logo
FOCUS: Free rice gaffe sends Ishiba into pre-election damage control mode

FOCUS: Free rice gaffe sends Ishiba into pre-election damage control mode

Kyodo News24-05-2025

By Noriyuki Suzuki, KYODO NEWS - May 23, 2025 - 11:56 | All, Japan
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba dismissed his agriculture minister Wednesday after an off-the-cuff remark about gifted rice angered a public that is already questioning the Japanese leader's handling of soaring prices.
Facing record-low public support following a series of slush fund scandals that engulfed the ruling party, Ishiba initially appeared concerned that ousting farm minister Taku Eto would trigger a cascade of negative repercussions for his administration and embolden the opposition.
However, with a parliamentary election looming, Eto was eventually forced out as Ishiba looked to limit the damage, given he has already lost the party's majority in the lower house.
Ruling party members have expressed concern that Eto's resignation has come at a particularly unfortunate time, and political analysts warn that a poor showing for the Liberal Democratic Party in the House of Councillors election may put Ishiba's premiership at risk.
By selecting Shinjiro Koizumi, a young leadership hopeful in the LDP, as new agriculture minister, Ishiba is gambling with his future.
Underperformance by the 44-year-old son of former prime minister Junichiro Koizumi will put pressure on Ishiba's already shaky standing.
"I want Mr. Koizumi to exhibit strong leadership as we face a mountain of challenges, such as surging rice prices, and to give his all to the job," Ishiba told reporters after making the appointment.
At first, Ishiba was reluctant to replace Eto, who faced a chorus of criticism when an attempt at a joke fell flat at a weekend fundraising event.
"I'm not buying rice. Thanks to my supporters giving me plenty of it, I have so much of it in my house that I could sell it," Eto said, a comment widely slammed as tone-deaf when the public is straining under rampant rice price inflation.
Ishiba, who himself has experience serving as agriculture minister, reportedly told his aides that the post is a "tricky" undertaking. Past departures of those holding the farm portfolio have often boded ill for the sitting prime minister.
But Eto's future in the position became untenable when major opposition parties jointly went on the offensive, threatening a no-confidence motion against him.
Such a motion, even if non-binding, would still send a strong message at a time when Ishiba desperately needs support from parts of the opposition bloc to pass bills and budgets and ensure the smooth functioning of his minority government.
"The cards are being stacked against the prime minister," said Masahiro Iwasaki, a political science professor at Nihon University.
"The rice issue could not have come at a worse time. It has further shaken the foundation of the government," he said, adding Ishiba's inability to properly resolve it is likely to deepen anti-LDP sentiment.
Despite Ishiba's stated goal of restoring public confidence damaged by a spate of political funds scandals in the LDP, Eto's gaffe has renewed scrutiny of the leader.
A senior ruling party member said of Eto's gaffe and subsequent resignation, "There is no doubt that this will become a debilitating blow" to the government.
Opposition parties appear eager to seize the opportunity to tighten the screws on Ishiba, with a senior executive of the Democratic Party for the People firing the first shot by demanding Eto's swift resignation.
Hours after the minister's departure, the head of the DPP, which has deepened policy coordination with the ruling camp while rejecting the idea of formally joining it, pressured Ishiba to the point where he promised to act on high rice prices.
"Are you going to take responsibility as prime minister if rice prices don't fall into the 3,000 yen range?" DPP chief Yuichiro Tamaki asked Ishiba during a one-on-one debate, prompting him to vow to push them below the 4,000 yen threshold as soon as possible.
Before the latest turmoil, former Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, Ishiba's immediate predecessor, said Tamaki could be a future candidate for premier, suggesting that LDP kingpins have lost confidence in the incumbent.
Within his own Cabinet, Ishiba is expected to count on the personal popularity of Koizumi, who political experts say is a viable future prime minister, to make amends for Eto's failure.
"For the prime minister, Mr. Koizumi may be a powerful rival but could also be a savior," Iwasaki said.
Related coverage:
Japan public express ire over farm minister out-of-touch rice remarks
Stores to get priority on gov't rice stockpiles to ease prices faster
Tokyo to waive basic water fees to help beat extreme summer heat

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Court rejects ¥13.3 tril damages verdict against Fukushima operator ex-bosses
Court rejects ¥13.3 tril damages verdict against Fukushima operator ex-bosses

Japan Today

time44 minutes ago

  • Japan Today

Court rejects ¥13.3 tril damages verdict against Fukushima operator ex-bosses

'Take responsibility for the Fukushima nuclear accident!' a plaintiffs' banner says. By Kyoko Hasegawa and Caroline Gardin A Japanese court overturned a 13.3 trillion yen damages verdict on Friday against ex-bosses of the operator of the stricken Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, thought to be the largest such award ever in the country for a civil suit. Four former executives had in 2022 been ordered to collectively pay 13.3 trillion yen in a suit brought by shareholders over the nuclear disaster triggered by a massive tsunami in 2011. But the verdict was thrown out Friday by the Tokyo High Court, a spokeswoman for the institution told AFP. Shareholders had argued the catastrophe could have been prevented if Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO) bosses had listened to research and implemented preventative measures like placing an emergency power source on higher ground. But the defendants countered that the risks were unpredictable, and the studies cited were not credible. "The defendants... cannot be found to have had this foreseeability at a point in time before the earthquake in question," Friday's court ruling said. The 13.3 trillion yen damages award was believed to be the largest amount ever ordered in a civil suit in Japan. It was meant to cover TEPCO's costs for dismantling reactors, compensating affected residents, and cleaning up contamination. The court spokeswoman said an appeal by the shareholders for an even higher damages order of 22 trillion yen had been denied. "Take responsibility for the Fukushima nuclear accident!" said a pink-and-white banner displayed by the plaintiffs after the ruling. Hiroyuki Kawai, head of their legal team, also issued a stark warning at a press conference on Friday. "If I were to summarize today's ruling in one phrase: It is a ruling that will lead to future serious nuclear accidents," he said. TEPCO declined to comment on the verdict. Three of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant's six reactors were operating when a massive undersea quake triggered a massive tsunami on March 11, 2011. They went into meltdown after their cooling systems failed when waves flooded backup generators, leading to the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl. Overall the tsunami along Japan's northeast coast left around 18,500 people dead or missing. In March this year, Japan's top court said it had finalized the acquittal of two former TEPCO executives charged with professional negligence over the Fukushima meltdown. The decision concluded the only criminal trial to arise from the plant's 2011 accident. © 2025 AFP

Editorial: Japan should pass bill on optional separate surnames during current Diet session
Editorial: Japan should pass bill on optional separate surnames during current Diet session

The Mainichi

timean hour ago

  • The Mainichi

Editorial: Japan should pass bill on optional separate surnames during current Diet session

Deliberations on bills separately submitted by three opposition parties over selective surnames for married couples are underway in the House of Representatives' Committee on Judicial Affairs. There are people who have had their dignity undermined due to having to change their surnames upon marriage, suffering disadvantages in their lives. It is unacceptable to leave the situation unaddressed. It is necessary to bring about a selective separate surname system for married couples during the current Diet session. The Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan (CDP) and the Democratic Party for the People (DPFP) have respectively submitted bills to revise the Civil Code to allow Japanese couples to choose whether to adopt a shared surname or retain their premarital surnames upon marriage. Both bills stipulate that the surname of children will be decided when couples get married if they opt for separate surnames. Under the DPFP bill, couples adopting different surnames will decide which name to list as the head of their family register, and their children will assume that name. There are no big differences between the two bills. The CDP and DPFP should immediately hold consultations to unify their bills for their early enactment. Fellow opposition party Nippon Ishin (the Japan Innovation Party) submitted a bill to expand the use of maiden names in business and on other occasions, though couples would retain a shared surname. Under its proposal, maiden names would be included in family registers to give people using legal grounds for continuing to use them. However, since the real name listed in the family register would still have to change, the problem of people feeling a loss of identity from having to change their surname would remain unresolved. The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), meanwhile, is split over the introduction of selective separate surnames, and forwent submitting its own bill to the Diet. There were moves within the party to make the expansion of the use of maiden names its basic stance, but it failed to build consensus due to a strong backlash from party lawmakers in favor of introducing the optional separate surname system. As the points of contention are clearly laid out, the LDP should swiftly agree to putting the bills to a vote. If the party finds it too difficult to achieve internal consensus, it should leave the decision to each LDP lawmaker without compelling them to adhere to party lines. Komeito's response to the issue is also questionable. Although the LDP's junior coalition partner had advocated for the realization of selective separate surnames in its campaign pledge for last year's House of Representatives election, it is currently struggling to align itself with the LDP. In Japan, the majority of those who change their surnames upon marriage are women. The United Nations' Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women has repeatedly issued advisories calling for correct of the system forcing Japanese couples to adopt a single surname, calling it discriminatory. The optional separate surname system fulfills the wishes of those wanting to retain their own surnames while not shunning those wishing to adopt a shared surname. No one should be disadvantaged by this system. It has been 29 years since the Legislative Council of the Ministry of Justice proposed the introduction of selective separate surnames. Today, fewer and fewer people are bound by traditional family values. There are also many people who believe married couples having different surnames will not affect family bonds. It is the role of politics to keep systems in step with the changing times.

High court rules TEPCO execs not responsible for nuclear disaster
High court rules TEPCO execs not responsible for nuclear disaster

Asahi Shimbun

timean hour ago

  • Asahi Shimbun

High court rules TEPCO execs not responsible for nuclear disaster

Hiroyuki Kawai, center, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, criticizes the ruling in front of the Tokyo High Court in Tokyo's Chiyoda Ward on June 6. (Masaaki Kobayashi) The Tokyo High Court on June 6 rescinded a court order for former executives of Tokyo Electric Power Co. to pay the company about 13 trillion yen ($92.6 billion) over the Fukushima nuclear disaster. In absolving the defendants of responsibility for financial damages caused to the company, the court ruled the giant tsunami that smashed into TEPCO's Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant on March 11, 2011, was 'unforeseeable.' The ruling overturned the Tokyo District Court's decision in 2022 to order the former TEPCO executives to pay compensation for failing to take measures that could have prevented the 'foreseeable' tsunami from causing the triple meltdown at the plant. 'This is unbelievable and unforgivable,' Yui Kimura, secretary-general of the plaintiffs' group, said of the high court's ruling. Hiroyuki Kawai, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, said: 'This is an extremely unjust and logically contradictory verdict. It allows a recurrence of the nuclear accident, and we will pursue the flaws in this decision at the Supreme Court.' The plaintiffs--42 shareholders of TEPCO—had demanded 23 trillion yen in compensation to the company from five former executives and others over the damage caused by their failure to take tsunami countermeasures. The five defendants were: Tsunehisa Katsumata, a former chairman who died in 2024; Masataka Shimizu, a former president; two former vice presidents, Ichiro Takekuro and Sakae Muto; and a former managing director, Akio Komori. Katsumata's heirs succeeded him in the lawsuit. The major issues in the lawsuit were whether TEPCO management at the time could have foreseen the occurrence of such a giant tsunami and whether they could have prevented the disaster by issuing instructions for tsunami countermeasures. In 2002, the central government released a long-term evaluation of earthquake forecasts that indicated the possibility of a major earthquake followed by a massive tsunami occurring off the coast of Fukushima Prefecture. The Tokyo District Court's ruling in 2022 noted that this long-term assessment was scientifically reliable because it was made by top-level Japanese researchers, among other things. Based on this assessment, the lower court found that TEPCO's management team could have foreseen the 2011 tsunami, and that the accident could have been prevented if the defendants had ordered the construction of a watertight structure to prevent flooding of the reactor buildings and other facilities. The tsunami knocked out power to the plant, leading to three reactors melting down and forcing thousands of residents to evacuate from the area. Based on the decommissioning and decontamination costs incurred and the amount of compensation paid to evacuees, the district court concluded that the former management had caused TEPCO more than 13 trillion yen in damages. At the appeal hearing, the defendants repeated their argument that 'the long-term assessment was unreliable, as it was criticized by seismologists and other experts.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store