
Russian Commanders Blamed For Ukraine Drone Attack On Bomber Fleet
Russian military analysts are hunting for scapegoats after Ukraine stunned Moscow with weekend drone attacks that destroyed a number of strategic bomber planes, weakening a key component of Russia's nuclear arsenal.
Aerospace forces commander-in-chief Viktor Afzalov and former defence minister Sergei Shoigu - now secretary of Russia's Security Council - are among those being publicly singled out for blame.
The drone strikes have prompted accusations of negligence, complacency and corruption. How was it possible, commentators are asking, for nuclear-capable aircraft to be left exposed, unprotected by hangars, and for Ukrainian intelligence to smuggle the drones within close reach of air bases and unleash them with devastating effect?
Two influential military blogs, Voyenkor Kotenok and Two Majors, said Shoigu had promised as far back as April 2021 to build more than 300 reinforced concrete shelters for aircraft, but this had not happened.
Military analyst Vladislav Shurygin condemned the "blatant irresponsibility and negligence" of the aerospace command headed by Afzalov, accusing the top brass of failing to anticipate threats and learn from past mistakes.
The Russian defence ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Another blogger, Roman Alekhin, said the attacks had demonstrated Ukraine's ability to penetrate deep inside Russia with saboteurs. Moscow had underestimated its enemy, he said, comparing the blow to Japan's 1941 attack on the U.S. navy at Pearl Harbor.
The heated online debate contrasts with near-silence from the authorities and scant coverage in state media. The Kremlin has said an investigation is underway.
President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday condemned what he called terrorist attacks by Ukraine that killed seven people in southern Russia on Sunday, but made no reference to the strikes on the air bases that took place on the same day.
BOMBER FLEET
Russia operates two types of nuclear-capable heavy bomber planes - the Tu-160 and Tu-95 MS, which NATO calls the Blackjack and Bear-H, respectively.
The Federation of American Scientists, in its annual review of Russian nuclear forces, said last month that it estimates Russia has only about 67 strategic bombers in its active inventory, although there is uncertainty about the numbers.
It said Russia had historically housed all its strategic bombers at Engels, in the Volga region, and Ukrainka in the Far East. But in 2022, the first year of the war, it redeployed some bombers from Engels to Belaya in Siberia and Olenya in the northern Murmansk region, apparently assuming they would be less vulnerable there to Ukrainian attack.
That assumption was disproved on Sunday, when Belaya and Olenya bore the brunt of the Ukrainian attacks. According to Western and Russian analysts, the aircraft that were hit were Tu-95 MSs and Tu-22 M3s - a type of intermediate-range bomber - though it remains unclear exactly how many were taken out.
Satellite images of Belaya, obtained by Reuters and reviewed by military experts, showed at least several strategic bombers there were destroyed or badly damaged. Russian analysts estimated a dozen or more aircraft in total were damaged or destroyed at Belaya and Olenya.
To replace them, military blogger Colonel Cassad wrote, it was likely that Russia would have to speed up production of the Tu-160 because it was only making four of those every year. Reuters could not verify that figure.
Aviation analyst Alexei Zakharov said even if as many as 15 Tu-95 MSs had been taken out, it would only reduce the number of nuclear cruise missiles that Russia was capable of firing by fewer than 100. He noted that strategic bombers are only part of a much larger nuclear force including ground- and submarine-launched missiles.
Even so, he said, Russia had learned a lesson that was "offensive and insulting. The main thing is that the right conclusions are drawn from this lesson".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
21 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump rates meeting with Putin as '10 on 10', refuses to reveal areas of disagreement
After ending his joint press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin, US President Donald Trump said that he rates today's Alaska talks as '10 on 10' After ending his joint press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin, US President Donald Trump said that he rates today's as '10 on 10'. In an exclusive interview with Fox News, immediately after the presser, Trump said he had a 'very good' meeting with Putin and insisted that he just wants to see 'people stop dying'. 'We had a very good meeting today, but we'll see. You have to get a deal. We agreed on a lot of points. I want to see people stop dying,' Trump told Fox News' Sean Hannity. However, Trump reiterated the fact that 'there's no deal' until there is one. 'Look, as far as I'm concerned, there's no deal until there's a deal. But we did make a lot of progress,' Trump averred. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The American leader also noted that he was happy when he heard Putin saying, 'If he were the president, the Russia-Ukraine war would have never happened.' Despite his positive outlook towards the meeting, Trump refused to reveal the 'areas of disagreement' between him and Putin. 'No, I'd rather not. I guess somebody's gonna go public with it, they'll figure it out. But no, I don't want to do that, I want to see if we can get it done,' he told Fox News. The ball is in Zelenskyy's court While speaking to the American news outlet, the president made it clear that he is now putting the onus on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to negotiate a ceasefire. He emphasised that he would soon be setting up a meeting with the Ukrainian leader and his Russian counterpart. 'Now it's really up to President Zelensky to get it done,' Trump said in a Fox News interview following his sitdown with Putin in Alaska. 'They're going to set up a meeting now between President Zelensky and President Putin, and me, I guess.' 'I want to make sure it gets done,' he added. 'And we have a pretty good chance of getting it done.' Soon after the meeting, Trump boarded Air Force One and will now be heading to Washington, DC.


India.com
21 minutes ago
- India.com
After meeting with Trump in Alaska, Putin makes shocking statement on Ukraine War, says if Trump were...
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday (local time) said that if US President Donald Trump had been in power in 2022, the Russia-Ukraine conflict would likely never have happened — a claim Trump has frequently raised several times, blaming his predecessor, Joe Biden, for the war. Putin stated that in 2022, he had cautioned former US President Biden that the tensions between the two nations should not be allowed to reach a point of no return. He made this statement in a joint press conference after nearly three hours of talks with Trump. Putin stated, 'Today, when President Trump says had he been the President back then, there would have been no war, and I am quite sure it would indeed be so.' Furthermore, he added, 'During the last contact with the previous administration in 2022, I tried to convince my previous American colleague that the situation should not be brought to the point of no return when it comes to hostilities. I said it directly back then that it is a big mistake.' Putin said that on Friday's negotiations had been useful and were held in a constructive atmosphere. The Alaska summit between Trump and Putin, held at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, included top officials from both sides. Putin was joined by foreign policy aide Yury Ushakov and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, while Trump was accompanied by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US special envoy Steve Witkoff.


Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Relief for India in the offing? Trump says he may have to think about tariffs on Russian oil buyers 'in 2 or 3 weeks'
Following a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, U.S. President Donald Trump stated he doesn't foresee the immediate need for retaliatory tariffs on countries purchasing Russian oil. However, Trump indicated this situation might change, suggesting he may need to consider such tariffs in the coming weeks, depending on future developments. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Trump tariffs and Russian oil Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads No pause on Russian oil U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday he will not have to think of retaliatory tariffs on countries buying Russian oil right now but may have to "in two or three weeks.""Well, because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that," Trump told Fox News after meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska."Now, I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now. I think, you know, the meeting went very well."Earlier, Trump claimed that the tariffs imposed on India for purchasing oil from Russia have influenced Moscow's decision to seek a meeting with Washington, as the country was losing its 'second largest customer'.In an interview with Fox News on Thursday, Trump said, "I think everything has an impact," and claimed that when he told India that "we're going to charge you, because you're dealing with Russia and oil purchases", it "essentially took them out of buying oil from Russia"."And then they (Russia) called, and they wanted to meet. We're going to see what the meeting means. But certainly, when you lose your second largest customer, and you're probably going to lose your first largest customer, I think that probably has a role."India was the second largest, and getting pretty close to China. China is the largest (purchaser of Russian oil)," the US president on Thursday said it has not halted oil purchases from Russia in response to the US President's tariff threat and continues to buy based solely on economic last week announced an additional 25 per cent tariff on US imports from India -- raising the overall duty to 50 per cent -- as a penalty for the country's continued imports of Russian oil. The tariffs will come into effect from August the steep tariffs are likely to hit the USD 40 billion of non-exempt exports that India does to the US, there has been chatter around stopping or curtailing oil imports from Russia However, AS Sahney, Chairman of Indian Oil Corporation (IOC), the country's largest oil firm, has clarified that there is "no pause" on Russian oil imports, and India's intent to continue buying Russian oil remains to the US tariffs, the Ministry of External Affairs had said that the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable.'Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security,' it has said that India's purchasing of Russian oil is 'fuelling' the war machine.