Senate passes Trump's major policy bill with $150 billion for the DOD
By a vote of 51-50 — with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie — the chamber advanced the vast tax, healthcare and border security bill President Donald Trump has championed as key to his legislative agenda.
That 940-page 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' also features $150 billion in funding for the military, which would go toward shipbuilding, the Golden Dome homeland missile defense project, munitions and other key priorities.
The bill next goes back to the House for final consideration. Trump has set a deadline of July 4 to pass the spending package out of that chamber, though some lawmakers in the House have already said they're unlikely to approve the bill before the end of the week.
The Pentagon has argued this package should be counted as part of the DOD's overall defense budget plan for the coming year, and defense officials moved spending priorities usually reserved for its base spending plan into the one-time package.
In its delayed spending request last week, the Defense Department issued an $848 million base budget request, which is a cut when accounting for inflation. That said, the Pentagon is counting on $113 billion in immediate funding from the supplemental spending bill in Congress, bringing the total for military spending closer to $960 billion.
Still, many top Republicans and Democrats in Congress have argued that the unusual arrangement will cause unnecessary confusion for the Pentagon and the defense industry responsible for major weapons programs.
In a briefing to describe the funding request, senior defense and military officials countered this argument, saying the immediate surge in funding may reassure some of these companies, which are accustomed to Congress starting the fiscal year on temporary spending plans known as continuing resolutions.
One official, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the administration would likely keep military funding close to $1 trillion for next year as well, though it hasn't yet decided on an appropriate baseline.
If not, the Defense Department will face extremely difficult choices when deciding how to factor the priorities included in the one-time spending package back into its yearly budget.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lara Trump considers run for NC Senate seat, backed by Rep. Pat Harrigan
North Carolina Republicans have different takes on how they should proceed now that Sen. Thom Tillis, R-NC, isn't running for reelection. North Carolina's 2026 Senate race wide open after Tillis bows out President Donald Trump's daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, says she is considering a run. Rep. Pat Harrigan, R-NC 10, says he will back Lara Trump if she goes for the seat. House Speaker Destin Hall, R-NC 87, says North Carolina Republicans should unite behind whoever President Trump endorses. Meanwhile, former Lieutenant Gov. Mark Robinson says there should be an open primary. Lara Trump does not currently live in North Carolina. If she decides to run, state law requires her to be registered to vote as a Republican in North Carolina by Sept. 20. That's 90 days before she'd have to file to run in the primary. Lara Trump grew up in Wrightsville Beach and went to N.C. State University before marrying Eric Trump. VIDEO: North Carolina's 2026 Senate race wide open after Tillis bows out
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pentagon spokesman says Iran's nuclear program knocked back 'closer to 2 years'
The Pentagon on Wednesday sharpened its assessment of Iran's nuclear program, declaring that Iran's ability to build a nuclear weapon following the U.S. strike on its nuclear facilities is "closer to two years" away. The assessment by Sean Parnell, the Pentagon's chief spokesperson, appeared to be significantly more optimistic than by U.N. inspectors at the International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA's director general Rafael Grossi said this past weekend that he believed Iran could begin enriching uranium in a matter of months. Military officials and experts have said that there is no doubt the U.S. bombing of three key nuclear sites in Iran -- Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan -- caused signficant damage when they were hit by 14 bunker-buster bombs and two dozen Tomahawk missiles. But they caution that a firm intelligence assessment will take time to do. And nuclear experts question whether some of the enriched uranium could have been moved in advance or stored elsewhere -- a possibility the Trump administration dismisses as probable. MORE: Early US intel assessment finds Trump-ordered strikes set back Iran's nuclear program only by months When asked what the latest intelligence might show, Parnell told reporters at a Pentagon briefing that the administration's stance is unchanged that Iran's nuclear sites were "completely obliterated." The term "obliterated" was first used by President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in the hours after the bombing. "It's not just ... enriched uranium or centrifuges or things like that. We destroyed the components that they would need to build a bomb," he said. "And so when you take that constellation of things into consideration, yeah, we believe that Iran's nuclear capability has been severely degraded. It's even their ambition to build a bomb," he added. Republicans said they were satisfied with the administration's assessment, whereas several Democrats said they remained skeptical after being briefed on the strike on Capitol Hill.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US lifts restrictions on Enterprise Product's ethane shipments to China
By Arathy Somasekhar and Karen Freifeld HOUSTON (Reuters) -The U.S. has cleared the way for Enterprise Products Partners to resume ethane shipments to China, the company said on Wednesday, revoking a restrictive license requirement that was put in place just weeks ago as the U.S.-China trade war turned from tariffs to supply chains. The U.S. had placed new restrictions on ethane -- and a wide swathe of other exports -- to China in late May and early June after accusing Beijing of slowing shipments of rare earths vital to automakers and other industries. Wednesday's letter revoking the previous license requirement comes after the United States and China resolved issues last week surrounding shipments of rare earth minerals and magnets to the U.S. Last week, the Commerce Department sent letters to Enterprise Products, Energy Transfer, as well as ethane traders Satellite Chemical USA and Vinmar International, informing the companies they could load ethane on vessels destined for China but could not unload the ethane in China without authorization. Energy Transfer, Vinmar and Satellite did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The U.S. Department of Commerce and the White House also did not immediately respond to requests for comment. About half of all U.S. exports of ethane, which is extracted from U.S. shale gas and primarily used as a petrochemical feedstock, head to China, and a halt in shipments was set to hurt U.S. producers as well as Chinese petrochemical manufacturers. Chinese petrochemical firms use ethane as a feedstock because it is cheaper than naphtha. U.S. oil and gas producers need China to buy their natural gas liquids as domestic supply exceeds demand. Sign in to access your portfolio