logo
Israel running low on missile interceptors as conflict with Iran continues: Report

Israel running low on missile interceptors as conflict with Iran continues: Report

Hindustan Times18-06-2025
Israel is running low on the defensive Arrow interceptors, according to a report in Wall Street Journal that cited an unnamed US official, raising concerns about Israel's ability to counter long-range ballistic missiles from Iran if the conflict continues. The report also claimed that US has been aware of the capacity of problems for months and Washington has been augmenting Israel's defenses with systems on the ground, at sea and in the air.
The report also stated that since the escalation of conflict in June, Pentagon has sent missile defense assets in the region. However now there is a concern that US is also burning through their supply of interceptrs as well.
Director of the Missile Defense Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said that neither the US nor Israel can 'continue to sit and intercept missiles all day.' He also said that Israel and his allies need to move with haste to do whatever needs to be done, and that they 'cannot afford to sit and play catch.
Meanwhile, Israel Aerospace Industries, the company that makes Arrow interceptors, did not respond requests about comments on the matter. The Israel Defense Forces said in a statement that, ' IDF is prepared and ready to handle any scenario. Unfortunately, we are unable to comment on matters related to munitions.'
The Arrow missile defence system, comprises of Arrow-2 and Arrow-3. This system is designed to intercept ballistic missiles beyond the earth's atmosphere. It employs a detachable warhead that collides with its target, neutralising potential threats before they can reach populated areas.
The other layers of Israel's defense system include David's Sling, and the Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 interceptors. The US Army also has similar defense systems as Israel, it has the Patriot PAC-3 (comparable to David's Sling) and THAAD (comparable to Arrow 2), while the US Navy has the Aegis and the SM-3 (comparable to Arrow 3).
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

School Assembly News Headlines Today: Top international, national other news of August 12
School Assembly News Headlines Today: Top international, national other news of August 12

Hindustan Times

time14 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

School Assembly News Headlines Today: Top international, national other news of August 12

School Assembly News Headlines Today (August 12): Find out below the important national, international and sports news headlines for August 12, 2025- School Assembly News Headlines Today: Top international, national other news of August 12 International Trump says India tariffs hit Russian economy hard: 'That was a big blow' US designates Balochistan Liberation Army as Foreign Terrorist Organisation 'Osama bin Laden in a suit': Ex-Pentagon official calls for banning Pakistan army chief Asim Munir from US National Why Supreme Court's dog order is mission impossible in Delhi 30 Oppn MPs were invited for meeting, no one turned up: Election Commission India should act proactively against China-Pak naval challenge: Parliament panel Education From Triple Talaq to Section 377: CBSE revamps Legal Studies curriculum, here's what it means for law aspirants IIM Bangalore launches FinTech certificate programme for young professionals CBSE approves open-book exams for Class 9 from 2026-27: Report School Assembly News Headlines Today: Top national, international, other news of August 11 Sports BCCI grooms Vaibhav Suryavanshi in special programme to fill looming vacuum amid Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma exit buzz 'Shubman Gill sent out a signal to the other members of Team India by…': Sunil Gavaskar reacts to Duleep Trophy squad 'I mean D Gukesh had a bad Classical event': Viswanathan Anand explains why GMs 'shouldn't rule out any format mentally'

‘Osama bin Laden in a suit': Ex-Pentagon official calls for banning Pakistan army chief Asim Munir from US
‘Osama bin Laden in a suit': Ex-Pentagon official calls for banning Pakistan army chief Asim Munir from US

Hindustan Times

time14 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘Osama bin Laden in a suit': Ex-Pentagon official calls for banning Pakistan army chief Asim Munir from US

Former Pentagon official Michael Rubin on Tuesday strongly condemned Pakistan army chief Asim Munir's recent 'nuclear threat' remark made during his visit to the United States, saying that his rhetoric seems reminiscent of Osama bin Laden, the terrorist behind 9/11. Former Pentagon official Michael Rubin has called for Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir to be declared 'persona non grata' in the US over his recent nuclear threats. In an interview with news agency ANI, Rubin said, 'Pakistan's threats on American soil are completely unacceptable." He added that Islamabad's threats are raising serious questions about whether the country could fulfil the responsibilities of being a state or if the time had come for it to end. Michael Rubin then went on to say, 'The Field Marshal's rhetoric is reminiscent of what we heard from Osama Bin Laden' "Americans look at terrorism through the lens of grievance," he explained. "They don't understand the ideological underpinnings of many terrorists. Asim Munir is Osama bin Laden in a suit." The former US official's remarks came following the Pakistan army chief's address at an event in Tampa, Florida, where he issued a stark nuclear threat, reportedly stating, 'We are a nuclear nation. If we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us.' Rubin further said, 'The fact that US Generals did not walk out of any meeting with Asim Munir should be a cause for resignation.' He further argued, 'There is no reason why the USA should consider Pakistan a major non-NATO ally; Pakistan should be the first major non-NATO ally to be listed as a state sponsor of terrorism, and should not be a member of the US Central Command anymore.' Calling for a severe diplomatic action, he said, 'Asim Munir should be persona non grata in the USA and never get an American Visa, along with any Pakistani official, till Pakistan explains itself and apologises.' India calls out 'nuclear sabre-rattling' Earlier, on Monday, India sharply reacted to Munir's remarks, describing them as an example of Pakistan's persistent 'nuclear sabre-rattling.' In an official statement, the ministry of external affairs (MEA) said the comments 'underscore doubts about the integrity of Pakistan's nuclear command and control,' especially given a military establishment 'hand-in-glove with terrorist groups.' The MEA added it was 'regrettable' that such threatening remarks were made from the soil of a friendly third country. Reiterating India's stance, the statement said, 'India has already made it clear that it will not give in to nuclear blackmail. We will continue to take all steps necessary to safeguard our national security.'

Asim Munir is Osama bin Laden in a suit, says ex pentagon official
Asim Munir is Osama bin Laden in a suit, says ex pentagon official

Time of India

time30 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Asim Munir is Osama bin Laden in a suit, says ex pentagon official

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel A former Pentagon analyst, Michael Rubin , has delivered a scathing assessment of Pakistan's recent nuclear rhetoric, describing the country as behaving like "a rogue state" following threatening comments made by its army chief on American controversy centres on remarks attributed to Pakistan's army chief General Asim Munir , who allegedly threatened that if Pakistan "goes down, it would take half the world down" with it. The comments were reportedly made during a meeting in Tampa, Florida, with US military officials Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon official and Middle East analyst, told that Pakistan's behaviour was "completely unacceptable" and compared the army chief's rhetoric to statements previously made by ISIS and Osama bin Laden."Pakistan is raising questions in many people's minds about whether it can fulfil the responsibilities of being a state," Rubin said. "The Field Marshal's rhetoric is reminiscent of what we've heard from the Islamic State."Rubin called for immediate diplomatic consequences, including stripping Pakistan of its status as a major non-NATO ally and potentially designating it as a state sponsor of terrorism. He also suggested that General Munir should be declared persona non grata and banned from receiving US analyst expressed particular concern about the lack of immediate response from US officials present during the alleged remarks. He argued that the Pakistani army chief should have been immediately escorted from the meeting and expelled from the country."Within 30 minutes of when Asim Munir made those comments, he should have been ushered out, taken to Tampa International Airport, and flown out of the United States," Rubin former Pentagon official suggested that President Trump's continued engagement with Pakistan might be influenced by external noted that Trump's approach represents a departure from the traditionally strong bipartisan support for the US-India partnership that has developed since the George W. Bush painted a broader picture of regional instability, suggesting that Pakistan's nuclear threats could provide cover for terrorist elements to "go rogue" with nuclear weapons . He argued that Pakistan represents a fundamentally different challenge from traditional diplomatic disputes."Americans look at terrorism through the lens of grievance," he explained. "They don't understand the ideological underpinnings of many terrorists. Asim Munir is Osama bin Laden in a suit."Perhaps most controversially, Rubin suggested that the international community should consider allowing Pakistan to undergo what he termed a "managed decline," potentially including recognition of breakaway regions such as Balochistan. He even raised the possibility of future military intervention to secure Pakistan's nuclear arsenal."It's coming near time when, in a future administration, other SEAL teams should enter Pakistan to secure its nuclear weapons because the alternative is simply too great to bear," he interview highlighted the complex web of relationships affecting US policy in South Asia. Rubin suggested that Trump's recent tensions with India over trade and sanctions related to Russian energy purchases were not counterproductive, noting that the US itself purchases strategic materials from predicted that US-India relations would likely improve once the current administration's approach changes, describing the current tensions as a "stress test" that would ultimately strengthen the analyst's comments reflect growing concerns about Pakistan's stability and its nuclear capabilities. While his proposals for dealing with Pakistan appear to go well beyond current US policy, they highlight the challenges facing policymakers as they navigate relationships with nuclear-armed states in an increasingly volatile region.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store