M23-Backed Congo River Coalition Accuses Kinshasa of Undermining U.S.-Brokered Peace Deal
In a statement issued Saturday, the Congo River Coalition, which includes the M23 rebel group, claimed that Congolese forces, backed by the Burundian National Defence Force, deployed heavy weaponry in civilian zones, warning that the mobilization 'risks triggering a humanitarian catastrophe.'
Coalition spokesperson Laurence Kanyuka described the moves as a 'provocative and reckless military build-up' that runs counter to ongoing Qatari-mediated talks in Doha. 'Such actions not only violate the spirit of the Washington agreement, but also demonstrate a blatant disregard for the civilian population,' the statement read.
Signed on June 27, the Washington peace deal committed both Congo and Rwanda to halting support for armed groups, respecting territorial integrity, and establishing a joint mechanism to dismantle the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR). It also outlined steps for dialogue between Kinshasa and M23, alongside humanitarian and economic stabilization measures for the troubled eastern provinces.
But the rebel coalition now questions Kinshasa's political will to uphold the agreement. 'While we remain committed to a political solution, the government continues to stall on confidence-building measures,' the group stated, accusing the authorities of 'dangerous double standards.'
The coalition said it reserves the right to 'defend civilians and its positions' if attacks continue, branding the current military campaign as 'criminal aggression.'
Tensions further escalated this week following Congolese reports of an unidentified aircraft entering the country's airspace. The incident has reignited concerns about the fragile nature of the truce and the challenges facing regional actors attempting to de-escalate one of Africa's longest-running conflicts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al-Ahram Weekly
2 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Rwanda-backed rebels killed over 140 civilians in eastern Congo, rights group says - Africa
Rwanda-backed rebels killed at least 140 people in farming communities in eastern Congo in July, Human Rights Watch said in a report Wednesday, describing the killings as 'summary executions.' The group said 141 people, predominantly ethnic Hutus, were feared dead or missing after the attacks near Virunga National Park in North Kivu province, citing local experts and witness accounts. It said the killings appeared to be part of a military campaign by the M23 group, the most prominent of more than 100 armed groups in mineral-rich eastern Congo, against the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), a mostly Hutu armed group. Nearly 2 million Hutus from Rwanda fled to Congo after the 1994 Rwandan genocide that killed 800,000 Tutsi, moderate Hutus and others. Rwandan authorities have accused Hutus who fled of participating in the genocide, alleging that the Congolese army protected them. The United States and others have been trying to achieve a permanent ceasefire since fighting between the M23 and Congolese forces escalated in January with the M23's seizure of two key cities. U.S. President Donald Trump this week asserted he had 'ended six wars' including this one, but experts say his impact isn't as clear cut as he claims. The U.N. has called the decades-old conflict in eastern Congo 'one of the most protracted, complex, serious humanitarian crises on Earth.' The Human Rights Watch report says the Rwanda Defense Force was involved in the M23 operations it describes, citing U.N. and military sources and witness accounts. There was no immediate comment from the Rwandan government. 'The M23 armed group, which has Rwandan government backing, attacked over a dozen villages and farming areas in July and committed dozens of summary executions of primarily Hutu civilians,' said Clementine de Montjoye, senior researcher at Human Rights Watch. Witnesses said M23 soldiers, accompanied by Rwandan soldiers who were identified by their accents, told them to 'immediately bury the bodies in the fields or leave them unburied, preventing families from organizing funerals,' the report said. One woman described being marched in a group to a riverbank near the town of Kafuru. The group of around 70 people was lined up before the soldiers began shooting at them. Forty-seven of the dead, including children, were identified, the report added. Willy Ngoma, military spokesperson for M23, called the report 'military propaganda.' M23 was previously accused of extrajudicial killings during its seizure of major cities earlier this year. A separate report by Amnesty International on Wednesday said the rights group found that both M23 and Congolese government-sponsored militias regularly committed mass atrocities and sexual violence against civilians, including gang rape. 'Rwanda and (Congo) cannot continue shunning responsibility; they must hold all perpetrators accountable,' said Tigere Chagutah, Amnesty International's regional director for East and Southern Africa. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
Al-Ahram Weekly
a day ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
There is no Egyptian proposal to transfer Hamas weapons to Egypt: informed source - Foreign Affairs
Senior Egyptian informed sources on Tuesday denied Israeli media reports which claimed that Cairo had proposed the transfer of Hamas weapons to Egypt. Speaking to Al-Qahera News on Tuesday, the sources stressed that the Egyptian-Qatari proposal, which Hamas has already accepted, only includes a 60-day ceasefire. They added that negotiations on a permanent ceasefire between Israel and Hamas would begin on the first day of the agreement's implementation. Israel's Kan channel claimed on Tuesday that Egypt has proposed transferring the weapons of Hamas and other Palestinian factions to its custody for an indefinite period, as part of a comprehensive post-war plan for the Gaza Strip. Multiple rounds of indirect negotiations – mediated by Egypt and Qatar throughout the two-year Israeli war in Gaza – have failed to secure a lasting ceasefire amid the insistence by Israel, backed by Washington, on continuing the war. On 19 March, Israel unilaterally ended a truce agreement, mediated by Egypt, Qatar, and the US in January, to resume its war on the strip. Tel Aviv and Washington backed off from ceasefire talks in July, claiming that Hamas was not negotiating in good faith. The new ceasefire plan, accepted by Hamas after fresh talks in Cairo, proposes an initial 60-day truce, a partial release of captives, the freeing of some Palestinian prisoners, and provisions for the entry of humanitarian aid. The new proposal also counters a recent Israeli plan to occupy all of Gaza City and ethnically cleanse nearly one million Palestinians to the south of the strip. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
Al-Ahram Weekly
a day ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
A deal or more escalation on Gaza? - World - Al-Ahram Weekly
Hours after Netanyahu spoke of his plans for a 'Greater Israel', Cairo began to pump up its criticisms of Tel Aviv this week. The announcement by all the Palestinian factions including Hamas this week that they are willing to move towards a ceasefire in Gaza on the basis of an amended US proposal has not confirmed hopes for a possible truce given the Israeli military action on the ground. Hamas and the rest of the Palestinian factions in Gaza announced their approval of partial truce proposals that were originally proposed by US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and amended by the Egyptian and Qatari mediators who have been trying to stop the Israeli war on Gaza since it began on 7 October 2023. Since then, there have been fewer than eight weeks of pause in the hostilities in the entire 22 months of the war. The approval by Hamas of the proposals came after that of the other factions and hours after President Abdel-Fattah Al-Sisi and visiting Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohamed bin Abdul-Rahman bin Jassim Al-Thani met to discuss ways to give a push to a ceasefire in Gaza on Monday. The deal that Hamas, along with the other factions, agreed to includes the cessation of military operations in Gaza for eight weeks, a significant relocation of Israeli troops in Gaza, the uninterrupted entry of desperately needed humanitarian aid into Gaza, and a partial release of the remaining Israeli hostages held since 7 October 2023 in parallel with the release of a number of Palestinians from Israeli prisons. Two informed sources said on Monday evening that Hamas had agreed to the proposals after the mediators had accommodated its wish for the deal to include the withdrawal of Israeli troops from the Morag Corridor that Israel created in April this year in southern Gaza. Carrying the name of an Israeli settlement that was dismantled in 1995 upon the return of Gaza to the Palestinian Authority (PA) in line with the Oslo Accords, this corridor was set to be the 'demarcation line' established by Israel for the Palestinian presence in Gaza. Earlier this week, Israel said it would provide tents to be put up south of the Morag Corridor to accommodate the close to 800,000 or more Gazans who will want to escape the anticipated hostilities that are forecast to start in less than two weeks after the plan announced by Netanyahu and his generals to reoccupy Gaza. 'The Morag Corridor is essential for the Israeli displacement plan, and Egypt supported the wish of Hamas to insist on having the Israeli troops pull out from it,' said an informed Egyptian source. He added that while Hamas is keen to avoid the displacement of half of the around two million Gazans from the north and middle to the south of the Strip, Egypt is also keen to avoid seeing a massive exodus of Palestinians to the south of Gaza near Rafah and on the borders with Egypt. None of the Egyptian and foreign sources who spoke to Al-Ahram Weekly, expected Netanyahu to pull his troops out of the Morag Corridor. Consequently, none of them seemed to anticipate that a ceasefire would be agreed on by Israel or, even if it were approved, it could be sustained. What is more likely, the sources suggested, is a new phase in the Israeli offensive that will bring about the displacement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians into southern Gaza. They also agreed that it would be up to the Gazans to decide whether they want to move to the tents south of the Morag Corridor or continue to suffer hunger, illness, and military strikes leading to death in the north of the Gaza Strip. 'Once in the south, it would be up to them to decide whether they want to continue to be lumped together in a highly populated block or move on,' said one Cairo-based foreign diplomat. He added that Netanyahu was going to offer 'safe exits' out of Gaza and 'possible destinations' for those who would agree 'to just go'. Otherwise, the sources added, Netanyahu, with some regional support, wants to throw the ball into Egypt's court, forcing it to look after the section of Gaza where the vast majority of the population would be lumped together. All Egyptian officials have been opposed to all plans either to displace the Palestinians in Gaza or to have Egypt administer Gaza, either entirely or partially. On Monday, Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty said Egypt would not take part in inflicting a new major injustice on the Palestinian people. In a joint press conference with Abdelatty on the Egyptian side of the Rafah Crossing on Monday, Palestinian Prime Minister Mohamed Mustafa praised Egypt's firm stance against the displacement of the Palestinians. However, Cairo-based foreign diplomats said that the issue of displacement could be much more layered because Israel has plans to move the Palestinians with or without the cooperation of Egypt. They said that Netanyahu believes he is unstoppable and that this is making him more aggressive to the dismay of pro-peace capitals inside and outside of the Middle East, including Cairo, which has abandoned its otherwise cautious statements on Israel. The developments came only days after Netanyahu talked about what he called his political and spiritual commitment to establish 'Greater Israel'. A political and biblical concept used by ultra-orthodox and radical Jews, the term is often used to refer to the expanded borders of Israel, established on parts of the historic land of Palestine in what is known as the Nakba in 1948, to include all of historic Palestine, parts of Jordan, parts of Egypt, and parts of some other neighbouring Arab states. It refers to the Arab territories that Israel occupied in June 1967 and extends to other areas in the region. While compatible with his political creed, Netanyahu's statement came as a shock to several Arab capitals. 'It is not so much that he is thinking about it; it is rather that he is now openly and shamelessly talking about it,' commented one Egyptian source. Both Amman and Cairo issued statements decrying Netanyahu's statements, with the Egyptian Foreign Ministry demanding an explanation of 'these media statements'. The Arab League issued a statement criticising Netanyahu's comments and blaming him for dragging the Middle East further away from peace. 'I cannot say that this is just something that he is saying to appease the radicals in his government or the extremist segment of the Israeli population. I think he really subscribes to the idea,' the same source said. It had been clearly reflected in all of Netanyahu's political choices. 'Netanyahu does not think that he can invade Egypt or Jordan, but he is certainly trying to eliminate the existence of a Palestinian population and a Palestinian nation,' the source said. It was for this reason that he has been 'playing all sorts of games to avoid signing up to a truce to end the war on Gaza.' Having always been sceptical about the possibility of a sustainable ceasefire in the genocidal Israeli war on Gaza, this source said on Sunday that now more than ever it seems highly unlikely that Netanyahu will move towards one. Throughout the week, the Israeli military action on the ground in Gaza has indicated that what is happening now is a new phase of the invasion. On Sunday, the Israeli army chief spoke openly of plans to occupy most of Gaza. 'Today, we are approving the plan for the next phase of the war,' Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir said during a field visit to the Palestinian territory, according to an Israeli army statement. He added that Israel will continue to strike Gaza 'until the decisive defeat of Hamas'. With no specific way of quantifying or defining the 'decisive defeat of Hamas', official sources in Cairo said that the statement was an indication of a longer and more deadly war. Since Israel started its war on Gaza, at least 65,000 people have been reported dead, including dozens who died of hunger, and over 120,000 have been wounded, with many left with crippling injuries. * A version of this article appears in print in the 21 August, 2025 edition of Al-Ahram Weekly Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
