logo
Crash caused by commercial driver? Employer's liability may be limited in Texas Senate bill

Crash caused by commercial driver? Employer's liability may be limited in Texas Senate bill

Yahoo17-05-2025

AUSTIN, Texas (KETK) — Should employers be on the hook when their commercial drivers crash? Texas SB 39 says not always, as it aims to limit what evidence can be shown in a civil lawsuit when their drivers cause a crash.
SB 39 could limit certain claims, such as negligent hiring, training or supervision, making it harder to hold the company directly responsible. If passed, an employer could only be sued for the driver's actions, not for their hiring, training, or supervision. The bill could make it harder for crash victims to get better compensation.
Polk County Jail resorts to moving inmates to Louisiana amid staffing, overcrowding issues
The bill was created to reduce litigation costs and speed up trials; however, the Sheriff's Association of Texas opposes the bill due to safety concerns.
In a letter published in May, the association requests senators and representatives to oppose the bill. They argue it would increase safety risks deputies face, such as when responding to crashes or investigating wrecks involving large trucks.
The Sheriffs' Association of Texas President and Franklin County Sheriff Ricky Jones emphasized the danger SB 39 could cause.
'Our deputies are often the first to respond to deadly crashes involving commercial vehicles,' Jones said. 'We've seen firsthand how these tragedies often result from repeat safety violations and reckless business practices. SB 39 would make it harder to hold these dangerous trucking companies accountable.'
In 2024, the association said Texas recorded 18,926 crashes involving large commercial trucks, and of those, 720 resulted in fatalities and 11,109 in injuries. 'This bill doesn't make our roads safer, and it doesn't help law enforcement,' Jones said. 'Instead, it protects bad actors and puts Texas families and first responders at greater risk.'
However, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick supports the bill, claiming it would help cut costs across the board.
'The explosion of lawsuits (many of them frivolous) against trucking companies in Texas has caused insurance rates to skyrocket, hurting Texans and our businesses. By passing SB 39, the Texas Senate has taken a major step toward providing judges a clear approach to collision cases. These changes will speed up collision trials involving commercial motor vehicles so victims get justice quicker while decreasing legal costs for Texas businesses.'
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick
SB 39 was passed in the Senate on April 24 and now heads to the Texas House, where, if passed, it will be signed into law.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How did Britain's food supplies become so vulnerable?
How did Britain's food supplies become so vulnerable?

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

How did Britain's food supplies become so vulnerable?

On May 15, Wilfred Emmanuel-Jones, founder of The Black Farmer food range, received an alarming and unexpected email. It was from a logistics firm that distributes food to UK supermarkets (including Tesco, Sainsbury's and Aldi) for him and other manufacturers, announcing it had been the victim of a cybercrime. The hack left Emmanuel-Jones in what he called a 'desperate situation': to be precise, it meant 18 pallets of Swedish meatballs from his smorgasbord brand were stuck in limbo – and at risk of being thrown away. Each pallet contained 160 cases; with seven packs per case, it amounted to a total of 20,160 packs of meatballs and an estimated retail value of around £100,000. If the meatballs did not make it to supermarket shelves, Emmanuel-Jones not only faced financial loss to his firm, but also scores of disappointed customers being denied one of their favourite meals. Coming in the wake of similar cyber attacks on Marks & Spencer and the Co-op, the hacked logistics firm was Peter Green Chilled – a distribution company based near Shepton Mallet, Somerset, which transports chilled food to stores. The attack has since cast a spotlight on how the UK's vast and vital food distribution, storage and warehousing sector operates, with questions raised about how often vulnerable the industry is to hackers – and whether more can be done to protect it. Emmanuel-Jones, who is best known for his award-winning sausages, says it was the first time his business, founded in 2004 on his farm in Devon, had been affected by cybercrime. 'If you're like us and a lot of other small companies, you've got to get a distributor,' he explains. 'The cheapest way of sending products around is by the pallet, but not all the supermarkets necessarily want a whole pallet. Peter Green [Chilled, our distributor] will also do the picking for you, so if someone wants a certain amount they'll do that. That's why they're crucial.' In its email, Peter Green Chilled said it had been the victim of a ransomware attack – which is when hackers encrypt a victim's data and lock them out of computer systems, demanding payment to hand back control. It left the firm unable to process or pick orders, although it later told the BBC its transport activities had continued. No one at Peter Green Chilled was available to comment to The Telegraph, but a source said it was 'busy trying to catch up'. Emmanuel-Jones said the result was that 18 pallets of The Black Farmer meatballs were left stranded in Peter Green Chilled's warehouse, 'with the clock ticking because they have a shelf life'. By the end of last week, he had managed to cut that number to eight, after persuading some supermarkets to accept full pallet deliveries. But, he added, 'to make matters worse', a fresh consignment of meatballs had just arrived from Malmö, Sweden – via the Port of Immingham in Lincolnshire – and he now faced the challenge of getting those to stores too. 'All of this has a dramatic impact on your cash flow,' he said. 'The distribution system does seem vulnerable.' Phil Pluck is the chief executive of the Cold Chain Federation, which represents the UK's temperature-controlled logistics sector – covering both storage and distribution. Its 270 members operate over 450 chilled warehouses and more than 40,000 temperature-controlled vehicles, from last-mile vans to 40ft trailers, ensuring food reaches consumers safely. Around 50 per cent of all food, whether it is produced in the UK or imported, travels through the cold chain. Walk into a supermarket and some of that produce is obvious: fresh meat, fruit and vegetables, for example. Yet other everyday items, including bread, cakes and often biscuits, also travel via it. Sometimes, food goes from a producer, port or warehouse to a general warehouse, too, which may hold products for a number of customers. Or, it may be sent to a regional distribution centre that is owned exclusively by one supermarket. 'What the cybercriminals know very well is that 450 warehouses of food isn't actually that many and that if you can disrupt the supply chain then it becomes serious very quickly,' says Pluck. 'There may be thousands of pallets in a warehouse belonging to 100 customers and they have to be delivered to hundreds of destinations.' He said an attack by hackers may result in a company being unable to read what is in their warehouses, or even to know where all their trucks are at a particular point. 'There are sophisticated warehouse management systems and telematics on the vehicles, tracking where they're going and what's inside them. If the hackers can get into the warehouse management system, they can effectively disable a very large quantity of food distribution, knowing full well that that causes major distribution problems that become very easily spotted in a public sense, very easily, very quickly, in that the result is bare supermarket shelves.' Around 10 of the federation's members have said they've been victims of cyber attacks in the past few years, Pluck adds, but he guesses that the true figure is 'way more'. There has been a 'much-increased' number of attempted attacks in the past year. The federation doesn't compile statistics on cyber attacks because, according to Pluck, they are 'guaranteed to be inaccurate' as some firms are unwilling to make it publicly known that they have been attacked, while others may resolve the impact of an attack before it becomes publicly apparent and then decide not to declare it. Most of the federation's members have cyber insurance. 'The cybercriminals don't necessarily care whether you're a supermarket, or whether you are part of the supply chain that serves that supermarket. What there is now are common software shares that allow the logistics supply chain to talk to each other. So that's another weak point,' he says. The cyber attacks have become more sophisticated. Where once they were what Pluck called 'chance' events with the attackers sending out thousands of 'friendly-looking' emails in the hope that someone might click on an attachment and inadvertently let them in, it's now not unusual for the attackers to look at a firm's client base or an IT service provider and then send a very legitimate-looking email saying, for example, 'We need to do a server upgrade.' 'They're hoping someone says yes and then that's it, they're in the system. Or they may actually mimic someone physically and send an actual human being to your premises pretending to be an IT service engineer who attaches something to your server,' he explains. 'If everyone in the system does what they need to do, then obviously you get greater protection, but it only requires one weak link in that. So, on our side of it, everyone has to be on their guard 24 hours a day and everyone has to be 100 per cent lucky. The attacker only has to be lucky once.' Pluck says the food distribution chain is vulnerable to cybercrime, but is no different from any other sector in that respect. However, he is calling for the Government to acknowledge the importance of the sector – which also distributes around 50 per cent of the UK's pharmaceuticals – and help to protect it with Critical National Infrastructure (CNI) recognition. 'It doesn't mean more money for the sector nor tighter or new regulation. But what it does give the cold chain is the ability to sit down with Government and create an Incident Response Plan. No such plan existed during Covid, and my sector just had to react as best it could. We got through it that time and fed the nation. But we can't be complacent and just muddle through again,' he adds. 'CNI will give us the clear platform to create a response plan as well as a recovery plan. Both are essential to supplying food and medicines to the UK citizen in the next major crisis.' Dray Agha, the senior manager at cybersecurity firm Huntress, agrees that cybercriminals are increasingly targeting food retailers and suppliers. 'Food supply chains rely on real-time inventory management, temperature control, and rapid distribution. A cyber attack disrupting these systems could lead to spoilage of perishable items, resulting in immediate financial losses. Paying a ransom may seem cheaper than absorbing the cost of wasted stock,' he says. Agha says firms should no longer see cybersecurity as a 'compliance issue' or a 'cost issue' but as something that can enhance a business and for which a healthy budget should be allotted. He says: 'Firms also need to invest in cybersecurity training and make security awareness a priority among the workforce; teach them that it's not just the responsibility of IT but the responsibility of everyone.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Karen Guregian: Stefon Diggs must not have received Mike Vrabel's memo
Karen Guregian: Stefon Diggs must not have received Mike Vrabel's memo

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Karen Guregian: Stefon Diggs must not have received Mike Vrabel's memo

FOXBOROUGH - For the last four months running, Mike Vrabel's message has been loud and clear to anyone willing to listen. Since being introduced as the Patriots head coach in January, he's stressed the importance of the winning culture he's trying to build with his football team. Advertisement That starts with putting the team first and making prudent decisions in that regard. 'Our players will respect, and they will appreciate, and they will be grateful for the opportunity that they have here and the people that work in this building ... We're going to earn the right to be here every day,' Vrabel said moments after being introduced. 'We're going to remove entitlement from our football team. We're going to get everything that we've earned from the head coach to the position coaches, all the way down to the players. We're going to earn the right to be here every single day.' Question of the week: Did Stefon Diggs actually get the memo? Most reports from the receiver's last stop in Houston had Texans players and coaches, as well as executives, waxing poetic about how Diggs had matured, and was an excellent example for the Texans younger players prior to suffering a season-ending knee injury. Advertisement Perhaps he still is that guy. But one has to question his judgment given a viral video that popped up this week of him partying on a yacht in Miami over the weekend. The video shows Diggs handing an unidentified pink substance to a group of women. Maybe that's not the biggest deal. Players have parties when they're not officially on the clock. And maybe the suspicious substance is much ado about nothing. It's just not a good look for a 31-year-old player who was signed to a lucrative contract (three years, $69 million) and is attempting to come back from an ACL injury suffered last season. 'Well, it's something that we're aware of,' Vrabel said when asked specifically about the Diggs video prior to Wednesday's OTA session. 'Obviously, we want to make great decisions on and off the field. We're hoping that with our time here on the field today, that when we don't have a script and we're on the call periods, that we're making great decisions. Advertisement 'The message will be the same for all our players, that we're trying to make great decisions.' Reading between the lines, Vrabel was not pleased having to address a topic where one of his players presumably made a bad decision. He wasn't happy the situation existed for public consumption. Pressed further, Vrabel indicated he had communicated with Diggs, who wasn't present for Wednesday's workout, but wouldn't elaborate further. He didn't have to. Seeing Diggs unfazed on camera and seeming to enjoy being filmed in that setting with all that was going on told Vrabel enough. Vrabel and the Patriots have put their money - and faith - in Diggs coming in and being a difference-maker and tone-setter for the team, both on and off the field. Advertisement They are banking on the 4-time Pro Bowler being the so-called adult in the receiver room, one that has quite a few young players who could use a guiding hand. Instead, Diggs didn't think twice about putting himself in the middle of a situation that was bound to create a distraction. It was the type of scene that might also trigger a league investigation, although that's more of an unknown at this point. An NFL spokesman reached by MassLive Wednesday said the league declined comment on the subject. Let's just say Diggs, the second biggest free agent signing next to defensive tackle Milton Williams, hasn't gotten off on the right foot in New England. There's still time for him to change the narrative, but making Vrabel have to answer for his poor decision-making is clearly not what the coach is looking for. Advertisement It's not part of the culture he's trying to build. It's not having players draw attention to themselves and say 'look at me' and look how cool I am telling all of these women to call me 'Daddy' on the video. It's about the team, and doing what's best for the team. It's about being smart, and staying away from trouble. For now, it's just one strike. It's up to Diggs not to get a second. In terms of his rehab from ACL surgery, all of the videos Diggs has put out with him working hard to get back to form have been encouraging. Seeing the Patriots release a video of him at one of the workouts last week was also a positive. Advertisement Receiver Kayshon Boutte, who spoke with the media Wednesday, said the group has made it a point to interact with Diggs whenever he's in Foxborough. 'He hasn't been here much, but we talk to him every time he comes,' Boutte said of the veteran, 'so it's been great talks.' Vrabel, however, seemed more than a little evasive when asked how the receiver was progressing when he's been in Foxborough. 'The timelines and the prognosis and everything, we're working hard to get him back and to be ready to go,' Vrabel said. 'When he's here, we'll coach him and we'll have him ready to go.' Given recent events, it's hard to know when Diggs will be back with the team whether for voluntary workouts or otherwise. Advertisement If Diggs eventually crawls out of Vrabel's dog house and is able to be the type of target Drake Maye so desperately needs, his presence will go a long way toward putting the Patriots offense back on the map. Unless, of course, he refuses to comply with Vrabel's vision for the football team. Then all bets are off. More Patriots Content Read the original article on MassLive.

Local reps criticize proposed dairy legislation
Local reps criticize proposed dairy legislation

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Local reps criticize proposed dairy legislation

Upstate Democratic and Republican lawmakers are coalescing in their efforts to block proposed legislation that would limit the size of dairy herds in New York. 'Although I don't believe this ill-conceived legislation will reach the floor for a vote this session, I will continue to vehemently oppose it,' said state Assemblyman Billy Jones (D-Chateaugay Lake). Jones is one of four upstate Democratic lawmakers which jointly issued a news release Monday opposing the legislation which Assemblywoman Linda Rosenthal (D-Manhattan) and Sen. Jabari Brisport (D-Brooklyn) introduced to prohibit the state Department of Environmental Conservation from issuing permits for new or expanding farms which seek to have herds of 700 or more dairy cows. State Assemblyman Matt Simpson (R-Lake George) and state Sen. Dan Stec (R-Queensbury) also oppose the legislation. 'This bill is yet one more unnecessary and misplaced piece of agenda-driven legislation that will add to Albany's constant top-down pressure to make it impossible for our state's hardworking farms to compete,' Simpson said, in an e-mail Tuesday. Simpson said the proposed legislation could force more North Country farmers out of business. 'Obviously, I oppose this asinine legislation. A new regulation limiting the number of livestock is the last thing New York's farmers need,' Stec said, the ranking Republican on the Senate Environmental Conservation Committee, in an email on Tuesday. Stec agrees with Jones that the legislation, introduced in March and currently under consideration in the Environmental Conservation committees of both houses, likely will not reach a vote of the full Senate or Assembly this session. At the heart of the debate is what defines a 'factory farm' versus a 'family farm.' Rosenthal and Brisport said that large herds increase agriculture runoff which pollutes streams and lakes, causing toxic algai blooms which can make people or animals sick. Rosenthal and Brisport also said that methane emitted from large herds increases greenhouse gasses which contribute to climate change. Jones, however, said that many New York dairy farmers have had to increase the size of herds in order to be financially solvent. 'Being raised on a family dairy farm myself and representing many hard-working dairy farmers in the North Country, I know firsthand how misguided this proposed legislation is,' Jones said. Rosenthal and Brisport said the legislation is intended to crack down on the proliferation of 'large-scale factory farms' in New York, a challenge some say does not exist in the state. A 'factory farm,' also known as a concentrated animal feeding operation, is an industrialized farm in which large numbers of animals are kept primarily indoors in order to minimize operating costs. Rosenthal and Brisport said that a study by Food and Water Watch, a national organization which advocates on food security and climate change issues, found a 21% increase in farms in New York between 2017 and 2021. 'These large-scale factory farms are often run by large corporations that squeeze out local competition to maximize profits,' the sponsors wrote in the justification section of the proposed legislation. Opponents of the legislation said herd size is not the only consideration in categorizing a factory farm. 'I represent over 1,400 family farms. … Some of these family farms have more than 2,000 head in their herd,' said Assemblywoman Carrie Woerner (D-Round Lake), one of the three other Assembly Democrats who joined with Jones in the joint news release. Farms which currently have more than 700 cows would not have to reduce their herd sizes, but would not be able to increase their herd sizes further, under the proposed legislation. The other two upstate Democratic Assembly members which joined in the news release are Agriculture Committee Chairwoman Donna Lupardo (D-Endicott) and Assemblywoman Marie Butteschon (D-Marcy). At the federal level, U. S. Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-Schuylerville) and Democratic congressional candidate Blake Gendebien both criticized the proposed state legislation to limit the size of dairy herds. 'New York Democrats must stop their attack on multi-generational, locally-rooted dairy farms that feed families all across our state,' Stefanik said, in a news release. Stefanik has said she is considering seeking the Republican nomination for governor in 2026. 'New York City Dems don't get agriculture,' Gendebien posted on his campaign Facebook page on May 30, inviting the sponsors of the proposed legislation to visit his dairy farm at Lisbon, in St. Lawrence County, to gain a better understanding of agriculture issues. Gendebien said in a telephone interview on Tuesday he is not surprised that upstate Democrats and Republican are united in their opposition to this particular legislation. 'We need farms of all sizes. They are all important,' he said. Gendebien, a Democratic in the 21st Congressional District in 2026, said the trend toward larger herds is due to multiple siblings or other relatives partnering to achieve economy of scale in their operations. Larger herds are necessary because the price-per-pound of milk has not kept up with inflation, he explained. Gendebien said his herd is currently 500 cows, but he will need to expand the herd in the future in order for his three sons to come into the business when they are adults. As well, farms will need to increase production to provide milk for a new Chobani yogurt plant being developed at Rome and two other dairy product plants planned for western New York, he said. Gendebien said there are virtually none, if any, corporate farms in New York. Of some-450 New York and New England farms he communicated with when he was a board member of Agrimark, the cooperative that makes Cabot and McAdam cheese, not one was owned by a corporation, he said. Gendebien said that dairy cows are treated humanely in New York, whether free to roam in pastures or confined in barns with ample room to move around and adequate cooling and heating systems. The Adirondack Council has not taken a position on the proposed legislation, said John Sheehan, a spokesman for the regional environmental group.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store