First-time buyers facing 'out of control' housing market like 'The Hunger Games', says TD
The Dublin North-West deputy said that first time buyers face 'absolutely unaffordable prices', further questioning the transparency of the costs around trying to buy a house.
'It's like the hunger games out there in terms of housing. I'm not using that in any facetious way. I'm saying this is the reality,' he
told reporters.
Hearne that there was an issue around the 'gazumping' of buyers when they are informed that they have been outbid, causing the price of a home to shoot up further.
'Queues for renting, queues to try and buy, people being outbid, and for housing the issue of gazumping is still going on,' Hearne said.
'There are real issues around the opaqueness in terms of housing purchasing, and it is those first time buyers, people trying to buy a home, who are suffering, who are being made to pay absolutely unaffordable prices.
Advertisement
He said this has reached a point where this is 'not unusual' and placed blame at the government which he said has 'not got to grips with' the system.
Hearne, who penned a 2022 book about the housing crisis called Gaffs before he was elected to the Dáil, is a member of the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Housing, Local Government and Heritage which will have its first meeting today.
First up on the agenda is local councils and their role in delivering housing.
The City and County Managers Association – which represents local authority chiefs – will tell the Oireachtas Committee on Housing about the impediments that need addressing so councils can build more housing units.
The group will outline while local authorities have delivered 24,000 social housing units since 2022, Government ambitions to increase this to 12,000 units per annum are 'simply not feasible without urgent structural support.'
TDs will be told that there is a need for investment funding, coordinated servicing of land by state bodies and increased staffing for councils to help meet the 12,000 target.
It is to hear that local authorities have delivered 24,000 social housing units since 2022, but that Government plans to increase this to 12,000 units per annum are 'simply not feasible without urgent structural support.'
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Commission of inquiry into abuse in day and boarding schools must become truly survivor-centred
A commission of inquiry into allegations of historical sexual abuse in day and boarding schools has been established by the Government with a time frame to report within five years. The commission will begin its work in October and the cost is likely to 'run into tens of millions of euro', Minister for Education Helen McEntee said last month as the inquiry was announced. [ What will Ireland's costly five-year schools abuse inquiry achieve? ] She also said the Government would 'pursue all levers available' to compel religious organisations to pay redress to victims of historical sex abuse in schools . While survivors of day and boarding schools are not a homogeneous group, and their justice interests reflect this, some themes continually emerge in research and practice: the desire for acknowledgment, validation, vindication, truth, exercise of voice, meaningful participation, access to records, reparation/redress and non-recurrence. READ MORE An in-depth international study, Transforming Justice Responses to Non-Recent Institutional Abuses, published in book form earlier this year, found fear and the breakdown of trust operated as significant barriers to effective engagement by church and state. This has resulted in an accountability gap for survivors and reputational damage for church and state institutions. The reluctance of those in the church to admit responsibility for abuses can be related to fear, including of viability beyond the financial costs of settling civil cases or contributing to state or other redress schemes. Benevolent intentions on the part of state participants can also be superseded by concerns with legal and financial liability. Senior politicians on both sides of the Border emphasised budgetary concerns at the forefront of political decision-making, including the fear of state exposure to a wide range of claims. Survivors also face significant barriers to justice from adversarial legal frameworks that include delays, statutes of limitations, data protection, exclusionary redress schemes, inequality of arms and the costs of legal proceedings. Law and legal culture become a hostile site for all sides, causing secondary harm for victim/survivors. New approaches must therefore be found. Some modifications to the Government's terms of reference for the new commission and the commission's approach could help in this regard. The sampling methodology should be replaced by a modularised approach, focusing on individual institutions and settings, producing modularised, interim investigatory reports at regular intervals. These could be delivered within months of the commission commencing its work and not waiting for five [or more] years. This approach was adopted to good effect by Australia's Royal Commission into Child Sexual Abuse and by the Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse in England and Wales. The sampling methodologies used by the commissions of investigation into the Archdiocese of Dublin and into the mother and baby homes in Ireland were not fit for purpose. Provision for a survivor engagement programme by the commission – through which survivors can share the impact of their experiences – is not adequate in giving voice to the testimonies of survivors who have much more to say about the abuses they suffered than about its impact on them. If we want to learn from the mistakes of the past, the commissioners need to survivors with lived experience on their teams A summary report given to the chairperson is not sufficient for this core part of the inquiry. A suitable methodology must be developed to enable survivor testimonies to be fully represented as cumulative evidence in the final report of the commission. It is laudable that the commission strives to be as survivor-centred as possible. It would be worth therefore publicising the training that all members of the commission will receive in trauma-informed and victim-centred approaches before they begin their work. More importantly, if the commission wants to give true effect to being as survivor-centred as possible in more than a paternalistic manner, a mechanism must be found to enable survivors to be represented as co-participants in the inquiry process. If we want to learn from research and from the mistakes of the past, the commissioners need to have survivors with lived experience on their teams, appointments for which must be made by open competition. Research by Diane Vaughan at Columbia University demonstrated the composition of commissions is hugely important to their findings and outcome. It is essential the commission holds public hearings and round tables on specific topics (televised where possible), as well as private sessions, in the interest of transparency and accountability. A problem with previous commissions of investigation was that they were accountable to no one, not even the Dáil. There is a discernible appetite for doing justice differently among survivors and church and state participants. The challenge is how to get the various interests working together to get to the truth, including the policy wrongs, abuses and failures of the past, in the interest of justice, healing and accountability. Mechanisms must be found to build trust between the parties based on openness and transparency, a sharing of records and respect for all perspectives. In this regard the terms of reference must be amended to include restorative justice as requested by many survivors to the scoping inquiry team, which last year recommended the commission be set up The restorative justice request from survivors was largely ignored in the report of the scoping inquiry and is not mentioned at all in the terms of reference of the commission. If we truly want to be survivor-centred, we cannot exclude the voices of some survivors because they do not suit a particular political agenda. Although we might be getting a bit better in how we approach these things, we still have a lot to learn. Professor Marie Keenan, school of social policy, social work and social justice at University College Dublin, is co-author with Prof Anne-Marie McAlinden and Dr James Gallen of Transforming Justice Responses to Non-Recent Institutional Abuses, published by Oxford University Press
Sunday World
7 hours ago
- Sunday World
Irish consumers turn their back on €66.7m as they fail to cash in on Deposit Return Scheme
The annual report shows Re-turn recorded revenues of €114.4m in 2024 Irish consumers last year turned their back on €66.7 million when they failed to cash in their deposits for soft drink containers through the Government's Deposit Return Scheme (DRS). That is according to the 2024 annual report for Re-turn which shows that the failure by consumers to redeem the €66m worth in deposits for their soft drink containers was the chief reason behind the State backed firm to record a pre-tax surplus of €51.3m for 2024. Established by Government, Re-Turn went live with its Deposit Return Scheme operations on February 1st 2024 with the aim to significantly increase the recycling rates of bottles and cans. Last year, 877.85m containers were returned made up of 433.2m plastic bottles and 444.6m cans. The annual report shows Re-turn recorded revenues of €114.4m in 2024. This included the €66.7m in unredeemed deposits and €47.7m made up of €17.2m from the sale of material and €30.5m from 'producer fees'. The annual report discloses that the income from unredeemed deposits has resulted in a VAT settlement by Re-turn of €23.7m. . News in 90 Seconds - Aug 9th The company's 2024 costs totalled €62.2m made up of direct collection and recycling costs of €46.5m and administrative expenses of €1.5.7m which included a spend of €4.6m on 'marketing, communications, and public awareness'. The report states that the €66.7m reflects the recognition of unredeemed deposits for the financial year and 'this is after a €36.5m estimate of deposits expected to be returned post year end'. The report states that 'unredeemed deposits are an expected and routine scenario for deposit return schemes and it was anticipated that in the initial transition period redemptions would be low and therefore there would be a high level of unredeemed deposits. The report states that "as a not-for-profit organisation, in the early stages of our maturity, the fees from unredeemed containers are being reinvested in a number of ways". These include paying off initial scheme set-up costs; infrastructure development; consumer education campaigns and contributing to our legally required contingency reserve The report adds that income from unredeemed deposits 'is expected to significantly reduce as the scheme reaches its targeted redemptions of 90% in the coming years'. The report states that 'in the long term, should unredeemed deposits be higher than forecast, we would support initiatives that drive increased adoption of the scheme as well as investing in broader innovative projects designed to further the country's circular economy strategy'. The report states that Re-turn closed the year with a cash balance of €89.8m. The report states that this cash figure will reduce significantly in 2025 when several significant draw-downs are scheduled and after accounting for these factors the adjusted cash balance would reduce to approximately €32m. The significant draw-downs include a VAT settlement on unredeemed deposits of €23.7m; a provision of €13.8m for Re-turn's contingency reserve fund; a settlement of the remaining €11.7m balance of the facility agreement with Bank of Ireland grant settlement of c.€3.2m to retailers in respect of 2024 and a provision of €5.4m for corporation tax arising on surplus in the scheme. In comments attached to the report, CEO of Re-turn, Ciaran Foley has stated: 'Thanks to the incredible buy-in and adoption from the Irish public, 877 million containers were returned through DRS in 2024, equating to an average 66% post transition period recycling rate. He said: 'The seasonality of the soft drinks market was reflected in some even higher months, such as in August when the return rate reached 75%. Every 1% increase equates to around 19 million containers, and we recorded some daily returns of over 5 million products over the Christmas period. Chair of Re-turn, Tony Keohane stated that the launch of Ireland's Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) in February 2024 marked a defining milestone in the country's journey toward a more sustainable future. He said: 'From a standing start in Autumn 2022, the scheme collected more than 877 million drinks containers in its first 11 months. In that short time, we've seen Irish consumers recycle more bottles and cans than ever before and do so in a way that produces high quality recyclate, helping build a truly circular economy.'
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Irish consumers missed out on €66.7m in uncashed bottle deposit returns last year
Irish consumers missed out on €66.7 million last year when they failed to cash in their deposits for soft drink containers through the Deposit Return Scheme (DRS). Re-turn's 2024 annual report shows the failure to redeem these depositswas the chief reason behind the State-backed firm recording a pretax surplus of €51.3 million last year. Established by the Government, Re-Turn began its DRS operations on February 1st, 2024 with the aim to significantly increase the recycling rates of bottles and cans. Last year, 877.85 million containers were returned, made up of 433.2 million plastic bottles and 444.6 million cans. READ MORE Re-turn recorded revenues of €114.4 million in 2024. This included the €66.7 million in unredeemed deposits and €47.7 million made up of €17.2 million from the sale of material and €30.5 million from 'producer fees'. The company's 2024 costs totalled €62.2 million, made up of direct collection and recycling costs of €46.5 million and administrative expenses of €15.7 million, which included a spend of €4.6 million on 'marketing, communications, and public awareness'. Influencers beware, Revenue is on the prowl Listen | 48:38 The report says 'unredeemed deposits are an expected and routine scenario for deposit return schemes and it was anticipated that in the initial transition period redemptions would be low and therefore there would be a high level of unredeemed deposits'. The report for the not-for-profit states, 'the fees from unredeemed containers are being reinvested in a number of ways'. These include paying off initial scheme set-up costs, infrastructure development, consumer education campaigns and contributing to its legally required contingency reserve. Income from unredeemed deposits 'is expected to significantly reduce as the scheme reaches its targeted redemptions of 90 per cent in the coming years'. Re-turn chief executive Ciarán Foley said: 'Thanks to the incredible buy-in and adoption from the Irish public, 877 million containers were returned through DRS in 2024, equating to an average 66 per cent post-transition period recycling rate. 'The seasonality of the soft drinks market was reflected in some even higher months, such as in August when the return rate reached 75 per cent. Every 1 per cent increase equates to around 19 million containers.'
