Crypto group with Trump ties finds friends in California
SACRAMENTO, California — A nonprofit with ties to Donald Trump is sponsoring state legislation from a Democrat in deep-blue California on an issue the president has embraced in his Oval Office comeback: cryptocurrency.
The group, co-founded by Mandy Gunasekara, former chief of staff at the Environmental Protection Agency during Trump's first term, is backing a bill from Democratic California Assemblymember Avelino Valencia that could make it easier to pay with cryptocurrency in the Golden State.
It comes as Trump's crypto ties are again in the spotlight this week at the Bitcoin 2025 conference in Las Vegas where members of his inner circle like JD Vance headlined, and after the industry spent millions to elect pro-crypto congressional candidates in the 2024 election. Meanwhile, Democrats in Washington remain divided on regulating crypto as they look to block the president's agenda without angering the powerful industry.
Valencia's bill presents a crucial test for the nonprofit Satoshi Action Fund's state-first strategy, given it deviates from the wider industry's Washington-focused approach.
'The industry was playing a lot of defense,' Satoshi CEO Dennis Porter, a crypto advocate and former podcaster who hosted his own show about Bitcoin, told POLITICO's California Decoded newsletter. '[If] you're on defense 100 percent of the time, you'll never win a single match.'
Valencia, a Southern California Democrat, said he wasn't previously aware of Satoshi's Trump connection and hasn't worked directly with Gunasekara. He added he drew up the measure independently from Satoshi, though he said the group 'proactively provided' feedback that informed his approach.
'My understanding is that the organization is nonpartisan and is made up of individuals from all political ideologies, which is one of the reasons the organization stood out,' Valencia added.
Porter said he sees untapped opportunity beyond Washington. To him, statehouses like California's present a cheaper and faster option for passing pro-crypto legislation that can pave the way for the industry to advance its priorities in Congress.
'[The] Civil Rights Movement or women's right to vote, or the cannabis movement — all of these things grew their momentum at the state level,' said Porter, who said he co-founded Satoshi with Gunasekara as a 501(c)(4) group in 2022.
'We set the policy blueprint for the country at the state level.'
Satoshi has been a driving force behind recent pro-crypto efforts in other, mostly Republican-controlled state legislatures, backing protections for bitcoin mining and crypto payments that passed in Montana, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Arkansas. The group also proposed model legislation that would allow states to invest public pension funds in cryptocurrencies, an idea Wisconsin and Michigan investors have embraced but has been slow to gain traction in other states.
California poses a tougher challenge. The state's deep-blue legislature has proven to be more crypto-skeptical: Lawmakers in 2023 passed a slate of new requirements and fees for digital asset traders.
Trump's entanglements in the crypto industry are complicating the issue for Democrats. The president held a private dinner with buyers of his memecoin, $TRUMP, earlier this month. His business empire, Trump Media & Technology Group, recently announced it was raising $2.5 billion to buy bitcoin.
Some Democrats are wary of supporting pro-crypto policies, as doing so could hand Trump a legislative win amid questions about potential conflicts of interest.
Porter said he sees Satoshi's work and the pro-crypto policies it supports as bipartisan. He declined to disclose information about Satoshi's donors, citing privacy concerns.
'Clearly, Republicans have sort of taken a lead on this stuff, but there are a lot of Democrats who for a long time have been very supportive of the technology,' Porter said.
Valencia is one of those Democrats. The Anaheim lawmaker said he's been interested in digital currency since his time as a San Jose State University student and began drawing up crypto legislation after taking over as Assembly Banking and Finance chair in late 2024.
One of those ideas became the bill he's pushing with Satoshi, which would authorize California businesses to accept cryptocurrency as a valid form of payment. Local governments and other public entities wouldn't be allowed to charge extra fees for goods and services purchased with cryptocurrency.
Valencia said the bill ensures 'fair treatment' for consumers paying with digital currencies without forcing businesses to accept cryptocurrencies.
'I have no doubt this is the currency and technology of the future,' he said. 'The lack of clear legal treatment leaves consumers unprotected.'
A version of this story first appeared in California Decoded, POLITICO's morning newsletter for Pros about how the Golden State is shaping tech policy within its borders and beyond. Like this content? POLITICO Pro subscribers receive it daily. Learn more at www.politicopro.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former Charger Seen As Final Piece For Commanders Offense
Former Charger Seen As Final Piece For Commanders Offense originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Austin Ekeler and Brian Robinson were the two-headed monster that the Washington Commanders relied on to reach the conference championship game last season. Advertisement Both are entering the final years of their deal with the team, though. With a bolstered offensive line, the Commanders could look to add another runner to the roster in the hopes of making their top two, a three-headed unstoppable force. A player they could look at? Former Baltimore Raven and Los Angeles Charger J.K. Dobbins. NFL reporter Gilberto Manzano suggested that Dobbins would be the top choice and best fit for Washington out of the leftover free agents. "It's a bit surprising that Dobbins remains unsigned after bouncing back from significant injuries to emerge as a Comeback Player of the Year candidate with the Chargers last season," Manzano said. "Perhaps teams aren't willing to pay a certain price for a running back with an extensive injury history. Advertisement "The Commanders could use a productive back such as Dobbins, who recorded 905 yards in 13 games last season. Dobbins wouldn't have to carry a heavy workload with Brian Robinson Jr. and Austin Ekeler also on the Commanders' roster." He has an injury history, but we are a bit puzzled as to why he sits on the shelf. Dobbins' 2024 season showed he could still play football at a high level with the right offensive line blocking for him. Washington has made tremendous strides to bolster their front five over the last two seasons. Because of this, a power runner like Dobbins would be an excellent fit for the Commanders offense. Advertisement Even maybe as a final piece to a Super Bowl roster. Related: Commanders Trade Paying Off As A Steal as Deebo Stars at OTAs Related: Commanders Rookie Putting On Show for Kingsbury at OTAs This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 1, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Five big issues looming over the final days of Maine's legislative session
Jun. 1—Some of the thorniest and most divisive policy issues of the session stand between Maine lawmakers and their plan to adjourn on June 18. While the biggest outstanding item on the agenda is finalizing a two-year state budget, other major issues remain unresolved, as well. Here's a look at what lies ahead. TRANSGENDER ATHLETES When Donald Trump returned to the White House in January, he issued two executive orders targeting people who are transgender, including an order prohibiting transgender girls from participating in girls sports. Those orders put Maine in the administration's crosshairs because the state allows transgender athletes to participate in sports consistent with their gender identity — a stand state officials say is consistent with Title IX, which grants equal opportunity to females in education and sports, and with the Maine Human Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination based on gender identity. That dynamic led to a high profile confrontation between Gov. Janet Mills and Trump at the White House, efforts by the Trump administration to cut Maine's funding, the censure of Rep. Laurel Libby, R-Auburn, for a social media post identifying a transgender high school athlete, a U.S. Supreme Court intervention, and a hotly contested and emotional debate in the State House, where Republicans have offered a slate of bills that would restrict participation by transgender athletes and students. None of those have yet been taken up by the full Legislature. Lawmakers on the Judiciary Committee deadlocked 6-6 on two bills that would eliminate funding from school districts that allow transgender girls to participate in girls sports. Democratic Rep. Dani O'Halloran of Brewer joined Republicans in backing LD 233, sponsored by Richard Campbell, R-Orrington, and LD 1134, sponsored by Sen. Sue Bernard, R-Caribou. Two other bills were voted "ought not to pass" by the committee, but still face floor votes. LD 868, sponsored by Rep. Liz Caruso, R-Caratunk, which would have required sports to be male, female or coed and required students to use restrooms and changing rooms consistent with their gender assigned at birth, was narrowly defeated in committee, 7-5. And LD 1432, sponsored by Rep. Mike Soboleski, R-Phillips, which would have removed gender identity from the Maine Human Rights Act, was opposed, 11-2. CHILD CARE The budget presented by Gov. Janet Mills proposes rolling back some recent investments in child care, including stipends to attract workers, but pending legislation would boost support for the struggling industry. Child care advocates presented a show of force early in the session, calling on lawmakers to protect the investments targeted by Mills. And while lawmakers are still negotiating the budget, additional standalone bills have been working through the Legislature. One of those bills, LD 1955, is sponsored by Senate President Mattie Daughtry, D-Brunswick. It calls for $1 million a year in child care provider stipends, plus a onetime appropriation of $3.8 million and an annual appropriation of $2 million to help qualifying families pay for child care. HOUSING The affordable housing shortage in Maine has been front and center again this session. LD 1829, sponsored by House Speaker Ryan Fecteau, D-Biddeford, aims to make it easier to build housing in communities by reducing minimum lot requirements, loosening regulations on in-law apartments or accessory dwelling units, streamlining municipal review for smaller housing developments, and allowing a single-story high bonus for qualified affordable housing. Lawmakers have also taken up bills that would provide funding to allow residents of mobile home parks to purchase those parks when offered for sale. Mobile home residents own their homes, but not the land underneath them. In recent years, parks have changed hands, leading to an increase in lot fees, and increasing the housing instability of of tenants. IMMIGRATION Immigration enforcement has been another focus of the Trump administration that spilled into the Legislature this year. Lawmakers are still considering bills that would define the relationship between federal authorities and state, county and local police. One bill, LD 1656, sponsored by Soboleski, would prohibit any restrictions from being placed on assisting with federal immigration enforcement. But two Democratic bills — LD 1259, sponsored by Rep. Ambreen Rana, D-Bangor, and LD 1971, sponsored by Rep. Deqa Dhalac, D-South Portland — take the opposite approach. Rana's bill would prohibit state and local law enforcement from entering into contracts for federal immigration enforcement, while Dhalac's bill would go further by adding additional restrictions on state and local law enforcement's ability to enforce immigration laws, while emphasizing the rights of detained immigrants. TAX BILLS With state revenues flattening, lawmakers are considering a range of proposals to support state programs and provide tax relief to families. One bill likely to come to the floor is LD 1089, sponsored by Rep. Cheryl Golek, D-Harpswell. It would create a so-called millionaire's tax to support K-12 education. Adding a 4% surcharge to incomes above $1 million could generate over $100 million a year, according to advocates who celebrated the positive committee recommendation. Copy the Story Link
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Maine lawmakers are still wrangling over state budget with weeks left in session
Jun. 1—Maine's legislative session is scheduled to end in just over two weeks, and many of the biggest issues remain unresolved. Lawmakers still must close out a two-year state budget that could include tax increases and spending cuts to settle thorny policy issues ranging from transgender athletes to immigration enforcement to child care funding. Finalizing the budget is going to be the biggest hurdle and likely will come down to the wire after some marathon days of negotiation and debate. Democratic lawmakers passed a portion of the state budget earlier this session with enough funding to continue basic services into the new fiscal year that starts July 1. But they left unresolved proposed tax increases and program cuts the Mills administration says are needed to meet the state Constitution's mandate for a balanced budget. They took a similar approach two years ago. Republicans, who have criticized Democrats for using their majorities to adopt baseline budgets without their input, are not keen on helping Democrats dig themselves out of a projected budget hole, especially if it includes tax increases. Democrats will need some Republican support for the remaining pieces of the budget to take effect in July. Lawmakers from both parties say they're aiming to conclude the session by June 18. They will need to approve a budget before they adjourn for the year, but they have the option of carrying over until next year any remaining bills, including about 100 spending bills that have passed both chambers and are awaiting funding before being sent to the governor. 'TOUGH CHOICES' Gov. Janet Mills is expected to meet with a bipartisan group of lawmakers next week to urge Republicans and Democrats to agree to a bipartisan budget — one that makes "tough choices" that protect core services at a time when state revenues have begun to level off and decline and as federal funding becomes increasingly uncertain under the Trump administration and the Republican-controlled Congress. "The Governor believes that with state revenues leveling off — and cuts likely coming from the President and Republicans in Congress — the time for hard budget decisions is here and now," spokesperson Ben Goodman said. "She continues to strongly urge Republicans and Democrats in the Legislature to work together to make the tough choices that are needed to ensure programs that keep Maine people healthy, our school children fed, our communities safe, and provide access to education and good-paying jobs are maintained in the years to come." Rep. Jack Ducharme, the lead Republican on the Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee, which is reviewing the budget, said his party is largely in the dark as Democrats debate among themselves about any changes to Mills' budget proposal. Committee Republicans have refused to support of many budget items until Democrats present a plan for new spending and revenue sources, he said. "We're really kind of the mercy of what they're going to bring to the table and what they're not," Ducharme of Madison said. "To date, they have not come up with an idea about where they're getting the money." In a written statement, Sen. Peggy Rotundo, D-Lewiston and co-chair of the budget committee, accused Republicans of not engaging in negotiations. Rotundo said lawmakers have routinely passed bipartisan budgets in her 19 years in elected office, though her statement did not acknowledge that Democrats, who have controlled both chambers since 2019, have passed mostly partyline budgets in recent years. "What has always made Maine's government work, regardless of who holds the majority, is the understanding that governing is a shared responsibility." Rotundo said. "It requires both parties to come to the table, roll up their sleeves, and work through challenges together." Earlier this session, Democrats used their majority to pass an $11.3 billion continuing services budget that continues to fund 55% of public education and provides $122 million to help stabilize the MaineCare program. But that budget doesn't include at least $122 million in additional funding needed to fund MaineCare — Maine's Medicaid program — in the second year of the budget. The governor's budget office said that the continuing services budget does not include $285 million in additional spending originally proposed by Mills. WHAT'S LEFT TO SPEND It's unclear exactly how much money is or isn't left for lawmakers to spend. Ducharme says the continuing services budget already spends $100 million more than state revenue projections over the next two years, which, when coupled with the additional MaineCare spending, has created a hole of more than $200 million. But Rep. Drew Gattine, D-Westbrook, who is co-chair of the budget committee, said there is more than $120 million in unallocated revenue available for the next biennium. That does not include any of the additional taxes or spending cuts proposed by Mills, he said. Gattine said that lawmakers will likely alter the governor's proposal, though he didn't provide any specifics. "The budget will be different than what the governor proposed — it always is," Gattine said. "Whether or not it's significantly different is in the eye of the beholder." Mills proposed a series of tax increases that could generate $156 million in revenue to meet existing commitments, including proposing the first increase in cigarette taxes in 20 years. Increasing cigarette taxes from $2 a pack to $3 would increase state revenue by $78 million, according to her administration. But Republicans and others have criticized that approach as hurting low-income families. Mills also proposed taxing online streaming services, such as Netflix and Spotify ($14 million); phasing in a new pension income tax for wealthier retirees ($44.7 million); increasing cannabis taxes ($6.3 million); and taxing pharmacies and private ambulance services, which it says will unlock additional federal funding to reinvest into the MaineCare program. Ducharme said Republicans remain steadfastly opposed to new taxes. "Maine people are the third or fourth highest taxed people in the nation with one of the smallest populations," Ducharme said. "It's ridiculous for us to think that we need to add more taxes because government can't get its spending under control." Mills has also proposed cutbacks, including eliminating state-funded Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program funds for noncitizens, cutting two crisis receiving centers planned for Aroostook and Kennebec counties, stopping a planned increase in child care worker stipends and planned cost-of-living increases for direct care workers, among others. Mills also proposed reforms to the state's General Assistance program aimed at reducing costs and returning the program to its original mission as a last resort safety net, rather than an ongoing housing assistance program. House Democrats initially agreed to a version of those reforms earlier this year, winning Republican support for a supplemental budget bill that would have allowed the state to immediately pay hospitals for services already provided to MaineCare patients. But that deal fell apart when Senate Republicans blocked its passage. House Minority Leader Billy Bob Faulkingham said at a news conference last week that Republicans are still fighting for some of the reforms they had previously sought in the budget, including reforms to the General Assistance and MaineCare programs. "We're still hoping they appear in the budget," Faulkingham said. Gattine said Democrats have focused on scrutinizing the governor's proposals, while also considering changes sought by lawmakers. But he said it's too soon to say where the final budget will land. "When we look at this stuff, we understand that these were tough choices, so we have to be much more careful and diligent in our work reviewing that (proposal), because at the end of the day we have to come up with something that is balanced, but also something that meets the moment and the needs of Maine people, which are significant," he said. Staff Writer Rachel Ohm contributed to this story. Copy the Story Link
