent's best friend Here's where I'm going to save your sanity and possibly your cardiovascular health: there's actually a simple solution to this madness. Go to your kid's contact info, select their ringtone and text, and toggle on Emergency Bypass. This magical little toggle means their calls will get through even when your phone is on silent or Do Not Disturb mode. Will they still call you at ungodly hours for streaming codes? Absolutely. But at least you'll hear it immediately instead of waking up to that wall of missed calls that makes you question every parenting decision you've ever made. The flip side of the coin Of course, this works both ways. Willow Hill – Labrabull shared that her own mother called her at 10:30 PM on a Sunday night, sending her into full panic mode as she jumped up to grab her charging phone… only to be told that 'Wawa has the $5 breakfast combo.' Because apparently good deals also can't wait until morning. It's a reminder that we're all just trying to stay connected in a world where 'urgent' has become relative, and the line between actual emergency and 'I need this right now' has gotten blurrier than my vision without my reading glasses. Finding the humor in the heart attacks At the end of the day, these moments of panic followed by relief (and yes, a little rage) are just part of the gig. We signed up for sleepless nights when we became parents—we just thought they'd end when our kids stopped needing 3 AM diaper changes, not start up again because Netflix logged them out. But here's what I've learned: even when it's 'just' a streaming code, the fact that they're calling us means something. In a world where kids communicate primarily through memes and emojis, a phone call—even one that makes us question our life choices—is still connection. They're still reaching out when they need something, even if that something is access to The Office for the thousandth time. So tonight, when you're lying in bed and your phone buzzes with that familiar panic-inducing sequence of calls, take a deep breath. Check the Emergency Bypass settings. And maybe keep a mental list of all your streaming passwords handy. Because if there's one thing I've learned in nearly 20 years of parenting, it's that the codes are always only good for 12 minutes, and they'll always expire at the exact moment your kid needs them most. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go write down the HBO Max password. Again. Solve the daily Crossword