Cement supply is the backbone of Libya's reconstruction

Libyan Express

7 days ago

Cement supply is the backbone of Libya's reconstruction
Libya's cement industry stands at a critical crossroads. As demand rises—driven by reconstruction efforts, housing expansion, and infrastructure projects—the country's reliance on imports and the chronic underperformance of local factories present both a national challenge and a strategic opportunity.
Despite having vast reserves of raw materials—enough to sustain production for at least the next 50 years—Libya's cement output remains far below its potential. Current data reveals that the nation's cement plants are operating at just 58% of their design capacity. Of ten available production lines, only four are active, despite a total design capacity of 10 million tonnes annually. The result: a growing dependence on imports from Egypt, Turkey, and Tunisia.
In 2020, for example, Libya imported 2.2 million tonnes of cement to meet domestic demand. Local factories produced only 3.1 million tonnes, falling short of the estimated market demand of 5.3 million tonnes. By 2024, demand had surged to approximately 7 million tonnes—yet supply continued to lag significantly behind.
A clear illustration of this gap is the Al-Burj plant in Zliten, one of Libya's largest cement factories. It currently produces around 1.5 million tonnes annually—less than half of what the country needs. This supply shortfall has pushed prices sharply upwards. By mid-2024, the cost of a quintal rose to approximately 90 Libyan dinars (900 dinars per tonne), representing a 54% increase compared to the previous year.
Yet the issue goes beyond underproduction. A combination of factors—security instability, speculative pricing, and restrictions on the movement of heavy trucks along major roads under the pretext of protecting infrastructure—has disrupted both local distribution and land-based imports. These logistical challenges have further inflated prices, with transport costs alone pushing cement prices from 17.5 to 25 dinars in just a few months.
This widening gap between supply and demand is unsustainable. Continued reliance on imports not only places strain on Libya's foreign currency reserves but also leaves the domestic market exposed to unpredictable price fluctuations. Without strategic intervention, any meaningful progress in infrastructure and housing development will remain out of reach.
There are, however, signs of positive movement. The Libya Africa Investment Portfolio (LAIP) has recognised the urgency of the crisis and prioritised the cement sector within its local investment strategy. As part of broader efforts to support national economic development, LAIP is investing in projects aimed at closing the supply-demand gap and restoring market stability.
At the forefront of these efforts is the revival of the Misrata Cement Plant—a major strategic project that has remained dormant since 2012. Now, with comprehensive technical and strategic planning in place, LAIP is working to restart operations. The plant is expected to produce 2 million tonnes annually in its first phase, increasing to 4 million tonnes in the second phase. The project is being implemented in partnership with Sinoma–Wuhan, a leading Chinese construction firm.
Experts believe the Misrata project could serve as a catalyst for wider sector reform, with the potential to reduce housing inflation, support major construction and infrastructure initiatives, and generate employment opportunities for young Libyans. Ultimately, the goal is to increase national cement output to 10 million tonnes annually. According to research by technical committees and specialised centres, this would reduce production costs, lessen reliance on imports, and help stabilise prices across the domestic market.
For LAIP, the project has broader strategic objectives: contributing to economic diversification, strengthening Libya's industrial base, and enhancing the country's long-term resilience.
Libya's cement crisis is not merely a supply chain issue—it is a test of economic sovereignty. Reviving this vital sector will require more than financial investment. It demands coordinated policy, regulatory reform, and a secure environment for industrial growth. But the potential rewards—economic resilience, infrastructure development, and national self-sufficiency—are too important to ignore.