How Work is Different This Summer
Year-round flexibility policies have changed the way many workers and workplaces approach summer work schedules, as we wrote last year. Gone are the days when offices cleared out for seasonal 'summer Fridays.' Now, says Jacqueline Sharma, VP of people at HR platform Envoy, the company's data show that Friday attendance is consistently lower than other days regardless of time of year.
But, as economic uncertainty constrains household travel budgets and adds pressures to workers, setting aside time to rest and recharge is more important than ever—even as it becomes more difficult. According to a survey from HR platform Dayforce, 71% of workers say there are factors standing in the way of taking time off, including being unable to afford it and feeling too busy to do so.
Here are other data points that show how work and time off will be different this summer:
Shrinking budgets are transforming summer travel. A majority of Americans are planning to take at least one vacation this summer, though many are saving money by driving instead of flying, staying with friends and family instead of at a hotel, or shortening their trips, according to a Deloitte survey on summer travel plans. As of early June, airlines are seeing 10% fewer sumer bookings relative to the same period in 2024.
On average, workers request 40% more time-off requests during the summer, according to data from HR software company Paycom. Last year, the most commonly requested day off was July 5, with over four times more requests for paid time off (PTO) than the average day in 2024. To help workers coordinate workflows amid PTO days and zombie crews, teams can adopt team-wide days off or no-meeting days on popular travel days. Charter, for example, added an additional team-wide mental health and wellbeing day directly ahead of Memorial Day and July 4.
Beyond team-wide days off, clarity around vacation policies and templates for out-of-office (OOO) messages and PTO plans can help minimize disruptions to ongoing work and empower more workers to take the time they need.
People are working on vacation at higher rates. The share of workers who say they disconnect completely from work during vacation has steadily declined over the past four years, according to data from Dayforce. In 2023 it was 47%, compared to 39% and 37% last year and this year, respectively. While remote-work privileges are allowing some workers to extend their vacation—allowing 'workcationers' to prolong their longest summer trips by an average of three days, according to Deloitte—the expectation to be always on may also prevent workers from resting, recharging, and connecting with friends and family during trips.
Help your team make the most of remote work while ensuring they also have time to actually unplug by offering work-from-anywhere (WFA) days in addition to PTO. Prudential Financial, for example, allows employees to work entirely remotely from anywhere in the US for four weeks per year. Managers can serve as models, whether that's taking regular WFA and PTO days, sharing their OOO plans well ahead of time, or completely unplugging during PTO days.
Summer care gaps are putting extra pressure on working parents. Among working parents, 76% say their level of focus during the summer is directly tied to the reliability of their children's summer-care arrangements, according to a survey from Bright Horizons. Some 68% of respondents said that summer feels like a break for everyone but themselves.
Respondents pointed to several unique summer challenges, including having to leave work early for activity pick up and drop off, worrying about what kids are up to at home, and managing summer care schedules that don't align with work schedules.
More than three-fourths of respondents shared that they wish their employer offered more support in navigating summer-care arrangements. PwC offers one model for summer-care support.
'As the different schools are letting out across the country, we're talking about our summer camps and some of the child-care offerings that might be even more popular during the summer months,' says Kim Jones, PwC's talent strategy and people experience leader. Those resources include discounted summer camps, a backup child-care reimbursement, and access to an online care marketplace.
Jones used many of PwC's child-care and flexibility benefits when her own daughter was young, noting that the support 'goes a long way towards helping you feel engaged with the organization, helping you want to perform at your best, helping you feel like your work is respected along with your personal life.' she says.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
13 minutes ago
- Business Insider
I moved from San Diego to Southern Italy for a simpler, slower life, but the best part was that I fell in love
It was 2019. I was reasonably healed from a grueling divorce, and I began to think about what I wanted my life to look like when I was solo. My son, Max, would be graduating in a couple of years, and I knew I didn't want to remain in this empty nest. San Diego had never felt like a forever home. When I was married, my now ex-husband and I discussed traveling around the world when our son graduated, and staying in one place for a few months at a time. For me, though, the idea of living out of a suitcase sounded like a nightmare. Where would I like to live? I asked myself. The answer was simple: Italy. After the divorce, I'd taken my second trip to Italy, spending a challenging but cathartic week hiking the Dolomite mountains in the north and processing my emotions in a yoga retreat in Lucca. A few years later, I took a solo trip to Sardinia. Something kept pulling me back to this country, which was surprising to me because I'd always been drawn to France. I even majored in French and studied abroad there. However, whenever I visited Italy, the people were wonderfully welcoming. And because I'd studied French, picking up Italian was easy. Why not move to Italy? What have I got to lose? Cleaning my empty nest I'll admit, I had qualms about packing up and leaving my teenage son. Okay, I wouldn't actually be leaving him since he was moving thousands of miles away to Orlando, but still, not being a few hours away by plane felt neglectful. People asked me how Max felt about his mother moving so far away. I asked him myself and got a shrug. "I dunno. It's cool." I took that as his blessing. The week after I bravely hid my tears as Max embraced me and headed into his own bright future, a moving company collected my paltry 11 boxes. I gave the keys to the rental house to our landlord, hugged my friends (not bothering to hide the tears this time), and boarded a plane with two cats in tow. It was the fall of 2022. This is how life is meant to be Despite being born in the US, I'd never felt truly at home in any American city. I never bought into the whole " hustle culture" and always longed for a simpler life. Whenever I'd come back from my many trips to Europe over the years, I'd promise myself that I'd slow down and savor life, which seemed to be so easy abroad. That effort never lasted long, though, and I would inevitably fall back into feeling harried. However, in Italy, life is slower. There's always time to stop and have a coffee and chat with friends. Evenings over Aperol Spritzes seem endless in the golden summer light. My work day only begins once I've had my swim in the Ionian Sea. Whereas Americans are seemingly slaves to work, Italians prioritize life. That may mean that the office you need to visit will be closed when you go, since the owner decided to close early and have an aperitivo (pre-dinner drink) with friends. Still, I love that people work to live here, not the other way around. And you don't have to take out a loan to live well. As a freelance writer, my unsteady income goes a lot further here in the south of Italy. Rent is so much cheaper in Calabria, the region where I live. In San Diego, I paid $2,500 a month for a two-bedroom house; in Italy, I had an apartment by the sea with two bedrooms for under $500 a month. And now we live rent-free in a house my husband's family gave us. Groceries are so much cheaper and fresher. For the two of us, we can eat well for under $300 a month. It's a relief being here with these prices when I hear so much about how prices have skyrocketed back in the US. And while this slower life has been blessing enough, do you know the best thing that has happened to me? I fell in love. I met Francesco on a tour he was giving just nine months after I moved here (he's a tour guide). We got married on our two-year anniversary, surrounded by his welcoming family. My experience living in Italy has gotten even better now that I'm married and have a fantastic Italian family. With them, I've picked olives, made wine, canned tomatoes, made sausage, and learned Calabrian dialect. I'm more connected to what I eat and to the nature around me than I ever was in the US. I laugh at the fact that 10 years ago, I could never have imagined that I'd be living a fabulous life in a tiny Italian town, but my life is so much better for taking this leap. As for my son, he enjoys visiting and getting to know my husband and his family. He's even learning Italian.
CNBC
13 minutes ago
- CNBC
Student loan forgiveness remains unavailable under popular repayment plan
The Trump administration paused student loan forgiveness on a popular plan earlier this summer. It has not yet resumed the debt cancellation, and this week, lawmakers urged it to do so. The U.S. Department of Education said earlier this summer that it was pausing the loan discharge component on the Income Based Repayment, or IBR, plan. That freeze remains in place. It's a setback to families who have been expecting — and are legally entitled to — the aid, lawmakers, including Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., wrote to Education Secretary Linda McMahon on Monday. "At a time when Americans across the country are struggling to meet the costs of health care, food, housing, child care and other basic needs, it is unacceptable for the Trump administration to take any action that delays or denies legally mandated debt relief," the lawmakers wrote. More from Personal Finance:Trump floats tariff 'rebate' for consumersStudent loan forgiveness may soon be taxed againStudent loan borrowers — how will the end of the SAVE plan impact you? Tell us There are currently 1.97 million federal student loan borrowers enrolled in IBR, according to higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz. Here's what borrowers should know about the plan's paused loan cancellation. IBR is one of the Education Department's income-driven repayment plans, also called IDRs. Congress created the first IDR plans in the 1990s with the goal of making student loan borrowers' bills more affordable. Historically, the plans cap people's monthly payments at a share of their discretionary income and cancel any remaining debt after a certain period, typically 20 years or 25 years. IBR will be one of only a few manageable repayment options left to millions of borrowers, after recent court actions and the passage by Congress of President Donald Trump's "big beautiful bill." That legislation phases out several income-driven repayment plans. Under the terms of IBR, borrowers pay 10% of their discretionary income each month — and that share rises to 15% for certain borrowers with older loans. Debt forgiveness is supposed to come after 20 years or 25 years, depending on when you took out your loans. (Older loans are subject to the longer timeline.) The U.S. Department of Education told CNBC it paused loan forgiveness under IBR while it responds to recent court actions involving the Biden administration-era SAVE, or Saving on a Valuable Education, plan. The department said that the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in February, which blocked the SAVE plan, had other impacts on student loan repayment. For example, under the rule involving SAVE, certain periods during which borrowers postponed their payments would count toward their forgiveness timeline. With SAVE blocked, borrowers no longer get credit during those forbearances. Ellen Keast, deputy press secretary at the Education Department, said in a late July statement that IBR discharges would resume "as soon as the Department is able to establish the correct payment count." The Department did not immediately respond to questions about why the pause continues. "The federal government does not move very quickly, but I would have expected some progress by now," said Kantrowitz. The hold on IBR discharges shouldn't impact student loan borrowers who are still years away from debt forgiveness, experts said. In fact, since IBR became available only in 2009, the soonest many borrowers could qualify for forgiveness would be 2034, Kantrowitz said. The current delay in debt erasure would most likely impact borrowers who'd previously been enrolled in another IDR plan — Income-Contingent Repayment, or ICR — and later switched to IBR. If you're pursuing debt forgiveness under IBR, your payments made under the plan (or another income-driven repayment plan) will still be bringing you closer to debt cancellation, as long as you are enrolled in IBR when you become entitled to that relief. If you expected your debt to be forgiven shortly, you should continue making payments, Kantrowitz said. You don't want to be flagged as late, and any overpayments should be refunded to you, he added.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How the Trump administration could attack state laws it says stifle US economy
The Trump administration is hunting for state laws that drag down the US economy. But axing statutes it sees as problematic will depend on how it wields the Constitution's powerful Commerce Clause. Last Friday, the Justice Department and the National Economic Council announced a joint initiative to "address" state statutes that "significantly and adversely affect the national economy.' State regulations, policies, causes of action, and practices were also included as targets. The plan is meant to support the White House's deregulation agenda, which President Trump described in a series of separate executive orders issued in January, February, and April. Those orders emphasize the administration's goal of alleviating policies that it views as "unnecessary burdens" on Americans, small businesses, private enterprise, and entrepreneurship. In an unusual twist, the agencies also solicited help from US citizens, asking members of the public to point out economy-slowing state laws and to propose legal theories that could reverse the laws' adverse effects. "They're crowdsourcing their legal theories," said Emily Berman, a constitutional scholar with the University of Houston Law Center. However, the plan stopped short of explaining what theories the administration would rely on to undo suspected harmful state laws. Jeremy Rovinsky, a federal prosecutor who teaches constitutional law at Crestpoint University, said the language used in the DOJ's plan to attack state laws shows that the Trump administration has the Commerce Clause in mind. "It's clear that Trump's lawyers are thinking through it this way," Rovinsky said. "The Supreme Court has allowed the federal government to regulate state power in an almost unlimited way." But the Commerce Clause doesn't guarantee the administration power to alter state law. The provision vests power to regulate commerce in Congress, not in the executive branch. A more straightforward type of challenge, the lawyer said, is one where state law directly conflicts with federal statutes. In those cases, the Justice Department could raise preemption challenges under the Constitution's Supremacy Clause. Preemption challenges argue that a state rule essentially steps on the federal government's toes, Berman said. The Commerce Clause Absent such a clear-cut conflict, the administration would need more legal leverage to countermand state law. That leverage could come from the Commerce Clause, the constitutional scholar said, which empowers Congress to regulate interstate and foreign commerce. "Anything that regulates commerce falls within the scope of Congress's authority, which has been interpreted relatively broadly," Berman said. To tap into the federal government's authority over commerce, the administration would need to persuade lawmakers to pass new federal legislation invalidating state law. Ravinsky said he sees the DOJ's announcement as an opening salvo to persuade members of Congress. "I think the people that are in [Trump's] inner legal circle wrote that document the way they did, because they want to give Congress a heads up to have them codify what he's doing with executive actions into actual congressional legislation," Ravinsky said. Jonathan Entin, professor emeritus at Case Western Reserve School of Law, said it's possible, but not certain, that pressure on Congress from either President Trump or others in the executive branch would lead to new, preemptive federal laws. "If the president says this is a big priority, then maybe a fair number of people in both the House and the Senate would go along with it," Entin said. "Now, whether there will be enough votes, that's a separate question," he added. "Congress does not legislate very much." "If Congress wants to move legislation against state laws that they say hurt the economy, they need 60 votes in the Senate," Entin said. "And the chances of getting 60 votes in the Senate for much of anything these days are pretty slim." The Supreme Court has largely upheld Congress' power over interstate commerce in a series of cases evaluating the Commerce Clause stretching back more than 80 years. In 1942, the Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in Wickard v. Filburn that expanded the federal government's regulatory power under the Commerce Clause. The case involved an Ohio farmer who grew more wheat than permitted under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938. The court rejected the farmer's argument that the federal government could not regulate his excess wheat supply under the act because it was grown for personal, rather than commercial, use. In a unanimous 8-0 decision, the court reasoned that while a single farmer's excess crop may not substantially impact interstate commerce, the same actions, if taken in the aggregate by multiple farmers, could indeed influence the national market. Despite the Supreme Court's longstanding support for expansive application of the Commerce Clause, Entin suspects that even new federal legislation could fail to preempt certain state laws. States still retain their police powers, he said, and can exercise those powers as long as doing so doesn't interfere with interstate commerce. "It's not clear to me that Congress can use its commerce power to preempt the state's exercise of their police powers, even if state laws may, in fact, be unwise or even foolish," Entin said. The 'dormant' Commerce Clause Still another, and equally uncertain, path to challenge state laws could involve a judge-created theory known as the "Dormant Commerce Clause," the lawyers said. The concept further expands Congress' power over interstate and foreign commerce by limiting states' authority to regulate commerce even when Congress has not directly legislated on an issue. The theory is intended to prevent states from adopting discriminatory, protectionist laws that benefit local economies to the detriment of the national market. The theory was put to the test and shown to have limits in a recent case decided by the Supreme Court. In 2023, the court loosely upheld a California state law known as Proposition 12, which criminalized California sales of pork meat that came from pigs housed in pens measuring less than 24 square feet — 10 square feet larger than the industry standard. The Iowa Pork Producers Association and 23 states argued that the law discriminated against out-of-state pork producers, imposing excessive burdens on interstate commerce. However, Berman said, Dormant Commerce Clause challenges to state rules have historically been brought by private litigants, not the federal government. "It's going to be a private business sector actor saying, 'Our business is being harmed ... we shouldn't have barriers to markets along state lines." Entin agreed that it would be unusual for the federal government to sue states over their regulations. Alternatively, he said, Congress could try to persuade states to change laws through conditional federal spending. The administration may not find support from the high court for pushing Congress' authority over commerce even further, Entin added. Conservatives on the court in recent years have expressed "real skepticism" about whether courts should be in the business of enforcing the Commerce Clause, he said. Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow Alexis on X @alexiskweed. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
