
Chelsea escape humiliation but Ipswich draw raises worrying issues
Enzo Maresca was facing surely the worst defeat of his tenure when Julio Enciso's tap-in and Ben Johnson's header put struggling Ipswich in sight of a famous win that would have kept alive their faint hopes of avoiding relegation from the Premier League.
Chelsea hit back and reduced the arrears in the first minute after half-time, Marc Cucurella 's presence at the near post forcing an own goal from Axel Tuanzebe, before Sancho sent relief around the ground by curling in his first goal since December.
The Blues will still see the result as two points dropped in the race for Champions League qualification, however.
Nicolas Jackson struck a post in the eighth minute after being set up by Enzo Fernandez's cut-back, then Noni Madueke brought a near-post save from Alex Palmer following Pedro Neto's neat, deep cross.
Ipswich's goalkeeper was alert to fling himself and get two hands on Levi Colwill's close-range header as Chelsea piled on huge early pressure and the visitors struggled to draw breath.
And so it was from nowhere that Ipswich went in front. Enciso had scored a stunning 30-yard effort on this ground for Brighton in April 2023 and, though this was a less spectacular finish, it had a similar impact.
George Hirst carried the ball forward and moved it wide for Johnson, whose low cross from the right was highly inviting, leaving Enciso to simply put out a foot and guide it past Robert Sanchez.
There was then the highly unusual sight of Sanchez shooing his defenders upfield at a goal-kick, bypassing Maresca's preferred build-up play.
Sanchez hoofed it long and the ball came straight back at Chelsea, Jack Clarke driving on and finding Enciso, who crossed to the far post where Johnson was waiting to nod home.
The flag immediately went up against Enciso, but the new semi-automated offside system intervened and Ipswich were two up.
The boos that greeted Chelsea as they left the pitch at half-time were the biggest noise the home fans had mustered to that point, but it was eclipsed 18 seconds into the second half when their team began their fightback.
Straight from kick-off Fernandez moved the ball wide on the right to Madueke, who ran it to the byline and pulled back for Cucurella arriving at the near post to shovel it against Tuanzebe and in.
Hirst then came within a whisker of restoring the two-goal lead with a brilliant, swinging drive that flashed inches wide before moments later failing to make proper contact with a header when unmarked six yards out.
Sancho levelled 12 minutes from time to rescue Chelsea and his effort could not have landed much more perfectly in the top corner.
Trevoh Chalobah ought to have won it with a late header that he powered down into the ground and over the bar. Cole Palmer was then denied by a full-stretch save from his namesake in the Ipswich goal in stoppage time.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
He said what? Russell Martin's explanation for Rangers' horror show in Champions League play-off doesn't stand up to scrutiny...
The dust may have settled on Rangers ' Champions League horror show against Club Brugge on Tuesday night, but the anger from supporters shows no sign of subsiding any time soon. Russell Martin's side absolutely imploded during a wretched first half which saw the Belgians race into a 3-0 lead after only 20 minutes in the play-off tie. Rangers pulled a goal back through Danilo after the break but, ahead of next week's second leg, it now looks all but certain they will be eliminated and drop down to the Europa League. The atmosphere was both toxic and mutinous, with a growing section of the fanbase calling for Martin to be sacked already. Yet, beyond the performance itself, it was actually Martin's comments in the post-match media conference which seemed to infuriate supporters more than anything. Many felt that he was deflecting the blame and refusing to take any responsibility as manager, and a lot of what he said just didn't hold up to scrutiny. Here, Daily Mail Sport examines some of those comments from Martin and puts the Rangers boss under the microscope. 'I think there's been a fragility at this club for a long, long time, so it's not a new thing. Apart from one season, the club have had a lot of pain in the last 14 or 15 years.' That's a pretty sweeping generalisation and little more than a convenient excuse. Yeah, absolutely, in terms of their efforts on the *domestic* front, Rangers have had a torrid time of it over the past 15 years or so. The only real highlight has been winning the league title in season 2020-21. But in Europe, it's been a different story. Rangers have, by and large, actually been pretty good in Europe. It's been the main highlight for the club over recent seasons, barring one disastrous campaign in the Champions League in 2022. They have consistently reached the latter stages of the Europa League and a succession of managers — Steven Gerrard, Giovanni van Bronckhorst, Philippe Clement and Barry Ferguson — have all found a way of making them competitive in European football. That first-half capitulation simply doesn't happen under any of those previous managers. They knew how to set a team up in Europe, how to be pragmatic and competitive, whereas Martin's side simply fell apart. Brugge are a good side, but we're not talking about a prime Barcelona here. They're not a PSG or a Man City. There was no excuse for the way Rangers simply imploded during those opening 20 minutes. 'When you're 2-0 down after seven minutes, tactics don't come into it because for the next half an hour, I didn't really see anything we'd worked on. Really nothing. You can't impact anything from the sidelines at that point. You put a game plan in place to try and win the game, but the decision-making changes because we're so anxious. It's not about tactics and not about style of play, that's about the reaction emotionally to the damage that's been inflicted and we didn't respond well enough to it.' This is the stuff that really made alarm bells ring and caused such anger among the supporters. Martin was essentially shirking responsibility and refusing to accept any blame for the performance. He was adamant it was nothing to do with tactics or style of play. He was putting the focus on the players and on their emotional reaction after losing those early goals. How can he possibly argue that tactics don't come into it? The second goal came directly from a set-piece, as Jorne Spileers was left totally unmarked from a corner to side-foot the ball past Jack Butland. If an opposition player is left totally unmarked at a corner, that's a tactical issue. Whether it's man marking or zonal, it all forms part of your tactical game plan. Tactics aren't just a matter of what formation you play, or whether you look to dominate possession or play on the counter. For Martin to claim that he couldn't influence things from the touchline was laughable, to the point it actually insulted the intelligence of supporters. Making changes mid-game, whether to the shape or personnel, in order to help improve the performance? That's what good managers do. They are able to affect change from the touchline. That is, quite literally, a key part of Martin's job. He could have tweaked things and tried to shore up the midfield to make sure Rangers weren't so exposed, but he fundamentally failed to do so. 'I'm proud of the players. I think that was as hard as it will ever be for them in the first half.' Unfortunately for both Rangers and Martin, there's no telling how bad this might get, no guarantee that Tuesday night was rock bottom. Martin and his players have an Old Firm game in just over a week's time. If Celtic go to Ibrox and run riot like Brugge did in those opening 20 minutes, the place will be in total meltdown. The atmosphere was toxic at times against Brugge, with some fans leaving early whilst a scuffle broke out among others in the Bill Struth Main Stand. But as bad as it was, the level of mutiny and vitriol from the stands would increase tenfold if Celtic pitch up at Ibrox and go 3-0 up inside 20 minutes. Before they even get to Celtic, Rangers face St Mirren in Paisley on Sunday before travelling for the return leg in Brugge. On the basis of what we are seeing, it's hard to make a case for them beating St Mirren let alone winning away in Belgium. After the international break, they will then face Hearts and Hibs at Ibrox in successive weekends in the Premiership and Premier Sports Cup. It's a very, very tough run of games. Buckle your seatbelts, this could still get a whole lot worse. 'The precursor to change is pain very often. The club's bounced around with different ideas, different plans, really been hinged on emotion, making decisions just on a quick reaction. So now we have owners and a leadership team that understand where the club's been and where it's at and where it needs to go to. But they also understand that's not going to come without a bit of pain.' It sounded very much like Martin believes he's bulletproof. He sounded like a manager who has been given certain assurances from the club's new American owners. Clearly, he believes he will get time to turn this tanker around, and that no knee-jerk decisions will be made with regards to him being sacked. But those assurances will only last up to a certain point. Rangers can't keep spilling points in the league — and they certainly can't continue to leave themselves so exposed in Europe. Strip it back and look at it now on a game by game basis. If Rangers lose to St Mirren in Paisley on Sunday, Martin will be getting asked about his job. That's where we're at. Never a popular appointment in the first place, fans simply aren't buying what he's selling. The football has been dreadful so far, there's no good stuff to offset all the many other issues of concern. Right now, the 3-0 home win over a limited Viktoria Plzen side a couple of weeks ago looks like an anomaly. If this continues, the Americans are going to have a serious decision to make. It's not about knee-jerk decisions. It will be about them having the courage to admit they may have made a mistake, and rectifying it at the earliest opportunity. 'We've had some guys who have found the start tough. But tonight they came through brilliantly. Joe Rothwell's best game, Max's (Aarons) best game, Jayden (Meghoma) was fantastic. Danilo will be better for scoring. Gassama just grows every game. So there are loads for us to be excited about and positive about moving forward. The tie is not over. It's still alive. We will go over there as underdogs next week. I'll enjoy that and I think the players will as well.' Utter nonsense. This was the definition of a manager moving into the realms of total delusion. Especially in the cases of Rothwell and Aarons, Martin was trying to spin an alternative reality and pull the wool over punter's eyes. Plainly, it didn't work. Aarons has been absolutely abysmal since his loan move from Bournemouth. There was a slight degree of mitigation at the start since he was being played out of position at left-back. But he's now playing in his natural position at right-back and he still looks hopeless. Any time he has the ball, it goes either sideways or backwards. He has also been really ropey defensively and has been caught in possession far too much. Aarons was supposed to be an upgrade on James Tavernier, but he looks nowhere near it. Just another over-hyped dud from the English Premier League. Rothwell has been decent on the ball at times in some of the domestic fixtures, but he lacks the mobility and awareness to play as a holding midfielder in Europe. He looked swamped and out of his depth during the Brugge onslaught in the first half. As for Martin claiming the tie isn't over? Yeah, pull the other one. Only 24 hours previously, Martin had been asked about the fact many people viewed Brugge as favourites. 'I don't think we'd ever go into any game considering ourselves underdogs, for sure,' he said.

Leader Live
8 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Crystal Palace transfer news: Eberechi Eze and Marc Guehi to start in CL tie
The future of both men – heavily linked to Tottenham and Liverpool respectively – is set to remain a hot topic when Palace host the Norwegians at Selhurst Park. Guehi and Eze trained in Beckenham on Wednesday morning, and the Eagles boss bristled at the suggestion he – or any manager – should expect any less than full commitment from players still attached to a deal. 'It's always the right of a club and the duty of a player to give 100 per cent as long as he is under contract,' said Glasner. 'Before Chelsea, I think many of you were surprised that Marc and Ebs started and played almost the whole game. 'Most of you will be surprised that they will start again tomorrow because of all the rumours. But again, they are committed. 'They are committed to the team, they have a contract here, they played a crucial part that we could be so successful, and they will play a crucial part as long as they are here. 'Because they are good, they are committed to the team, and when one of the players leave, which I don't know at the moment, then they want to leave as players who always gave 100 per cent for Crystal Palace. "This is how we want to be, taking every single game seriously and always showing our personality. If we do this, we know we can be quite successful." 🎙️ The manager ahead of tomorrow night… — Crystal Palace F.C. (@CPFC) August 20, 2025 'This is what they did since they signed, and this is what we expect from them until the end of their contract, whenever this is.' Palace captain Guehi is under contract until next summer, while Eze's deal expires in 2027. A release clause in the region of £68million in Eze's contract expired on Friday and, despite further talks on Saturday, the England international played 84 minutes in the draw with Chelsea at the weekend. Glasner added: 'We are not talking every day to Marc and Ebs and also not kneeling down and saying 'oh, thank you that you arrived today'. 'No, we expect it, and they worked hard in training, before the training, after the training, professional, and that's why it's not a big issue here. 'Of course we know things can always happen. The window is not closed, but we really – and this is a credit to the players, to the group – they are always focused on what we have to do in our games. 'We started with the Community Shield, and this noise, these rumours, it's not just for three days, it's been written for weeks. 'They played the Community Shield and we won, and they played at Chelsea, and we drew, and they will play against Fredrikstad, and then let's see.' Palace goalkeeper Dean Henderson is not surprised by how Eze and Guehi have handled the noise around them. He said: 'I think the pair of them are great lads. They're so committed and so professional. It showed at Chelsea, getting to work, they were both phenomenal. 'I'm sure they will stay committed throughout and they're always here to help the team. They're part of us at the minute, so we will keep enjoying them.'


The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
When is the Champions League draw? Date, start time, teams qualified and how to watch live
Paris Saint-Germain defend their Champions League title this season with six Premier League teams eyeing glory at next year's final in Budapest. Liverpool, Arsenal, Manchester City, Fifa Club World Cup champions Chelsea, Newcastle and Europa League champions Tottenham will be in the draw. The Gunners reached the semi-finals last term, losing out to PSG 3-1 on aggregate after thrashing both PSV and Real Madrid before their final four exit. And Luis Enrique's side went on to thump Inter Milan 5-0 in the final and have since edged past Spurs on penalties in the Uefa Super Cup earlier this month, denying Thomas Frank a trophy in his first game in charge. Here's everything you need to know about the Champions League group stage draw: When is the Champions League 2025/26 group stage draw? The draw will be held in Monaco on Thursday, 28 August and begins at 6pm BST. How to watch live Champions League 2025/26 group stage draw will offer a live stream on their website and YouTube channel. How does the league phase draw work? The league phase has 36 teams with every team handed eight games. The 36 teams are split into four pots of eight teams based on their Uefa coefficient, with the opponents generated by automated software. The opponents then come from each pot, with two teams selected from each, one home and one away. Teams cannot play another team from the same country and are not permitted to face more than two teams from one country. Those finishing inside the top eight go straight into the last 16, then the next 16 teams advance to the play-off stage, with eight of those 16 teams progressing to the last 16. Who has qualified for the Champions League 2025/26 group stage? Pot 1: PSG, Real Madrid, Man City, Bayern Munich, Liverpool, Inter Milan, Chelsea, Borussia Dortmund, Barcelona Pot 2: Arsenal, Bayer Leverkusen, Atletico Madrid, Atalanta, Villarreal, Juventus, Eintracht Frankfurt Pot 2/3: Tottenham Pot 3: PSV, Ajax, Napoli, Sporting, Olympiacos, Slavia Prague, Marseille Pot 3/4: Monaco Pot 4: Galatasaray, Union Saint-Gilloise, Athletic Bilbao, Newcastle Champions League 2025/26 key dates Matchday 1: 16–18 September 2025 Matchday 2: 30 September–1 October 2025 Matchday 3: 21/22 October 2025 Matchday 4: 4/5 November 2025 Matchday 5: 25/26 November 2025 Matchday 6: 9/10 December 2025 Matchday 7: 20/21 January 2026 Matchday 8: 28 January 2026 Knockout phase play-offs: 17/18 & 24/25 February 2026 Round of 16: 10/11 & 17/18 March 2026 Quarter-finals: 7/8 & 14/15 April 2026 Semi-finals: 28/29 April & 5/6 May 2026 Final: 30 May 2026 (Budapest) Champions League 2025/26 odds PSG 5/1 Liverpool 11/2 Barcelona 6/1 Real Madrid 13/2 Arsenal 7/1 Man City 8/1 Bayern Munich 9/1 Chelsea 14/1 Newcastle 18/1 Inter Milan 20/1