Artificial intelligence rollout for police forces to investigate grooming gangs
The intelligence and technical experts support forces investigating complex cases such as organised exploitation of modern slavery, county lines and child sex abuse.
Some 13 forces currently have access to their apps, which are said to have been used 12,500 times – saving more than £20 million and 16,000 hours for investigators.
The expansion, announced by the Home Office, comes after Baroness Casey recommended a national police operation to review cold cases, in her rapid audit on grooming gangs published in June.
Operation Beaconport has since been established, led by the National Crime Agency, and will be reviewing more than 1,200 closed cases of child sexual exploitation.
Safeguarding minister Jess Phillips said: 'The sexual exploitation of children by grooming gangs is one of the most horrific crimes and we must punish perpetrators, provide justice for victims and survivors, and protect today's children from harm.
'Baroness Casey flagged the need to upgrade police information systems to improve investigations and safeguard children at risk. Today we are investing in these critical tools.'
The technology being rolled out can translate large amounts of text in foreign languages from mobile phones seized by police, and analyse a mass of digital data to find patterns and relationships between suspects.
NCA director general Graeme Biggar said providing reassurance to victims and their families has been a main focus of the national policing operation since June.
He added: 'We must and will ensure their voices are heard and collectively, we will restore confidence that the law enforcement response to child sexual exploitation is without fear or favour, is evidence based and not undermined by fears of inflaming community tensions.'
The Home Secretary has also written to police forces to make sure they are collecting ethnicity data as recommended by Baroness Casey.
The crossbench peer's report found the lack of data showing the ethnicity and nationality of sex offenders in grooming gangs is 'a major failing over the last decade or more'.
The audit found that officials had dodged the issue of ethnicity among the groups of sex offenders for fear of being called racist, but there were enough convictions of Asian men 'to have warranted closer examination'.
The Government has launched a national inquiry into the abuse and further details are expected to be announced in the coming weeks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
3 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Police watchdog launch probe over alleged leak of Manchester Airport footage
In July 2024, the Manchester Evening News (MEN) published a video taken from CCTV of the incident, days after a mobile phone clip shared online showed a police officer kicking and stamping on a young Asian man as he lay on the floor. The phone footage went viral and sparked protests in Manchester city centre and outside Rochdale police station before the MEN's footage revealed that in the lead up to the actions, a female police officer was punched in the face. Last week Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, 20 – the man on the floor – was convicted by a jury at Liverpool Crown Court of assaulting Pc Lydia Ward causing her actual bodily harm after he broke her nose. He was also convicted of assaulting her Greater Manchester Police (GMP) colleague Pc Ellie Cook during the incident at the airport's Terminal 2 car park pay station on July 23. Amaaz and his brother, Muhammad Ahmed, 26, both from Rochdale, face a retrial next year over an allegation they assaulted Pc Zachary Marsden – the officer seen to kick and stamp. A probe by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) into the use of force by GMP officers during a series of arrests at the airport on July 23 remains ongoing. But the police watchdog has confirmed a separate investigation is under way over the alleged leak. An IOPC spokesman said: 'We can confirm a Greater Manchester Police officer was recently informed they are being criminally investigated over an allegation they shared footage relating to an active police investigation into an incident at Manchester Airport in July 2024 without any legitimate policing purpose. 'We began our independent investigation following a referral from the force in September 2024, after concerns were raised about the source of a video provided to the media. 'We will now investigate these allegations and obtain an account from the officer concerned in due course.' The officer has been informed they are being investigated over a number of potential offences including unlawful obtaining of personal data, misconduct in a public office and perverting the course of justice. In an opinion piece on Wednesday, MEN editor Sarah Lester said the footage it published 'provided critical context' and pointed out that the protests 'stopped overnight'. She wrote: 'After a careful process of verification and intense internal debate, we published it. 'We did so because we believed, and still believe, that in a democracy, the public deserves the full picture. 'Many senior figures in Manchester, including within the police, told us they were relieved, even grateful, that we had published it.' Ms Lester went on: 'We do not know the identity of the person being investigated and we make no comment on them or the investigation. 'But we do ask: what public interest is being served by pursuing this individual? How much taxpayer money is being spent on this – while the justice system groans under the weight of backlogs and delays? 'What message does this send to others who might be considering speaking up? This is a bad decision.'
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Minister contradicts terms of Labour's migrant returns deal
Labour's migrant returns deal with France has descended into farce as a minister appeared to contradict the terms of a new treaty. Cabinet minister Lisa Nandy said small boat migrants sent back under the deal would see their human rights claims heard after being sent back to France. However, it later emerged that some types of human rights cases would, in fact, block the Home Office from being able to remove migrants in the first place. Asked whether human rights challenges amounted to a loophole in the plan, Culture Secretary Ms Nandy said: 'That's not the case at all. 'The deal that we've struck will allow… us to send people back to France who have human rights claims. 'Those claims will be heard in France.' She told Sky News: 'I know that the Conservative Party has been saying that this is a loophole. It isn't and we're really confident about that.' However, the treaty clearly sets out how small boat migrants cannot be sent back to France if they have 'an outstanding human rights claim'. The Home Office confirmed some human rights claims will block migrants' removal until they have been concluded in full. It was a narrower interpretation of the circumstances than those set out by Ms Nandy, and legal proceedings could take months or even years to wrap up. The Mail has learned pro-migrant groups have begun informal discussions about launching a joint legal action against Labour's plan – just as they did against the Tories' Rwanda scheme. Sources said there had already been 'a certain amount of co-ordination' between charities and other groups, with details of the treaty still being analysed. The Free Movement website, which offers advice to immigration lawyers, has published an analysis of the new measures which says: 'Legal challenges will be more difficult than for Rwanda, however there are still likely to be grounds on which some people can resist removal to France. 'For example, if the inadmissibility decision was wrong, if people have family in the UK, or had experiences in France which make it inappropriate to send them back.' Meanwhile, the French interior ministry led by Bruno Retailleau - who signed the treaty alongside Home Secretary Yvette Cooper - declined to answer questions about the deal. Last month Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer pledged migrants would be 'detained and returned to France in short order' under the agreement. But earlier today – the first day it was in force – Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp posted videos from the Channel as he watched migrant boats bound for the UK coast, escorted by a French vessel. He said it showed the Anglo-French deal was a failure, adding that occupants of the boats were 'coming to a hotel near you soon'. 'On the very day Labour's flagship Channel deal was meant to kick in, I watched French ships escort illegal migrants straight into British waters,' Mr Philp said. 'Labour's migrant surrender deal with France is in shambles and today has proven that it will have no deterrent effect whatsoever.' It is unclear whether the Home Office had detained any of the new arrivals for possible removal to France. Officials had previously described how migrants would be taken to the Home Office's processing centre at Manston, near Ramsgate in Kent, for initial screening. Those selected would be sent to short-term detention facilities for further screening, and then on to an immigration removal centre.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Labour's migrant returns deal with France descends into farce as Cabinet minister appears to contradict terms of treaty
Labour's migrant returns deal with France has descended into farce as a minister appeared to contradict the terms of a new treaty. Cabinet minister Lisa Nandy said small boat migrants sent back under the deal would see their human rights claims heard after being sent back to France. However, it later emerged that some types of human rights cases would, in fact, block the Home Office from being able to remove migrants in the first place. Asked whether human rights challenges amounted to a loophole in the plan, Culture Secretary Ms Nandy said: 'That's not the case at all. 'The deal that we've struck will allow… us to send people back to France who have human rights claims. 'Those claims will be heard in France.' She told Sky News: 'I know that the Conservative Party has been saying that this is a loophole. It isn't and we're really confident about that.' However, the treaty clearly sets out how small boat migrants cannot be sent back to France if they have 'an outstanding human rights claim'. The Home Office confirmed some human rights claims will block migrants' removal until they have been concluded in full. It will include cases which cannot be formally 'certified' by officials as 'clearly unfounded'. A Home Office spokesman said: 'Not everyone will fall within the scope of certification. 'No doubt there will be examples where people who file a human rights claim will fall outside the scope of certification and that would have to be heard.' It was a narrower interpretation of the circumstances than those set out by Ms Nandy, and legal proceedings could take months or even years to wrap up. The Mail has learned pro-migrant groups have begun informal discussions about launching a joint legal action against Labour's plan – just as they did against the Tories' Rwanda scheme. Sources said there had already been 'a certain amount of co-ordination' between charities and other groups, with details of the treaty still being analysed. The Free Movement website, which offers advice to immigration lawyers, has published an analysis of the new measures which says: 'Legal challenges will be more difficult than for Rwanda, however there are still likely to be grounds on which some people can resist removal to France. 'For example, if the inadmissibility decision was wrong, if people have family in the UK, or had experiences in France which make it inappropriate to send them back.' Meanwhile, the French interior ministry led by Bruno Retailleau - who signed the treaty alongside Home Secretary Yvette Cooper - declined to answer questions about the deal. Last month Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer pledged migrants would be 'detained and returned to France in short order' under the agreement. But earlier today – the first day it was in force – Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp posted videos from the Channel as he watched migrant boats bound for the UK coast, escorted by a French vessel. He said it showed the Anglo-French deal was a failure, adding that occupants of the boats were 'coming to a hotel near you soon'. 'On the very day Labour's flagship Channel deal was meant to kick in, I watched French ships escort illegal migrants straight into British waters,' Mr Philp said. 'Labour's migrant surrender deal with France is in shambles and today has proven that it will have no deterrent effect whatsoever.' It is unclear whether the Home Office had detained any of the new arrivals for possible removal to France. Officials had previously described how migrants would be taken to the Home Office's processing centre at Manston, near Ramsgate in Kent, for initial screening. Those selected would be sent to short-term detention facilities for further screening, and then on to an immigration removal centre. Under the terms of the treaty the UK must hand France the names of those to be removed within 14 days of their arrival. The French government then has up to 28 days to respond. Labour's deal with France came a year after Sir Keir scrapped the Tories' Rwanda asylum scheme as one of his first acts in office. The Rwanda deal, designed to deter Channel crossings and save lives, was ready to finally get off the ground after more than two years in legal limbo.
