Supreme Court refuses to entertain PIL to bring political parties under POSH Act
Supreme Court
on Friday refused to entertain a
PIL
seeking to bring major
political parties
within the purview of the 2013
POSH Act
, which aims to protect women from sexual harassment at workplaces, saying the matter was for Parliament to decide.
The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act came into being in 2013 to protect women from sexual harassment at workplaces and ensuring a safe work environment.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Project Management
MCA
Data Science
CXO
MBA
Finance
Technology
Data Science
Degree
PGDM
Design Thinking
Leadership
Artificial Intelligence
Management
Others
Operations Management
Public Policy
Healthcare
Digital Marketing
others
Product Management
Cybersecurity
healthcare
Data Analytics
Skills you'll gain:
Portfolio Management
Project Planning & Risk Analysis
Strategic Project/Portfolio Selection
Adaptive & Agile Project Management
Duration:
6 Months
IIT Delhi
Certificate Programme in Project Management
Starts on
May 30, 2024
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Project Planning & Governance
Agile Software Development Practices
Project Management Tools & Software Techniques
Scrum Framework
Duration:
12 Weeks
Indian School of Business
Certificate Programme in IT Project Management
Starts on
Jun 20, 2024
Get Details
A bench comprising Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran was hearing the PIL filed by Yogamaya M G seeking to bring major political parties under the ambit of the
POSH
Act.
At the outset, senior advocate Shobha Gupta, appearing for the petitioner, sought a direction to treat political parties as "employers" under the POSH Act, saying it will require them to constitute internal complaints committees (ICCs) to address sexual harassment allegations.
"This is a matter in the domain of Parliament. How can we interfere," the CJI asked, adding that the petitioner can get some women parliamentarians on board and present a private bill in Parliament.
Live Events
Gupta said Parliament has not taken any steps on the issue.
Moreover, the petitioner was not seeking any fresh legislation but merely an interpretation of the existing provisions of the POSH Act to include political parties within its ambit, she said.
She also referred to a 2021 Kerala High Court judgment, which held that political parties are not required to constitute ICCs under the POSH Act.
The CJI said the high court judgment may be challenged independently.
The lawyer then sought the liberty to challenge the high court judgement.
"The learned senior counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the petition with a further liberty to take such steps as advised in law," the bench said in its order.
Besides the Centre and the chief election commissioner, the plea made political outfits including the Congress, BJP, CPI (M), CPI, Trinamool Congress, Nationalist Congress Party, Bahujan Samaj Party and the Aam Aadmi Party parties in the petition.
Economic Times WhatsApp channel
)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
26 minutes ago
- Business Standard
INDIA bloc leaders to meet, stage protest over voter list revision in Bihar
The leaders of the INDIA bloc will meet on Tuesday at 10 am in the Parliament Library Building, in the office of the Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha. Following the meeting, MPs of the alliance will stage a protest at 10:30 am in front of Makar Dwar in Parliament against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. The protest will be held under the slogan, 'our vote, our right, our fight'. Meanwhile, a crucial meeting of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) Parliamentary Party is scheduled to take place today at the Parliament Library Building (PLB). The meeting will be attended by NDA members from the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. The meeting comes amid a stalemate in Parliament over the opposition demand for discussion on Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. The opposition parties are demanding the withdrawal of SIR. The Lok Sabha could not take up the National Sports Governance Bill, 2025 and the National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill, 2025, for discussion amid opposition protests. Amid opposition protests, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said that following an all-party meeting, time had been allotted in the BAC meeting to discuss the National Sports Bill and the Anti-doping Bill. He urged members not to waste the time of the House and condemned their stance. Union Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaivya said that bills are important and urged opposition members to allow discussion. BJP MP Jagdambika Pal, who was in the Chair, also urged members to allow discussion to proceed. He said since the monsoon session began, the House has not passed any bill. Rijiju later said that the opposition has continued with disrupting proceedings even as the third week of the monsoon session has begun. Both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha have witnessed repeated adjournments over the opposition's insistence on a demand for discussion on the SIR in poll-bound Bihar. Rijiju had said last week that the government is ready to hold discussions on any issue as per rules, but there cannot be a discussion on Special Intensive Revision (SIR) as it is a process undertaken by a constitutional body, the Election Commission of India. "I want to clarify that the government is ready to hold discussions on any issue as per rules. There cannot be a discussion on SIR because it is a process undertaken by a Constitutional body, and it is not happening for the first time..." Rijiju told ANI. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC to hear plea against Madras HC order barring use of leaders' name in welfare schemes
The Supreme Court on Monday granted an urgent hearing against a Madras high court order restraining the Tamil Nadu government from naming any government welfare schemes after any former chief ministers or ideological leaders and further disallowed depiction of party symbol to accompany such announcements. MadrasHC barred Tamil Nadu government from naming any government welfare schemes after any former chief ministers or ideological leaders (File photo) A bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Bhushan R Gavai agreed to hear the state's appeal on Wednesday after an urgent mentioning was made by senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi appearing for the state. Rohatgi said, 'This is a very unusual order of the Madras high court that requires urgent hearing,' pointing to the July 31 interim order passed while hearing a public interest litigation filed by member of parliament (MP) C V Shanmugam of the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK). The HC in its order said, 'We are inclined to pass an interim order to the effect that while launching and operating government welfare schemes through various advertisements, the name of any living personality, photograph of any former Chief Minister/ideological leaders or party insignia/emblem/flag of respondent No.4 shall not be included.' As the court wished to know about the details of the order, Rohatgi said: 'According to the HC order, no scheme of government can have the name of the chief minister or any political figure. The order was passed on Thursday and we are in the process of filing an appeal. It requires urgent hearing as the high court has restrained us based on a wrong reading of judgments of this court.' 'We will have it on Friday,' CJI Gavai said, after Rohatgi pointed out that the scheme is intended for the benefit of the poor. Shanmugam in his petition before the high court challenged a June 19 order of the state government for implementing a public outreach programme having the name of chief minister MK Stalin. The scheme 'Ungaludan Stalin' was intended at taking the government's benefits and services to the doorstep of beneficiaries by organising nearly 10,000 camps at a proposed budget of ₹54.95 crore. The HC order referred to Supreme Court decisions of 2014 and 2015 in Common Cause v Union of India which laid down guidelines to regulate governments from issuing advertisements to glorify their parties using state funds. Citing these judgments, the HC said, 'The use of photographs of ideological leaders or former Chief Minister, prima facie, would be against the directives of the Supreme Court.' It noted a 2016 judgment of the top court which clarified that under certain exceptions, publication of the photograph of the incumbent CM is permissible. As the SC had formed a central committee on content regulation in government advertising, the PIL in the high court had sought a direction to this committee along with the Election Commission of India to take action against the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), the ruling party in the state under paragraph 16A of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968.
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
INDIA bloc leaders to meet, stage protest over voter list revision
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel New Delhi: The leaders of the INDIA bloc will meet on Tuesday at 10 am in the Parliament Library Building, in the office of the Leader of Opposition in Rajya the meeting, MPs of the alliance will stage a protest at 10:30 am in front of Makar Dwar in Parliament against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. The protest will be held under the slogan, 'our vote, our right, our fight'.Meanwhile, a crucial meeting of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) Parliamentary Party is scheduled to take place today at the Parliament Library Building (PLB).The meeting will be attended by NDA members from the Lok Sabha and the Rajya meeting comes amid a stalemate in Parliament over the opposition demand for discussion on Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. The opposition parties are demanding the withdrawal of Lok Sabha could not take up the National Sports Governance Bill, 2025 and the National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill, 2025, for discussion amid opposition opposition protests, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said that following an all-party meeting, time had been allotted in the BAC meeting to discuss the National Sports Bill and the Anti-doping Bill. He urged members not to waste the time of the House and condemned their Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaivya said that bills are important and urged opposition members to allow MP Jagdambika Pal, who was in the Chair, also urged members to allow discussion to proceed. He said since the monsoon session began, the House has not passed any later said that the opposition has continued with disrupting proceedings even as the third week of the monsoon session has Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha have witnessed repeated adjournments over the opposition's insistence on a demand for discussion on the SIR in poll-bound had said last week that the government is ready to hold discussions on any issue as per rules, but there cannot be a discussion on Special Intensive Revision (SIR) as it is a process undertaken by a constitutional body, the Election Commission of India . "I want to clarify that the government is ready to hold discussions on any issue as per rules. There cannot be a discussion on SIR because it is a process undertaken by a Constitutional body, and it is not happening for the first time..." Rijiju told ANI.
