Bangladeshi anti-corruption officials give evidence against UK MP Tulip Siddiq
Ms Siddiq, who is Ms Hasina's niece, resigned from her post in Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's Government in January following reports that she lived in London properties linked to her aunt and was named in an anti-corruption investigation in Bangladesh.
The Labour MP represents the north London district of Hampstead and Highgate and served as economic secretary to the Treasury – the minister responsible for tackling financial corruption.
She is being tried together with her mother, Sheikh Rehana, brother Radwan Mujib and sister Azmina.
Ms Siddiq has been charged with facilitating their receipt of state land in a township project near the capital Dhaka.
They are out of the country and being tried in absentia.
Ms Siddiq's lawyers have called the charges baseless and politically motivated.
Muhammad Tariqul Islam, a public prosecutor, disputed a claim by Ms Siddiq that she is not Bangladeshi, saying the anti-corruption watchdog through investigations found that she is a citizen.
The prosecutor said if Ms Siddiq is convicted she could be sentenced to three to 10 years in prison.
Ms Siddiq in an interview with the British newspaper The Guardian recently referred to Bangladesh as 'a foreign country' and called the charges against her 'completely absurd'.
She asserted to The Guardian she was 'collateral damage' in the longstanding feud between her aunt and Bangladesh's interim leader Muhammad Yunus.
Ms Hasina had a frosty relation with Mr Yunus, and during her rule Mr Yunus faced a number of cases including for graft allegations.
Courts overturned those charges before he took over as interim leader days after Ms Hasina's ousting last year in a student-led uprising.
Separately, the anti-corruption investigation has alleged that Ms Siddiq's family was involved in brokering a 2013 deal with Russia for a nuclear power plant in Bangladesh in which large sums of money were said to have been embezzled.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Mum fined after failing to argue term-time resort holiday was ‘educational'
Michelle and Andrew Partington, from Wigan, have been fined by the council for taking their son Oliver on an 'educational' holiday to Sharm El Sheikh during the term-time A mum failed to convince her local council that a term-time trip to Sharm El Sheikh was 'educational'. Michelle Partington branded the council 'despicable' for slapping her with fines over her son's term-time holiday. Along with her husband Andrew Partington, the couple decided to take their son Oliver, 12, out of school for 10 days so they could travel to Egypt on 1 June. The 46-year-old said she wanted to cheer up her son after he switched schools in April due to bullying but 'couldn't afford' to the £3,270 trip during the school holidays, as it would have set her back an extra £2,000. This comes after a British tourist caused outrage by riding a cow in Tenerife. Have you been fined for taking your child on a term-time holiday? We'd love to hear from you. Email webtravel@ Despite arguing the trip - which included snorkelling and quad biking - which was an 'education' one because of Egypt's rich history, the school rejected her request to take Oliver out of school. Michelle says she was 'devastated' when she and her husband both received an £80 fine from Wigan Council on 2 July. Local councils can issue a fine of £80 per parent for a child's unauthorised absence from school, including holidays during term time. If parents fail to pay the fine within a 21-day timeframe the amount doubles and if it remains unpaid they may face prosecution. Many teachers and headteachers have publically urged parents to stop taking their children out of school during term-time, as doing so can be so disruptive to a child's education and to the classroom. Michelle has not heeded the calls, instead reacting furiously to the fines. She wrote on social media: "This is just despicable behaviour. Something needs to be done and soon". The mum has now launched a petition calling for council's to be stripped of their fine issuing powers in such instances. A spokesperson for Wigan Council has noted that "parents have a legal duty to ensure their child receives full-time education, either by regular attendance at school or otherwise". Michelle, a driving school company director who lives in Wigan, Greater Manchester, said: "It was really upsetting. I was shocked when I found out it wasn't just £80 and it was £160 even though we're one family unit. I was absolutely devastated that we had to cancel the plans we had made. "The holiday was worth it despite the fine. It was a once in a lifetime trip and it was magical. We certainly couldn't afford to go to Egypt [during the school holidays], maybe Pontins or Haven or something. "We work hard so getting to spend time together as a family was nice and we don't get to do that very often. As much as education is really important, I think spending time with family and relaxing with family and enjoying family time on holiday is equally as important for a child's mental health. "I did let the school know we'd be taking him out. I told the school this would be considered an educational trip because we were going to Egypt, which is where lots of civilisation began, and there's lots of history there. We arranged it to make sure there were no exams taking place so we were sensible in that much. "They said the authorisation was denied and we would be taking him out of school without their consent. They advised me that we may receive a fine. I was expecting to get a fine and I'd heard that it was £80. Myself and my husband received separate letters. I just thought they were doing their due diligence by sending it to them both, but it was £160. You'd think there was a better way to deal with this. While on the 'educational' holiday they went snorkling, quad biking and had a meal in the desert. Michelle said: "We had to swap his high school because he was bullied. He was still very upset about what had happened. This holiday was to cheer him up about that as well. I feel like the school and the council didn't really take that into consideration. You'd have thought there'd be some sort of lenience there." Like many other parents in state school, Michelle feels it is unfair that she has to fork out so much more for school holiday breaks, when private school families enjoy huge discounts as their terms are much shorter. "What is unfair is the holiday companies charging through the nose so much more money when people need to go during the school holidays. It just makes it impossible for normal people to book nice holidays during the school holidays because it's too expensive," she continued. A Wigan Council spokesperson said: "Parents have a legal duty to ensure their child receives full-time education, either by regular attendance at school or otherwise. Headteachers may only grant a leave of absence during term time if they consider that there are exceptional circumstances, and the Department for Education's statutory guidance, updated in August 2024, reinforces that a holiday is not considered exceptional."
The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
Reeves says rulings on tax must wait for Budget amid inheritance tax speculation
Rachel Reeves has said that decisions around taxes will have to wait for the autumn Budget, amid reports that the Treasury is looking to raise more money from inheritance tax. The Chancellor told reporters that decisions will be made 'in the round' and her priority 'is to get our economy firing off all cylinders'. Earlier this week, the Guardian reported that officials are examining whether tightening rules around the gifting of assets and money could help address the UK's multi-billion-pound fiscal shortfall. Government U-turns over winter fuel payments and welfare reform have left Chancellor Rachel Reeves with a multibillion-pound spending gap to about the reports on Thursday, Ms Reeves said: 'Any decision around taxation is a … decision for the Budget, and I'll make those announcements. 'We haven't even set the date yet for the Budget, but the key focus of the Budget is going to be to build on numbers that we've seen today to boost productivity and growth and prosperity all across the country. 'That is my number one priority as Chancellor, to get our economy firing off all cylinders so that working people in all parts of the country will feel the benefits of that economic growth.' Pushed on whether taxes will have to increase in the autumn, Ms Reeves added: 'We'll wait for the official forecast from the Office of Budget Responsibility, and we'll make those decisions in the round.' Among the reported inheritance tax measures under consideration is a potential cap on lifetime gifts, part of a broader review into how assets can be transferred before death to minimise inheritance tax liabilities. Under current UK rules, gifts made more than seven years before a person's death are exempt from inheritance tax. Gifts made between three and seven years prior are taxed on a sliding scale, depending on their value and the total estate. The Chancellor was speaking as new official figures show that the UK economy slowed in the second quarter of this year amid pressure from tariff uncertainty and tax increases. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said gross domestic product (GDP) grew by 0.3% for the quarter after 0.7% growth in the first three months of the year. However, the figure was stronger than the 0.1% level widely expected by economists after an uptick in activity in June and revised data for earlier in the quarter.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Highlanders have the right to be angry over explosion of wind farms
Quite a result for a never previously convened group of volunteers sitting on powerless community councils. But was it a step back for the green transition, a step forward for local democracy or a bit of both? Five hundred people from 56 community councils – representing almost half the Highland population – gathered to highlight the 1305 wind-related infrastructure projects that are either built or going through planning in the Highlands. No-one's denying that's a small avalanche. The big questions are: who is the energy for? (probably not Scots); who benefits financially? (certainly not Scots); who gets to decide? (absolutely not Scots), and how much does net-exporting Scotland or the energy-hungry UK actually need? (Fa kens). READ MORE: Pro-Palestine protesters greet JD Vance as he lands in Scotland It seems Labour and the SNP are bodyswerving all these vital questions, and Highlanders, despite their reputation for feudal cap-doffing and learned silence, have finally snapped, got angry and got organised. So, are they just a bunch of climate-crisis-denying Nimbys? I've been making a film about this unprecedented revolt over the last week and visited folk in straths and glens from Strathdearn near Tomatin to the Dornoch Firth near Strath Oykel. I'm sure there are people who simply hate turbines and are opposed to net zero. I didn't meet any of them. I did meet people from glens with five, seven, or even 13 wind farms already in place who are being told to accept the same again. Without any say. Without any meaningful income. And without the highest energy bills in Europe getting one penny cheaper. They must also watch while those existing wind farms switch off in high wind because the grid can't take their energy. We pay for those constraint payments, and if they are common for existing turbines, how will the new wind farms deliver? (Image: Getty Images) Furthermore, wind farm applications go through planning piecemeal, with complex documents that take hours for community councillors to download and a lawyer's mind to dissect. So far, every application has been approved by the Scottish Government – despite occasional rejection by Highland Council and even a Scottish Government reporter. It feels like a total fait accompli and normally calm people have become stressed, angry, upset and determined not to let this pass. I'm sure some distant pointy heids thought wind farms accepted since 2007 meant Highlanders would be a soft touch. Au contraire. It's a case of once bitten twice, not just shy, but adamant – enough's enough. We met one veteran community councillor who wanted a conversation with the companies, SSEN and the Scottish Government about the totality of wind farms planned for each glen: 'We could negotiate and approve the ones that are completely uncontroversial and try to change or just veto the ones everyone opposes.' If something as reasonable as that isn't even thinkable, what are we saying about local democracy? If Scotland is to house practically all the wind infrastructure for the whole of Britain without any benefit in bills, what does that say about the supposed union of equals? And if all of this happens without opposition by the planning authority, the Scottish Government, we can only assume that they are 100% on side. Or that they worry more about denting the high levels of inward investment to Scotland by placing any restrictions on electricity infrastructure? Or that their green targets and position ahead of the UK will be dented? If so, well done. Every Tom, Dick and Harry (the spivs and speculators from Alex Salmond's era) has a wind company and land on the east coast of the Highlands – near the grid upgrades and the freeports – sitting pretty for the moment when the contracts for difference are awarded and the wind bonanza really begins. No wonder British Energy Minister Michael Shanks declined the invitation to attend the Inverness Convention along with Scottish Energy Minister Gillian Martin and SSEN – the private power company charged with deciding pylon routes and the location of turbines, battery plants and sub-stations. Labour's Western Isles MP Torcuil Crichton did attend and argued for councils to become co-developers of wind cash thereby making money for local services. If it can be done in Stornoway, he argued, why not on the mainland? But he also made no apologies for the huge wind energy targets his government will push through whether local communities like it or not. The audience was not amused. SNP MP Graham Leadbitter drew grumbles for sidestepping responsibility, saying planning is a Holyrood matter and the SNP don't run Westminster. True but unhelpful. SNP MSP Maree Todd prompted snorts of exasperation when she said she was furious about the size of local energy bills and fuel poverty. Fine – why did the SNP not support locational pricing then? And her MSP colleague Emma Roddick was almost shouted down after saying she felt as powerless as the audience and declared the main problem is pitifully low levels of community benefit. They certainly are inadequate – but local opposition has moved way beyond that. Tory MSP Edward Mountain received a roar of approval for saying: 'We in the Highlands are being sacrificed on the altar of net zero. And we need to stop energy companies trying to bribe local communities.' It's supremely ironic. THE Tories are getting ready to clean up in Highland seats in 2026, even though the current situation is almost 100% their fault. Who privatised the energy industry in the 1980s, placing strategic decisions in the hands of private companies like SSE and private operators (many of them the state-owned companies of our European neighbours) – the Tories. Who created a wind energy desert in England that will now be filled with Highland-produced energy – the Tories and their decade-long turbine moratorium south of the border. Who created a devolved settlement that handed energy to Westminster, not Holyrood, unlike every other devolved or federal system – Labour. Who created massive, remote councils like Highland, which has the biggest landmass in the world – the Tories. Who created toothless community councils as a sop to towns, villages and islands when their genuinely local councils were abolished – the Tories. And who's been the implacable opponents of 'Mugabe-style land raids' or for anyone else the overdue process of real land reform that would stop absentee millionaires owning land and taking land use decisions over the heads of local communities – be that for the green transition or any other 'worthy' cause. Yip – the Tories. They've produced chronic disempowerment. Labour have produced the 'ambitious' green energy targets – now set in law – driving the Highland windfarm expansion. And yet it's the SNP who are taking the pounding. Why? Because voters expected them to reverse the tide, stand up for communities, argue, wheedle, deal and protect – and they haven't. Doubtless, some will argue the Scotland Act means they can't. That answer may be right. It may be good law. Great accounting. Satisfactory box-ticking – but it's terrible politics. The Scottish Government believes it must rubber-stamp whatever energy demands the British Government makes of rural Scotland or ... what? If it's a fight where the Scottish Government backs Highland communities, starts a long-overdue process of decentralisation, produces and share an actual strategy and challenges Westminster to do the same and forces Keir Starmer to own an unreconstructed broken, Thatcherite energy market where Scots will never, ever get cheaper bills – then bring it on. Meantime, c'mon the communities.
