Baltic nations switch off Russian power grid in ‘victory for freedom'
Three Baltic states have cut ties with Russia's power grid to join the European Union's network in 'a victory for freedom.'
Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania – all former Soviet republics now in the European Union and Nato – had wanted to block Russia's ability to geopolitically blackmail them via the electricity system.
Zygimantas Vaiciunas, Lithuania's energy minister, told AFP on Saturday: 'We have removed any theoretical possibility of Russia using energy [grid] control as a weapon.'
Kaja Kallas, the EU foreign policy chief and Estonia's former prime minister, hailed the grid switch as 'a victory for freedom and European unity'.
Mr Vaiciunas said the Baltic states had completed the disconnection process at 9.09 local time (07.09 GMT) on Saturday.
'We have been waiting for this moment for a long time,' he told reporters, after speaking with his Estonian and Latvian counterparts.
'The energy system of the Baltic states is finally in our own hands. We are in control,' he added of the 'historic' moment.
Official celebrations are planned across the Baltics. Authorities are on guard for any potential cyber-attacks linked to the grid switch.
Latvia will physically cut a power line to Russia later today and Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, is expected to attend a ceremony with Baltic leaders in Vilnius on Sunday.
The Baltics have long prepared to integrate with the European grid but they have faced technological and financial issues.
The switch became more urgent after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, which spooked the Baltic states into thinking that they could be targeted.
They stopped purchasing Russian gas and electricity after the invasion but their power grids remained connected to Russia and Belarus, controlled from Moscow.
This left them dependent on Moscow for a stable electricity flow, which is crucial for factories and facilities requiring a reliable power supply.
The Baltic states will operate in 'isolated mode' for about 24 hours to test their frequency, or power levels, according to Litgrid, Lithuania's state-run grid operator, before they integrate with the European grid on Sunday.
Rokas Masiulis., the Litgrid head, previously said: 'We need to carry out some tests to assure Europe that we are a stable energy system.
'We'll switch power stations on and off, observe how the frequency fluctuates and assess our ability to control it.'
The states will then integrate into the European power grid via Poland.
Authorities have warned of potential risks linked to the change.
Lithuania's state security department told AFP: 'Various short-term risks are possible, such as kinetic operations against critical infrastructure, cyber-attacks and disinformation campaigns.'
Poland's power grid operator PSE had said it would use helicopters and drones to patrol the connection with Lithuania.
Edgars Rinkevics, the Latvian president, told LTV1 that the countries could not 'rule out possible provocations'.
In Estonia, police and volunteer defence corps will man critical electrical infrastructure until next weekend because of the risk of sabotage.
Several undersea telecom and power cables have been severed in the Baltic Sea in recent months. Some experts and politicians have accused Russia of waging a hybrid war, an allegation that Moscow denies.
A total of €1.6 billion euros ($1.7 billion) – mostly EU funds – have been invested in the synchronisation project across the Baltic states and Poland.
Gitanas Nauseda, the Lithuanian president, was sure that the switch would go smoothly, telling reporters: 'People won't feel it, either in terms of their bills or any inconvenience.'
Estonia's climate ministry urged everyone to carry on as usual as 'the more regular and predictable the behaviour... the easier it is to manage the power grid'.
But some consumers are worried about power cuts and home improvement stores in Estonia noted a sharp increase in sales of generators.
After the Baltic decoupling, the energy system in the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad will lose its grid connection to mainland Russia.
Kaliningrad has been building up power generation capacity for years and Dmitry Peskov, the Kremlin spokesman, dismissed all concerns.
Asked about the cut-off last week, he said: 'We have taken all measures to ensure the uninterrupted reliable operation of our unified energy system.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
New York Fails To Adopt Climate Reporting Requirement In 2025 Session
The New York state Assembly Chamber is seen on the opening day of the 2023 legislative session at ... More the state Capitol Wednesday, Jan. 4, 2023, in Albany, N.Y. (AP Photo/Hans Pennink) When California adopted climate reporting requirements in 2023, it opened the door to a potential wave of state level regulations relating to sustainability and climate change that could build on federal requirements. With Trump winning the 2024 elections and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ending the climate-related risk rule, activists shifted focus to Democrat controlled states. In early 2025, the New York State Senate introduced legislation that mimicked California's requirement. However, when the legislative session closed on June 12, those proposals had failed to make it out of committee, closing the door on mandatory sustainability reporting until 2026. Climate reporting, sustainability reporting, and environmental, social, and governance reporting experienced a surge of interest starting in 2019. These reporting requirements are designed to work in tandem with regular financial reports to provide information to investors on other activities of the company not directly related to finances. Climate reporting, or climate-related risk reporting, is the main driver of new reporting requirements. It stems from the Paris Agreement and the goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 'net zero' by 2050. During the 2019 United Nations Conference of Parties in Glasgow, the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation announced the creation of the International Sustainability Standards Board to create global reporting standards. In March 2022, the SEC announced they would begin the rulemaking process to create a climate-related risk rule requiring publicly traded companies to report GHG emissions and climate risks. In the European Union, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directed was adopted in September 2022, mandating the creation of European Sustainability Reporting Standards. The IFRS Sustainability Reporting Standards were released by the ISSB in June 2023, with a focus on GHG emissions and climate action. The next month, the European Union adopted the ESRS, incorporating the IFRS standards for environmental issues, while adding human rights and governance issues for a broader ESG reporting requirement under the CSRD. After years of delays, in March 2024, the SEC adopted a climate-related risk rule, but it was promptly met with legal challenges and implementation was postponed. Following the election of President Trump to a second term, the SEC began taking steps to rollback the reporting requirement. With the certain death of sustainability reporting at a federal level, advocates shifted focus to states to get them to follow California's lead. Given its international reputation as the business hub of the U.S., New York was a major focus for this changes. As the second largest Democrat controlled state, behind California, it was more likely that they would follow California's lead. New York's proposal were introduced in the Senate in the form of Senate Bill 3456, titled the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act, and Senate Bill 3697, titled the Climate-Related Financial Risk Reporting Bill. The proposals mimicked the California legislation, requiring GHG emission reporting for Scope 1 and Scope 2 starting in 2027, for FY 2026, and Scope 3 starting in 2028, for FY 2027. For most state legislatures, they are considered part time. As a result, they only meet for limited periods annually, or in some cases biennially, to conduct business in a 'legislative session.' The New York legislature meets for approximately 60 days every year. The 2025 legislative session started on January 8 and concluded on June 12. Within the respective chamber, bills must work through a committee process that requires approval from committees that are deemed to have an interest in the legislation. Once approved by the committees, the bills are sent to the floor for a vote by all members, then sent to the other chamber for their approval. New York's climate reporting bills were originally sent to the Senate's Environmental Conservation Committee and passed unanimously. That is as far as they got. Both bills were then sent to the Finance Committee, where they never called for a vote. The bills have, for all intents and purposes, died in committee. This is even more surprising when you consider the make up of the Senate. The New York State Senate is composed of 63 members. Currently, 41 are Democrats and 22 are Republicans. The Democrats have a super majority of the Senate, giving them near full autonomy to pass what legislation they deem fit. That climate reporting bills failed to make it out of committee is significant. It should be noted that the New York legislature never officially ends session. Unlike Florida that typically only meets for 60 days, then holds a ceremony signalling the official end of the legislative session, New York does not officially gavel the session closed. Instead, they go into recess. It is a procedural technicality that allows them to re-adjourn without the intervention of the Governor. However, they only meet outside the typical legislative session in exceptional circumstances. What isn't passed by June 12 will not pass. As climate activists are facing major setbacks on sustainability reporting requirements internationally, including a current debate to reduce the reporting requirements in the European Union's CSRD, the failure of New York to consider the proposal is a signal of a broader, bipartisan pushback. A similar failure in Democrat controlled Colorado further highlights the issue. It was assumed that what was lost at the federal level would be gained at the state level, that appears to be a fallacy. The question is shifting from what states will join California, to whether California will continue to stand alone.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Irish government rejects motion to stop sale of Israeli bonds
The Irish government on Wednesday defeated a cross-party motion that called on it to stop the Central Bank of Ireland from facilitating the sale of Israeli bonds. The motion, presented by the Social Democrats and supported by Sinn Féin, Labour, and People Before Profit, was intended to block what many refer to as 'Israeli war bonds'. The instruments provide economic support to Israel while it conducts military operations in Gaza, and Ireland's Central Bank currently approves the sale of these bonds in EU markets. Bonds issued by non-EU countries must be approved by the financial regulator in one member state before they can be sold within the single market. The bill failed with 85 votes against and 71 in favour, upholding the government's position. Several TDs, Irish members of parliament, argued that Ireland should not be involved in financial instruments that fund destruction in Gaza. The Central Bank estimated that Israel has raised between €100mn and €130mn from their sale. Taoiseach Micheál Martin nonetheless rejected claims that the Irish government is complicit in genocide by allowing the facilitation of the bond sales. Despite publicly acknowledging the severity of Israel's attacks in Gaza, he maintained that Ireland must oppose the military action within legal and diplomatic channels. As such, the government argued that it cannot legally direct the Central Bank due to its independence under Irish and EU law. When the same objection arose last month in response to a similar motion from Sinn Féin, party leader Mary Lou McDonald argued: 'We have over 20 pages of independent, robust legal opinion clearly stating that the bill is compliant with Irish law, European law and international law.' Related Entertainment world reacts to Greta Thunberg interception in Gaza-bound aid boat Does the public support the government of Israel in Western European countries? As per the EU's Prospectus Regulation, non-EU countries like Israel must meet disclosure and legal standards to issue bonds in the bloc. If those standards are met, the Central Bank doesn't have the authority to reject bond applications. 'The Central Bank cannot decide to impose sanctions for breaches or alleged breaches of international law. It is for international bodies such as the UN or the EU to determine how to respond to breaches or alleged breaches of international law,' said Central Bank Governor Gabriel Makhlouf. He added that the Genocide Convention applies to the Irish State, not regulatory bodies like the Central Bank. The reason why the Irish Central Bank is at the core of this issue — despite Ireland being one of the EU countries that has been the most vocally pro-Palestine — is Brexit. When the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union in 2016, Israel chose Ireland to be the home member state to approve its bonds. Prior to 2021, this responsibility fell to the UK. The current prospectus for Israeli bonds is set to expire in September, but Central Bank officials believe that Israeli authorities will likely initiate the renewal process several weeks beforehand. In the absence of new EU sanctions or changes to existing legislation, the Central Bank will remain legally bound to approve the bond prospectus, regardless of the political fallout. Meanwhile, protesters have been gathering for months outside the seat of the parliament, Leinster House, and the Central Bank, demanding that the government block Israeli bond sales.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Germany announces new 1.9B euro Ukraine aid boost
Germany's defense minister on Thursday pledged a new military aid package for Ukraine worth 1.9 billion euros, as European and NATO officials met in Rome to discuss bolstering the bloc's defense and security spending amid rising risks of Russian aggression. Berlin's pledge will likely bring relief to Kyiv after Washington signaled a reduction in next year's budget for military aid to Ukraine. Germany is Ukraine's second-largest backer, and along with other European nations has been under increasing pressure to make up for the Trump administration's retreat from supporting Ukraine's military operation. Russia has stepped up strikes on Ukrainian urban centers in recent days, and despite Washington urging negotiations, both sides seem as far as ever from progress toward a peace deal, analysts said.
