Coty forecasts fall in quarterly sales, to raise premium fragrance prices
The company's shares were down 16% in extended trading after it also posted a surprise fourth-quarter loss.
Coty will raise prices in its premium fragrances unit in the U.S. and onshore some production to cushion the impact of the 15% duties on imports from Europe under U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs policy, executives said.
Retailers in the U.S. are increasingly cautious due to tariffs and are destocking inventories as cost-conscious consumers tighten spending on some beauty and skincare products.
Coty expects first-quarter like-for-like sales to decline 6% to 8%, compared with 4.5% growth a year ago and said product launches should drive sales growth in the second half.
"Our analysis of cosmetics category weakness points to value-seeking behavior, some fatigue with innovation as consumers circle back to basics and less frequent usage, particularly with Gen-Z migrating to fragrances," finance chief Laurent Mercier said in a statement.
Changes in the immigration policy under the Trump administration has also contributed to the slowdown in the country, Mercier added.
Coty also said it has invested disproportionately in its U.S. mass beauty business at the expense of more profitable fragrances unit.
The company would reallocate investment in fragrances instead of mass beauty, which has struggled of late due to intense competition from cheaper products online.
Coty reported an adjusted quarterly loss of 5 cents per share, compared with analysts' estimates of a profit of 2 cents per share, according to data compiled by LSEG.
The loss included a negative impact from an equity swap mark-to-market of $0.07 due to the stock price decline in the quarter, the company said.
Beauty retailer Estee Lauder (EL.N), opens new tab also gave a weak annual profit forecast on Wednesday.
The company's fourth-quarter revenue fell 8% to $1.25 billion, but beat estimates of $1.20 billion.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
MAGA billionaire announces he's backing new school in four states with VERY apt name
Billionaire Bill Ackman is continuing his charge to change education in America as he's backing new, AI-assisted 'Alpha Schools' in four states. While much of Ackman's activism has been aimed at rooting DEI and ' woke ideology' out of the Ivy League schools that helped make him, Alpha Schools are aimed at K-12 education. Alpha Schools already exist in Texas, Florida and California and are coming to four states this fall, including a Manhattan campus, heading to Ackman's backyard, where he will become an ambassador. The schools use artificial intelligence and teachers are known as 'guides' - many of whom don't have traditional teaching backgrounds - who help 'speed-teach' two hour lessons to students. They claim that the two-hour, AI-software backed lessons teach students twice as much than a traditional school. Children are still kept active in the afternoons with 5-mile bikerides and AI-generated plans that allow children to explore personal hobbies and teaching practical skills like entrepreneurship, public speaking and financial literacy, according to WSJ. Ackman, whom some have hailed as the new Warren Buffett, hailed the program on social media: 'The first truly breakthrough innovation in K-12 education that I have seen since the Kipp Academy.' 'The bottom line: Alpha kids love school and have incredible outcomes.' While much of Ackman's activism has been aimed at rooting DEI and ' woke ideology' out of the Ivy League schools that helped make him, Alpha Schools are aimed at K-12 education Co-founder Mackenzie Price noted that social issues and politics are not allowed in her classrooms. 'We do not let anything - political, social issues - come in the way. We stay very much out of that,' she said. The schools are charging 'founding families' anywhere from $45,000 to $60,000 a year for tuition. Unsurprisingly, liberal teachers union head Randi Weingarten is not a fan of Price's ideas. 'Students and our country need to be in relationship with other human beings. When you have a school that is strictly A.I., it is violating that core precept of the human endeavor and of education,' she told The New York Times. Ackman has long been at odds with Harvard, criticizing the university for not doing enough to protect students from antisemitism. Early last year he launched an unsuccessful bid to get four candidates on the ballot for a governing board. The financier runs New York-based hedge fund firm Pershing Square Capital Management and has been a vocal supporter of Trump's policies on tariffs and spending. Harvard is 'a collection of buildings, nice real estate' located in Cambridge, Massachusetts next to the Charles River, he said. But its cutting-edge faculty, researchers and students could easily move elsewhere, he said. 'This is the best time in history to start a university.' He also again hit out at the school's governing board, saying it has become insular and that there is no mechanism to remove members the way there is in corporate America where investors can run board challenges.
Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Elon Musk must face lawsuit claiming he ran illegal $1 million election lottery
Aug 20 (Reuters) - Elon Musk was ordered on Wednesday by a federal judge to face a lawsuit by voters accusing the world's richest person of defrauding them into signing a petition to support the U.S. Constitution for a chance to win his $1 million-a-day giveaway. U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman in Austin, Texas said Jacqueline McAferty plausibly alleged in her proposed class action that Musk and his political action committee America PAC wrongly induced her to provide personal identifying information as part of the giveaway, late in the 2024 election campaign. Lawyers for Musk and America PAC did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Musk founded America PAC to support Republican Donald Trump's successful 2024 presidential run. McAferty, an Arizona resident, said Musk and America PAC induced voters in seven battleground states to sign his petition by promising that $1 million recipients would be chosen randomly, as in a lottery, though the voters had no real chance to collect. She said voters who signed were also required to provide names, addresses, email addresses and phone numbers. In seeking a dismissal, Musk listed several "red flags" as proof he had not run an illegal lottery. He said these included statements that the $1 million recipients were "selected to earn" the money and expected to become America PAC spokespeople, defeating the idea that the payment was a "prize." But the judge cited other statements suggesting the defendants were "awarding" the $1 million, and the money could be "won." "It is plausible that plaintiff justifiably relied on those statements to believe that defendants were objectively offering her the chance to enter a random lottery--even if that is not what they subjectively intended to do," Pitman wrote. The judge was appointed to the bench by President Barack Obama in 2014. Musk had also rejected the suggestion that petition signers suffered harm by providing contact information. Pitman said an expert in political data brokerage could testify what that information was worth for voters in battleground states. The lawsuit was filed on Election Day, Nov. 5, 2024. A day earlier, a Philadelphia judge refused to end Musk's giveaway, saying that city's top prosecutor failed to show it was an illegal lottery. Musk is a Texas resident, and his electric car company Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab is based in Austin. The case is McAferty v Musk et al, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, No. 24-01346.
Sky News
27 minutes ago
- Sky News
Europe's sanctions on Russia were to starve Putin's funds - instead something else has happened
Why is Donald Trump threatening to impose sanctions, or tariffs, or maybe both, on India in relation to the Ukraine war? The short answer is that India has established itself as one of the single most important customers for one of the single most important products made in Russia: crude oil. You only have to glance at the data on Russian fossil fuel exports to see what I mean. Nor is it just India. China has raised its imports of Russian fossil fuels by 44% since the imposition of sanctions. Back before the invasion of Ukraine in 2022, by far and away the biggest recipient of Russian energy exports was Europe. Then Europe imposed sanctions on various different Russian products, most notably oil. The idea was to starve Vladimir Putin of the revenues he is using to fund the Russian war machine. Instead, something else happened: those Russian tankers which previously delivered oil to Europe instead started sending it to Indian oil refineries. The Middle Eastern oil tankers that had previously served those Russian refineries began sending their oil to Europe. Nothing, fundamentally, really changed. And while Europeans are no longer taking direct shipments of Russian oil, they are taking plenty of shipments of oil products - from diesel and petrol to kerosene - made from Russian oil in Indian refineries. In the face of this, Europe and its G7 allies have subsequently begun to try to prevent those tankers from taking Russian oil at all. A price cap was imposed on legitimate shipping companies, limiting the amount of revenue Russia could derive from its exports. That, in turn, created another step-shift: Russia began to build up its own "shadow fleet" of tankers which it used to carry on sending oil to India and China. And so, in the latest episode of sanctions "whack-a-mole", the G7 has begun to implement a separate round of bans on that shadow fleet. Now, the point is not that any of these measures were pointless. Each has made a marginal difference in clamping down on Russia and limiting its revenues. But the whole exercise has proved far harder than expected. All of which is why Donald Trump is now talking about raising tariffs or imposing sanctions on India. He has discussed imposing secondary sanctions on countries continuing to do business with Russia. For all that he is being painted as one of Vladimir Putin's closest allies, in reality, these are dramatic economic levers that even Joe Biden stopped short of pulling. The question is whether they do indeed get activated - and what happens next in the game of sanctions "whack-a-mole".
