Nkabane: Parties rejecting budget of Higher Education Dept punishing SA students
She said those calling for her head are misogynistic and against transformation in the post-school sector.
ALSO READ: Majority of political parties in NCOP reject higher education dept's budget, call for Nkabane's axing
Nkabane was motivating her budget in the National Council of Provinces (NCOP) on Tuesday, where the majority of political parties said she was failing at her job and couldn't be trusted to manage billions of rands.
She, however, avoided responding to her handling of the appointment of boards for the Sector Education and Training Authorities (SETA), which has landed her in hot water.
As the Democratic Alliance (DA) on Tuesday sought to increase the pressure on Nkabane to step down or be fired, it laid a complaint against her with the police for misleading Parliament.
Hours later, Nkabane faced the DA's parliamentary caucus, who along with the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), slammed her management of the department and said they didn't support the budget.
But Nkabane held her ground.
'They are not rejecting the budget of Nobuhle Nkabane. This is not the budget of Nobuhle Nkabane. This is the budget of the people of South Africa.'
In attempts to counter claims that she's failing to root out corruption in the National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS), Nkabane said she had gone to court to cancel a monthly R2.5 million office lease in Cape Town, and to stop the contracts of payment service providers who don't deliver.
'When you are against transformation, it irritates a lot when you see such a young woman leading such a huge ministry in your presence.
"It's misogyny. I understand it, I know where it's coming from, and worse when it's a black woman.'
On Thursday, Nkabane can expect more backlash as she moves to the National Assembly to motivate the budget.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Politicians dangle immigration control as election bait
As elections near, political parties revive anti-illegal immigration rhetoric to lure frustrated voters while long-standing issues remain unresolved. A disgruntled South African job seeker belonging to Alexandra Dudula Movement holds a banner reading Foreigners Must Go Home during their operation to remove foreign street vendors on pavements and stalls in Alexandra township in Johannesburg on February 13, 2022. (Photo by Phill Magakoe / AFP) With the mushrooming of political parties ahead of next year's local government elections, it is becoming obvious that the campaign ticket is 'abahambe' – undocumented foreigners must go. Operation Dudula started its movement and gained popularity as a result of this. The Patriotic Alliance members at some point stood at a porous river blocking illegal crossing of foreigners, coining the abahambe slogan. Since then, we have seen a zoning in on the effects of the lack of immigration control that has plagued South Africa. Houses have been hijacked, services and utilities driven into hundreds of thousands in arrears. Spaza shops on every corner and run from RDP houses meant for the poor. Then, the expired food fiasco and food manufactured on site, the shops doubling up as living and sleep areas. ALSO READ: Gauteng Traffic Police and Home Affairs immigration officers arrested for kidnapping and theft All of a sudden, our political parties see it fit that it is time to regulate the industry. This is despite the fact that home affairs officials are arrested more frequently over corruption. Our cities are in disarray. South Africans who speak out on immigration control, or its lack thereof, are labelled as xenophobic. If the stories are true that government clinics are serving more foreigners than South Africans, then somewhere, something is fundamentally wrong. This is not a call to refuse medical assistance to those in need, but rather a question as to where are South Africans going for assistance because, as said by one woman on social media: 'We have been pushed out of hospitals and forced to go to private practitioners.' Who, then, are government clinics meant for? ALSO READ: Two immigration specialists arrested in Beitbridge corruption probe Let it be understood, compliance is regulation and not xenophobia. The government often talks of good neighbourly relations, a welcoming home for all Africans… but the same government now refuses to take any more strain from illegal immigrants. Even though the economy is in under strain, the timing of the government's admission is nothing short of dubious. It was first brought to our attention in 2008. The nerve for us to feign shock and horror when illegal foreigners took the government to court, forcing its hand to allow their stay and the enjoyment of civic provision. What the politicians use as an electioneering tool, which is close to the hearts of every citizen, becomes the carrot dangled for votes at election time.
Daily Maverick
6 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Tanzania turns back clock to brutal, repressive Magufuli era as elections loom
President Samia Suluhu Hassan's government is increasingly abusing anti-terrorism legislation to suppress genuine political opposition before the October polls, according to NGO Intelwatch. The government of Tanzania's President Samia Suluhu Hassan 'has begun a systematic, unrelenting and brutal clampdown on critics, opposition leaders, civil society and even foreign activists' ahead of the October 2025 elections. Hassan's government is also increasingly abusing anti-terrorism legislation to suppress genuine political opposition before the polls, according to a report, Tanzania's Repression of Dissent under the Guise of Counterterrorism by Intelwatch, a South African-based NGO dedicated to strengthening public oversight of state and private intelligence agencies in southern Africa and around the world. 'The human rights situation has regressed to levels reminiscent of the Magufuli era, marked by enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings and systematic repression,' the report says, referring to Hassan's predecessor John Magufuli, who became notorious for his brutal crackdowns on any political dissent. 'The counterterrorism task forces, notorious for the alleged kidnapping and killing of perceived government critics, have resurfaced with full force, targeting opposition figures, activists and journalists,' the report continues. Tundu Lissu arrest It cites in particular the arrest on 9 April 2025 of opposition Chadema party leader Tundu Lissu on charges of treason, which carries a potential death penalty. This was because he vowed that Chadema would boycott and disrupt the elections in the absence of reforms, such as an independent electoral commission to ensure free and fair polls. His arrest almost ensures that the October elections will go ahead without any real opposition to the ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM), the report says. The report notes that after encouraging signs of political reform after she succeeded Magufuli in 2021, Hassan has reverted to type ahead of the elections, deploying the same methods and colonial-era and anti-terrorism legislation to undermine political freedoms and curtail opposition activities to ensure the CCM maintains its unbroken grip on power since independence. The report notes that especially after the 9/11 bombings in the US in 2001, Tanzania came under especially US pressure to strengthen its counterterrorism legislation, particularly adding provisions to address money laundering to curtail terrorism financing. Abuse of legislation However, it adds that instead of combating terrorism, these tougher measures have been repeatedly used to 'quash political opposition, muzzle independent journalism and target human rights defenders'. It cites the case of at least 50 leaders of the Association for Islamic Mobilisation and Propagation (Uamsho), a Muslim group advocating for Zanzibar's secession from the union with Tanzania, who were detained for almost nine years from 2012 to 2021. 'Despite their release, it is estimated that at least another 150 clerics are still behind bars', the report says. The report cites the case of Wilfred Lwakatare, an opposition leader from the main opposition party Chadema, who was arrested in 2013 and fought lengthy court battles before being released. Chadema leader Freeman Mbowe was arrested in 2021 – under Hassan's presidency – on terrorism charges for allegedly financing terrorist activities with the intent of assassinating government officials. No credible evidence was presented and Hassan had the case dropped after behind-the-scenes negotiations between her and Mbowe. The report says the abuse of anti-terror legislation took off with President Jakaya Kikwete and peaked under Magufuli, who was elected in 2015 and died in office in 2021, apparently of Covid. Extrajudicial killings and disappearances spiked under Magufuli. A 'credible' estimate is that security forces killed at least 3,000 people between 2016 and 2020, the report says. Tanzania plunged in the World Press Freedom Index, from 71 in 2016 to 124 in 2021 (out of 180 countries) after the government introduced stringent regulations curtailing freedom of expression. The police actively monitored internet and social media communications 'to suppress debates and messaging which portrayed Magufuli in an unfavourable light'. Optimism snuffed out The report notes that when then vice-president Hassan succeeded Magufuli, there was initial optimism that she might usher in a new era of respect for the rule of law and human rights, particularly concerning counter-terrorism efforts. She did introduce some political reforms, notably lifting Magufuli's ban on political rallies; ordering the release of prisoners facing money laundering, economic sabotage and terrorism charges; freeing the 36 Uamsho clerics; issuing a stern warning to the police and security agencies against targeting civilians; and appointing a bipartisan task force to propose minimum electoral reforms ahead of the 2025 elections. However, very little came of these moves and the hopes of reform were dashed when opposition Chadema leader Mbowe was arrested. As it became clear that the state had no evidence against him, and under mounting domestic and international pressure, Hassan eventually released Mbowe in exchange for 'reconciliation' talks between Chadema and CCM. Brutality after democracy pretensions abandoned The Intelwatch report says, 'if any evidence were needed to confirm that President Hassan and her advisers have abandoned all pretensions to democracy and reform, it is the recent wave of attacks on foreign human rights defenders that came to support Lissu ahead of his treason trial'. It notes that a group of politicians, jurists and human rights activists from the region, including former Kenyan Minister of Justice Martha Karua, 'renowned Kenyan human rights defender' Boniface Mwangia, and Agather Atuhairet, a 'high-profile Ugandan lawyer-activist', were detained at Julius Nyerere International Airport in Dar es Salaam on 18 May 2025. They were kept in police custody for four days, the report said. Karua and Athuhairet were 'brutally tortured, humiliated and tormented… both … suffered inhuman, degrading and brutal treatment'. They were allegedly handcuffed and blindfolded, told to strip naked and tortured, and sexually assaulted before being dumped on the Kenyan border, the report said. But the report adds that such cases are not new, as opposition figures have continued to disappear or be murdered under Hassan's rule. It cites Chadema's secretary, Ally Kibao, who was kidnapped in September 2024 from a bus in broad daylight. His lifeless body, the face burned with acid, was dumped in a forest. In July 2024, 24-year-old artist Shadrack Chaula was sentenced to two years in prison or a fine of $2,000 for drawing and burning a picture of President Hassan. After paying the fine and securing his release, Chaula 'disappeared less than a month later and has never been seen again'. State repression The report says that 'Tanzania's transformation into a surveillance state has been largely facilitated by external actors who have provided sophisticated technological capabilities, training and operational support to the country's security apparatus.' It cites mainly China, Russia and Israel for supplying such technology, though also mentioning Western countries. The report concludes that 'the history and evolution of state repression in Tanzania reveals a disconcerting narrative of a democracy in decline — one in which counterterrorism has become a euphemism for authoritarian consolidation. 'Under the guise of ensuring national security, successive leaders have normalised arbitrary arrests and detentions, enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, digital surveillance and the silencing of dissent. 'The brief moments of optimism under President Hassan's early presidency, when reformist rhetoric suggested a push towards democratic renewal, have quickly given way to the weaponisation of terrorism legislation against opposition leaders such as Tundu Lissu. 'The brutal treatment of foreign human rights defenders, and the systemic targeting of journalists and activists indicate an intensification of the repressive apparatus honed under President Magufuli. 'Held in such an atmosphere of digital authoritarianism and the attendant fear and repression, the October 2025 elections are unlikely to produce an outcome reflecting the democratic will of Tanzanians.' Intelwatch urged the international community, regional partners and Tanzanian citizens to address the crisis 'with urgency and resolve' or 'the Tanzanian model will become a blueprint for future repression across Africa'. DM
eNCA
8 hours ago
- eNCA
Minister Creecy tables budget before parliament
CAPE TOWN - It was a day for budget votes. Some were more controversial than others after the DA said it would boycott the budgets of at least two departments presided over by compromised minister. It's the final leg of the national budget process because the Appropriation Bill can only be passed if all departmental votes have been agreed to. One of the less controversial budget vote was for transport – although opposition parties criticised none the less.
