logo
How can Maine fix its housing crisis? A new report has dozens of ideas

How can Maine fix its housing crisis? A new report has dozens of ideas

Yahoo30-01-2025

Jan. 29—Recent reports on Maine's housing crisis have carried some eye-popping numbers: The state needs to build 84,000 homes by 2030. Washington County needs to increase its annual number of building permits by 1,200%. The median home sale price was nearly $400,000 last year.
For years, state housing officials and advocates have argued that the only way to shrink those numbers is simply to build more. When the need is so great, the task can seem overwhelming. But a new state-sponsored report, presented this week to the Legislature's Committee on Economic Housing and Development, issued specific recommendations for how to do just that — 83 pages of them.
And it could set the stage for the Legislature's upcoming session.
Two years ago, the state released a report that declared Maine is short about 84,000 homes, and that the total housing stock — not just the number of new homes being built — needs to increase by about 11% by 2030 to alleviate the existing housing crisis and make room for all the people needed to bolster the state's declining workforce.
Then, in September, officials broke down the needs at the county level and established housing "goals," finding that annual housing production statewide needs to just about double.
The September report included a long list of suggestions — including infrastructure improvements, increased state and federal funding for affordable housing development, and simplified building and land-use regulations at the state and municipal levels — but did not require any changes or include direct money to any particular solutions.
This week's report drills deeper into those suggestions, offering a more granular look at the ways the state can incentivize development, data collection and workforce development. It also lays out which options are the most and least cost-effective and labor-intensive.
Most of the 40-plus changes outlined would require legislative action, so the report is partly intended to serve as a roadmap for Maine's lawmakers as they draft and consider new housing bills.
"If we know our needs and we know our goals, the next question is, how do we get from where we are now to where we need to be by 2030?" said Greg Payne, the state's senior housing adviser. "What state-level policy levers exist that we can pull to create more homes more quickly, and at a more sustainable cost?"
View this document on Scribd
The reports come at the behest of the Legislature as part of LD 2003, a law passed in 2022 that, among other changes, requires municipalities to allow up to four units on any property zoned for single-family residential use.
The landmark law was "a step forward," according to the newly released report, but significant challenges remain.
"Delays in development approvals, high impact fees, uncertain infrastructure costs, and resistance to increased density continue to make it difficult to deliver homes that are affordable for most Mainers," HR&A Advisors wrote.
HR&A, a consulting firm, provided research for the first report and authored the most recent.
Some recommendations include:
— Increasing the pace and volume of housing development reviews and appeals
— Reforming state and local building codes to reduce development costs
— Establishing a mixed-used income housing fund
— Preserving mobile homes and exploring modular and 3D-printed housing
— Finding state-owned properties that could be sold for housing development
— Increased subsidies for affordable rental and homeownership programs
Few of the recommendations are revolutionary, but if adopted, a handful could prove to be unpopular among municipalities, many of which have pushed back against implementing the zoning changes required by LD 2003.
For example, all three reports have emphasized the need for accurate and comprehensive data collection. Currently, housing production data is tracked by the U.S. Census Bureau, which compiles data voluntarily submitted by municipalities. One suggestion follows the lead of states like Connecticut and Oregon, and would require that municipalities regularly submit data on housing production and demolition. It would need to be a mandate, so municipalities couldn't opt out, the report said.
The report also suggested that towns and cities that "contribute to housing goals" should be prioritized for state funding.
"Participating municipalities would gain prioritized access to discretionary funding, such as school renovation and infrastructure funding, by meeting or exceeding housing production targets and adopting priority zoning and land use policies," the report said. Municipalities could be scored based on their adoption of a range of policies including reducing minimum lot sizes to 0.5 acres in designated growth areas and requiring multifamily housing provisions in local comprehensive plans, among other options.
HR&A floated the idea of a housing appeals process to "limit delays and unlawful denials of housing proposals."
The state would need to determine the criteria for a project to be eligible for appeal. Some states, like Connecticut, limit eligible projects to those that include affordable housing. There could also be criteria to exempt municipalities from the appeals process.
A housing appeals process was included in earlier versions of LD 2003 but was scrapped in the scaled-back version of the bill that eventually passed. The appeal process was opposed by the Maine Municipal Association, which argued that allowing developers to take municipalities to court for denying projects undermines local housing control.
SUPPORT FOR TRADES
This week's report also emphasized the need for Maine to support the private sector, particularly by bolstering the construction trades workforce.
According to the Maine Department of Labor, the state is short between 2,000 to 4,000 workers in the construction and adjacent industries, including transportation and material workers, construction laborers, electricians, equipment operators and building inspectors.
HR&A recommended providing long-term funding for apprenticeship programs, attracting nontraditional workers, streamlining licensing for the trades and accelerating employer-financed workforce housing projects.
These recommendations wouldn't be the first steps the state has taken to alleviate the housing shortage — Maine has invested over $310 million in doing just that, according to Payne, the senior housing adviser.
"These historic investments, along with key zoning and land use reforms, have supported vulnerable residents and our workforce while creating the largest pipeline of affordable housing development in MaineHousing's history," he said in a statement. "But as reports like this show, there's more Maine could do to address this critical need."
Copy the Story Link

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wyoming lawmakers seek to eliminate SIPA, again, in effort to simplify budget process
Wyoming lawmakers seek to eliminate SIPA, again, in effort to simplify budget process

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Wyoming lawmakers seek to eliminate SIPA, again, in effort to simplify budget process

CHEYENNE — Wyoming lawmakers will try again to eliminate the state's Strategic Investments and Projects Account (SIPA) in a continued effort to make the state's budget process more transparent for the public. Efforts have been made in past legislative sessions to eliminate Wyoming's many financial 'coffee cans.' In 2024, lawmakers successfully repealed the School Capital Construction Account and its related accounts. This year, the Legislature successfully eliminated the Budget Reserve Account (BRA) through Senate File 168 and nearly eliminated SIPA through the passage of SF 169. However, Gov. Mark Gordon line-item vetoed SF 169 and kept SIPA online. The governor maintained his long-term support of simplifying the state's budget process, but he disapproved of the Legislature's approach in SF 169. Gov. Mark Gordon Gov. Mark Gordon '(SIPA) was originally a compromise between a previous legislature and the then-serving governor,' Gordon wrote in his veto letter. He served as state treasurer in 2013, when SIPA was first created. 'The compromise recognized the value of the governor's authority to use some of the funds when making budget recommendations.' Gordon argued the original structure of the bill limited his ability to make budget recommendations. Currently, excess funds from the state's Permanent Mineral Trust Fund (PMTF) account are split evenly between SIPA and the state's main savings account (the Legislative Stabilization Reserve Account, or LSRA). SF 169 originally eliminated SIPA by July 2026 and transferred all excess funds into the LSRA. Wyoming statute prohibits the governor from proposing appropriations from LSRA in excess of the 5% statutory reserve account. In other words, he can't make budget recommendations from this account. 'It is a cagey strategy to undermine a long-standing compromise between the executive and legislative branches and breach the original intent of SIPA,' Gordon wrote. One effect of Gordon's veto removed the split of funds flowing into SIPA and LSRA; now, all excess funds go directly into SIPA, effective immediately. He reasoned this action is necessary, as he expects the state will see greater pressure to fund public schools with the passage of more tax cuts and diversions, along with falling oil and natural gas prices. 'The combined effects of these factors create substantial pressure on the general fund to cover any school funding deficit and still meet the ongoing costs of government,' Gordon wrote, 'as well as provide services to Wyoming families and businesses.' Impact of veto During the Legislature's Select Committee on Capital Finance meeting on Thursday, lawmakers moved to draft a bill similar to SF 169 and, in a sense, make it 'veto-proof.' Sen. Larry Hicks, R-Baggs, who was the primary sponsor of SF 169, said Gordon's veto 'left … quite a dilemma here.' 'The net effect of this line-item veto, if we allow this to stay in statutes the way it currently is, it zeros out the reserve accounts,' Hicks said. Sen. Larry Hicks, R-Baggs (2025) Sen. Larry Hicks, R-Baggs Legislative budget and fiscal staff provided a comparison of the two versions of the bill and their long-term fiscal impacts, based on numbers from the January long-term forecast of the state's fiscal profile. The SIPA transfers 45% of what it retains to the School Foundation Program (SFP) account, the state's main spending account to fund public schools. If the SIPA is entirely repealed, the SFP loses that funding. Before SF 169 was signed into law, the LSRA and SFP were estimated to receive $124.1 million and $369.4 million, respectively, from SIPA over a six-year forecast period. Under the version passed by the Legislature, LSRA was estimated to receive $191.6 million in that same time period. The SFP would receive a total of $111.4 million in the first two fiscal years, and then not receive anything starting in fiscal year 2027 with the repeal of SIPA. Under Gordon's vetoes, the SFP is estimated to receive $470 million over the six-year forecast period, and the LSRA will receive no funding at all. 'But I want to point out that, starting in FY 28 the (PMTF) reserve account can't guarantee the full amount, and it falls short by about $60 million,' said LSO senior fiscal analyst Polly Scott. 'As Sen. Hicks did state … the estimate is that the reserve account is depleted somewhere in (fiscal year 2028).' Under the version adopted by the Legislature, the reserve account's life is extended beyond the six-year forecast, Scott added, because the state is relying on it less. Lawmakers respond State Treasurer Curt Meier noted that the PMTF reserve account is acting the way the LSRA should act. He suggested removing the 1.25% guarantee from the PMTF reserve account into SIPA so it can 'function (as) what it was supposed to do.' 'You're spending money you don't have and then you're trying to catch up … so you can spend it in this year's legislative session,' Meier said. 'Let the reserve account stand on itself, rather than putting more pressure on it than what it can afford to bear.' Then, the Legislature could move the unrealized capital gains into the LSRA, he said. The LSRA already provides $100 million to the school spending account once it drops below a certain threshold. Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne (2025) Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne Chairwoman Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne, suggested also discussing lifting this cap from the LSRA into the SFP at the committee's next meeting in September. For now, committee members voted to draft a bill that eliminates the SIPA, with a provision to remove the 1.25% flow guarantee from the PMTF reserve account, and discuss it at the next meeting. 'The elimination of the SIPA account is important, I think, to the Legislature as a whole, in order to simplify and provide transparency to the budget process,' Nethercott said. 'Because the SIPA account has been butchered. It's been tortured ... and no longer serves its intended purpose, creating a transparency issue.'

Former Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan sentenced to 7.5 years in prison
Former Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan sentenced to 7.5 years in prison

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Former Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan sentenced to 7.5 years in prison

CHICAGO, Ill. (WTVO) — Former Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan has been sentenced to 7 and a half years in prison on bribery and corruption charges. A jury convicted Madigan earlier this year of conspiracy, bribery, and wire fraud in a high-profile corruption trial. He was also ordered to pay a $2.5 million fine. The jury could not reach a decision on six of the 23 counts against him, including an overarching racketeering conspiracy charge, after deliberations that lasted more than 10 days. Ultimately, he was convicted on 10 counts of bribery, conspiracy, and wire fraud. Acting U.S. Attorney Morris Pasqual called it a 'historic' conviction, ranking high among top public corruption cases tried in Chicago's federal courthouse. He said that Illinois residents have a right to trust in their government.' The trial, which began in October, featured more than 60 witnesses, including a congresswoman, business leaders and former state legislators. Madigan, 83, served as House speaker for more than 30 years, becoming the longest serving U.S. legislator, and earned the nickname the 'Velvet Hammer' for his forceful yet quiet leadership style. He left political office in 2021 while under investigation and was indicted the following year. First elected to the Legislature in 1970, Madigan was speaker of the state House from 1983 to 2021, except for two years when Republicans were in control. He set much of Illinois' political agenda by deciding which legislation would be voted on and by controlling several campaign funds. He also oversaw political mapmaking. Among his crimes: Madigan used his influence to pass legislation that benefited companies like ComEd, which gave kickbacks, jobs, and contracts to Madigan loyalists in return. Rep. John Cabello (R-Machesney Park) reacted to the sentencing, saying, 'I hope the entirety of his trial sends a message to every corrupt politician watching: The people of Illinois deserve better—not the corrupt cesspool Madigan and his cronies created. Sadly, there are currently 57 state lawmakers, including those from the Rockford area, who received funding from or maintain ties with Madigan. Another reason that Illinois needs real ethics reform now.' Rep. Joe Sosnowski (R-Rockford) said, 'No one is above the law. Speaker Madigan was found guilty of gaming the system for personal gain. The people of Illinois expect more from their leaders and deserve an ethical state government. We need to stop the culture of pay-to-play politics that has allowed corruption to run rampant in Illinois for decades'. The Associated Press contributed to this report. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Republican Nevada governor vetoes voter ID measure
Republican Nevada governor vetoes voter ID measure

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Republican Nevada governor vetoes voter ID measure

Nevada's GOP Gov. Joe Lombardo on Thursday vetoed a voter ID measure, foregoing a proposed requirement to have voters show identification before casting ballots at the polls. The bill, known as A.B. 499, was passed in a bipartisan effort by the state Legislature to improve voter verification and increase the number of drop boxes for mail ballots across the state. Lombardo said he ultimately chose to veto the bill over a lack of clear provisions and guidelines on regulations. 'I wholeheartedly support Voter ID and am appreciative of the effort to codify it into statute. However, this bill is not entirely consistent with the constitutional amendment that Nevada voters will consider again in 2026,' the governor wrote in a Thursday message. 'AB 499 fails to resolve-and may even introduce- inconsistencies in how voter identification is reviewed, does little to improve signature verification and leaves too much ambiguity for future interpretation or regulation,' he added. The legislation would've required in-person voters to show their ID while allowing mail-in ballots to be accepted with a valid signature. 'This inconsistency undermines the principle of uniform voter verification. Voter ID is essential for ensuring election integrity, and it should be applied consistently across all voting methods,' Lombardo said. However, state Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager (D) said the veto symbolized a 'breach of trust' after the governor previously shared support for the bill, according to The Associated Press. Lombardo's veto comes as Republicans usher in a sweeping push to codify stricter identification requirements for voters. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store