
House committee ties tax credit for working class to oil tax hike
To cap a day of setbacks for oil and gas, another House committee voted later Friday to advance a measure to increase the royalty rate, or a charge oil producers pay based on the value of oil or gas they extract.
House Bill 14, which passed the House Taxation and Revenue Committee on a 7-5 vote Friday morning and now heads to the full House, would replace the state's Working Families Tax Credit with an Earned Income Tax Credit, eliminating state income tax liability for single people making less than $25,000 a year and childless married couples making less than $30,000 a year.
The thresholds go up with the number of children; married couples with three children would need to make more than $70,000 a year to have any tax liability.
The amendment would add an extra 0.28% "oil and gas equalization surtax" when crude prices are $55 a barrel or more, which when added to the existing tax effectively raises the rate to 3.4%, said Rep. Derrick Lente, D-Sandia Pueblo, who chairs the House Taxation and Revenue Committee.
This would bring in an extra $130 million a year, he told the committee. It would also cut the rate on natural gas producers by one-tenth of 1% to 3.9%, which would reduce the amount collected from them by $11 million a year.
"For several years now, we have cut taxes for working people and made our tax code more reflective of our state's values,' Lente said in a statement Friday. 'Today, we are doubling down on our investments in workers and families, while making sure that the industry profiting from the extraction of our state's natural resources pays its fair share.'
The amendment had its origins in House Bill 548, introduced by Rep. Nathan Small D-Las Cruces, chair of the House Appropriations and Finance Committee. As originally written, the measure would have boosted the tax on oil to 4% to make it the same as natural gas. Lente said the amendment was a response to concerns with the original proposal.
'The fact of the matter is, he listens," Lente said. "We listen. We listened.'
Supporters of HB 14 said it makes sense to use revenue from a wealthy industry to cut taxes for less-wealthy New Mexicans.
Camilla Feibelman, director of the Sierra Club's Rio Grande chapter, said natural resources such as oil and gas belong to the public and are mostly drilled on public lands.
"We stand in strong support of ensuring that those natural resources support our families first and foremost," she said.
Democrats framed the tax credit as a way to help during a time of economic uncertainty amid rising prices rise and increasing odds of a recession.
'We don't know how unaffordable life will become over the next few years, so New Mexico is stepping up to ensure that you can keep more of your hard-earned money so that you can afford staples from food, medicine, health care ... energy, whatever the case may be, said House Speaker Javier Martínez, D-Albuquerque.
Opponents mostly didn't object to the tax credit but to the tax increase on oil producers, which they worried would be passed on to consumers and hurt producers or even drive some out of the state.
"We say we love this industry, but at this point, I think there's been over 23 bills that have negatively impacted this industry that have come through this body" this session, said Rep. Jonathan Henry, R-Artesia.
'The more that break-even price goes up, the quicker the industry shuts down,' Henry said. 'When that industry shuts down, what happens to our budget in New Mexico?'
Some questioned the wisdom of tying 'an ongoing tax credit to volatile oil and gas revenues,' as Alison Riley, public policy director of the New Mexico Chamber of Commerce, put it.
'The chamber is proud to support working families, but with $3 billion in new revenue, there is plenty to fund priority programs ... without a tax increase,' said Terri Cole, president and CEO of the Greater Albuquerque Chamber of Commerce.
In a statement after the vote, the New Mexico Oil and Gas Association said HB 14 was "originally a good bill" that was "hijacked."
"Instead of raising taxes, the Legislature should prioritize policies that drive down consumer costs, foster economic growth and diversification, and protect the energy workers that are the backbone of many communities across our state," said Missi Currier, the organization's president and CEO.
Senate Bill 23, which the House Appropriations and Finance Committee voted 9-8 to advance Friday evening, increases the maximum royalty rate from 20% of the value of the oil or natural gas to 25% in certain areas. That hike, according to a Legislative Finance Committee analysis, could generate from $50 million to $75 million in additional revenue to the state's land grant permanent fund. A separate State Land Office analysis estimated it could eventually boost additional annual revenues by $50 million to as much as $84 million.
State Land Office Deputy Commissioner of Operations Sunalei Stewart said 25% royalty rates are already relatively standard for oil production on private lands, including in New Mexico, and that the agency has a legal obligation to charge oil companies the market rate for public resources.
'This is not anti-oil and gas. This industry contributes a tremendous amount, and we appreciate that — the school kids benefit,' he told lawmakers. 'But it is our job to ensure that we're getting that market rate.'
However, industry advocates and Republican lawmakers worried the bill would contribute to driving oil and gas companies away.
'It almost seems punitive to me,' said Rep. Harlan Vincent, R-Glencoe. '... We're not treating oil and gas like we should be treating oil and gas.'
Rep. Matthew McQueen, D-Galisteo, said the state's exceptional land parcels for oil production would help keep companies here, noting that even if their expenses were a little higher, their profits would be high too.
'We're talking about the best of the best, which are not only the best in the Permian [Basin], but potentially some of the best in the world,' he said. '... It has never once been suggested that these parcels would not find willing bidders.'
New Mexican reporter Esteban Candelaria contributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
12 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
California is set to act fast after Texas advances congressional maps to boost Republicans
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The added complexity is because California has a voter-approved independent commission that Newsom himself backed before Trump's latest redistricting maneuver. Only the state's voters can override the map that commission approved in 2021. But Newsom said extraordinary steps are required to counter Texas and other Republican-led states that Trump is pushing to revise maps. Advertisement 'This is a new Democratic Party, this is a new day, this is new energy out there all across this country,' Newsom said Wednesday on a call with reporters. 'And we're going to fight fire with fire.' Texas Democratic lawmakers, vastly outnumbered in that state's legislature, delayed approval of the new map by 15 days by fleeing Texas earlier this month in protest. They were assigned round-the-clock police monitoring upon their return to ensure they attended Wednesday's session. Advertisement That session ended with an 88-52 party-line vote approving the map after more than eight hours of debate. Democrats have also vowed to challenge the new Texas map in court and complained that Republicans made the political power move before passing legislation responding to deadly floods that swept the state last month. A battle for the US House control waged via redistricting In a sign of Democrats' stiffening redistricting resolve, former President Barack Obama on Tuesday night backed Newsom's bid to redraw the California map, saying it was a necessary step to stave off the GOP's Texas move. 'I think that approach is a smart, measured approach,' Obama said during a fundraiser for the Democratic Party's main redistricting arm. The incumbent president's party usually loses congressional seats in the midterm election. On a national level, the partisan makeup of existing districts puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. Trump is going beyond Texas in his push to remake the map. He's pushed Republican leaders in conservative states like Indiana and Missouri to also try to create new Republican seats. Ohio Republicans were already revising their map before Texas moved. Democrats, meanwhile, are mulling reopening Maryland's and New York's maps as well. However, more Democratic-run states have commission systems like California's or other redistricting limits than Republican ones do, leaving the GOP with a freer hand to swiftly redraw maps. New York, for example, can't draw new maps until 2028, and even then, only with voter approval. The struggle for — and against — Texas redistricting Texas Republicans openly said they were acting in their party's interest. State Rep. Todd Hunter, who wrote the legislation formally creating the new map, noted that the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed politicians to redraw districts for nakedly partisan purposes. Advertisement There was little that outnumbered Democrats could do other than fume and threaten a lawsuit to block the map. Because the Supreme Court has blessed purely partisan gerrymandering, the only way opponents can stop the new Texas map would be by arguing it violates the Voting Rights Act requirement to keep minority communities together so they can select representatives of their choice. House Republicans' frustration at the Democrats' flight and ability to delay the vote was palpable during the Wednesday vote. House Speaker Dustin Burrows announced as debate started that doors to the chamber were locked and any member leaving was required to have a permission slip. The doors were only unlocked after final passage more than eight hours later. Republicans issued civil arrest warrants to bring the Democrats back after they left the state Aug. 3, and Abbott asked the state Supreme Court to oust several Democrats from office. The lawmakers also face a fine of $500 for every day they were absent. Associated Press journalists John Hanna in Topeka, Kansas, and Sara Cline in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, contributed to this report.


The Hill
41 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump raises prospect of Ukraine attacks on Russia: ‘Impossible' to win without attacking invader country
President Trump on Thursday promised 'interesting times ahead' as he raised the prospect of Ukraine launching an offensive against Russia, amid signs that the Kremlin could be slow-walking progress on a peace deal. In a post on the Truth Social platform, the president seemed to justify a hypothetical offensive against Russia and criticized the Biden administration's longstanding policy against Ukraine using U.S. long-range missiles to attack inside Russia. 'It is very hard, if not impossible, to win a war without attacking an invaders country. It's like a great team in sports that has a fantastic defense, but is not allowed to play offense. There is no chance of winning! It is like that with Ukraine and Russia,' Trump wrote in his post. 'Crooked and grossly incompetent Joe Biden would not let Ukraine FIGHT BACK, only DEFEND. How did that work out? Regardless, this is a war that would have NEVER happened if I were President – ZERO CHANCE,' he continued. 'Interesting times ahead!!!' Two weeks after Trump's 2024 victory, former President Biden authorized a major shift in U.S. policy to allow Ukraine to use long-range U.S. missiles to attack sites in Russia. Trump, at the time, sharply criticized the decision, calling it 'stupid' and saying he 'might' consider reversing the decision, adding, 'I think it was a very stupid thing to do.' 'I don't think that should have been allowed, not when there's a possibility — certainly not just weeks before I take over,' Trump said at a press conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort last December. 'Why would they do that without asking me what I thought? I wouldn't have had him do that. I think it was a big mistake.' Lawmakers in both parties generally offered support for the shift, with some Republicans saying the move was welcome but came too late. Other Republicans, including many of Trump's supporters, echoed the president's sentiment and called the move escalatory. Trump's latest public musing about a hypothetical Ukrainian offensive comes as Russian officials have expressed some doubt about early prospects of a peace deal, including on potential security guarantees for Kyiv and a bilateral meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.


Newsweek
43 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Democrat Switches Party to Republican to Run Against Wes Moore
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Maryland Democrat Ed Hale announced this week he is switching parties to become a Republican and run against Democratic Governor Wes Moore, who is up for reelection in the 2026 midterms. Todd Eberly, professor of political science at St. Mary's College of Maryland, told Newsweek that Hale may have a better chance of winning a Republican primary than a Democratic one against Moore, but that he is likely to be met with skepticism from many GOP voters. Newsweek reached out to the Moore and Hale campaigns for comment via email and online contact form, respectively. Why It Matters Maryland is generally a solidly Democratic state, but it has elected moderate Republican governors in the past. The governorship was held by Republicans Larry Hogan from 2015 to 2023 and Bob Ehrlich from 2003 to 2007. Moore is viewed as a rising star in the Democratic Party and has been named a potential candidate for the 2028 presidential race, though he has said he is more focused on serving his state than thinking ahead to the upcoming race for the White House. What To Know Hale, a businessman and owner of the professional indoor soccer team Baltimore Blast, announced that he would run for governor of Maryland in May as a Democrat, setting up a primary challenge against Moore. However, he said this week he would instead run as a Republican, Baltimore-based news station WBFF reported. Hale said during the launch event that he does not believe he would be able to defeat Moore in the Democratic primary, according to WBFF. "He takes all the money and oxygen out of the room," Hale said. He emphasized job creation and "common-sense pragmatism" during the launch. He said he is a lifelong Democrat but has never been a loyalist, adding that he voted for both Hogan and Ehrlich. Maryland Governor Wes Moore speaks at the 2025 ESSENCE Festival of Culture in New Orleans on July 6, 2025. Maryland Governor Wes Moore speaks at the 2025 ESSENCE Festival of Culture in New Orleans on July 6, ESSENCE Eberly told Newsweek that Hale may face a challenge in appealing to MAGA-aligned voters in the GOP primary. "For his admission, he said this is sort of an opportunistic switch because he knows he couldn't defeat Moore in a primary, so he's switching to run as a Republican," Eberly said. "I don't know that voters necessarily respond well to opportunistic maneuvers like that." However, Moore could be vulnerable against a strong Republican candidate as his approval has dropped in recent months, Eberly said. Moore has faced criticism over the state's budget situation, and the competitiveness of the race could hinge on whether lawmakers successfully address that in the next legislative session, he said. Still, there are some factors that could favor Moore, including the fact that 2026 is likely to be a stronger national environment for Democrats, and he can run as a foil to President Donald Trump, Eberly said. Other Republicans, such as businessman Carl Brunner and former Senate candidate John Myrick, are also running. Hogan has also been floated as a potential candidate. In Maryland, governors cannot serve more than two consecutive terms but are able to serve non-consecutively. Republicans are hopeful Hogan could make the race competitive if he chooses to run. Hogan may be the Republican who poses the biggest threat to Moore, Eberly said. What People Are Saying Professor Todd Eberly told Newsweek: "When Hogan won for Senate, he secured about 64 percent of support in the primary because he was challenged by perennial candidate here in Maryland who aligned with President Trump. So there was a MAGA vote, if you will, because Hogan isn't particularly popular with Trump-aligned Republicans. The person with deepest pockets in a Republican primary against Hogan would be Hale, but I don't think Hale would have that appeal to Trump voters." Maryland Senate Minority Leader Steve Hershey told WBFF: "The Republican nomination for governor will not be handed out to the highest-profile defector from the left. It must be earned. If Mr. Hale is sincere, he'll need to demonstrate it—not just in announcements, but in sustained, demonstrable action." What Happens Next The Maryland primary will be held June 23, 2026, and the general election will be November 3, 2026. The Cook Political Report currently classifies the race as Solid Democrat.