
When should tennis players turn pro during college? Ethan Quinn has a story to tell
When it comes to making major life choices, choosing one route to the top of tennis over another on the outcome of a single point wouldn't figure to be a great idea.
So maybe it's not so surprising that for long stretches of the past 18 months, Ethan Quinn has been feeling like he made a terrible mistake.
Advertisement
Quinn was a point away from losing the national college tennis men's singles title in 2023. A freshman, playing in the biggest match of his life, he was down a set and a service break and facing triple match point against Ondrej Styler of Michigan on a steamy spring day in Lake Nona, Fla.
Lose any of those points, or the fourth match point he faced after saving the first three, and Quinn heads back to the University of Georgia to continue his college career. But in one of the ultimate Sliding Doors moments, he won them all. He won the next set, too, and with it, the NCAA title.
Two months later, instead of preparing for his sophomore season as a Georgia Bulldog, Quinn found himself on a practice court on Long Island, N.Y. with Jannik Sinner. He was getting ready to play his first ATP Tour main-draw match at the U.S. Open, thanks to the automatic wild card that goes to the collegiate champion — along with the host of other opportunities that appeared too good to pass up in the afterglow of his triumph.
It didn't take long for him to start thinking that maybe he should have passed them up after all.
'I thought I was going to come on tour and explode like Ben Shelton did, or Alex Michelsen,' Quinn, a 21-year-old native of Fresno, Calif. with wavy blond har and a boyish visage,' tells The Athletic. 'I thought I was going to take it by storm. That didn't happen.'
Nearly two years since Quinn's decision, he has evolved into a better tennis player but also into a fable whose ultimate lesson remains unknown. There are dozens of college players right now weighing whether to leave for the pro ranks. With Quinn, every win and loss becomes an accelerant or a speed bump, another data point to help answer the question that hangs over these first years of his career: Did throwing himself to the wolves after somehow escaping from triple match point on an opponent's serve help or hinder his development?
Advertisement
He got another data point April 22, when he beat the Brazilian veteran Thiago Monteiro in three sets to qualify for the main draw of the Madrid Open. In keeping with his style, he clawed through, climbing back from a set down to prevail in two tiebreaks on a surface he has only the most modest familiarity with.
'On the dirt that is a really good W,' Brian Garber, his day-to-day coach, wrote in a text message after it was over.
At the time of Quinn's decision to turn pro, he didn't have too many people telling him not to leave college. He'd accomplished his main individual goal, though not every NCAA champion leaves immediately. Both Emma Navarro and Danielle Collins returned to the University of Virginia after winning the women's championship there.
One of the loudest voices was Brad Stine, who helped Jim Courier become the world No. 1 and now coaches Tommy Paul. Stine had been guiding Quinn's development since he was a young boy, and he was unequivocal about which of the forking paths to take.
'I pushed him to turn pro,' Stine said in an interview this month.
He knew how much Quinn loved his near-perfect undergraduate life at Georgia. Girlfriend, star athlete, playing matches in front of 3,000 rabid Bulldog fans. Staying is the easy, comfortable choice, Stine told him. The tough choice is to leave.
Quinn was just the fourth freshman to win the NCAA title since 1977. The win helped him earn the Hurd Award, a $100,000 grant to assist his transition to pro tennis. Stine felt that he needed to cash in by collecting the money and the opportunities from wild card entries, as well as deals with sponsors looking to bet on his potential. Working with his representatives at GSE Worldwide, Quinn joined a growing wave of young players with a deal from the Canadian clothier Lululemon. He got a racket deal with Babolat and a national television spot with Prudential during the 2023 U.S. Open. Orgain, the protein drink company, recently became a sponsor.
Advertisement
'I said: 'I think you're going to be successful, but you are looking at a minimum of two years to make the top 100 and those two years will not be easy,'' Stine said.
He was right about that.
Quinn went 5-9 on the Challenger Tour from early July through mid-October of 2023. In 2024, he had stretches of winning just a match or two a month. His biggest weapon is his massive forehand, and in college it often didn't come back across the net. It does in the pros, and it comes back more and more, with more and more interest, the higher he moves up the ladder.
As ridiculous as it might sound, Garber swears Quinn has one of the biggest forehands in the world when he can tee it up.
'Ask Tommy Paul, he'll tell you,' he said. 'In college, that forehand and the fear of it won him so many matches. He could hide his backhand. You can't do that in pro tennis.'
'I had some regret, honestly,' Quinn said. 'I was like, 'Man, am I cut out for this?''
It's still too early to reach a conclusion, if that is even possible. There's no counterfactual narrative to compare it with. But while Quinn has hardly been an overnight sensation, his trendline is pointing in the right direction under Garber, a Stine disciple who previously helped get Aleksandar Kovacevic, another American college product, from the 300s into the top 100.
Quinn finished 2023 as the world No. 344. By the end of last year he was at No. 202. He began this year with six wins, before losing in the final of the Canberra Challenger to the Brazilian sensation Joao Fonseca, who beat him 6-4, 6-4 in a loss that has aged quite well. Then he won and lost a match in the Australian Open qualifiers.
He's now up to No. 115, which puts him on the cusp of the top 100 and direct entry into the Grand Slams. He's gone from losing to Challenger Tour players to beating them more often than he loses. He's gone from losing in ATP Tour qualifiers, to winning matches there, even against seasoned veterans with top-10 giant-killing pedigree like Monteiro, who beat Stefanos Tsitsipas at last year's Madrid Open.
Advertisement
Quinn beat two European veterans with years of red-clay experience earlier in April, topping the maddening dropshot specialist Corentin Moutet and the former world No.12 Borna Coric in consecutive three-set matches in Barcelona before losing to Carlos Alcaraz in the round of 32.
On paper, it looks like a smooth and steady climb. Living it through it week to week has been a different story.
Quinn has missed Athens, one of America's great college towns. He has missed his friends. He has missed being on a team. The lonely grind, mediocre food and at times depressing accommodations of the lower rungs of professional tennis don't help matters.
On visits back to campus, he speaks with his college coach, Manuel Diaz, one of the best of his era. They talk through his second thoughts and his doubts. Diaz, who retired last year, helped guide former pros John Isner and Mikael Pernfors when they played at Georgia. He has seen versions of this before.
'In our sport you are going to be challenged and questioned,' Diaz said in an interview. 'You are going to question yourself, and you have to figure out how get around that monster.'
Garber and Stine have never shied away from that challenge, nor the question about road not taken. Early on, every time Quinn lost he'd tell them he thought he should be back in college. During a particularly discouraging stretch, when Quinn was lamenting his choice, they told him that if he wanted to go back to college, he should.
'We told him we wouldn't hold it against him,' Garber said.
Quinn had continued to take classes remotely after he left. It would have been a little complicated to regain his eligibility, and it would have cost him some prize money. But it was doable. If that's where he wanted to be, he should go, they told him. Quinn stayed the course, figuring this adjustment was going to be tough no matter when he tried to make it.
Advertisement
Garber has tried to help Quinn change from a one-weapon college player into a versatile professional. Stine told them to start nearly every day working on his crosscourt backhand. He had a tendency to leave it in the danger zone where good players can dance a few steps backwards and turn the ball into a forehand kill shot.
'I want his crosscourt backhand to hang in an exchange with Djokovic,' said Stine, who streams all of Quinn's Challenger matches. 'And Brian is getting him there.'
Inevitably, there have been some valleys. Last August, after Quinn barely showed up in an ugly first-round loss in Lincoln, Neb. in front of about five people, Garber told him to take a few days and decide whether he still wanted him and Stine to stay on. Quinn called a couple days late to say he did. To say that the loss — and the sloppy one before it — was on him, not them.
Late last year, Garber came to Stine with an idea of his own. He thought Quinn, who is a shade under six feet tall, needed to change his serve from a platform stance, with his feet apart, to a pinpoint stance, where he launches up after drawing his feet together. Jannik Sinner made a similar change in 2023 to raise his contact point and add power; his serve effectiveness has since become his main point of difference to his closest rival, Carlos Alcaraz.
Garber had noticed that Quinn's hips were tight. He felt that launching from the pinpoint position would help him speed up his hip rotation and get more oomph behind the ball.
He's now regularly hitting serves above 130 miles per hour and has hit 143 mph on the radar gun. He's also added a serve variation, the slider out wide on the deuce side, to pull his opponent outside the tramlines and open up the other side of the court.
Garber has also helped Quinn develop a four-step routine to help him reset his brain after an emotional point or game. Go to the towel for a breath, do a two-step shuffle on the way back into position, think about how you want to play the next point as you bounce the ball, look up and go.
Advertisement
'Make a plan and then commit to the plan,' Garber said. 'Simple as that.'
He's even gotten something of a team to replace the one he left at Georgia. He, Kovacevic and Paul are all based in and around Boca Raton, Fla. with a few other players. Taylor Fritz lives nearby. Frances Tiafoe comes around. They train with Franco Herrera, Paul's longtime trainer and one of his closest friends. Quinn said he watches and learns.
'Working out with guys that are top-10, doing the same things, being really professional, that's helped me know that I could go on court and be really physical throughout the length of a match and really challenge the top players,' Quinn said.
Paul, he said, who spends every spare hour he can find on his fishing boat, has also taught him the value of having a release, so life isn't all about tennis. He's gotten into thrifting during his travels, and he's also become a major coffee nerd. He's got his own machine, a scale and other gadgets at home.
'There's a lot of times where I'm just spending time in coffee shops, watching them make coffees and just trying to scale it, and then I will use what I've watched to kind of take to my own machine,' he said.
That's not working so badly in tennis either.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge approves NCAA House settlement, changing the landscape of collegiate athletics
Very late on Friday afternoon, we got a massive end-of-the week news dump when a judge officially approved a settlement in the NCAA v. House case. With the ruling, the landscape of college athletics will soon look very different than it has prior. The goal of the settlement is to provide structure to the NIL landscape in college football, which is currently effectively a free-for-all. Following the ruling, On3 discussed some of the ramifications of the ruling. 'Since the NCAA was founded in 1906, institutions have never directly paid athletes, On3's Pete Nakos wrote. 'That will now change with the settlement ushering in the revenue-sharing era of college sports. Beginning July 1, schools will be able to share $20.5 million with athletes, with football expected to receive 75%, followed by men's basketball (15%), women's basketball (5%) and the remainder of sports (5%). The amount shared in revenue will increase annually. Advertisement 'Power Four football programs will have roughly $13 to $16 million to spend on rosters for the 2025 season. Many schools have front-loaded contracts ahead of the settlement's approval, taking advantage of contracts not being vetted by the newly formed NIL clearinghouse . . . ' . . . The settlement also imposes new restrictions on college sports. An NIL clearinghouse will be established, titled 'NIL Go' and run through Deloitte. All third-party NIL deals of $600 or more must be approved by the clearinghouse. If not approved, the settlement says a new third-party arbiter could deem athletes ineligible or result in a school being fined. In a gathering at the ACC spring meetings last week, Deloitte officials reportedly shared that 70% of past deals from NIL collectives would have been denied, while 90% of past deals from public companies would have been approved.' It remains to be seen exactly how the new rules will affect USC specifically. Given the Trojans' recent hire of Chad Bowden and the subsequent revamping of their recruiting operation, USC seemingly has the right people in place to bring the program into college football's new era. This article originally appeared on Trojans Wire: NCAA House settlement approved, as college sports braces for impact


NBC Sports
24 minutes ago
- NBC Sports
With wife on bag, 2015 U.S. Junior champ Philip Barbaree returns to U.S. Open
The key to Philip Barbaree qualifying for the U.S. Open? He married his caddie. Well, let's be clear. The 26-year-old Barbaree first met Chloe Lettau in late 2023. Barbaree, a former standout at LSU and USGA champion, was going on three years having not yet made a world-ranked cut. But then he earned status for last year's Canada swing on PGA Tour Americas, and two events in, with Chloe already in Alberta to watch, Barbaree asked her if she wanted to carry the bag. 'I guess,' responded Chloe, who works in medical sales and had no prior golf experience prior to dating Barbaree. That was good enough for Barbaree, who found a stand bag, made it as light as possible and packed some extra snacks. Then he went out and not only made his first cut but tied for 23rd. 'And this has been our thing ever since,' said Barbaree, who married Chloe on March 1. They celebrated their engagement anniversary in May in Peru with a 33-hole day at about 9,400 feet of elevation. It's been a decade since Barbaree defeated Andrew Orishack in the final of the 2015 U.S. Junior Amateur, where he stormed back from 5 down with eight holes to play at Colleton River to win in 37 holes. 'It one sense it feels like forever ago, and in another it feels like yesterday,' Barbaree says. He enrolled a semester early at LSU in Spring 2017, was teammates with Sam Burns and turned pro a semester early, halfway through his fifth year, in November 2020. In between, he posted the fourth lowest scoring average in Tigers' history along with eight top-5 finishes. After his sophomore season, he qualified for the 2018 U.S. Open at Shinnecock Hills, where he shot 82-79 and beat just two players, Michael Block and Scott Gregory. 'I do feel like my game and my mind are leaps and bounds better than they were in 2018,' Barbaree said. Much of that strength came through failure. Barbaree saw just nine starts – and no weekends – on major tours in his first three years as a pro, as he cut his teeth mostly on the mini-tours. He'd be lying if he said he didn't think about changing careers during that first year. In fact, after moving back home to Shreveport following a brief stint in Dallas, Barbaree took a part-time job working for his dad, Phil Sr., who owns Superior Grill, a Mexican restaurant chain that also has locations in New Orleans and Baton Rouge. He lasted just a couple shifts. 'I started at the bottom,' Barbaree recalled. 'Bussing tables, setting tables, having to take in outside furniture. I got sick, I cut my finger, and after a couple long nights I said, I'm not cut out for this. I gotta get back out playing.' Barbaree has always been a prolific putter, and last year he made some improvements with his ball-striking after he started working with Chad Darby, who teaches out of the David Toms Academy in Shreveport. He's done a little bit of offseason speed training with long-driver Jack Smith as well. Barbaree's mental strides can mostly be attributed to Chloe, who now splits her time caddying for her husband and selling CPAP machines. 'Her not being a golfer has probably helped,' Barbaree said. 'She picks up different things than people who are. If I'm being indecisive, she'll realize it and tell me. Somebody who might play golf might try to rationalize it. She'll go, 'Well, it just seemed like you were in between clubs a lot and thinking about it more than usual.' … I feel like we always figure out little things to do better every week. 'And I definitely feel like I enjoy playing golf as much as I ever have.' Barbaree, who is ranked No. 1,000 in the world on the dot, is coming off his best finish on PGA Tour Americas, a T-3 showing in Bogota, Colombia, at the Inter Rapidisimo Golf Championship, which was shortened to 36 holes because of weather. His U.S. Open final qualifier last Monday in West Palm Beach, Florida, was also affected by storms. He was 1 over after 10 holes before rallying to card a first-round, 3-under 69 at Emerald Dunes. Then he birdied four of his first five holes of the second round before play was suspended for the day. He returned to fire a closing 64 and share medalist honors at 11 under. Now, the question is, will Chloe have to carry a tour bag around Oakmont? 'Absolutely not,' Barbaree said with a laugh. He knows the U.S. Open is as much a test of endurance, both physically and mentally, as it is an examination of all 14 clubs. Seven years ago, he wore himself out playing practice rounds and arrived on the first tee that Thursday gassed. He also understands how crucial it is to keep Chloe on the bag. Said Barbaree: 'We're not breaking up the team any time soon.'


USA Today
40 minutes ago
- USA Today
Golfweek asked ChatGPT for predictions and more at the 2025 U.S. Open
Golfweek asked ChatGPT for predictions and more at the 2025 U.S. Open ChatGPT analyzed Oakmont and the field at the U.S. Open, then predicted contenders. But it shocked us with a big-name it thinks could miss the cut. Golf fans don't need artificial intelligence to know the U.S. Open is the toughest golf tournament on the schedule every year, and that Oakmont Country Club prides itself on being one of the hardest golf courses in the world. The list of men who have won there is illustrious: Tommy Armour (1927), Sam Parks Jr. (1935), Ben Hogan (1953), Jack Nicklaus (1962), Johnny Miller (1973), Larry Nelson (1983), Ernie Els (1994), Angel Cabrera (2007) and Dustin Johnson (2016). While golf media members and prognosticators have been bantering about who might win this year's U.S. Open since Scottie Scheffler won the 2025 PGA Championship last month, Golfweek decided to see what one of the biggest brains on Earth had to say on the subject. ChatGPT is a large language model developed by OpenAI that can generate human-like text, making it seem as if you're texting with a real person. A very real person. It's designed to understand and respond to user input, answer questions and even have a back-and-forth conversation. Here's what ChatGPT thinks about Oakmont Country Club, who might be a contender on Sunday afternoon, and which highly-ranked player is most likely to miss the cut. ChatGPT on Oakmont Country Club Golfweek: Let's start with the course. Among the venues that the USGA has used for recent U.S. Opens, how hard is Oakmont? ChatGPT: Oakmont Country Club is, without question, the most difficult course in the regular U.S. Open rota—and possibly the toughest test in all of championship golf. That's not just opinion; it's supported by scoring data and player feedback across decades. Let's talk numbers. In the last three U.S. Opens played at Oakmont—2007, 2016, and 1994—the winning scores were 4 under (Dustin Johnson, 2016), 5 over (Angel Cabrera, 2007), and 5 under (Ernie Els in a playoff, 1994). What's notable is that even with modern equipment, only four players broke par in 2016, and that was with a relatively calm week. In 2007, nobody broke par—Cabrera's +5 was good enough to win, and only eight players finished within 10 shots of the lead. Compare that to: 2023 at LACC (North Course): Wyndham Clark won at -10 Wyndham Clark won at -10 2022 at The Country Club (Brookline): Matt Fitzpatrick won at -6 Matt Fitzpatrick won at -6 2021 at Torrey Pines: Jon Rahm won at -6 Jon Rahm won at -6 2019 at Pebble Beach: Gary Woodland won at -13 Oakmont plays harder, period. Golfweek: Why is Oakmont so tough? ChatGPT: It's a combination of classic design and sheer brutality: Greens: Oakmont's greens are legendary—lightning fast, sloped, and crowned. They routinely roll 14+ on the Stimpmeter during U.S. Opens, making them the fastest in major championship golf. They're also massive, but pins are tucked and approaches must land on the right tier or risk a three-putt—or worse. Bunkers: Over 210 of them, many of them deep and positioned exactly where your ball wants to go. The famous 'Church Pews' between 3 and 4 are iconic, but every bunker feels like a penalty area. Narrow fairways and thick rough: The USGA always narrows the fairways at Oakmont, and the rough is dense, upright, and penal. Driving it in the short grass is a premium, especially with how firm the course usually plays. No water hazards, no gimmicks: Oakmont beats you up with angles, firmness, and speed. There are no ponds, no forced carries over lakes—just pure shotmaking, and nowhere to hide if you're off. In short: Among recent venues, Oakmont is the bar-none toughest. It demands everything—tee ball placement, spin control, elite lag putting and mental endurance. Even top players often leave with their confidence dented. Golfweek: What do you anticipate will be the hardest hole at the 2025 U.S. Open? ChatGPT: If history, design and setup trends are any guide, the most difficult hole at the 2025 U.S. Open will almost certainly be the first hole—and yes, that's as intimidating as it sounds. Oakmont's first hole is a par 4 that plays to about 480 yards. Right out of the gate, players face a brutally demanding tee shot that sets the tone for the day. The fairway tilts left to right, and anything slightly offline can kick into the rough or into the right-side bunkers. In the 2016 U.S. Open, fewer than 50 percent of players found the fairway on No. 1 all week. The green is angled front-to-back slopes severely from left to right. If you miss on the wrong side, it's a guaranteed bogey or worse. Most courses ease players into a round with a mid-length par 4 or scoring opportunity. At Oakmont, the first tee shot is more of a stress test—no warm-up swings, no bailouts, and no faking it. It's a major reason players say Oakmont gets in your head before your round even starts. Who might win the 2025 U.S. Open? Golfweek: Predict three players who will be in contention for the lead at the U.S. Open at the start of the fourth round? ChatGPT: Great question—and one that requires blending data, history, course fit and recent form. Predicting who will actually be leading after 54 holes is always a gamble, but three players stand out as especially likely to be in the hunt at Oakmont on Saturday night of the 2025 U.S. Open. Here are three names I'd put real stock in: Scottie Scheffler Why he'll be there: No one in men's professional golf has been more consistent than Scheffler over the last 18 months. He's leading the PGA Tour in Strokes Gained: Tee to Green by a wide margin again in 2025, and Oakmont is a ballstriker's crucible. He drives it long and straight, controls spin beautifully, and has shown major resilience even when his putter isn't firing. Oakmont fit: Scheffler's natural shot shape—a tight fade with the driver—matches up well with Oakmont's demanding tee shots. His elite iron play will give him chances on holes where most players are scrambling for bogey. Plus, his recent putting switch (to the TaylorMade Spider Tour X L-Neck) has stabilized what was once a glaring weakness. Xander Schauffele Why he'll be there: Xander has been the most consistent U.S. Open performer of the past decade, with seven straight top-15 finishes since 2017. He finally broke through with a major win at the 2024 PGA Championship, and there's no reason to think he won't carry that confidence into Oakmont. Oakmont fit: He's cool under pressure and rarely beats himself. That kind of temperament plays at Oakmont, where the course demands total discipline. He's also top 10 in proximity from 175–225 yards in 2025—exactly the kind of approach range you face all week there. Tommy Fleetwood Why he'll be there: Fleetwood's name might surprise some, but he's put together a quietly excellent season and ranks among the best in strokes gained around the green and scrambling—a huge asset at Oakmont. His U.S. Open record is strong (T-2 in 2018, T-4 in 2017), and he thrives in tough, windy, firm conditions. Oakmont fit: Fleetwood is a grinder. He's not flashy off the tee, but he puts the ball in play and thrives when par is a good score. His creativity and feel on and around the greens could give him a real edge over players who are used to softer setups. Golfweek: Who is a player no one will be talking about who you think could finish in the top 10 at Oakmont? ChatGPT: Sahith Theegala He's not under-the-radar to golf fans anymore, but in a major field packed with big names and major winners, Theegala still qualifies as a sleeper—especially at a venue like Oakmont, where the course itself is the star, and emotional control is as critical as ball control. 1. He's a creative shotmaker with a great short game. Oakmont requires creativity and feel—two of Theegala's strengths. He plays with a natural flow and doesn't overly rely on mechanics, which helps him on uneven lies, thick rough, and the types of awkward recovery shots that Oakmont dishes out routinely. 2. Top-tier putting and touch. He's ranked among the top 30 on the PGA Tour in Strokes Gained: Putting in 2025 and has shown the ability to drain mid-range putts under pressure. Oakmont's greens will be a nightmare for players who rely too much on analytics or struggle with speed control. Theegala, on the other hand, has the kind of natural putting stroke that holds up well on fast, sloped greens. 3. Major confidence curve. He's trending in the right direction. Theegala notched a T-6 at the 2024 British Open Championship, a T-12 at Augusta in 2025, and a strong run at the Players earlier this year. The experience is adding up, and he's shown he can handle big stages without losing his rhythm or confidence. 4. Comfortable in chaos. Some players unravel when they miss fairways or when the course gets firm and fiery. Theegala doesn't. He's a scrambler by nature, and Oakmont rewards guys who stay patient, aren't rattled by bogeys, and can grind out 72 tough holes. Who might miss the cut at the 2025 U.S. Open? Golfweek: Give me a big-name players who you think is most likely to miss the cut. ChatGPT: If you're looking for a bold prediction—and one that could stir up some clubhouse conversation—I'd say the big-name player most likely to miss the cut at the 2025 U.S. Open at Oakmont is Bryson DeChambeau. That might seem controversial on the surface, especially considering how well he played in the 2024 majors and how much he's embraced U.S. Open setups in the past. But Oakmont is not Winged Foot or Pinehurst, and the setup in 2025 may be his undoing. Here's why Bryson is at risk: 1. Oakmont neutralizes power without precision. Bryson's strategy in 2020—bomb it as far as possible and gouge it onto the green—worked at Winged Foot because the fairways were narrow but the rough was uniform and not overly penal in some areas. At Oakmont, that same approach is far riskier. Oakmont's fairways are extremely narrow, the rough is thicker and clumpier, and the greens are firmer and faster. Miss a fairway here, and you're often looking at a layup, not a wedge from the rough. It's a course that rewards accuracy and punishes any loss of control—off the tee, into the greens, and especially around them. 2. Short game and putting concerns. Bryson has made strides with his putter, but Oakmont's greens are an entirely different animal. They're famously the fastest in major championship golf, and Bryson's tendency to struggle with speed control and lag putting under pressure could become a major liability. If you're not extremely precise with your spin and trajectory into these greens, three-putts (or worse) pile up fast. 3. Course architecture doesn't favor his style. There are no real 'gettable' par 5s at Oakmont (No. 12 being the exception, and even that's relative), and no holes where a high-risk/high-reward strategy offers a clear payoff. In fact, trying to overpower Oakmont can backfire quickly—ask players like Phil Mickelson or John Daly, both of whom struggled mightily here in past Opens when they tried to play aggressively. In 2016, when Bryson was still an amateur, he did make the cut at Oakmont, finishing T-15—but he was playing a far more controlled, conservative game back then. In recent U.S. Opens, he's had mixed results: wins at Winged Foot and Pinehurst, missed cut at Torrey Pines. Bottom line from ChatGPT ahead of the 2025 U.S. Open If Bryson comes in swinging driver with reckless abandon, Oakmont could chew him up. And if his iron play and touch around the greens aren't sharp, he could be heading home Friday night. He's got the talent, but this venue asks the wrong questions of his current game.