logo
80 Years On, Mauthausen Survivor Unites with Eisenhower Family in Powerful Tribute to Liberation & Holocaust Remembrance

80 Years On, Mauthausen Survivor Unites with Eisenhower Family in Powerful Tribute to Liberation & Holocaust Remembrance

Eva Clarke, liberated as an infant by American army, met Eisenhower's great-grandson at event held by the International March of the Living & Eisenhower family
WASHINGTON , DC, UNITED STATES, February 26, 2025 / EINPresswire.com / -- In an emotional tribute to liberation and Holocaust remembrance, Holocaust survivor Eva Clarke today met President Dwight D. Eisenhower's great-grandson for the first time, at a March of the Living Washington event to personally thank him for the role that the Americans troops had in liberating her and other survivors. The event marked the new collaboration between the International March of the Living Holocaust education organization and the Eisenhower family.
This landmark partnership will see Merrill Eisenhower joining the 2025 March of the Living on Holocaust Remembrance Day from Auschwitz to Birkenau death camps, walking alongside Holocaust survivors and thousands of participants from around the world to honor the memory of the victims and the heroism of the liberators and the survivors. The collaboration underscores the continued commitment of the Eisenhower family and March of the Living to ensure that the lessons of the Holocaust are preserved for future generations.
Monday's event was attended by prominent figures from both the Jewish community and beyond, including Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Yechiel Leiter, who addressed the event.
Eva Clarke, who was born in the Mauthausen concentration camp in Austria in 1945, one week before the camp's official liberation by U.S. Army forces under General Eisenhower, said upon meeting Eisenhower: 'I am the infant your great grandfather and the American soldiers saved. Had he and his soldiers not arrived in time, I would not be standing here today. General Eisenhower wasn't just a military man, but a visionary leader. He saw the dangers of Holocaust denial the moment he witnessed the atrocities committed by the Nazis. He fought against this – and you, Merrill, by participating in the March of the Living, continue his legacy and fight against it today. It is a great honor for me to march together with you on the Jewish Holocaust Remembrance Day.'
Merrill Eisenhower responded, saying, 'There is no greater privilege than continuing the legacy of my great-grandfather, who not only led the liberation of thousands of Jews from a cruel fate but also ensured the world bore witness to the horrors of the Holocaust by ordering everything to be documented. To march in the March of the Living alongside survivors, whose lives were saved thanks to him, is a solemn duty. We must keep telling their stories, stand against Holocaust denial, and fight antisemitism and intolerable in all of its manifestation wherever it appears. I thank the March of the Living organizers for the honor of marching in his footsteps and continuing his his legacy.'
This year's March of the Living, set to take place on Holocaust Remembrance Day, April 24, 2025, will commemorate the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the death camps in Germany, Austria, Czechoslovakia, and Poland. Thousands of participants from around the world will honor Holocaust survivors and the Allied forces, led by General Eisenhower, who ended Nazi tyranny and brought freedom to millions.
As Clarke and Eisenhower Walk side by side at Auschwitz, their presence will reaffirm a shared commitment: to remember, to educate, and to stand against antisemitism and Holocaust denial, ensuring that history's darkest chapter is never repeated.
Phyllis Greenberg Heideman, President of the March of the Living, told the participants: 'The March of the Living stands as a living testimony to the triumph of memory over forgetfulness. The march of Eva and Merrill, alongside other survivors, is a powerful reminder of why we must continue this fight against denial and distortion. The fact that the great-grandson of the Supreme Commander who liberated Europe will march with us in the 80th year of the liberation is not just symbolic—it continues the legacy of a leader who never forgot what he saw in the Nazi death camps.'
Prominent philanthropists Josh and Marjorie Harris, who co-hosted the event, said: 'We are deeply proud to stand with the March of the Living and the Eisenhower family in this vital mission of remembrance and education. General Eisenhower understood the impact of bearing witness, and that remembering the past is the key to safeguarding the future. At a time when antisemitism is on the rise, that responsibility is more urgent than ever. It is a privilege to lend our voices to this cause, to honor the survivors and liberators, and to ensure that their stories continue to be heard for generations to come.'
Eva Clarke's Story: A Testament to Survival
Born on April 29, 1945, at the gates of Mauthausen concentration camp, Eva Clarke's survival was a miracle. Her mother, Anka Kauderova, endured unimaginable hardships: deported from the Theresienstadt ghetto to Auschwitz while pregnant, she lost her husband, Bernd, to the gas chambers. Transferred to a forced labor camp and then Mauthausen, Anka gave birth while weighing just 32 kilograms, with Eva born at only 1.3 kilograms. Had Eva been born just a day earlier, both mother and child would have been sent to the gas chambers—but the gas had run out.
American forces arrived days later, providing life-saving care to the mother and newborn. Today, Eva is one of only three babies known to have survived being born in Mauthausen. Her story is chronicled in the book Born Survivors, and she continues to share her experiences to ensure the world never forgets.
N10S
+972546921720 ext.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gabbard strips security clearances of 37 intelligence officials, including many with Biden ties
Gabbard strips security clearances of 37 intelligence officials, including many with Biden ties

The Hill

time25 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Gabbard strips security clearances of 37 intelligence officials, including many with Biden ties

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revoked the security clearances of 37 current and former intelligence officials, sharing the list in a move that prompted swift criticism that the Trump administration was politicizing clearances. Among those on the list are several Biden administration officials, including Maher Bitar, who joined the National Security Council (NSC) after previously working for then-House Intelligence Chair Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) amid the first Trump impeachment. Bitar has since returned to Schiff's office. Emily Horne, an NSC spokesperson under Biden, also had her clearance revoked, as did Brett Holmgren, who most recently served as Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research and who is married to former Biden White House Counsel Dana Remus. Gabbard, without evidence, accused those listed of politicizing or leaking intelligence or 'committing intentional egregious violations of tradecraft standards.' She said the move came at the direction of President Trump. 'Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right. Those in the Intelligence Community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold. In doing so, they undermine our national security, the safety and security of the American people and the foundational principles of our democratic republic,' Gabbard wrote on X. The announcement was quickly condemned by national security professionals, including others who have had their clearances revoked by Trump. 'Can you say 'Privacy Act violation'? I certainly can. Further proof of weaponization and politicization. The vast majority of these individuals are not household names & are dedicated public servants who have worked across multiple presidential administrations,' said Mark Zaid, a national security attorney who has represented those who have had clearance revoked and also had his own clearance stripped under Trump. Zaid noted that the move was first published by The New York Post ahead of the public announcement by Gabbard. 'Pure politicization of security clearance process. These are unlawful decisions that deviate from decades of precedent. Completely unprofessional that individuals are targeted in [a] way that impacts their careers, yet they are not notified before leaking memo to friendly media,' he wrote on X. Larry Pfeiffer, who served as senior director of the White House situation room and chief of staff at the CIA, said the decision would only undercut U.S. intelligence. 'The skill and talent that Trump and Gabbard deprive the US national security and intelligence communities, govt & private sector, is huge. Makes one wonder who they are really working for, directly, indirectly, or as useful idiots,' he wrote on X, ending the tweet with a Russian flag. The list also cuts clearances for those who have spoken in the media about various Trump administration decisions. Beth Sanner, a longtime national security official who also served during the first Trump administration, has commented on Trump's policies through her role as a national security analyst at CNN. Charles Kupchan, who worked at NSC under the Clinton and Obama administrations, and Sarah Vinograd, who was at NSC under Obama and at the Department of Homeland Security under Biden, have also recently commented on Trump's foreign policy moves. Trump has revoked security clearances for a number of officials, including those who signed onto a letter saying the Hunter Biden laptop had the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign, as well as the clearances of attorneys working at major law firms.

Is this the end of history?
Is this the end of history?

Boston Globe

time25 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Is this the end of history?

🛒 Cartoon: A Market Basket moment Revising the nation's history, Trump style By David Shribman In his first term, Donald Trump mounted a relentless, remorseless war against the truth, issuing according to the Washington Post 30,573 Last week, the White House sent the Smithsonian This order demands 'content corrections where necessary' to replace 'divisive or ideologically driven language' with what the administration claims would be 'unifying, historically accurate, and constructive descriptions' on exhibits. As benign as that might sound, it opens the door to a frontal attack on the independence of a cultural establishment known for its down-the-middle presentation of the nation's history. Advertisement With 21 museums, the Smithsonian is known as both the 'nation's attic' (its nickname) and the national curator (its functional role), with beloved items that include the 30-by-34-foot flag that inspired Francis Scott Key to write the lyrics to the 'Star-Spangled Banner.' But earlier this summer, under pressure from the administration, its National Museum of American History removed references to Trump's two impeachments from its Advertisement The reference to Trump was restored, but confidence in the museum has not been damaged. To be sure, collisions over the truth — what it is, who gets to tell it, what its purpose is — are as old as the Even so, the Smithsonian episode and its recent precursors — including David Kennedy, the Pulitzer-winning historian at Stanford University, expressed concern that the health, plurality, diversity, and integrity of America's civil institutions — celebrated since the time of Alexis de Tocqueville — are endangered. 'All history is contested, and national histories are among the most contested territories in the cultural landscape,' he said in an email exchange with me. 'But it has long been taken as a self-evident principle that the contestation must proceed with scrupulous attention to the facts and to responsible methods of research and presentation.' Advertisement Even the national parks have become battlegrounds, through the March executive order attacking instances where sites 'perpetuate a false reconstruction of American history, inappropriately minimize the value of certain historical events or figures, or include any other improper partisan ideology.' That prompted the senior director of cultural resources of the Beyond the administration's focus 'on the greatness of the achievements and progress of the American people' as mandated in that executive order, the administration also is seeking to force its own version of events onto contemporary life even as it applies a shiny varnish over the past. This summer, the administration expanded its airbrushing to include government data, when Trump fired a Labor Department official whose report on job creation didn't jibe with the president's expectations, hopes, or needs. This is the data that companies depend on to make critical decisions about investments and hiring, that academics use to chart the nation's economic direction, that policy makers use to determine when to act and when to remain still. Whitewashing this data, as Trump seems inclined to do, will only hurt the nation's ability to keep its economy humming. Economist Advertisement More broadly, if the facts about American history are obscured or buried, or if the truth is devalued or cancelled in the daily course of national government, the country will eventually become a land 'where ignorant armies clash by night,' as Already the fight about the truth has divided the country, with a An assault against facts, or against history, or against fair-minded renderings of events commemorated in national parks and landmarks, are in essence an assault against the oldest values of the country, forged in the ultimate rebellion against authority undertaken by the Revolutionary Founders. But the blueprint for fighting crimes against the truth is even older, and is found in Scripture. 'These are the things you shall do,' the What the right, left, and center are saying about Trump's Ukraine attempts at peace-making Curated by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine delivers remarks at a meeting with President Donald Trump and European leaders. DOUG MILLS/NYT FROM THE RIGHT In The New York Sun, Advertisement FROM THE LEFT In The New York Times, columnist FROM THE CENTER In The Atlantic, staff writers Advertisement War and peas By Christopher Weyant Christopher Weyant Before you leave... Trivia by Gwen Egan Around what percentage of the Smithsonian's collections are on display at any given time? A. Less than 1% B. More than 50% C. Less than 5% D. More than 25% Think you know the answer? Try your hand Thanks for reading Right, Left, and Center. Globe Opinion's free weekly newsletter about local and national politics. ✍🏼 If you'd like to receive it in your inbox every Wednesday, you can 📬 Delivered Wednesdays. David Shribman is a nationally syndicated columnist. He can be reached at

White House Launches TikTok Account as Ban Remains on Hold
White House Launches TikTok Account as Ban Remains on Hold

Newsweek

time26 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

White House Launches TikTok Account as Ban Remains on Hold

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The White House on Tuesday officially launched a TikTok account (@whitehouse), aiming to tap into the platform's reach of more than 150 million U.S. users to share President Donald Trump's messages and policy priorities. While previous intelligence assessments warned that the app could be vulnerable to influence from its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, the launch reflects the administration's focus on creative and direct engagement with broader audiences. Trump has previously praised the app, saying it helped him connect with younger voters and boost support in his victory over Democrat Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election. In June, President Trump issued his third executive order delaying enforcement of the U.S. TikTok ban—this time extending the deadline to September 17, 2025, giving ByteDance additional time to divest or face removal under the law. "The Trump administration is committed to communicating the historic successes President Trump has delivered to the American people with as many audiences and platforms as possible," said White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. The move builds on the platform's role in Trump's successful 2024 campaign, particularly in reaching younger voters. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store