Altadena ICE raid highlights fears that roundups will stymie rebuilding efforts
LOS ANGELES - When ICE agents raided the construction site of a burned property in Altadena earlier this month, they made no arrests. The man they were after was not there. But the mere specter of them returning spooked the workers enough to bring the project to a temporary halt.
The next day, half of the 12-man team stayed home. The crew returned to full strength by the end of the week, but they now work in fear, according to Brock Harris, a real estate agent representing the developer of the property. "It had a chilling effect," he said. "They're instilling fear in the workers trying to rebuild L.A."
Harris said another developer in the area started camouflaging his construction sites: hiding Porta Potties, removing construction fences and having workers park far away and carpool to the site so as not to attract attention.
The potential of widespread immigration raids at construction sites looms ominously over Los Angeles County's prospects of rebuilding after the two most destructive fires in its history.
A new report by the UCLA Anderson Forecast said that roundups could hamstring the colossal undertaking to reconstruct the 13,000 homes that were wiped away in Altadena and Pacific Palisades on Jan. 7 - and exacerbate the housing crisis by stymieing new construction statewide.
"Deportations will deplete the construction workforce," the report said. "The loss of workers installing drywall, flooring, roofing and the like will directly diminish the level of production."
The consequences will spread far beyond those who are deported, the report said. Many of the undocumented workers who manage to avoid ICE will be forced to withdraw from the labor force. Their specialties are often crucial to getting projects completed, potentially harming the fortunes of remaining workers who can't finish jobs without their help.
"The productive activities of the undocumented and the rest of the labor force are often complementary," the report said. "For example, home building could be delayed because of a reduction in specific skills" resulting in "a consequent increase in unemployment for the remaining workforce."
Jerry Nickelsburg, the director of the Anderson Forecast and author of the quarterly California report released Wednesday, said the "confusion and uncertainty" about the rollout of both immigration and trade policies "has a negative economic impact on California."
Contractors want to hire Americans but have a hard time finding enough of them with proper abilities, said Brian Turmail, a spokesperson for the Associated General Contractors of America trade group.
"Most of them are kind of in the Lee Greenwood crowd," he said, referring to a county music singer known for performing patriotic songs. "They'd rather be hiring young men and women from the United States. They're just not there."
"Construction firms don't start off with a business plan of, 'Let's hire undocumented workers,'" Turmail said. "They start with a business plan of, 'Let's find qualified people.' It's been relatively easy for undocumented workers to get into the country, so let's not be surprised there are undocumented workers working in, among other things, industries in construction."
The contractors' trade group said government policies are partly to blame for the labor shortage. About 80% of federal funds spent on workforce development go to encouraging students to pursue four-year degrees, even though less than 40% of Americans complete college, Turmail said.
"Exposing future workers to fields like construction and teaching them the skills they need is woefully lacking," he said. "Complicating that, we don't really offer many lawful pathways for people born outside the United States to come into the country and work in construction."
The recently raided Altadena project had plenty of momentum before the raid, Harris said. The original house burned in the Eaton fire, but the foundation survived, so the developer, who requested anonymity for fear of ICE retribution, purchased the lot with plans to rebuild the exact house that was there.
Permits were quickly secured, and the developer hoped to finish the home by December. But as immigration raids continue across L.A., that timeline could be in jeopardy.
"It's insane to me that in the wake of a natural disaster, they're choosing to create trouble and fear for those rebuilding," Harris said. "There's a terrible housing shortage, and they're throwing a wrench into development plans."
Los Angeles real estate developer Clare De Briere called raids "fearmongering."
"It's the anticipation of the possibility of being taken, even if you are fully legal and you have your papers and everything's in order," she said. "It's an anticipation that you're going to be taken and harassed because of how you look, and you're going to lose a day's work or potentially longer than that."
De Briere helped oversee Project Recovery, a group of public and private real estate experts who compiled a report in March on what steps can be taken to speed the revival of the Palisades and Altadena as displaced residents weigh their options to return to fire-affected neighborhoods.
The prospect of raids and increased tariffs has increased uncertainty about how much it will cost to rebuild homes and commercial structures, she said. "Any time there is unpredictability, the market is going to reflect that by increasing costs."
The disappearance of undocumented workers stands to exacerbate the labor shortage that has grown more pronounced in recent years as construction has been slowed by high interest rates and the rising cost of materials that could get even more expensive due to new tariffs.
"In general, costs have risen in the last seven years for all sorts of construction" including houses and apartments, said Devang Shah, a principal at Genesis Builders, a firm focused on rebuilding homes in Altadena for people who were displaced by the fire. "We're not seeing much construction work going on."
The slowdown has left a shortage of workers as many contractors consolidated or got out of the business because they couldn't find enough work, Shah said.
"When you start thinking about Altadena and the Palisades," he said, "limited subcontractors can create headwinds."
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
25 minutes ago
- Fox News
The Faulkner Focus - Thursday, June 26
All times eastern Making Money with Charles Payne FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: State Department holds briefing amid increased threat to Americans overseas


CNN
33 minutes ago
- CNN
Full Court Press - Inside Politics with Dana Bash and Manu Raju - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
CNN Inside Politics 43 mins The Trump Administration is laser focused on telling Americans that the US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities were an unequivocal success, even as questions remain about whether the regime's capabilities were actually eliminated. Plus: Republicans are running out of time to get their massive policy bill over the finish line by July 4th. So today the president is bring food delivery drivers and border agents to the White House to pressure GOP lawmakers still hesitant to support it. And: Democrats are racing to understand NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's rise from obscurity and whether he will help or hurt their efforts to win back power next year.


Miami Herald
36 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Does US give too much or too little support to Israel? Poll findings break record
A record-high share of Americans believes the U.S. is too supportive of Israel, according to a new Quinnipiac University survey. Most voters are also against the U.S. joining Israel in its conflict with Iran. The poll comes after President Donald Trump came to Israel's aid by authorizing a military strike on three Iranian nuclear sites on June 21, following the outbreak of war between the two Middle Eastern countries. The conflict began when Israel launched a preemptive strike on Iran, citing fears that Tehran was close to developing a nuclear bomb, a claim the Iranian government has denied. On June 24, Trump announced a cessation of hostilities, writing on Truth Social, 'THE CEASEFIRE IS NOW IN EFFECT. PLEASE DO NOT VIOLATE IT!' So far, it has remained in place. Meanwhile, the U.S. government has supplied billions of dollars in military aid to Israel for its war in Gaza, which has led to the death of some 55,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health officials. Most of the enclave's 2 million residents have also been displaced, and many have gone without adequate food and water, according to the U.N.'s Palestinian refugee agency. Here is a breakdown of the results from the poll, which sampled 979 registered voters June 22-24 and which has a margin of error of 3.1 percentage points. U.S. support for Israel In the poll, 42% of respondents said the U.S. is too supportive of Israel, marking the highest share on record since Quinnipiac University first asked this question in 2017. Just 5% said the U.S. is not supportive enough of Israel, and a plurality, 45%, said it gives about the right amount of assistance. The results broke along partisan lines, with a majority of Republicans, 75%, saying the American government provides the right level of support. Most Democrats, 63%, said it is too supportive. U.S. involvement in Iran conflict Respondents were also asked for their views on the Trump administration joining Israel in attacking Iranian nuclear sites. A slim majority, 51%, said they oppose U.S. involvement, while 42% said they support it. Again, there was a major partisan divide. While 81% of Republicans favored the involvement of the American military, 75% of Democrats opposed it. That said, fewer Americans took issue with Israel acting on its own to strike Iranian nuclear and military sites. Half of respondents said they supported Israel's military strikes on Iran, while 40% opposed them. The vast majority of Republicans, 80%, favored the strikes, while 60% of Democrats opposed them. Worries about wider war Following Trump's bombing of Iran, most Americans are also now worried about the possibility of a war between Washington and Tehran. The majority of respondents, 78%, said they are either very or somewhat concerned about the U.S. getting drawn into a war with Iran, while 22% said they are not so concerned or not concerned at all. On this question, there was bipartisan agreement, with 62% of Republicans and 97% of Democrats telegraphing concern. 'American voters, most of whom are not supportive of the country joining in the Israel-Iran conflict, are extremely troubled by the possibility that involvement could metastasize and draw the U.S. into a direct war with Iran,' Quinnipiac polling analyst Tim Malloy said.