America 'accuses' one of China's largest technology company: You plotted to steal our trade secrets and ...
A U.S. federal judge has reportedly ruled that
Huawei Technologies
, China's leading telecommunications equipment manufacturer, must face a sweeping 16-count indictment accusing the company of stealing trade secrets, racketeering, wire and bank fraud, and violating
U.S. sanctions
. U.S. District Judge Ann Donnelly rejected Huawei's motion to dismiss the charges, calling the company's arguments premature in a 52-page ruling, according to court documents.
According to a report by news agency AP, the U.S. Justice Department (DoJ) alleges that Huawei and its subsidiaries engaged in a concerted effort to steal American trade secrets, installed surveillance equipment that aided Iran in monitoring protesters during 2009 anti-government demonstrations, and conducted business in North Korea despite U.S. sanctions. The 2019 indictment also charged Huawei with using a Hong Kong shell company, Skycom, to sell equipment to Iran in violation of sanctions, and accused its chief financial officer,
Meng Wanzhou
, of misleading HSBC about Huawei's Iranian dealings.
Arrest of Huawei founder's daughter in Canada
Meng, the daughter of Huawei's founder, was arrested in Canada in 2018 on a U.S. extradition request but was released in 2021 as part of a prisoner swap that freed two Canadians detained by China. Huawei did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the ruling. The case, which intensified during former President Donald Trump's administration, saw the U.S. raise national security concerns and urge Western allies to exclude Huawei from their high-speed wireless networks. Chinese officials have countered, accusing the U.S. of 'economic bullying' and using national security as a pretext to suppress Chinese companies. Huawei's legal team argued the allegations were vague and some charges improperly applied U.S. law extraterritorially.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
Facing U.S. sanctions that have restricted access to American processor chips and technology, Huawei, the world's largest network gear maker, has pivoted to developing its own chips and focusing on the Chinese market. The company has also expanded into network technology for hospitals, factories, and other industrial sectors less affected by U.S. restrictions. The ruling sets the stage for a high-profile legal battle as Huawei confronts the serious allegations in the U.S. federal court.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Arms dealer 'linked to Vadra' now a fugitive
NEW DELHI: A Delhi court on Saturday declared arms dealer Sanjay Bhandari a fugitive economic offender, observing that failed extradition attempts does not make him an "angel or immune from the prosecution for the violation of Indian laws". The order, which was reserved by the court of Special Judge Sanjeev Aggarwal on May 24, was pronounced on Saturday. "Extradition attempt may have failed, but it will not make accused angel or immune from the prosecution for the violation of Indian laws. FEO proceedings are another way of making one come back to India to face trial by coercing him to return by attachment, confiscation of properties of such fugitive economic offender and proceeds of crime, and by disentitling the such fugitive economic offender from putting forward or defending any civil claim," the judge said in his 100-page judgment. "...this court is satisfied that Sanjay Bhandari is a fugitive economic offender under section 12(1) of the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018, and is declared as such under the above provision(s)" of the Act, he said. ED and I-T department had in the extradition proceedings claimed that Bhandari had undisclosed foreign income worth Rs 655 crore on which he evaded tax worth Rs 196 crore. The middleman in defence deals, allegedly a key factor in deals like that of trainer aircraft Pilatus, deposited huge amounts of money in bank accounts of overseas shell companies and also invested in properties in the UAE and the UK between 2009 and 2016. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo The case against Bhandari has an important political dimension - his alleged links with Robert Vadra , spouse of Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra. Robert is also being probed for his links with Bhandari, who fled to London when multiple agencies started investigating him in 2016. The judgment came on the ED's application filed under the Act in 2019. The court said the "fugitive" tag is to an individual who has committed schedule offence or offences involving an amount of Rs 100 crore or more and who has absconded or refused to return to avoid criminal prosecution. This will allow ED to confiscate his properties anywhere in the world and bar Bhandari, who is wanted by Indian agencies in multiple cases, from filing or defending any civil proceedings in India. The judge dismissed Bhandari's counsel's argument that the UK high court's order disallowing ED's plea for his extradition makes him eligible to stay in London, and therefore, FEO won't apply to him. "The said argument is without any substance as the extradition failure will not make any difference as the extradition of the accused was one of the means to bring the accused to India to face trial in the said offence under Section 51 of the Black Money Act," the judge said. The court stressed Bhandari wilfully refused to return to face criminal prosecution, and said, "...this court is satisfied that the total value of the schedule offence is Rs 100 crore or more i.e. the schedule to the present FEO Act which is Section 51 of Black Money Act." The court also rejected Bhandari's contention that declaring him a fugitive economic offender entails very serious consequences, effectively amounting to economic death penalty. "Bhandari always has an option to return... when he chooses not to return to India, he cannot take the plea of avoiding all the legal consequences... In any case those who play with fire should be aware of its consequences," the court said.
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Jail or blacklisted': Ethan Klein wants Twitch CEO Dan Clancy to get jailed over HasanAbi toy gun incident
(Image via @huffnmorepuff & @hasanthehun/X) Tensions are boiling over in the streaming world as H3H3's Ethan Klein called out Twitch CEO Dan Clancy with a scathing statement: 'I hope Dan Clancy ends up in jail.' This explosive remark came after a fiery controversy involving political streamer HasanAbi, sparking a debate over Twitch's selective rule enforcement and alleged hypocrisy among creators. The Trigger: HasanAbi's Toy Gun Outburst On July 3, 2025, HasanAbi went viral after a clip surfaced showing him reacting aggressively to a viewer's alleged threats. During a live stream, he identified a YouTuber believed to be behind the hate messages and pointed what appeared to be a toy gun at the screen, ranting: 'Let's hang Hasan and Mamdani for treason, he says... What are you going to do? Try to f**king put malware in my phone? Is that what you're going to do? You skinny b**ch! Ugly a**!" The video ignited backlash, with some accusing HasanAbi of inciting harassment and even potential doxing — a serious violation of Twitch's terms of service. Ethan Klein Fires Back The next day, Ethan Klein, known for his bold opinions on the H3 Podcast , took to Instagram with a brutal critique. Klein claimed that Hasan had not only doxed the wrong person but had also done so while wielding a realistic-looking toy weapon — something Ethan himself had been previously crucified for. (Ethan Klein called out Twitch over HasanAbi toy gun incident on Instagram (Image via @h3Hhproductions/Instagram) His story was unapologetically direct: 'You spent the last year calling me a doxxer for doing the same exact thing... I'm not offended… I just find the brazen hypocrisy funny.' But the sharpest barb was reserved for Dan Clancy. Ethan accused the Twitch CEO of enabling favoritism and failing to enforce platform rules consistently, saying: 'It's approaching criminal negligence... I hope Dan Clancy ends up in jail or blacklisted from ever working in tech again.' Twitch's Silence Raises Eyebrows The controversy gained even more traction when Daniel Saltman, CEO of REDACT and fellow streamer, stepped in. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo He revealed that he had reported HasanAbi's channel through every official Twitch channel, with no response. Saltman tagged Clancy directly on X (formerly Twitter), accusing Twitch of ignoring reports and dodging accountability: 'This has now been reported on every available system. Good luck finding a reason to ignore them.' Fallout & What's Next At its core, this controversy underscores two major issues: platform favoritism and inconsistent enforcement. Twitch has yet to issue an official statement, and as criticism mounts, pressure on Dan Clancy continues to grow. Will Twitch respond? Will there be consequences for HasanAbi? And will Clancy survive this latest firestorm? One thing's for sure: this isn't over. For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Newly-weds duped of 7.6L for Europe honeymoon
1 2 3 Kolkata: A honeymoon trip to Europe turned into a nightmare for a newly-wed couple from New Alipore after they were allegedly defrauded of Rs 7.6 lakh by a travel agency, the owner of which turned out to be involved in fraud. The initial probe found that several others might have been duped in a similar fashion. The fraud came to light just three days before their wedding when they received a message cancelling their trip without explanation. The couple filed a police complaint against both owners for criminal conspiracy and cheating. The agency, operating from the Survey Park-east Jadavpur area, allegedly collected full payment for a European tour package, scheduled to start on May 14, but failed to provide confirmed bookings or travel vouchers. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata According to the complaint, the couple made multiple payments between Jan and April through various bank transfers, totalling Rs 7.6 lakh to the company's business account. "We were given dummy bookings that were neither confirmed nor approved for flight tickets and travel vouchers required for visa applications," said the victim, a partner of a fledgling firm. The agency owners initially issued two post-dated cheques of Rs 3.8 lakh each for June 27, promising a full refund within 45 days. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why seniors are rushing to get this Internet box – here's why! Techno Mag Learn More Undo This incident follows a series of travel scams in the city. Last week, police arrested a travel agent in Chinsurah for a Rs 5.2 crore airline ticket fraud targeting a tour company. The Ekbalpore Police Station also registered a case against another travel agent who allegedly cheated multiple victims of Rs 2 crore through fake Southeast Asian tour packages. "Citizens are advised to exercise caution while booking travel packages. Verify travel agency credentials, cross-check bookings directly with hotels and airlines, and maintain records of all transactions. Report suspicious travel offers to the nearest police station or cyber cell immediately," said a senior officer at Lalbazar. A detective department officer said, "We are investigating multiple travel fraud cases. Citizens should avoid making full payments in advance and deal only with registered travel agencies with verifiable business histories." The guidelines specifically warn against agencies requesting wire transfers to personal bank accounts and those providing vague documentation. Experts recommend booking through agencies affiliated with recognised trade organisations. "Legitimate travel agencies will always provide detailed itineraries and secure payment options," said an operator, adding, "If something seems too good to be true, it probably is. " The police have also urged travellers to report suspicious agencies to their state's consumer protection office.
