Adani claims its export program helps contribute to sustainable energy – but experts say that's ‘wilful disinformation'
Adani's Queensland export site claims its operations 'ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all', which is one of the UN's 17 sustainable development goals.
Australia, along with other UN members, adopted the goals in 2015, designed to address global challenges including poverty, justice, environmental degradation and climate change.
The relevant UN goal is chiefly concerned with providing affordable and clean energy, which it says requires a substantial increase in renewable energy.
Adani's North Queensland Export Terminal (NQXT) near Bowen has the capacity to export 50m tonnes of coal a year. In its latest sustainability report, NQXT says it supports the UN goal by 'enabling the export of high-quality Australian coal to the world'.
One of Australia's leading experts on the development goals, Prof John Thwaites, said the word 'sustainable' in the UN goal was key.
'I would argue that to 'support the advancement of the sustainable development goals', energy and port operations need to support sustainable energy,' said Thwaites, the chair of the Monash Sustainable Development Institute.
'Simply exporting coal is not achieving or supporting the sustainability objective of the goals.'
Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton's Clear Air column as a free newsletter
He said there were also numerous references in the UN goals for the need to take action on climate change, and that 'simply exporting coal which will be burned and produce greenhouse gas emissions overseas' is not supportive of this.
Another leading expert on the UN agenda, Dr Cameron Allen, said the intention of the energy development goal was to 'focus on sustainable energy and clean energy and I don't think fossil fuels or coal falls into that'.
'I don't think anyone would agree that it's in line with the aims of that goal,' said Allen, from Monash University.
'Exporting coal isn't in line with the sentiment … or the language of the goal, which includes the word sustainable. The international climate change agreements also make it clear that burning fossil fuels is not sustainable.'
Guardian Australia has been scrutinising various claims made by Adani after finding that its Carmichael coal operation has paid zero corporate tax in more than three years of operation, and may never do so.
The Indian conglomerate had pledged to plough billions of dollars into the Australian economy through taxes and royalties when it was going through the contested approvals process to establish an open-cut coalmine in the Galilee Basin.
In response to questions about how its operations advance the UN sustainability goals, a spokesperson for Adani's Australian mining business, which is branded Bravus Mining and Resources, said coal exports helped combat poverty.
Sign up to Clear Air Australia
Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis
after newsletter promotion
'Developing nations in the Asia Pacific region use coal from the Carmichael mine alongside renewables to provide reliable and affordable energy solutions that help reduce poverty and power growth,' the Bravus spokesperson said.
Adani's port facility website also says its operations align with a UN goal to protect terrestrial ecosystems by managing its water on-site next to neighbouring wetlands.
Traditional owners have raised concerns over the threat posed by the coal operations to the nearby Caley Valley, in claims rejected by Adani.
In 2017 and 2019, flood waters were released from the port into the wetland. In the 2017 incident, the Queensland government later found the water that turned areas of the wetlands black from coal dust had not caused a widespread impact.
Adani's Carmichael mine, rail and port operation is among the most politically divisive projects in Australia, given it has opened up new fossil fuel reserves in a sensitive location at a time the country has pledged to transition to renewables.
Claire Snyder, director of watchdog group Climate Integrity, said the NQXT claim amounted to aggressive greenwashing.
'Framing coal exports as a contribution to sustainable development undermines global climate goals, misleads the public, and uses the authority of the UN to legitimise ongoing harm,' Snyder said.
'Given what we know about coal's role in driving climate breakdown, this is wilful disinformation and meaningless sustainability waffle to protect the social licence of coal.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
TotalEnergies won't invest in NextDecade's Train 5 LNG project, sources say
LONDON/PARIS, Aug 6 (Reuters) - TotalEnergies ( opens new tab has decided not to invest in U.S. developer NextDecade's (NEXT.O), opens new tab fifth liquefied natural gas Rio Grande export facility in Texas or to buy LNG from its output, two sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. The French energy major is prioritising lower-cost projects elsewhere as it reassesses its global LNG strategy, the sources said. The decision marks a shift for TotalEnergies, one of the world's top three LNG exporters and the largest buyer of U.S. LNG. The company is focusing on restarting construction of its $20 billion Mozambique LNG project and expanding its portfolio through deals in Canada, Qatar, and elsewhere. TotalEnergies declined to comment. NextDecade said it was targeting mid-September for a final investment decision on Train 5 and was working to contract an additional 2.5 million tons per annum under LNG supply deals to support the project. NextDecade is contending with rising construction costs due to U.S. steel tariffs, stiff competition from U.S. rival Venture Global, and a projected global LNG supply glut that could depress prices from 2027. TotalEnergies has a 17.5% stake in NextDecade and a 16.7% interest in Phase 1 of the Rio Grande project, which includes the first three trains. In April, it signed a 20-year deal to purchase 1.5 mtpa from Train 4. In an interview with Reuters in February, TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanné expressed interest in supporting a fifth train at Rio Grande. But on a July earnings call, he emphasised future investments in Mozambique, Qatar, Papua New Guinea, and Canada, citing low costs. He noted that Train 5's marketing was NextDecade's responsibility. He also said that U.S. steel tariffs had raised Rio Grande LNG's project costs, though by less than 10%.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Qantas has devalued its frequent flyer points. What should you do now?
Qantas was back in the spotlight this week with news that affected members of its frequent flyer program. The airline has made significant changes to its loyalty program, effectively devaluing its frequent flyer points. While we don't know the full extent or the specifics of the changes, airline loyalty program experts estimate a 20% average increase in the number of points needed to redeem a seat. Qantas has given us a few examples, including that a Classic Rewards economy seat on a Sydney-Melbourne flight has risen to 9,200 points plus $55 in fees, from 8,000 points plus $55 in fees. So, will the Qantas promise of more rewards seats available to flyers make the additional expense worth it? Or are people better off spending their points on shopping instead of flights? Flagging the changes in January, the chief executive officer of the frequent flyer program, Andrew Glance, said: 'A lot has changed in the last six years.' He suggested the changes would mean the airline could increase the number of Classic Rewards and Classic Plus Rewards seats available to be booked with frequent flyer points. Qantas has for some time fielded complaints about the scarcity of Classic Rewards seats in general, especially in premium classes. The airline has acknowledged the changes would force many members to spend more points and more cash on fees. However, Qantas said it hadn't adjusted the value of its loyalty scheme since 2019, and that the August changes were only the second since 2004. Daniel Sciberras, who works for the guide website Point Hacks, says the latest increase is 'relatively reasonable', even if customers aren't happy about it, because the program 'needs to remain viable'. In his view, this is because the average 15% to 20% jump in the number of points needed to book flights works out to about a 2% to 3% rise a year since 2019 – roughly in line with inflation. The specifics of what each Classic Rewards seat will cost under the new scheme have not yet been revealed. However, Sciberras says his tips for consumers in general haven't changed. He says there's no difference to 'the general rule' – that redeeming points for premium seats on long-haul fights is the 'best bang for your point'. 'So, you're still going to get great value when it comes to flights, especially in those long-haul premium cabins.' He says people are generally better off redeeming points on business-class seats than paying for an economy seat and using points to get an upgrade. His advice remains the same when it comes to domestic bookings too: use your points on routes with less competition. Sciberras says this is because busy domestic routes with lots of competition – such as flights between Sydney, Brisbane and Adelaide – generally have lower ticket prices. The amount of points needed to redeem a seat is fixed, and based on distance, he says. This means you're better off using points to book domestic flights that would otherwise be more expensive, such as to destinations like Hamilton Island, Uluru or Broome. Not if you want to get the best value for money, Sciberras says. 'You're always going to get more value by redeeming your points for flights than other things: accommodation, car hire, anything from the shopping mall,' he says. This is because points – when worked out in dollar terms – end up being worth more when used to book flights, he says. Sciberras says points usually work out to be about 1c in value when used to book flights. 'But … if you want to get a $50 gift card, it'll be like 10,000 points, right? That gives you half a cent in value,' he says. 'Short-haul domestic might be only around 0.7c per point, so it's not much more. But if you're going international first class, you could get 4c or 5c in value, or even more per point.'
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘No clear explanation': businesses reliant on Meta struggle in the wake of wrongful suspensions
This time of the year is typically the busy booking season for Sam Enticknap, a makeup artist based in Margaret River, Western Australia. But the phone has stopped ringing since her Instagram account, which had 48,000 followers, was suspended without notice by Meta three weeks ago. 'I received a horrible email saying a reference to child sexual exploitation content, which obviously was quite traumatic to see,' she said. 'Saying my Instagram accounts have been disabled with just no clear explanation.' Enticknap estimates that, as a result of her account being wrongly suspended, she has lost 80% of the bookings she otherwise would have leading into the busy wedding season in Margaret River. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'A lot of people come through Instagram, they find hashtags and they find word of mouth, and obviously through other businesses that always tag us,' she said. Enticknap said it made her realise how reliant she was on Meta for business. She said she lost two Instagram accounts and a Facebook account as a result of the permanent suspension, and said attempts to contact the company to have the ban appealed had resulted in a 'dead end'. She said she was not alone, citing another Western Australian business – which sells artificial flowers – which had been suspended from Meta platforms and received the same reference to child sexual exploitation. 'My friend who has another successful makeup business, she went down the week after me, but she's managed to get her account back,' Enticknap said. Incorrect account suspensions on social media platforms are not a new phenomenon. Often when Meta is asked by media about an account, it is later restored. However, something changed in July. A flood of emails were sent to journalists from people all over the world saying that, without warning, their Facebook and Instagram accounts had been suspended. Many were told – erroneously – by Meta that their accounts had been suspended for breaching community standards on child sexual exploitation, abuse and nudity. Users report Meta has typically been unresponsive to their pleas for assistance, often with standardised responses to requests for review, almost all of which have been rejected. There are petitions with tens of thousands of signatures, a subreddit devoted to people who have had their accounts disabled and talk of a class action against Meta over the bans. From around a dozen emails received in the past two weeks, Guardian Australia has reported five accounts – including Enticknap's to Meta, which said it had internally escalated the investigation of those accounts. Media reporting of the plight of businesses struggling as a result of their Instagram ban has led to many of those accounts being restored. But the company claims there has not been an increase in incorrect account suspension, and the volume of users complaining was not indicative of new targeting or over-enforcement. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'We take action on accounts that violate our policies, and people can appeal if they think we've made a mistake,' a spokesperson for Meta said. Meta is reliant on a mix of human reports and automation to find and remove accounts in breach of its rules. The company publishes data on how many accounts it removes – and data on how many it subsequently restores – in its quarterly community standards enforcement report. However, the latest report only covers to the end of March, so it can't yet be judged whether the company has had a significant uptick in removed accounts or appeals. For Enticknap, the suspension carries an emotional weight. Her father died this year, and the photos and messages her father uploaded to Facebook cannot be accessed. 'I've tried to message and just say: 'Can I just get my data? Can I just get that? Shut me down, but let me get those pictures back',' she said. 'But nothing. I've not had any reply.'
