Two private schools in Kingston and Bromley to close
'Heartbreaking'
According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS), the board of trustees at Bishop Challoner confirmed on Thursday the Catholic independent school for children aged three to 18 would close on 4 July.The school, which opened in 1950, stated it had been "an incredibly difficult decision" to close but it had to be made due to the "increasingly challenging environment for schools". Amanda, whose 18-year-old son Barney is in Year 13 at Bishop Challoner, told BBC London the news was "heartbreaking" and came as a "complete shock". "I feel very much aware of this huge community of people who are being affected: members of staff, support staff, students and parents," she said.She added not all independent schools were "full of wealthy families", and this was a "small, caring school".Barney is neurodiverse and Amanda said: "We chose the school because of its small, community-feel, very calm environment. It's given Barney a social environment that feels safe."I feel very lucky that my son is going to university in September but I can't imagine how parents are feeling with their children in the middle of their GCSEs or A-levels." The school's Chair of Trustees Patricia Colling said: "This is a very difficult time for our parents, pupils and staff. "We are saddened that, despite our best efforts, the school has to close."
'Quality of education'
LDRS said ILG was offering parents of pupils at Park Hill the option to move to its sister school Westbury House School, in New Malden, from September, which is a 12-minute drive away. Park Hill will be converted into a dedicated full-time nursery, offering 51 weeks of provision for children aged between three months and four years old.ILG said closing the preparatory school, which opened in 1949, and moving its pupils to Westbury House would protect both education settings for the future.Sarah Nunn, Park Hill's head teacher, said in a message on the school's website the move would provide pupils with greater opportunities for social development, a wider friendship network and an expanded extracurricular programme – including sport, music and drama. An ILG spokesperson said: "The benefit of being in a private group is that we can protect both settings, and ensure the continuity and quality of education for our children, who will always remain our top priority."
Additional reporting by Olivia Demetriades, BBC London
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BBC forced to edit flagship Today programme and apologise after Robert Jenrick was branded 'xenophobic' for Mail on Sunday article
The BBC was forced to edit its flagship Today programme and apologise after a guest branded Robert Jenrick 'xenophobic'. Author and refugee charity boss Dr Krish Kandiah prompted fury after he criticised this weekend's Mail on Sunday front page in which the shadow justice secretary said he worried for his young daughters and defended residents protesting against asylum hotels. During the Thought for the Day segment this morning, the theologian suggested the Tory MP's concerns were 'irrational' and such language 'fuelled angry protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers.' But after Mr Jenrick said that it was wrong to brand those who fear for their children 'racist', saying they were instead 'good parents', the BBC removed segments from the Radio 4 breakfast broadcast. They also issued an apology for the 'inclusion' of some of the language used. 'On BBC Radio 4 this morning listeners were told that if you're concerned about the threat of illegal migrants to your kids, you're racist,' Mr Jenrick tweeted. 'Wrong. You're a good parent.' The row erupted after Dr Kandiah said: 'A front page story in The Mail on Sunday quoted shadow justice minister Robert Jenrick talking about his fears for his young daughters,' he said. 'He said, "I certainly don't want my children to share a neighbourhood with men from backward countries who broke into Britain illegally and about whom we know next to nothing." 'These words echo a fear many have absorbed. Fear of the stranger. The technical name for this is xenophobia. 'All phobias are by definition irrational. Nevertheless, they have a huge impact. 'It is understandable that many people are scared by the unknown, especially if they've been told illegality and unfairness are part of the story. However, over the past year, xenophobia has fuelled angry protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers, deepening divisions in our communities.' Dr Kandiah then quoted statistics saying the majority of people arriving in small boats are 'found to be genuinely fleeing war, persecution and famine'. He did not state that the boats cross the Channel from France – a safe country – before arriving in the UK. Reform MP Richard Tice defended Jenrick, saying: 'Delusional lefty filling R4 Today as usual. 'Trying to smear and label anyone who stands up for British women and girls 'We should be proud of Britain, our traditional values and affirm that our culture is superior to the anti-women misogynistic culture of some other nations.' A Tory source said: 'Thought for the Day has long descended into a bunch of nobodies wittering on about their mad-hat socialist ideas. 'If the BBC are not prepared to broadcast serious religious voices they should at least ensure the second-rate ones they do find are balanced.' A BBC spokesman said: 'Today's episode of Thought for the Day contained reflections from a faith perspective on fear in society but has been edited to remove some of the language used and we apologise for its inclusion.'
BBC News
2 minutes ago
- BBC News
Why Gers figures will play a prominent role in the Scottish election
Gers-day, every August, is a statistical festival to add to Edinburgh's other colourful offerings. It gives performers a wide variety of creative options to attract into them, and you'll find Scotland's public finances benefit a lot from the generosity of the Treasury in London. Spending per head last year was nearly £2,700 ahead of the figure for the UK as a you may find, as the Office for National Statistics told us for 2022-23, that spending per head is higher in same set of figures showed us that the net transfer of funds was not as big as the ones for north-west England, Wales, Yorkshire and Humberside or the West Midlands. Just because Scotland is the only part of the UK to go through this annual analysis does not mean it's the outlier. Dig a bit deeper, as the Scottish government has done, and you'll find that devolved revenues have been rising faster than devolved expenditure. That was the first choice of interpretation by Holyrood's Finance Secretary Shona may be so, but expenditure is a much bigger number than devolved revenue, so the growth rates don't matter as much as the actual minister added that Scotland raises more money per head than other parts of the UK except London and south-east puts it in that position is oil and gas tax revenue, which is on a long-term downward trend. Even if it weren't, it's widely recognised as an unreliable way to balance the nation's on the bright side of independence doesn't answer the awkward questions this raises, where there would be no division between devolved and reserved finances and a future with not much oil and gas revenue flowing. What choices would an independent Scottish government make? An independent Scotland would, last year, have had to borrow – if it could persuade the bond markets – more than one ninth (11.7%) of the economy's annual total output. The UK last year was borrowing one-twentieth (5.1%), while the European Union tells it members that less than one-thirtieth (3%) is more like the maximum sustainable answer from supporters of independence is that they could unleash the potential of the Scottish economy to grow faster and fill Holyrood's coffers with more tax revenue. That is preferable to setting out where the spending axe might have to figures, they remind us, reflect the slow growth you get under the current constitutional arrangements, and it should be possible to do much already finding that faster growth, sought by ministers in Westminster and Holyrood, is hard to achieve. It depends on the choices a newly independent Scottish government would make. There are trade-offs between growth and independent future may not seem imminent. But First Minister John Swinney has made that his chosen battleground for the Holyrood election next May. These Gers figures will surely feature in that debate.
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Next Palestine Action protest aims to sign up 1,000 people
The next mass protest in support of the banned group Palestine Action will aim to be twice the size of the last, organisers have said, as they increase pressure on the government to lift its proscription. Last Saturday's protest in Parliament Square was predicated on 500 people signing up but the next one, announced on Wednesday for 6 September, is conditional on 1,000 people agreeing to take part. Defend Our Juries, the pressure group behind the protests opposing the proscription of Palestine Action, said it believed a turnout of 1,000 would be enough to get the ban lifted. A total of 532 people were arrested at Saturday's demonstration, all but 10 under section 13 of the Terrorism Act for carrying placards saying: 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.' The number of people arrested for peaceful protests, their age profile – half of those arrested were 60 or older – and the strain it is putting on the criminal justice system have led many to question the ban. A Defend Our Juries spokesperson said: 'With all the real challenges facing the country, it's crazy that the Labour government has generated a political crisis over people quietly holding cardboard signs against genocide in Parliament Square. This won't be forgotten.' After the weekend's arrests, Downing Street and Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, said the protesters did not know about the group's violent tendencies. In response, Defend Our Juries and the Palestine Action co-founder, Huda Ammori, pointed to intelligence assessments released in Ammori's continuing legal battle fighting proscription that they said contradicted the claims. The Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre (JTAC), a government body based within MI5, produced a report on 7 March that said the group 'primarily uses direct action tactics', which typically resulted in minor damage to property. 'Common tactics include graffiti, petty vandalism, occupation and lock-ons,' it added. A separate assessment by the Proscription Review Group (PRG) said a ban would be 'relatively novel' as 'there was no known precedent of an organisation being proscribed on the basis that it was concerned in terrorism mainly due to its use or threat of action involving serious damage to property'. Nevertheless, the JTAC and PRG recommended proscription. References to violence by Downing Street and Cooper are understood to refer to an allegation of assault against a single person associated with Palestine Action, which they deny and relates to live proceedings so cannot be discussed fully because of the risk of contempt of court. The Defend Our Juries spokesperson suggested that even if the allegation were proved that would not make the whole organisation terrorist, adding: 'When the Labour MP, Mike Amesbury, assaulted his constituent, no one suggested that that made the Labour party a terrorist organisation.' They continued: 'The public response to our protests has been overwhelming. Despite (or because of) the legal risks, the government has turned an arrest for terrorism into a badge of honour for resistance to genocide. We have been inundated with offers of support from all quarters … The protest will go ahead as long as at least 1,000 people commit to taking part. That could well be enough for the ban to be lifted. If 5,000 people show up, we're certain the ban will be gone, and with it, most likely, Yvette Cooper.' The former cabinet minister, Peter Hain, has said the UK government is 'digging itself into a hole' over Palestine Action and that fellow Labour peers and MPs were regretting voting to ban the group. Lord Hain, who opposed proscription and was a leader of the anti-apartheid movement, said equating the likes of retired magistrates and serving doctors with al-Qaida was 'absolutely wrong' and would 'end in tears for the government'.
