Ex Oasis drummer Zak Starkey reveals he confronted the Gallagher brothers after being axed from band's much anticipated reunion tour and says his recent sacking from The Who has left dad Ringo Starr 'not too happy'
Drummer Zak Starkey has revealed he confronted the Gallagher brothers after not being asked to join Oasis' much-anticipated reunion tour which kicks off in July.
The son of Ringo Starr, 59, who performed with the Britpop band between 2004 and 2009, said during an appearance on Tuesday's BBC Breakfast that he was 'gutted' not to be apart of the line up.
'I texted [Liam and Noel] and said "why am I not in it?"' before going on to say that bands get comfortable with musicians and the brothers were happy with their current drummer, which he said he was 'alright with that'.
Asked if he would he would have liked to rejoin Oasis for the shows, the drummer beamed: 'God, yeah. Greatest rock and roll band of my generation. Greatest rock and roll singer of my generation'.
Conversation then turned to Zak's recent sacking from The Who by Pete Townsend and Roger Daltrey, just one month after he was fired from the band before quickly reinstated - which he said had left his famous father 'not too happy'.
From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new Showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop.
Zak said: 'I texted [Liam and Noel] and said "why am I not in it?"' before going on to say that bands get comfortable with musicians and the brothers were happy with their current drummer, which he said he was 'alright with that' (pictured playing with Oasis in 2005)
Recalling how his sacking came about, Zak explained that during a recent gig he had insisted the band play their 1971 track The Song Is Over, which they never usually perform live, only for things to 'go wrong'.
He then went on to hit back at claims he'd been 'retired not fired' due to his busy schedule, admitting he actually 'had nothing on'.
'I'm open to offers [to return to] The Who because I love that band more than anything. It is the reason I started drumming.
The band's guitarist Pete Townshend took to Instagram last week to announce that Zak, the Who's drummer since 1996, was no longer part of the band.
But Zak quickly took to his own social media to claim that his departure was not a mutual decision and that he was fired from the band.
Zak's sacking comes just months ahead of the legendary bands farewell tour across North America and Pete revealed Scott Devours will replace him on drums.
The statement from Pete read: 'After many years of great work on drums from Zak the time has come for a change. A poignant time. Zak has lots of new projects in hand and I wish him the best.'
In a second post, Pete and Roger Daltrey added: 'The Who are heading for retirement, whereas Zak is 20yrs younger and has a great future with his new band and other exciting projects.
Zak explained that during a recent gig he had insisted the band play their 1971 track The Song Is Over, which they never usually perform live, only for things to 'go wrong' (pictured following the interview)
'He needs to devote all his energy into making it all a success. We both wish him all the luck in the world.
'Scott Devours – Who fans will know him from Roger's solo shows – will be replacing Zak. We hope all our fans will welcome him. Pete Townshend and Roger Daltrey'.
Resharing The Who's post, Zak hit back: 'I was fired two weeks after reinstatement and asked to make a statement saying I had quit the who to pursue my other musical endevours this would be a lie.
'I love the who and would never had quit. So I didn't make the statement ….quitting The Who would also have let down the countless amazing people who stood up for me (thank you all a million times over and more) thru the weeks of mayhem of me going 'in an out an in an out an in an out like a bleedin squeezebox x.
'To clarify "other projects" yes I do have other projects and always have. The Who have been sporadic or minimalist in touring most years apart from a two extensive tours in 2000 and 2006/7.'
Zak continued to list his other previous projects before adding: 'Releasing singles but not touring cos members are so busy. None of this has ever interfered with The Who and was never a problem for them.
'The lie is or would have been that I quit The Who- I didn't. I love the who and everyone in it.'
But on Monday, Zak again took to his Instagram account to share that his version of events had been contradicted yet again after a phonecall with The Who singer-guitarist Roger.
The son of Ringo Starr, 59, was fired from the band last week, just one month after he was sacked then quickly reinstated
Guitarist Pete Townshend took to Instagram on Monday to announce that Zak, the Who's drummer since 1996, was no longer part of the band
Zak has since claimed his departure was not a mutual decision and that he was fired from the band
Zak said Roger told him he hadn't actually been fired and instead 'retired to work on his own projects'.
He wrote: 'NOISE&CONFUSION!!!! I had a great phone chat with Roger at the end of last week which truly confused both of us!!!
'Rog said I hadn't been 'fired'…I had been 'retired' to work n my own projects. I explained to Rog that I have just spent nearly 8 weeks at my studio in Jamaica completing these projects, that my group Mantra Of The Cosmos was releasing one single at the beginning of June and after that had run its course ( usually 5/6 weeks ) I was completely available for the foreseeable future….
'Rog said "Oh!" and we kind of left it there- On good terms and great friends as we have always been.
'Gotta love these guys. As my mum used to say "The mind boggles!!!" XXX.'
It comes weeks after The Who shared the shock news that they will be retiring from touring after 60 years, following a final run of shows in the US later this year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Erika Jayne finally breaks silence on ex Tom Girardi's jail sentence for swindling clients out of $15million
Erika Jayne has emotionally spoken out days after ex-husband Tom Girardi was sentenced to jail after his conviction on multiple fraud charges. Giradi, 86, faces dying behind bars with his sentence of seven years and three months in federal prison after being found guilty of swindling his horribly injured or grieving clients out of around $15 million in settlement fees. Erika, 53, revealed she had learned Girardi's grim fate while in London on tour during a candid chat on the Friday, June 13, episode of Diamonds in the Rough with Teddi Mellencamp. The reality star, who was wed to Girardi for 20 years, said: 'And then 10 minutes before the second show, I get the news that Tom is being sent to prison. … It just hurts. 'It reopens old healing wounds, and it is something that, you know, I had a sold-out crowd in a theater just for me, and I was so grateful. My happiest place in the whole world to be is on stage. So while I was happy … there's a little piece [of me] that was like, "Ugh." 'I was very disappointed because those people [in the audience] were there for me, and I felt like five percent of myself was feeling sorry for myself. I was 95 percent there, and five percent of myself was feeling sorry for myself. Giradi, 86, faces dying behind bars with his sentence of seven years and three months in federal prison after being found guilty of swindling his horribly injured or grieving clients out of around $15 million in settlement fees - pictured August 2024 'This was the day that he got sentenced, my second show. My first show was flawless. And my second show was great, don't get me wrong. But there was that five percent I could have given the audience, and instead I was feeling sorry for myself. The reality star said she struggled to 'fight back thoughts and emotions' during her performance. Erika was herself accused alongside Girardi of embezzling money to fund their lavish lifestyles - but faced no charges. As well as his jail time, Girardi has been ordered to pay $2,310,247 in restitution to his victims and a $35,000 fine. Judge Josephine L. Staton, who handed down the sentencing, ordered Girardi to surrender to federal authorities by July 17. The sentencing occurred in a courthouse in downtown Los Angeles on June 3, which also happens to be Girardi's 86th birthday. A jury found the once-powerful attorney guilty on four counts of wire fraud in August. Girardi, who built the prestigious LA law firm Girardi & Keese after his fight against a California utility giant inspired the Oscar-winning movie Erin Brockovich, plead not guilty to the four counts (he had been indicted on five counts of wire fraud in 2023). His high-rolling career came tumbling down in 2020 when he was accused of stealing millions in settlements he'd won for the victims of the 2018 Lion Air plane crash in Indonesia, a tragedy in which 189 people died. The claims from that crash were also the basis of separate criminal charges against Girardi in Chicago, where he was charged with eight counts of wire fraud and four counts of criminal contempt of court. However those charges were dropped following the California conviction. He pleaded not guilty in that case. 'This self-proclaimed "champion of justice" was nothing more than a thief and a liar who conned his vulnerable clients out of the millions of dollars,' United States Attorney Bill Essayli said in a press release about the prison sentence. 'My office will vigorously prosecute corrupt lawyers and those who assist them in criminal activities.' Lawyers for Girardi, who was diagnosed with late-onset Alzheimer's disease and dementia in 2021, had concerns about the defendant residing in prison amid his health woes. Attorney Sam Cross, who is among Girardi's lawyers, said the defendant would probably end up spending the rest of his life in prison in light of his health troubles, according to the LA Times. 'Should Tom Girardi die in prison?' he asked the judge multiple times in remarks. Cross also asked the judge on Monday to keep Girardi in his current assisted living facility instead sending him to federal prison, arguing he would not receive the proper care he needs in prison. 'We believe he is in need of specialized treatment,' Cross explained to the judge, according to Deadline. He described Girardi as 'frail, elderly' and argued he would be at risk of being 'exploited or taken advantage of' in prison. But the judge ultimately disagreed, citing testimony from a BOP forensic psychologist, a BOP neuropsychologist, and the self-awareness Girardi was apparently exhibiting. She concluded they can safely sentence Girardi to a U.S. Bureau of Prisons facility. 'He will be designated to an appropriate facility,' she said. Girardi's mental competence had been a major issue throughout the trial, with his lawyers previously attempting to push for a new trial in addition to claiming he is unable to assist his lawyers, struggles with his memory, and is legally unfit to appear before a jury (however prosecutors claimed it was mostly an act, alleging he had been faking dementia to evade being held responsible for his crimes, according to the Los Angeles Times). In January 2024 Girardi was cleared to stand trial with U.S. District Judge Josephine L. Staton declaring he was 'competent to stand trial', despite his Alzheimer's diagnosis. Girardi was previously declared fit by a court-appointed psychologist in June 2023 but his attorneys presented repeated challenges. Neuropsychologist Dr. Diana Goldstein said that she 'has concluded her examination and opined, among other things, that [Girardi] is competent to stand trial,' she wrote. It is unclear the basis for that conclusion and her full analysis. Goldstein's report was filed under seal and partly redacted by Girardi's attorneys. The prosecutors who retained Goldstein do not have access to the complete document, Yahoo News reported. California forensic and clinical psychiatrist, Dr. Nathan Lavid wrote in a sworn affidavit that Girardi suffered from late-onset Alzheimer's disease and dementia, the news outlet reported. Girardi's brother, Robert, had been acting as conservator on his brother's behalf after Girardi underwent a mental evaluation in February 2021, The New York Post reported. During the trial, the jury heard that between 2010 and 2020 the shamed attorney used his clients' settlement funds 'like a personal piggy bank.' 'Girardi Keese was a den of thieves and Tom Girardi was the thief-in-chief,' Assistant U.S. Attorney Scott Paetty previously told the court. 'Girardi Keese was a house of cards built on the lies of Tom Girardi.' Girardi ran a massive 'Ponzi scheme,' lying to clients and using their misappropriated millions to pay for his own lavish lifestyle of private jets, luxury cars, exclusive club memberships, expensive jewelry for his third wife, ex-go-go dancer Jayne plus $20 million to fund her acting career. The couple were together for 21 years but their divorce - filed by Jayne soon after the Lion Air allegations - has been held up since Girardi Keese filed bankruptcy in 2021 with more than $100 million in debts. Jayne never showed up at her soon-to-be-ex husband's trial and it's unclear if she ever made an appearance to the sentencing on Tuesday, however she made no mention of her estranged husband's legal troubles on Instagram that day, with her latest Instagram Story being a shout-out to her new Vogue profile at 7:15AM PT. Girardi - who was disbarred in 2022 following the allegations against him - was portrayed by his defense team as suffering from dementia. 'He got old, he got sick, he lost his mind,' his attorney Charles Snyder previously told the court. 'All the lights were on but there was nobody home. He lost touch with reality.' Girardi and his legal team also pointed the finger of blame at another man, Christopher Kamon, 49, the chief financial officer of Girardi Keese who they say stole between $50 million and $100 million from the company. Kamon plead guilty to two counts of wire fraud and was sentenced to 121 months in federal prison in April in a separate trial. During the trial, prosecutors told jurors that Girardi preyed on clients who were 'in their darkest hours,' suffering from terrible injuries or mourning the death of loved ones. Joe Ruigomez - who desperately needed money to pay the giant medical bills for the horrible injuries he suffered in a 2020 gas explosion at his home that killed his girlfriend - was told by Girardi that his settlement from the PG&E utility was $5 million, when it was actually $50 million. Another Girardi client, Judy Selberg, hired the once-acclaimed lawyer to bring an unlawful death lawsuit after her husband Paul was killed in a boating accident in April 2018. Girardi won $500,000 for her but at the time of the guilty verdict, more than four years after the settlement, she's still owed a large portion of that. He also held up Erica Saldana's $2.5 million settlement which she needed to pay the medical bills for the devastating injuries her one-year-old son suffered in a car crash. And Josie Hernandez had to declare bankruptcy because Girardi didn't pay her the money she was owed from a settlement over a medical device injury. In all these cases, when the clients called or emailed Girardi to ask when they were going to get their money, he came up with excuses like there was a lien or 'holdback' on the settlement, that there was an IRS issue or a judge needed to 'sign off' before the money could be paid. All these claims were false. 'He lied to his clients over and over and over again about why they weren't being paid,' Assistant U.S. Attorney Ali Moghaddas previously told the court. 'He lied to them them because he did not want to give them their money because it was gone….it was already spent. 'Behind the curtain he was pilfering his clients' funds. It was just cruel to treat victims in this manner. 'He was buying two private jets while his clients weren't getting paid…. This this case is a simple and sad story of trust violated and greed.' It took the jury of seven men and five women only four and a half hours of deliberation to reach their guilty verdicts - two hours the first day and two-and-a-half hours the following day.
BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
Two private schools in Kingston and Bromley to close
Two private schools in south London will close after 75 years due to declining pupil numbers and Labour's introduction of VAT on school Learning Group (ILG), which runs Park Hill Preparatory School and Nursery, in Kingston, and Bishop Challoner School in Bromley, will close at the end of the academic High Court judges dismissed a legal challenge over the government's policy. Lawyers for the families and private schools argued it was discriminatory. Barristers for the Chancellor, His Majesty's Revenue and Customs and the Department for Education said it was to raise standards for state school children by making private school parents pay "their fair share". 'Heartbreaking' According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS), the board of trustees at Bishop Challoner confirmed on Thursday the Catholic independent school for children aged three to 18 would close on 4 school, which opened in 1950, stated it had been "an incredibly difficult decision" to close but it had to be made due to the "increasingly challenging environment for schools". Amanda, whose 18-year-old son Barney is in Year 13 at Bishop Challoner, told BBC London the news was "heartbreaking" and came as a "complete shock". "I feel very much aware of this huge community of people who are being affected: members of staff, support staff, students and parents," she added not all independent schools were "full of wealthy families", and this was a "small, caring school".Barney is neurodiverse and Amanda said: "We chose the school because of its small, community-feel, very calm environment. It's given Barney a social environment that feels safe."I feel very lucky that my son is going to university in September but I can't imagine how parents are feeling with their children in the middle of their GCSEs or A-levels." The school's Chair of Trustees Patricia Colling said: "This is a very difficult time for our parents, pupils and staff. "We are saddened that, despite our best efforts, the school has to close." 'Quality of education' LDRS said ILG was offering parents of pupils at Park Hill the option to move to its sister school Westbury House School, in New Malden, from September, which is a 12-minute drive away. Park Hill will be converted into a dedicated full-time nursery, offering 51 weeks of provision for children aged between three months and four years said closing the preparatory school, which opened in 1949, and moving its pupils to Westbury House would protect both education settings for the Nunn, Park Hill's head teacher, said in a message on the school's website the move would provide pupils with greater opportunities for social development, a wider friendship network and an expanded extracurricular programme – including sport, music and drama. An ILG spokesperson said: "The benefit of being in a private group is that we can protect both settings, and ensure the continuity and quality of education for our children, who will always remain our top priority." Additional reporting by Olivia Demetriades, BBC London
The Sun
24 minutes ago
- The Sun
I've seen signs of how stressed Harry is recently – he's killed any chance of reconciliation with King, expert says
A ROYAL expert says Prince Harry seems "down and sad" having killed any change of mending bridges with his father. Last month, the royal launched into an astonishing rant on the BBC after losing his legal challenge to get back his tax-payer funded security. 6 6 The 40-year-old made a series of bombshell claims about the Royal Family - all the while insisting he wanted reconciliation. King Charles was said to be "frustrated and upset" by his son's tirade. Renowned royal photographer Arthur Edwards told the Royal Exclusive Show that Harry looked "so sad" in the interview. He told The Sun's Royal Editor Matt Wilkinson that Harry "doesn't seem to be having a real role now" as Meghan delves into her various business ventures. He said: "And I keep thinking back to that video he made when he lost the court case. And he looked so sad in that, so really down and not upbeat like he was normally. "I feel somehow he's having probably second thoughts. All he wanted to do was reconcile with his father. "The thing is, if he'd only said sorry on that interview, 'sorry, Pop, you know, I do want to see you' - I think that might have had a different [effect]. "But in many ways, it was coming from his heart, I thought. His father is not well, he's concerned - it's his father." "I did feel that was a change in his attitude. I mean, I haven't seen anything in five years. and then suddenly he comes out with that. "I thought he looked so sad, you know, so sad." The Sun's Royal Editor called Harry's interview "one of their biggest mistakes" and said "it came from a place of anger". Prince Harry's biggest bombshells: Prince Harry lost his publicly-funded security appeal in a humiliating blow today Harry claimed the King WON'T speak to him 'because of this security stuff' He said he 'can't see a world' where he would bring his wife and children to the UK Harry revealed he has 'forgiven' his family and was up for reconciliation - but claimed it was ALL down to Charles The royal described his court loss as a 'good old fashioned establishment stitch up' He also said he feels 'let down' by his country and reached out to the PM for help. Buckingham Palace breaks its silence with a scathing statement after the bombshell interview Prince Harry says he 'doesn't know how long King Charles has left' The Royal gave the extraordinary interview after losing his appeal against the decision to remove his taxpayer-funded security. In a fresh scathing attack, the Duke of Sussex unleashed a host of new claims including how dad Charles is no longer speaking to him and how he's "uncovered his worst fears". The Duke of Sussex said he would "love reconciliation" with the royal family. This comes after years of feuding with the family, including his own brother Prince William. The feud between the Duke and his family started when he and Meghan Markle announced on January 8, 2020, that they would be stepping down as 'senior' members of the Royal Family. A tragic revelation in the bombshell interview was when Prince Harry revealed that his father, King Charles, won't speak to him. Harry said when making the emotional admission: "He won't speak to me because of this security stuff." Harry and William are also said to be barely on speaking terms. William was reportedly 'blindsided' by Harry's decision to ditch his duties to live in his Montecito mansion with Meghan and the pair have yet to make amends. Another blow to the Royal relationships struck when Harry released his memoir Spare in 2023. Harry didn't hold back in the controversial book which caused a deeper chasm between him and his brother. In the bombshell memoir, he detailed Megxit and how the Royal family brand Meghan "difficult" and "rude." He slammed Queen Camilla as a villain and was highly criticised for outing his family for cash. The Duke of Sussex chillingly suggested it would be the Firm's fault if anything happened to him or wife Meghan Markle. He said he misses the UK and it is "sad" that he won't be able to show his children his homeland. A Palace Spokesperson said at the time: "All of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion." 6 6 6 Prince Harry is 'pointing finger' & 'wants to blame everybody else' in bombshell interview as he 'fumes over court loss' PRINCE Harry is pointing the finger in his bombshell interview after losing his battle for taxpayer-funded security, an expert slams. The Duke responded to losing his court fight over his security in the UK in a bombshell BBC interview - in which he blamed a number of people for not giving him what he believes is sufficient security. The Duke chillingly suggested it would be the Firm's fault if anything happened to him or wife Meghan Markle and that he feels unsafe to bring his children to the UK. Broadcaster and royal biographer Hugo Vickers, 72, said it's not unlike Harry to play the blame game and it's about time he takes some accountability. Vickers told The Sun: "I think he's pointing the finger pretty much at all of us really. "He's always angry and so he's sort of doing what he does so often you know which is to blame other people. "That is what they do the whole time. "They're always telling us what they think and what they feel and telling us that we're in the wrong and they're in the right. "He wants to attribute blame to everybody else - I mean he never seems to accept that he, himself, has done quite a few things which on the whole we don't really like." After losing the appeal over receiving security for himself and his family - after battling for three-and-a-half years - Prince Harry expressed he was immensely disappointed with the verdict.
