HSBC raises average gold price forecasts for 2025 and 2026
Gold tends to perform well during periods of economic uncertainty and geopolitical tension, which lifted spot gold to a record high of $3,500.05 an ounce in late April.
Spot gold was trading at $3,348.50/oz at 1146 GMT on Tuesday.
"We anticipate a wide and volatile trading range of $3,600-3,100/oz for the rest of the year and year-end prices of $3,175/oz for 2025 and $3,025/oz for 2026," the bank said in a note on Tuesday.
U.S. Senate Republicans on Monday evening were still trying to pass President Donald Trump's sweeping tax cut and spending bill despite divisions within the party about its expected $3.3 trillion hit to the nation's debt pile.
Meanwhile, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned that countries could be notified of sharply higher tariffs as a July 9 deadline approaches.
HSBC said that even if gold prices ease, levels above $3,000 an ounce have reinforced gold's role as a safe haven and effective portfolio diversifier.
It noted that central bank gold purchases will moderate on further rallies above $3,300 and could increase should gold correct nearer to $3,000.
On the physical front, the bank said further gold price gains above $3,500 could lead to reduced demand in the jewellery, coin and small bar markets, particularly in economies such as India and China.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UAE Moments
9 hours ago
- UAE Moments
Your Daily Career Tarot Card Reading for July 2nd, 2025
2.7.25 Strength: Drawing this card indicates that if you're willing to make just a bit more effort you can forge ahead now. Whether you're hoping to get a fabulous job or want to expand your business, this is your opportunity to go for it. Yes, you will need to apply yourself and may have to work harder and longer for a while, but it will be worth it.
Dubai Eye
10 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
US Senate passes Trump's tax-cut, spending bill; sends to House
The Republican-controlled US Senate passed President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill on Tuesday, signing off on a massive package that would enshrine many of his top domestic priorities into law while adding $3.3 trillion to the national debt. The bill now heads back to the House of Representatives for final approval. Trump has pushed lawmakers to get it to his desk to sign into law by the July 4 Independence Day holiday. Trump's Republicans have had to navigate a narrow path while shepherding the 940-page bill through a Congress that they control by the slimmest of margins. With Democrats lined up in opposition, Republicans have had only three votes to spare in both the House and Senate as they wrangled over specific tax breaks and healthcare policies that could reshape entire industries and leave millions of people uninsured. Yet they have managed to stay largely unified so far. Only three of the Senate's 53 Republicans joined with Democrats to vote against the package, which passed 51-50 after Vice President JD Vance cast the tie-breaking vote. The vote came after an all-night debate in which Republicans grappled with the bill's price tag and its impact on the US healthcare system. It was not immediately clear what changes had been made to the massive package to resolve those concerns. The vote in the House, where Republicans hold a 220-212 majority, is likely to be close as well. An initial version passed with only two votes to spare in May, and several Republicans in that chamber have said they do not support the version that has emerged from the Senate, which the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates will add $800 billion more to the national debt than the House version. The House Freedom Caucus, a group of hardline conservatives who repeatedly threatened to withhold their support for the tax bill, is pushing for deeper spending cuts to reduce its total price tag. "That's not fiscal responsibility. It's not what we agreed to," the group said on Monday. A group of more moderate House Republicans, especially those who represent lower-income areas, object to the steeper Medicaid cuts in the Senate's plan. 'I will not support a final bill that eliminates vital funding streams our hospitals rely on,' Representative David Valadao, a California Republican, said during the weekend debate. Still, House Republicans are likely to face enormous pressure to fall in line from Trump in the days to come. The bill would make permanent Trump's 2017 business and personal income tax cuts, which are due to expire at the end of this year, and dole out new tax breaks for tipped income, overtime and seniors that he promised during the 2024 election. It provides tens of billions of dollars for Trump's immigration crackdown and would repeal many of Democratic President Joe Biden's green-energy incentives. The bill would also tighten eligibility for food and health safety net programmes, which nonpartisan analysts say would effectively reduce income for poorer Americans who would have to pay for more of those costs. The CBO estimates the latest version of the bill would add $3.3 trillion to the $36.2 trillion debt pile. That increased debt effectively serves as a wealth transfer from younger to older Americans, nonpartisan analysts say, as it will slow economic growth, raise borrowing costs and crowd out other government spending in the decades to come. The bill also would raise the nation's borrowing limit by $5 trillion, postponing the prospect of a debt default this summer that would roil global markets. Republicans rejected the cost estimate generated by the CBO's long-standing methodology. Nonetheless, foreign bond investors see incentives to diversify out of US Treasuries as deficits deepen. Republicans say the bill will help families and small businesses and put benefit programmes like Medicaid on a more sustainable path, and they have broadly agreed on its main contours. But they have struggled to agree on the Medicaid funding mechanism and a tax break for state and local tax payments that is a top priority for a handful of House Republicans from high-tax states including New York, New Jersey and California. Others worry that a crackdown on a funding mechanism for the Medicaid health programme could lead to service cutbacks in rural areas. Some on the party's right flank, meanwhile, have pushed for deeper Medicare cuts to lessen its budgetary impact. Trump has singled out those Republican dissenters on his Truth Social network and excluded them from White House events, and few have been willing to defy him since he returned to office in January. Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, one of the three Republicans who voted against the bill, said on Sunday he would not run for re-election next year. Republican senators Susan Collins of Maine and Rand Paul of Kentucky also voted against the bill.
The National
10 hours ago
- The National
Jerome Powell maintains wait-and-see policy as Trump ramps up pressure for rate cuts
Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell on Tuesday repeated his wait-and-see approach towards cutting US interest rates despite mounting pressure from US President Donald Trump. 'As long as the US economy is in solid shape, we think that the prudent thing to do is to wait and learn more and see what those effects might be,' Mr Powell said during a panel discussion at a European Central Bank forum in Portugal. 'We're simply taking some time,' he told delegates. The Fed last month held its target range for interest rates between 4.25 and 4.50 per cent – the fourth consecutive time it has left rates unchanged. When asked if July's meeting was too soon for a rate cut, Mr Powell said the Fed is going 'meeting by meeting'. 'I wouldn't take any meeting off the table or put it directly on the table. It's going to depend on how the data evolve.' Two Fed officials have indicated a willingness to cut rates in July because they believe tariffs will have a one-time inflationary impact, while others have backed Mr Powell's cautious approach. Projections from the Fed's June meeting showed a majority of officials expect to cut rates twice this year. The Fed has maintained a cautious approach towards setting rates since Mr Trump's inauguration, with the president's shifting tariff policy causing economic uncertainty. And Mr Powell said the Fed could have cut rates more by now were it not for tariffs, in a similar message he said during congressional testimony last week. 'In effect, we went on hold when we saw the size of the tariffs, and essentially all inflation forecasts for the United States went up materially as a consequence of the tariffs,' he said. Most economists argue tariffs will lead to higher inflation and slower growth, although data in recent months was mixed. A Commerce Department report last week showed the inflation picture has changed little, with the Fed's preferred metric rising by 2.3 per cent annually. Core inflation, which strips food and energy, came in higher than expected at 2.7 per cent. But signs of tariff-related pressures are beginning to appear. Meanwhile, an ISM survey on manufacturing on Tuesday showed manufacturing remained sluggish last month, although at a more modest pace. 'But worries about tariffs continue to crimp supply, leaving manufacturers fraught with trade-offs for holding inventory as pricing pressure builds,' Wells Fargo economists Shannon Grein and Tim Quinlan wrote in a note to clients. Mr Powell on Tuesday said he expects to see higher inflation readings in the coming months, repeating a similar warning he has cautioned in recent weeks His comments come a day after Mr Trump further escalated his attacks. On Monday, he sent a note to the Fed chairman written over a list of countries' interest rates. 'Jerome – You are, as usual, 'Too Late'. You have cost the USA a fortune – and continue to do – you should lower the rate – by a lot!,' the note read. On the same missive, Mr Trump said US interest rates should be between 0.50 per cent and 1.75 per cent. Mr Trump has said he wants the Fed to lower rates to help service US debt. Mr Powell has so far deflected the pressure coming from the White House. 'I'm very focused on just doing my job,' he said when asked if Mr Trump's attacks make his job more difficult. 'The things that matter are using our tools to achieve the goals that Congress has given us: maximum employment, price stability, financial stability. That's what we focus on – one hundred per cent,' he said. Separate data released on Tuesday showed US job openings unexpectedly rose to a six-month high in May, but a decline in hiring showed there were some signs of a slowing labour market. Still, that is unlikely 'to shake the Federal Reserve out of its wait-and-see mode', Oxford Economics lead economist Nancy Vanden Houten said.
