&w=3840&q=100)
European missile group MBDA supplying parts for bombs used in Gaza airstrikes: Report
MBDA, Europe's largest missile manufacturer, is reportedly selling key components for bombs that have been used in airstrikes in Gaza, resulting in the deaths of Palestinian children and other civilians, according to an investigation by The Guardian. The investigation, conducted in collaboration with Disclose and Follow the Money, highlights concerns about European companies potentially profiting from the devastation in Gaza.
The focus of the investigation is the GBU-39 Small Diameter Bomb, for which MBDA owns a factory in Alabama, US, that produces the 'wings'. These wings, which are fitted to the GBU-39 bomb made by Boeing, unfold after launch, guiding the bomb to its target. Revenues from MBDA Incorporated, the US company, flow through MBDA UK, based in Hertfordshire, England, and any profits are then passed to the MBDA group, headquartered in France, The Guardian reports.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
MBDA distributed almost £350 million in dividends last year to its three shareholders: Britain's biggest defence firm BAE Systems, France's Airbus, and Italy's Leonardo, according to The Guardian.
The GBU-39 is reaching Israel under the US military aid program. Since the Hamas massacre of Israeli citizens on October 7, 2023, an estimated 4,800 of the bombs have been shipped, either bought directly from Boeing or transferred from US military reserves, to which Israel responded by launching a war on Gaza. The most recent consignment of 2,166 was announced in February of this year, just as the UN reported that almost 70% of Gaza had been reduced to rubble.
According to the investigation, using open source information and analysis by weapons experts, there have been 24 verified cases where the GBU-39 was deployed in attacks that resulted in civilian deaths, including children.
These attacks often occurred at night, without warning, targeting school buildings and tent camps sheltering displaced families. Some of these incidents have been examined by the United Nations and Amnesty International, with concerns raised about potential war crimes, The Guardian notes.
In one instance, on May 26, 2025, a bomb struck the Fahmi al-Jarjawi school in Gaza City, killing 36 people, half of whom were children. Hanin al-Wadie, a five-year-old girl, survived the attack but suffered severe burns and psychological trauma, losing her parents and sister, The Guardian reports. Weapons experts identified fragments of a GBU-39 bomb at the scene.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
MBDA confirmed its contract with Boeing for the wings and stated that it complies with all relevant national and international laws applicable to the arms trade in the countries in which it operates, all of whom have export policies and operate robust export control regimes, according to The Guardian.
However, campaigners argue that the case highlights the limitations of the UK's move to pause some arms shipments to Israel, as the US arm of MBDA can continue supplying Boeing from its Alabama factory.
Sam Perlo-Freeman, the research coordinator at Campaign Against the Arms Trade, said that MBDA is profiting from the arming of Israel, according to The Guardian. He suggested that MBDA could sell MBDA Inc. if it wanted to avoid complicity in arming Israel and that the UK government should take all actions within its power to stop the genocide, including sanctions on companies arming Israel and banning UK investments in such companies.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
UCLA faces uncertainty as Trump suspends $584 million in federal grants over civil rights probe
The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) is facing a major funding crisis after the Trump administration formally suspended $584 million in federal research grants, nearly twice the previously estimated amount. The move follows findings by the US Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division that UCLA violated civil rights laws by failing to address alleged antisemitic incidents on campus. This marks the first time a public university has had its federal research funding halted under the administration's growing scrutiny of higher education institutions. The implications are far-reaching, potentially disrupting scientific research, faculty-led projects, and student programs across multiple departments. Allegations tied to campus protests and civil rights protections According to the Justice Department, the suspension follows a civil rights probe that concluded UCLA acted with 'deliberate indifference' in allowing a hostile environment for Jewish and Israeli students. The investigation cited incidents during the 2024 pro-Palestinian protests, when demonstrators allegedly blocked access to classes and other facilities. The federal government said UCLA's handling of these events violated both the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Susan Boyle Is Now so Thin and Looks Beautiful! Undo The university has denied wrongdoing but agreed to a $6 million settlement with three Jewish students and one Jewish professor who filed a lawsuit claiming their civil rights were violated. Chancellor Julio Frenk described the situation as a critical moment for the university. 'If these funds remain suspended, it will be devastating for UCLA and for Americans across the nation,' he said in a statement, highlighting the university's role in conducting 'groundbreaking research.' Funding cuts impact major research bodies The suspended grants span several federal agencies, including the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Energy. These funds play a central role in supporting advanced research, scientific innovation, and faculty development. James B. Milliken, the newly appointed president of the University of California system, criticised the funding cuts, arguing that they do not serve the stated purpose of addressing antisemitism. 'The extensive work that UCLA and the entire University of California have taken to combat antisemitism has apparently been ignored,' he said, adding that the loss of funding threatens research that 'saves lives, grows our economy, and fortifies our national security. ' The university has agreed to enter talks with the administration in an effort to resolve the matter. As part of the lawsuit settlement, UCLA will contribute $2.3 million to eight organisations focused on combating antisemitism and supporting Jewish students. It has also established an Office of Campus and Community Safety and introduced new policies for managing on-campus protests. A pattern emerging across universities The administration's action against UCLA follows a similar approach taken with Columbia University. Last month, Columbia agreed to pay $200 million to settle allegations of violating federal antidiscrimination laws. That agreement restored more than $400 million in research grants. Officials have indicated that the Columbia settlement may serve as a model for how the federal government addresses comparable issues at other universities. The Trump administration's strategy appears to tie institutional accountability directly to research funding, using financial pressure to enforce compliance with federal civil rights standards. What this means for students and campus life While the legal and administrative outcomes continue to unfold, the immediate consequences for students are less abstract. The suspended funds support a range of university functions, including student fellowships, lab work, faculty-led research opportunities, and programs that many students rely on for academic and career development. A prolonged freeze could limit student access to research roles, delay ongoing projects, and reduce campus resources in the coming academic terms. For those in fields tied to federally funded research, particularly STEM and public health — the uncertainty introduces new challenges in an already competitive environment. UCLA has said it remains committed to maintaining a safe and inclusive campus for all students. As negotiations with the federal government proceed, the university community, especially its student body, is bracing for further clarity on how the situation will affect academic programs in the months ahead. (with AP inputs) TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
'Who's he to stop us?' AAP MP on Trump tariffs, penalty for buying oil from Russia
Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MP Ashok Kumar Mittal on Wednesday strongly criticised United States President Donald Trump's announcement of a 25% additional tariff on Indian products, calling it "illogical" and accusing Washington, DC, of applying "double standards" in its trade policies. Aam Aadmi Party MP Ashok Kumar Mittal also suggested that the current situation could also open up new avenues for the Indian economy.(File/Sansad TV) Mittal defended India's purchase of oil from Russia and questioned the legitimacy of US criticism. Mittal said, "Yes, we are purchasing oil from Russia. Who is he to stop us? He himself is purchasing uranium, certain critical metals from Russia. His allies, European countries, are purchasing oil from Russia. China is purchasing oil from can't have double standards, double policies. He will have to withdraw his illogical orders, illogical tariffs." Mittal asserted that Indian industry is "competent enough" and will find "alternative ways to sell the products." He said, "The US has imposed a 50% total tariff on Indian products. Of course, this will hurt the Indian industry in the short term. But our entrepreneurs, our businessmen, our industrialists are competent enough, strong enough. They will find alternative ways to sell the products." He suggested that the current situation could also open up new avenues for the Indian economy. "We may increase consumption in India, we are 1.4 billion populations and we can find some more markets. Rather, it may give us opportunities. Indian economy is growing 6 to 8 % per year, and its effect on GDP will be maximum 0.2, meaning nothing as per our growth, and we will easily absorb this deficiency in our growth and find other ways." His reaction comes after, US President Donald Trump on Wednesday signed an Executive Order imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on imports from India. According to the order issued by the White House, Trump cited matters of national security and foreign policy concerns, as well as other relevant trade laws, for the increase, claiming that India's imports of Russian oil, directly or indirectly, pose an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to the United the order, the total tariff on Indian goods will be 50 per cent. While the initial duty becomes effective on August 7, the additional levy will come into effect after 21 days and will be imposed on all Indian goods imported into the US, except for goods already in transit or those meeting specific exemptions. The Executive Order also allows for modifications based on changing circumstances, including potential retaliation by other countries or steps taken by Russia or India to address the national emergency." Accordingly, and as consistent with applicable law, articles of India imported into the customs territory of the United States shall be subject to an additional ad valorem rate of duty of 25 per cent," the order stated. India has termed the United States' move to impose additional tariffs on India over its oil imports from Russia as "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable." Ministry of External Affairs said New Delhi will take "all actions necessary to protect its national interests." In an official statement, the MEA said, "The United States has in recent days targeted India's oil imports from Russia. We have already made clear our position on these issues, including the fact that our imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India." "It is therefore extremely unfortunate that the US should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest," the statement added. We reiterate that these actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable. India will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests," the MEA stressed. (ANI)
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Germany, Ukraine's second biggest backer, is ready to play a larger role
Since June, the intensity of Russian attacks on Ukrainian territories has increased significantly, leading to a large number of civilian deaths. June 2025 recorded the highest civilian casualty since the start of the Russia-Ukraine war in February 2022. As per numbers by the UN Human Rights Mission in Ukraine, 232 people were killed and 1,343 were wounded. On 30 June, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul travelled to Kyiv to reiterate Germany's military, financial, economic and humanitarian support for Ukraine. 'In Ukraine, it will be decided whether our Europe remains a place where freedom and human dignity hold sway, or becomes a continent on which violence can be used to redraw borders,' said Mr. Wadephul. This follows visits by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to Berlin in May and German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius to Kyiv in mid-June. Mr. Pistorius announced a total German military aid worth €9 billion for 2025. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Bundestag on July 9 said that all diplomatic means to resolve the Russia-Ukraine war had been exhausted. 'When a criminal regime openly questions another country's right to exist with military force and sets out to destroy the political order of freedom on the entire European continent, the federal government I lead will do everything in its power to prevent this,' said Mr. Merz. Patrick Keller, the head of the Centre for Security and Defence at the Berlin-based German Society for Foreign Relations (DGAP), notes that Germany has been at the forefront in supporting Ukraine since 2022. However, he acknowledges that in the light of the increased Russian aggression, these efforts look insufficient. 'We have to continue to increase our efforts. With the change in the German government, there has been a new focus on defence and security policy overall. It is understood that the Ukrainian effort also serves as a deterrent for Europe in the era of an aggressive Russia,' said Mr. Keller. Niklas Balbon, Research Fellow with the Global Public Policy Institute (GPPi), a Berlin-based think tank, noted that while Germany has promised financial aid to Ukraine, the challenge is how soon Ukraine's weapons production can be scaled up. Trump's flip-flop Ever since U.S. President Donald Trump's infamous White House meeting with Ukraine's Mr. Zelenskyy in February this year, Europe has been on tenterhooks. The U.S. remains one of the largest members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), but Mr. Trump has made it clear that European countries must increase their defence spending. Mr. Trump's views on Russian President Vladimir Putin have also gone from being positive following some 'respectful conversations' earlier this year to outright criticism in the last month. Mr. Keller notes that one cannot change the fundamental attitude of the current state of affairs with the U.S. government, but can make the most of it. 'In the current situation, Mr. Trump is getting increasingly critical of Mr. Putin and is willing to support Ukraine in innovative ways. Europe has to jump at this opportunity. We really need to get going with increased capacity in Ukraine and helping them to produce weapons on their own. The German defence industry is more than ready to build in Ukraine and help them scale and build weapons-making factories,' said Mr. Keller. Ukraine does produce close to 40% of the weapons it uses in the war at home, as of mid-2025, and U.S. support covers 30%. There are plans to increase domestic weapons production to 50% within the next six months, as per Mr. Zelenskyy. This is where Germany is expected to help out. In 2024, drones manufactured in Ukraine made up 96% of all unmanned aerial vehicles used in combat. Ukraine is approaching a capacity to make 4 million drones annually by this year. Mr. Balbon notes that even though Europe would like to be more independent from the U.S., it does not have the capabilities to be more autonomous or produce the weapons needed in Ukraine quickly enough. 'European decision makers are thinking about how to game the U.S. administration to support Ukraine, while also allowing Mr. Trump to sell it as a victory to his voter base. The NATO countries buying weapons from the U.S. to donate to Ukraine is one such way,' said Mr. Balbon. As per NATO General Secretary Mark Rutte, Germany, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Britain, the Netherlands, and Canada are ready to buy weapons from the U.S. to be donated to Ukraine. The weapons include Patriot missile batteries and air defence systems, F-16 fighter jets, Howitzer artillery systems and more. Patriot is the world's most advanced air-defence system. In May, Mr. Merz had said that there would be no range restrictions for weapons that would be delivered to Ukraine. However, Defence Minister Mr. Pistorius has said that Germany won't be providing Kyiv with the long-range Taurus cruise missiles that can strike targets that are 500 km away. 'If one looks at the Patriot systems, the U.S. has 60 ready, whereas Germany just has 4-6. It is a question of scale and timing, as it takes months to build them. If Ukraine needs these systems now, the most effective way is to buy them from the U.S.,' said Mr. Keller, noting that despite all the challenges posed by the Trump government, Europe cannot give the impression that it wants the U.S. out – it's in no one's interest. Modern warfare While Germany has announced billions in aid for helping Ukraine build weapons, experts say that investments have to be made in the right capabilities, keeping in mind the nature of future warfare. 'The warfare of the future will rely a lot on unmanned drones, AI technology, space-based systems and so on, so you would need a smart combination of various factors to succeed,' said Mr. Keller, noting that a large part of defence spending has to go to nimble industries and startups over large defence contractors. German defence startups such as Helsing, Quantum Systems, Stark Defense have been at the forefront of providing drones to Ukraine alongside large defence players like Rheinmetall. 'It is important to keep in mind that the biggest innovator and driver in drone warfare is Ukraine. NATO countries are learning from this and playing catch-up. German military is also learning how Ukrainians are using drones, so there is a flow of knowledge in both directions,' said Mr. Balbon. Political challenges Even before the new government led by the coalition between the conservative Christian Democrats (CDU/CSU) and centre-left Social Democrats (SPD) assumed office, Germany had agreed on a €500 billion budget to be spent on civilian, climate, economic and defence needs. This special budget is over and above Germany's annual budget. For sectors like infrastructure and defence spending, Germany also exempted the conservative 'debt brake' that only allowed it to borrow 0.35% of its GDP. 'The lifting of the debt brake allows the German government to balance defence spending with other forms of spending when it comes to lifting the economy, improving domestic infrastructure and so on. In the ruling coalition, the CDU also wants to reform social spending and lower expenditure, as they argue that the German government is spending too much money. For Social Democrats, that's not in their interest. This is the key tension,' said Mr. Balbon. 'The increased defence spending isn't just key for Germany, but also largely for Europe, as it is a deterrence against Russia in the mid-term. The capabilities that are being acquired with this money, in theory and practice, can be sent to Ukraine as well,' said Mr. Keller. But it does come with some political backlash from the far right and far left parties within Germany. According to Mr. Balbon, the far left parties are opposed to military spending in general, as they don't want Germany to invest in armed forces. 'The far right (namely, Alternative for Germany or AfD) are more interested and aligned ideologically with Russia. But there's a paradox – they want Germany to stop supporting Ukraine, but they also want a stronger German military whilst negating the very reason there is a need for larger German defence spending - namely, Russian aggression,' said Mr. Balbon. 'Given German history, there's an inherent criticism of militarisation and spending on military purposes as opposed to spending on social benefits, childcare, rent and so on. It will be important for defence planners and the industry representatives to get this mix right,' said Mr. Keller. Neighbours perception Given Germany's history, especially in the Second World War, it is generally wary of taking any leadership position within Europe. When it comes to Ukraine, Germany has been the second-largest supporter, after the US, in terms of weapons and aid. Germany's increased spending isn't scaring its neighbours but is being welcomed, noted Mr. Keller. 'Historically difficult neighbours, such as the Baltic countries, Poland, and the Czech Republic, feel that Germany is finally living up to its responsibility. It has prompted other wealthy EU countries, such as France, to increase their own defence spending,' said Mr. Keller. Mr. Balbon concurs. 'The predominant fear in Europe and Germany is that at some point in the future, Russia will attack the Baltic countries. It's not so much a fear of massive on-ground invasion, but that Russia will try out some smaller level attack to see how NATO responds – whether it will trigger Article 5 or which members will come to help,' said Mr. Balbon. Article 5 is a cornerstone of NATO, which states that an armed attack against any one NATO member is an attack against all. Meaning if any NATO member is attacked, other members are obligated to assist by 'such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force'. At the recent NATO Summit in The Hague on June 24-25, all 32 member countries agreed to increase their defence spending to 5% of their GDP by 2035. Germany now has a permanent brigade (to have 5,000 troops by 2027) in Lithuania, which is one of the three Baltic countries bordering Russia. Estonia and Latvia are also expected to get a European multinational battlegroup presence. Mr. Keller notes that there are no guarantees that all NATO members would fulfil the 5% target, given past record when many countries failed to fulfil the 2% target. 'Domestic political pressure and economic reasons may cause individual countries to lag behind. That should not happen, and it is the responsibility of wealthy countries to lead by example. This is why it is important for Germany to fulfil its obligations. There is a shared perception among the NATO members that they are stronger united,' said Mr. Keller. (Nimish Sawant is an independent journalist based in Berlin)
