
In Hawaii, where 90% of food is imported, farmers who offset imbalance now face cuts
Native Hawaiian farmer Kaina Makua was anticipating $470,000 from the federal government this year to quadruple his production of kalo, or taro, the ancestral crop that is pounded into the sticky, purple staple poi. In January, he found out the money wasn't coming.
In Hawaii, where 90% of the food is imported, local farmers like Makua need boosts from federal funding so there is greater food security in the islands. State researchers have found an island needs to grow at least 50% of its staple crops — like kalo, 'ulu (breadfruit) and 'uala (sweet potato) — to be self-sufficient in a disaster.
Local farmers are not only critical to helping alleviate the rate of 1 in 3 households that are food insecure in Hawaii, but they also provide these staples and other produce to food banks and schools. However, since the Trump administration paused funds from the Inflation Reduction Act and cut other U.S. Department of Agriculture programs, nearly $90 million in funding for Hawaii and Pacific region farms and food system organizations has been frozen or cut, according to the Oʻahu Resource Conservation and Development Council.
Now local farmers are 'in survival mode,' as Makua said — scaling back and unsure how to make up the loss.
Makua has spent the past 15 years turning his family's farm in Kauai into a cultural hub, Aloha ʻĀina Poi Company, where he mentors young farmers and offers an after-school program so kids can learn Hawaiian farming practices and keep the traditions alive.
'Trying to grow these Indigenous crop systems, and trying to get everybody back to Native foods, it's an uphill battle,' said Makua. 'There was so much headway being made, so much effort and progress and positivity, just to be once again let down.'
Hawai'i Farm Bureau Executive Director Brian Miyamoto said there is great confusion among local farmers about what is frozen and what is not. For example, the Environmental Quality Incentives Program, which provides technical and financial assistance to agricultural producers, is safe for now. However, without many answers from the federal government about whether the freezes are permanent, or what shoe is dropping next, farmers are scrambling to figure out their next move. The USDA did not respond to request for comment.
'Organizations that may have had their funding frozen or may not be sure if they're going to continue being funded, they're going to have to make business decisions to start possibly laying off staffing, cut back on what the services can offer,' Miyamoto said.
Over the past decade, Native Hawaiian farming practices and food systems have gained momentum, as the state's goal was to increase local food production to 20% to 30% of food consumed by 2030. Now that progress is in peril.
'We're not going to be able to achieve those agriculture goals that we've been working on for years,' said Miyamoto. 'With our cultural crops, instead of the trend of increasing that production, do we see a scaling back of it, because of the availability of federal funds to help support those programs? There is so much uncertainty.'
The future of Native food production uncertain
Before Western contact, Native Hawaiians subsisted on fishing and staple crops like kalo, 'ulu and 'uala. By the mid-1800s, European and American businessmen gained enough power in the islands to buy land to turn into sugar and pineapple plantations. When those industries dried up by the 1950s, most of Hawaii's agricultural land was paved over for tourism development. By the 1960s, only half of Hawaii's produce was grown locally.
According to the USDA's 2022 Census of Agriculture, there are around 6,500 farmers in Hawaii, a growing number of whom are Native Hawaiian practitioners like Makua who are working to revitalize traditional food systems and nourish the land.
One way local farmers have increased their reach and power over the past decade is by banding together through food hubs and cooperatives. By combining their yield, farmers can secure state contracts to feed schools and food banks. With the federal cuts, they're unsure if they can make that happen.
At the Hawai'i 'Ulu Cooperative, more than 150 farmers bring in their 'ulu harvests, which are then packaged and sold frozen or as flour, pancake mix or other products to local schools, hospitals and retailers. The co-op hoped to increase its 'ulu production to a million pounds by 2030, but the USDA has frozen grants providing farmers with direct payments and technical support. A three-year, $6 million grant for farmers is also currently tied up in the funding freeze.
'The funds for the farmers were mostly about expansion,' said co-op co-founder and CEO Dana Shapiro. 'For the most part, they've all paused on their plans to do that, which is a really huge setback for folks that have prepped their fields. It means everything [unwanted] is going to grow back, and in Hawaii things grow so quickly. If you don't plant it right away, you've lost all that work.'
The co-op has also been a supplier to the USDA's Local Food in Schools program that recently saw budget cuts. 'Federal cuts to these programs will have a huge impact on the co-op and our farmers, as well as on the local community of kids and underserved families, who have benefited from receiving fresh, healthy local food,' Shapiro said.
Miyamoto and other local agricultural leaders spent the past week meeting with the USDA and other agencies in Washington, D.C., as part of a delegation to Congress. While they got clarification on some programs, like the continuation of the Environmental Quality Incentives Program, they did not on others. He continues to ask the state Legislature for money to make up for the federal loss, but he knows it's an uphill battle with so many sectors needing funds.
Makua, meanwhile, is figuring out where to turn next. 'If this is the road to success, it's going to be a resilient road, and the humans that will come out of our program at least will be more than resilient,' he said. 'But we might pivot. We don't know. We'll see what the summer brings.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
Drillers, unions urge US senators to preserve hydrogen credit
WASHINGTON, June 5 (Reuters) - A coalition of nearly 250 companies and business and labor groups on Thursday urged top U.S. Republican senators to preserve a credit for the emerging hydrogen fuel industry as they hash out President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill. Oil and gas lobbying group the American Petroleum Institute, a local unit of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, and DuPont (DD.N), opens new tab urged Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senator Mike Crapo to extend the construction deadline to December 31, 2029 for hydrogen projects to receive a tax break. The Senate is debating its version of the bill after the House of Representatives terminated the so-called 45V credit for any project which begins construction after the last day of 2025. "If this course of action is adopted by the Senate, it will drive tens of billions of dollars in planned private sector investments out of the United States and into other countries," the groups said in a letter to the senators, dated June 5. "Failing to act now by preserving 45V means ceding the future of hydrogen to China." The Business Council for Sustainable Energy and the Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative also signed the letter. House Republicans slashed the credits which had been included the Inflation Reduction Act, the landmark climate legislation signed by former President Joe Biden, a Democrat. Under the IRA, hydrogen producers got tax credits for projects that began construction before 2033. Industry analysts say clean hydrogen, opens new tab, or hydrogen produced from non-fossil energy sources, or natural gas paired with technology to capture carbon emissions and store them underground, is needed to decarbonize heavy industry and some vehicles. The letter said clarity from lawmakers would spur tens of billions of dollars in private capital, boost domestic manufacturing, and create long-term employment in construction, operations, and technology.


The Herald Scotland
2 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
'It shouldn't be illegal for men to buy sex' Ash Regan bill won't work
The details of his crimes are harrowing and heartbreaking. The case exposed just how deeply seated the police's systemic bias towards sex workers was. Just how vile and entrenched its institutional racism towards Indigenous people was – many of the missing women were Indigenous. Read more The failures in this case made one thing crystal clear. To the police in Vancouver, sex workers had no value. Pleas from families and the community to trace missing women were ignored over and over again. To say the results were devastating is an understatement. It is for this reason that I do not think sex workers or the people (men) who buy sex should be criminalised. Because the involvement of police with prostitution historically does not bode well for the women involved. It also ignores the agency of women in sex work and ensures the industry remains stigmatised. And marginalises those within it further. This week, Alba MSP Ash Regan introduced her 'Unbuyable Bill'. The Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill would see the buying of sex criminalised and the selling of sexual services decriminalised. It hinges on the principle that prostitution is a form of male violence against women. The Bill would also quash historic convictions and create a statutory right to support for those in and exiting prostitution. Essentially following the Nordic model. Though, will those statutory support services be funded properly? If not, they are redundant. Right now, in Scotland, the sale of sex is not illegal, but it might as well be. Running a brothel and soliciting or loitering in public to sell sex are against the law. In Canada after the Robert Pickton trial concluded, outrage over the way the way the missing women were ignored led to the Missing Women Commission of Inquiry. A direct result of the inquiry was a new policing strategy in Vancouver that effectively decriminalised sex work. Alba MSP Ash Regan (Image: free) The result was meaningful change, and sex workers were safer for it. But despite recommendations to replicate the Vancouver approach nationwide, in 2014, Stephen Harper's Conservative Government introduced Bill C-36, which followed the Nordic model. Buying sex became illegal. Advertising someone's sexual services was criminalised. So was accepting money to place those ads and profiting from someone's sexual services. It has been more than ten years since the Nordic Model was introduced in Canada, and sex workers have argued that it still polices sex work, and they still face harassment from the force. They also say that it makes it more difficult to screen clients, which pushes the industry further into the shadows. The other issue is that the model does not recognise the autonomy of sex workers. Not all sex work is survival sex work, and no abolitionist policy will be able to control the fact that consensual sex work does exist. Bill C-36, like the 'Unbuyable Bill', is rooted in radical feminist and abolitionist views. The law claims to address gender inequality and coercion, but it paradoxically limits women's ability to choose sex work, keeps their circumstances criminalised and fails to provide viable alternatives. A paper published in the Melbourne Journal of International Law found that if you separate Bill C-36's rhetorical claims from its actual effects, the law in reality 'is exposed as little more than a moralising condemnation of female sex workers, designed to limit their freedoms and capacity for self-determination, in order to induce their exit from sex work, in a manner which is wholly irreconcilable with the pursuit of 'gender equality'.' Legislating sex work is inherently difficult. It's crucial to make sure that the most vulnerable are protected, but it's contentious to paint everyone with the same brush. In Ireland, where buying sex was criminalised in 2015, sex workers reported that demand actually increased following the introduction of the new legislation. A report on the new law by the Department of Justice published in 2019 found that the law had a 'minimal effect' on demand. Sex workers also reported a heightened fear of crime, and it contributed to a climate where they felt even more marginalised and stigmatised. READ MORE MARISSA MACWHIRTER Scotland has a history of institutionalised abuse of working-class women and girls that is intertwined with its view of the 'social evil' of prostitution. The Glasgow System of the mid-nineteenth century saw the systemic policing of women and girls. Aged from seven to 39, they were plucked off the streets by police officers at will and taken to places like the Magdalene Asylum or the Lock Hospital for brutal and intimate examinations (often carried out by men) and barbaric treatments for venereal disease that often killed them. The Lochburn Magdalene Institution closed in 1960. Not that long ago. The case of Emma Caldwell, a 27-year-old woman murdered in 2005 by serial rapist Iain Packer, highlights how stigma against sex workers remains a serious issue in Scotland, just as it does in Canada. Failures in the police investigation have led to a forthcoming independent public inquiry. It took 19 years for Packer to be brought to justice. Regan's Bill is good in the sense that it has sparked fresh debate about the rights of sex workers. Though the reality of it becoming law before Scottish Parliament elections in 2026 is pretty unlikely. As in Canada, decriminalising sex work does not win as many votes as clamping down on it. And the Nordic model, as far as I am concerned, is still a crackdown. Shifting the burden of criminality does not constitute gender equality. Marissa MacWhirter is a columnist and feature writer at The Herald, and the editor of The Glasgow Wrap. The newsletter is curated between 5-7am each morning, bringing the best of local news to your inbox each morning without ads, clickbait, or hyperbole. Oh, and it's free. She can be found on X @marissaamayy1


Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
Wall Street's potential winners and losers from Trump's tax bill
June 5 (Reuters) - As President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill heads to the Senate, analysts examine how his broad-ranging policies could turn the fortunes of U.S. companies if the package is enacted as law. What Trump has dubbed a "big, beautiful bill", narrowly passed the Republican-controlled House on May 22. The bill seeks to extend tax breaks, set during Trump's first term in 2017 and on track to expire at the end of 2025, for multinational corporations. It is also expected to fulfill many of Trump's populist campaign pledges, including an immigration crackdown and ending some green energy incentives. The tax breaks are largely expected to be positive for the U.S. stock markets, but some analysts see only a modest upside. "Since the 2025 tax cuts are primarily an extension of the current tax code, we expect changes to provide only marginal benefits to equity performance," Morgan Stanley analysts said in a note last month. Overall, the bill is expected to add about $2.4 trillion to the $36.2 trillion U.S. debt pile, the Congressional Budget Office said on Wednesday. Here is a list of industries and companies that are likely to be affected by the bill: Defense companies could see renewed interest from investors as the new bill looks to step up spending on air and missile defense, munitions and border security. "There should be some benefit there to the defense contractors," said Chris Haverland, global equity strategist at Wells Fargo Investment Institute. "We currently rate industrials at a neutral. There'll be some offsets there, but there should be some benefits to the defense area." Brian Mulberry, client portfolio manager at Zacks Investment Management, named defense contractors RTX (RTX.N), opens new tab and General Dynamics (GD.N), opens new tab as potential beneficiaries. The iShares US Aerospace & Defense ETF is trading at all-time highs. Shares of U.S. solar companies slumped on May 22, as the bill aims to cancel funding for green-energy grant programs, which were established under the Biden administration in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. "If the bill passes, that's going to be a huge negative for renewable (energy stocks)," said Dave Grecsek, managing director of investment strategy and research at wealth management firm Aspiriant. "We could have a little bit more downside to the renewable energy space, but a lot of it is already priced in." Companies including First Solar (FSLR.O), opens new tab, Enphase Energy (ENPH.O), opens new tab and Sunrun (RUN.O), opens new tab are all in the red for the year. The bill includes substantial funding cuts for the U.S. Medicaid program, with fiscal hawks pushing for cuts to partly offset the cost of the bill's tax components. "Reductions to Medicaid funding also shift the cost to state and local governments that may be burdened by increased health care costs. This may cause notable revenue losses for hospitals, potentially pressuring (the) credit quality of both state and nonprofit health care municipal bonds," Morgan Stanley said. Shares of major health insurers CVS (CVS.N), opens new tab, Humana (HUM.N), opens new tab, UnitedHealth (UNH.N), opens new tab, Elevance (ELV.N), opens new tab and Cigna (CI.N), opens new tab would be in focus. The S&P 500 managed healthcare index (.SPLRCHMO), opens new tab is down 30.6% year to date. BofA Global Research said it expects interest rates to remain high if the bill does not meaningfully address deficit reduction, and flagged several companies that could be hurt by higher rates. SBA Communications (SBAC.O), opens new tab, Equinix (EQIX.O), opens new tab and Alexandria Real Estate Equities (ARE.N), opens new tab are some of the real estate-linked companies that are at risk, BofA Global Research said. "Homebuilders need to take a margin hit on the house to increase affordability. So that's a very simple translation of how fiscal stimulus is leading to a negative consequence for the stock market," said Viresh Kanabar, macro strategist - asset allocation at Macro Hive. The bill also includes legislation to extend or expand Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) provisions that are set to expire at the end of 2025. The provisions include 100% bonus depreciation for equipment investment, immediate deduction of domestic research and development (R&D) expenses and looser business interest expensing through 2029. BofA Global Research named a slew of S&P 500 companies with no overseas sales that could benefit from these items, including utility firms Alliant Energy (LNT.O), opens new tab, Ameren Corp (AEE.N), opens new tab and American Electric Power Company (AEP.O), opens new tab.