Opinion: Closure of incentive scheme is appalling news for farmers
The government's announcement of the closure of the 2024 Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) is appalling news for farmers and rural businesses as well as nature and biodiversity, at a time when the industry is still reeling from the Autumn Budget.
SFI was the most ambitious, forward-thinking and environmentally-friendly agricultural policy seen anywhere in the world - it promised a fairer future for farmers and a greener future for the world.
Despite this, the government has now announced that "SFI has reached its completion" and that it has stopped accepting new applications immediately.
All existing SFI agreements will be paid to farmers, and outstanding eligible applications that have been submitted will also be taken forward.
The government said Environmental Land Management scheme agreements will remain in place, including SFI, and it will launch a new and improved SFI in 2026. The redesign of the scheme will follow the spending review, which will take place in June.
The announcement came with a high degree of disingenuous messaging from the government. It has been made to appear as though this was something that was always planned. However, the reality is that since its launch, the SFI has been hampered by a stuttering roll-out, with uptake only increasing significantly in the last 12 months - all while basic payments were relentlessly reduced.
The industry was very much under the impression that the scheme would continue to remain open, with Defra providing assurance that there would be minimal changes for SFI, apart from the addition of new actions later in 2025.
In our region, there are many examples where land managers are demonstrating it is possible to farm the land and protect and enhance nature and the environment.
This is now at serious risk and the businesses that had planned to enter SFI, but had not yet submitted an application, will need to review their business plans with urgency.
The stop-start nature of these schemes does nothing to build confidence and this latest blow undermines the hard work of forward-thinking farmers and land managers who have put positive environmental outcomes at the heart of their businesses.
The government must work with us, immediately, to find a solution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Which taxes could rise in the budget to fill £40bn black hole? What we know
Sir Keir Starmer and chancellor Rachel Reeves are planning tax rises ahead of the autumn budget, according to a report. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is reportedly exploring options to raise additional revenue from inheritance tax ahead of the autumn budget. The move comes following reports earlier this week that the government is planning tax rises ahead of the autumn budget. The Guardian reported the government will begin "preparing the ground" from next month to forewarn the country about what is to come. Government U-turns over winter fuel payments and welfare reform have left Reeves with a multibillion-pound spending gap to fill, amid pushes for a wealth tax by some Labour MPs — and millionaires themselves. Here's what we know so far. Why is the government considering increasing inheritance tax? The paper reported that there will be no increases to income tax, national insurance or VAT - a key Labour manifesto pledge ahead of last year's general election. Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown, said that choosing to increase inheritance tax meets "the government's criteria of raising tax without taxing people more during their working lives". Added to this, by raising revenue through inheritance tax, there are a lot of ways to garner more income. 'The system is so fiendishly complex that there are an enormous number of rules, and therefore tweaks, that the government could consider," she said. One of the paths to explore would be a maximum limit on the amount of money or assets that can be given away as Potentially Exempt Transfers (PETs) without incurring inheritance tax (IHT) if the donor survives for seven years after making the gift. By doing so, this would 'bring in taxes, from stamp duty to VAT". 'From a Treasury perspective, capping PETs would need to be balanced against the fact that, at the moment, these gifts allow for money to pass through the generations. It means younger family members can put it to work for them, buying homes and spending," Coles added. Which taxes could rise? While increasing inheritance tax is being explored, there are still other options on the table. A rise in gambling taxes looks to be on the cards, with Reeves leaving the door open for this on 7 August after Gordon Brown had urged the chancellor to raise levies to cover the cost of lifting the two-child benefit cap. The former prime minister is calling for the government to increase duties for online casinos and slot machines, with Reeves saying of this: "We've already launched a review into gambling taxes. We're taking evidence on that at the moment." Reforms to gambling levies could generate the £3.2bn needed to scrap the two-child limit and benefit cap, the Institute for Public Policy Research has said. Meanwhile, the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (Niesr), a major economic think tank, has called for reform of the council tax system, such as overhauling council tax bands and possibly replacing it with a land value tax. The government has not commented on this. Leading health experts have also called for a change to the alcohol tax, linking duties to inflation and ending 'cider exceptionalism", a 2023 measure which resulted in cider being taxed at a lower band compared to other products of the same strength. Which taxes are not expected to rise? The government remains committed to its pledge not to increase income tax, national insurance or VAT, though recent messaging has been mixed. On 6 August, Starmer declined to explicitly say whether the government was still committed to not raising VAT, income tax, as well as corporation tax in the budget. Downing Street later sought to clarify the government remains committed to its manifesto pledges, which included a promise not to raise taxes on 'working people', including income tax and VAT. There have been mounting rumours of a wealth tax, but as it stands, the government is ruling this out. Culture secretary Lisa Nandy, Scottish secretary Ian Murray and business secretary Jonathan Reynolds have rejected this in recent weeks, with all of them suggesting it wouldn't work. Why do taxes need to rise? Reeves has set herself two fiscal rules: the 'stability rule', which ensures day-to-day spending is matched by tax revenues so the government only borrows to invest; and the 'investment rule', which requires the government to reduce net financial debt as a share of the economy. Niesr said weaker-than-expected recent economic activity, U-turns on welfare cuts and forecast-beating borrowing mean Reeves is on track to miss one of her fiscal rules by £41.2bn in 2029-30. It cautioned she faces an 'impossible trilemma' of trying to meet her fiscal rules while fulfilling spending commitments and upholding the manifesto pledge not to raise taxes. And it said she will likely need to break the promise not to raise taxes for "working people" and resort to 'moderate but sustained' hikes - or cut spending - to address the shortfall. Read more Rachel Reeves is under pressure to balance the books. This chart shows the scale of UK debt (Yahoo Finance UK) Rachel Reeves said this flagship policy would raise money - it may end up doing the opposite (Sky News) Reeves 'vastly underestimated' scale of private school parents' VAT rebellion (The Telegraph)
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Something for everyone in UK's latest GDP data
Growth figures for the second quarter of the year have something for everyone. A better-than-expected outturn of 0.3% over three months, helped by a healthy 0.4% bounce in June, put a little spring in the chancellor's step on the long road to the autumn budget. For her critics, meanwhile, any slowdown from the 0.7% recorded in the first three months of the year would be cast as failure, even if the figure was much improved on the 0.1% consensus forecast among economists. Politics latest: Reeves won't rule out change to inheritance tax rules Arguments over nuances in the numbers often say more about the politics of the day and the failings of economic forecasters than the reality for households and Rachel Reeves, facing darkening forecasts for inflation, unemployment and the size of the hole in the public finances, there is qualified good news here. The economy is undoubtedly growing, albeit more slowly in the past three months than in the first quarter, and taken together, growth of 1% is the strongest in the G7 in the first half of this year. More awkwardly for a government that made growth its priority on taking office, the slowdown in the second quarter coincides with the hike in employment taxes in April that was the centrepiece of the last budget. Money blog: Restaurant owner fumes over pretty much everythingThe underlying figures also show that public spending was the largest driver of growth, but it is the private sector that needs to thrive to meaningfully change the equation when Ms Reeves comes to balance the books and meet her own fiscal rules. More important to most is the reality of an economy in which food and fuel inflation has become entrenched and forecast to rise further before the year is out. Interest rates have been cut further to 4%, the lowest level since March 2023, but with unemployment ticking up as the labour market tightens, the timing of further cuts remains unclear. And while wages continue to rise above inflation, increasing real-terms income, for many, it simply does not feel like it.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Government ‘lines up insolvency firm' in case of Thames Water collapse
The Government has reportedly appointed insolvency specialists to step up planning for Thames Water in case the troubled water company collapses. Environment Secretary Steve Reed signed off the appointment of FTI Consulting to act as an administrator in case Thames fails to secure funding from lenders, Sky News reported. Contingency plans could see Britain's biggest water firm placed into a special administration regime (SAR), meaning it would be put into an insolvency process. A spokeswoman for the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) said: 'The Government will always act in the national interest on these issues. 'The company remains financially stable, but we have stepped up our preparations and stand ready for all eventualities, including applying for a special administration regime if that were to become necessary.' Thames Water, which has 16 million customers, remains locked in talks over a rescue funding deal with a number of senior creditors. In June, private equity firm KKR pulled out of plans to inject around £4 billion of cash into the financially-stricken company in a bid to keep it afloat. Thames Water chairman Sir Adrian Montague recently said the firm was still in 'crisis mode' as it seeks to avoid special administration measures. A spokeswoman for Thames Water said: 'Our focus remains on a holistic and fundamental recapitalisation, delivering a market-led solution which includes targeting investment grade credit ratings and returning the company to a stable financial foundation. 'Constructive discussions with our many stakeholder continue.' FTI Consulting has been contacted for comment.
