
CDC vaccine advisory meeting should be postponed amid bias concerns, Cassidy says
Follow
Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy on Monday night called for federal health officials to postpone this week's meetings of outside vaccine advisers, citing a small, newly appointed panel and concerns about biases against vaccines.
Cassidy's push to delay the meeting comes after multiple efforts from the Louisiana doctor to ensure that US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. would not stoke uncertainty over vaccine safety. Cassidy, who chairs the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, grilled Kennedy on his vaccine views earlier this year before ultimately voting to confirm him as HHS secretary, saying they would keep in close contact about vaccine action.
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is convening its Advisory Committee on Immunizations Practices on Wednesday and Thursday. The meeting has been scheduled for some time, but Kennedy dismissed the 17 existing members of the committee this month and named eight new appointees two days later.
Among the new appointees are Dr. Robert Malone, who has advocated against mRNA vaccines, and Dr. Martin Kulldorff, who has questioned vaccine safety. Both have served as paid witnesses in cases against vaccine manufacturers. Other new members include Dr. Retsef Levi, an IT professor of operations management who co-authored a study suggesting a link between Covid-19 vaccines and heart problems, and Dr. Vicky Pebsworth, a nurse aligned with the National Vaccine Information Center, which advocates for vaccine exemptions.
'Although the appointees to ACIP have scientific credentials, many do not have significant experience studying microbiology, epidemiology or immunology,' Cassidy wrote on X on Monday. 'In particular, some lack experience studying new technologies such as mRNA vaccines, and may even have a preconceived bias against them.'
He further said that the meeting should not take place when there is no permanent CDC director. The administration's nominee for that post, Dr. Susan Monarez, is due to appear for her confirmation hearing before the HELP Committee on Wednesday morning, the same day the advisory panel is set to convene. The administration withdrew its first nominee for CDC director, former Rep. Dr. Dave Weldon, in March amid senators' concerns about his vaccine views and the prospect that multiple Republicans would vote against his nomination.
Cassidy had expressed reservations earlier this year about voting for Kennedy's nomination, asking the longtime vaccine safety critic during a HELP Committee confirmation hearing whether he would listen to the science on the issue.
'Your past of undermining confidence in vaccines with unfounded or misleading arguments concerns me. Can I trust that that is now in the past? Can data and information change your opinion, or will you only look for data supporting a predetermined conclusion?' he said during closing remarks in Kennedy's January confirmation hearing.
The nominee had said earlier in the hearing that 'news reports have claimed that I am anti-vaccine or anti-industry. I am neither. I am pro-safety.'
Cassidy ultimately voted to confirm Kennedy, saying in Senate floor remarks that he had secured assurances that the secretary would protect public confidence in vaccination.
'Regarding vaccines, Mr. Kennedy has been insistent that he just wants good science and to ensure safety. But on this topic, the science is good, the science is credible. Vaccines save lives. They are safe. They do not cause autism,' Cassidy said February 4.
He went on to say that he recognizes that parents could need reassurances that vaccines are safe but that confidence in the science should not be undermined.
'To this end, Mr. Kennedy and the administration committed that he and I will have an unprecedentedly close collaborative working relationship if he is confirmed. We will meet or speak multiple times a month,' Cassidy said.
Yet in his X post on Monday, the senator was stark. 'The meeting should be delayed until the panel is fully staffed with more robust and balanced representation – as required by law – including those with more direct relevant expertise,' he wrote.
Spokespeople for HHS and Cassidy did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Vaccine Fatigue Will Fade, CSL CEO Says
CSL CEO and Managing Director Paul McKenzie says the time is right to spin off its Seqirus business as vaccine demand grows and "fatigue" fades in the US, especially among the ageing population. The Australian biotech giant's shares plunged the most in 23 years after it reported disappointing earnings. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Minnesota election official weighs in on Trump's vow to end mail-in voting
The Brief President Donald Trump said he plans to issue an executive order to ban mail-in ballots and voting machines before the 2026 midterm elections. Trump has claimed there was fraud in the 2020 presidential election, election officials say there has been no evidence of this. Experts said only Congress could change federal election law. (FOX 9) - President Donald Trump vowed Monday to lead what he calls "a movement" to eliminate mail-in voting. Trump said he is working with attorneys on drafting an executive order towards his goal ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Election law experts and Minnesota election officials point to the U.S. Constitution and say a president is not given the authority to change election law. The backstory Trump posted a similar message earlier on Monday on social media and said his reason for this pledge is a matter of election integrity. "We're going to start with an executive order that's being written right now by the best lawyers in the country to end mail-in ballots because they're corrupt," said Trump. How can this be achieved? Fact check An election law expert said only Congress can change how federal elections are run. "States basically operate both the state and federal, but the U.S. government under the Constitution has some authority to be able to regulate the time, place, and manner of federal elections," said David Schultz, political science professor at Hamline University and law professor at University of St. Thomas. "Could Congress pass a law that basically bans mail-in voting for federal elections. The answer is yes. But notice what I said, is that Congress would have to a law to be able to do that. The president can't issue an executive order. Could Congress pass a law that prevents states from using mail-in ballots in their own elections, the answer is no." Local perspective Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon addressed some of Trump's remarks in a statement sent to FOX 9. "The U.S. Constitution gives states full control of the time, place, and manner of elections – subject only to action by Congress. A President has no power to grab election authority from states. "America's elections are run largely by local communities. This choice is intentional to ensure that towns, cities, and counties have full control over who represents them. The people who do the work of administering elections are our neighbors and friends, each of whom takes an oath to follow the law, prevent fraud, and conduct their work in a fair and impartial manner. These local election administrators register voters, create ballots, count ballots, and so much more. Once their work is complete on election night, they report the results to our office. Our office never touches a ballot during an election." Simon also responded to Trump's mention of voter fraud. "Every election cycle, everywhere, Minnesota included, you're going to have a very few bad apples who do the wrong thing and engage in some sort of misconduct, but man it is a microscopic level. We know that because we get all the reports, by law, from all of the prosecutors," said Simon. Simon addressed Trump's statement about the prevalence of mail-in voting. "Just about the only country in the world that uses it," said Trump. "There are dozens of countries around the world from Japan, Australia, New Zealand, most of Western Europe that use and have the option of mail in balloting," said Simon. Secretary Simon also responded to Trump's concerns about voting machines. Simon said electronic tabulating equipment gets certified by both state and federal authorities and is more accurate than hand counting. Plus, in Minnesota, paper ballots are used to check the accuracy of machine results, and paper ballots are kept for two years after every election. What they're saying Donna Bergstrom, Deputy Chair of the Republican Party of Minnesota sent FOX 9 this statement. "President Trump is right to shine a spotlight on the flaws and vulnerabilities of mail-in voting. Election integrity is the foundation of our representative democracy, and Minnesotans deserve to know that their vote is secure and accurately counted. Even Democrats like Amy Klobuchar and Angie Craig have admitted Minnesota's mail system is unreliable—you can't even depend on getting your electric bill on time, so why would we turn the integrity of our elections over to that same broken system? "At the same time, we recognize that in a few remote areas of Minnesota, mail-in ballots are the only option because of the distance from polling places, and as a retired United States Marine, I know that our military members deserve access to voting and sometimes this is their only option. But those are specialized exceptions." The Source Minnesota Secretary of State, Political Science and Law professor, President Donald Trump, Republican Party of Minnesota, FOX News, and the Associated Press.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tarrant County officials to vote on drastic reduction of early voting and election day sites
The Brief Tarrant County commissioners will vote on a proposal to significantly reduce the number of early voting and Election Day polling locations. The plan would cut the number of early voting sites by more than half, from 51 to 24, and Election Day locations from 349 to 214. Some commissioners and local residents are raising concerns about potential voter suppression and confusion, while the rationale for the cuts remains unclear. TARRANT COUNTY, Texas - On Tuesday, Tarrant County commissioners will consider slashing the number of election days and early voting locations. Opponents are trying to rally the opposition ahead of the vote. Local perspective FOX 4 reached out to all the Tarrant County commissioners to see if they wanted to make any comments ahead of tomorrow's meeting. The agenda came out on Friday as some say they are still reviewing the proposal. Commissioner Alisa Simmons tells FOX 4's Peyton Yager that she's been working all weekend to get this specific agenda item postponed, but she says she has been met with pushback. "How? Where? Why? How the election administrators got to this point," said Commissioner Simmons. Just some of the questions Democrat Tarrant County Commissioner Alisa Simmons is preparing to bring to Tuesday's Commissioner's Court Meeting. What we know On the agenda is a plan to reduce the number of early voting locations by half and slash more than 100 election day voting locations for the upcoming off-year election in November. If passed, the number of early voting locations would go from 51 to 24. Election day locations would be 214 compared to last year's 349. What they're saying "The contrast is stark. This is evidence of voter suppression. This tactic is in the form of impeding and limiting access to the ballot box," said Simmons. Commissioner Simmons told FOX 4 on Monday that she hasn't received a clear reason for the drastic drop. Democrat Precinct One Commissioner Roderick Miles stated on Monday, "I stand firmly against any actions, policies, or proposals that even resemble voter suppression." Republican Precinct Four Commissioner Manny Ramirez also told FOX 4 that he has several concerns and is looking forward to hearing the elections administrator's rationale or formula for the proposal. Dig deeper Last September, an effort to eliminate early voting sites at several college campuses failed in a 4 to 1 vote at a Special Commissioner Court Meeting. Republican County Judge Tim O'Hare was the lone voter in favor of arguing the college locations were too close to other polling sites, and it was a waste of money. The proposal was nixed following a four-hour fiery public comment. Commissioner Simmons is expecting the same turnout on Tuesday. "This will cause so much voter confusion. People have grown accustomed to voting at the places they live near or work near," said Simmons. What's next Neither Republican Tarrant County Judge Tim O'Hare's office nor Republican Commissioner Matt Krause responded to FOX 4's request for comment on Monday. Commissioners' court meets tomorrow at 10 a.m. This is still on the agenda and people can sign up for public comment. The Source Information in this article was provided from interviews and public comment obtained by FOX 4's Peyton Yager. Solve the daily Crossword