&w=3840&q=100)
Trump's White House eyes stake in Intel in exchange for easing political pressure: Report
The Trump administration was reportedly exploring the possibility of taking a financial stake in Intel Corp., a move that could both advance President Donald Trump's domestic manufacturing goals and reduce political tensions surrounding the company's chief executive, Lip-Bu Tan.
According to sources cited by The Wall Street Journal, people familiar with the matter indicated that these discussions were still at an early stage and might ultimately collapse. The president raised the idea during a Monday meeting at the White House with Tan. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent were also present. The meeting reportedly followed several days of heightened scrutiny over Intel's links to China, amid a broader US push to secure control over critical semiconductor manufacturing.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Bloomberg was the first to report on the talks. Following the news, Intel's shares closed the day up more than 7 percent, with further gains in after-hours trading, The Wall Street Journal reported.
From criticism to courting
The overture toward Intel marked a sharp shift in tone from the previous week, when Trump publicly called for Tan's immediate resignation. Writing on his Truth Social platform, the president had accused the CEO of being 'highly conflicted,' citing his investments in Chinese technology firms. Those comments followed a letter from Republican Senator Tom Cotton questioning whether Tan had divested from companies linked to the Chinese Communist Party and the People's Liberation Army.
Despite the earlier criticism, Trump struck a conciliatory note after their White House meeting, reportedly praising Tan's career and success story. The president also suggested that the Intel chief would meet with Cabinet members and return with proposals within a week. This apparent reversal hinted at the administration's willingness to work with Tan, even while concerns over his past business ties lingered, The Wall Street Journal said.
Strategic significance of Intel
The Trump administration have reportedly identified Intel as the domestic company best positioned to challenge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) in the global chip fabrication market. For months, the White House has sought to expand America's share of semiconductor manufacturing as part of a broader 'America First' industrial strategy.
Industry observers told the American business daily that tech firms have been quick to emphasise US investments in order to gain favour with the administration and secure beneficial policy treatment. Jim Secreto, a former Commerce Department official during the Biden administration, was quoted as saying that the Trump team understood the considerable leverage it held over the technology sector.
If completed, a government stake in Intel would join a list of unprecedented interventions by Trump in the private sector. In recent months, the administration reportedly struck a deal with Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices requiring each to pay the government 15 percent of their China sales in exchange for export licenses. Similarly, in Nippon Steel's takeover of US Steel, the president secured a 'golden share,' granting him influence over the company's operations.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Intel's current challenges
Even with possible government backing, there are doubts about Intel's capacity to substantially increase US capital spending, given its current financial and operational difficulties. The company's losses reportedly widened to $2.9 billion in the second quarter.
Tan, who assumed leadership of Intel in March after serving on its board since 2022, inherited these challenges alongside a wave of restructuring measures. The company has announced layoffs, scaled back its foundry business, cancelled planned manufacturing sites in Germany and Poland and delayed a high-profile facility in Ohio. Speaking to analysts in July, Tan acknowledged that turning the company around would take time and patience, noting that 'a lot' needed to be fixed in order to move forward, CNBC reported.
Geopolitical backdrop
The talks between Trump and Intel also unfolded against a shifting geopolitical backdrop. Over the weekend preceding the meeting, Trump announced a 90-day extension on the suspension of tariffs on Chinese imports while trade negotiations continued. He emphasised that all other elements of the agreement with Beijing would remain unchanged.
This broader US–China technology rivalry has put semiconductor policy at the centre of economic and national security discussions.
Market and industry reactions
The market appeared to welcome news of the potential White House–Intel arrangement. Beyond the 7 per cent surge in Intel's stock price on the day of the report, shares rose an additional 2 per cent in extended trading. Investors reportedly viewed the possibility of government support as a temporary confidence boost, though questions remained about Intel's long-term strategy.
Looking ahead
While no formal deal has yet been announced, the talks highlight both the fragility of Intel's current position and the administration's willingness to wield economic tools to achieve strategic goals. For Tan, a successful arrangement could mean relief from immediate political attacks, a stronger financial footing for Intel's turnaround efforts and a public signal of confidence from a president who just days earlier had demanded his resignation.
For Trump, securing a stake in Intel would reinforce his message of revitalising US manufacturing, bolster the domestic semiconductor industry and demonstrate his administration's readiness to reshape corporate governance through direct government involvement. However, it could also spark debates over the proper limits of presidential power in private industry and the risks of politicising critical technology sectors.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Intel, for its part, issued a statement reaffirming its support for the administration's efforts to strengthen US technology and manufacturing leadership, while declining to comment on what it described as rumours. Whether the discussions produce a concrete agreement or fade amid political and market complexities, the episode highlights the high stakes at the intersection of technology policy, corporate strategy and presidential politics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
13 minutes ago
- First Post
Rubio: Trump-Putin progress warrants Zelenskyy, European leaders' Washington meeting
Talks between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin have created enough momentum for a follow-up meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders in Washington. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed progress on key issues, including borders, security guarantees, and Ukraine's military alliances, though he warned significant compromises would be required from both Russia and Ukraine. Talks between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin sparked enough momentum to warrant a meeting with Ukrainian and European leaders, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told CBS on Sunday. Rubio also stated that both Russia and Ukraine would have to make compromises to stop the war, and that the US may be unable to create a situation that ensures peace. European leaders will accompany Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to Washington on Monday, hoping to buttress him as Trump urges Ukraine to accept a speedy peace accord following his meeting with Putin on Friday. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I'm not saying we're on the verge of a peace deal, but I am saying that we saw movement, enough movement to justify a follow-up meeting with Zelenskyy and the Europeans,' Rubio told the 'Face the Nation' show. Rubio's comments were among the first by senior US officials present at the talks with Putin. In a social media post, Trump wrote, 'BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA. STAY TUNED!' he gave no details Speaking separately to Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' program, Rubio said the talks had narrowed down the key issues. These included drawing borders, long-term security guarantees for Kyiv, and which military alliances Ukraine could have, he said, adding 'there's a lot of work that remains.' Putin has ruled out Ukraine becoming a member of NATO. Article 5 of the alliance's charter is a mutual defence pact obliging allies to defend a member from attacks. Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy to Russia, told CNN that the US side had won 'the concession that the United States could offer Article Five-like protection.' Pressed for details, he said, 'the United States is potentially prepared to be able to give Article Five security guarantees, but not from NATO, directly from the United States, and other European countries.' This would be one of the topics for discussion on Monday, he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to sources, Trump and Putin discussed proposals for Russia to relinquish tiny pockets of occupied Ukraine in exchange for Ukraine ceding a swathe of fortified land in the east and freezing the front lines elsewhere. 'We may not like it, it may not be pleasant, it may be distasteful, but in order for there to be an end of the war, there are things Russia wants that it cannot get, and there are things Ukraine wants that it's not going to get,' said Rubio. In a separate interview with ABC, Rubio said if a deal could not be reached to end the war, existing US sanctions on Russia would continue, and more could be added. When Zelenskyy visited the White House in February, the meeting ended in a shouting match. Rubio, speaking to CBS, dismissed the idea that the European leaders were coming to Washington to protect Zelenskyy. 'They're not coming here tomorrow to keep Zelenskyy from being bullied. They're coming here tomorrow because we've been working with the Europeans,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We invited them to come.'
Hans India
13 minutes ago
- Hans India
Ageing population, high debt seen as drags on China's growth ahead
China is expected to face an adverse economic impact in the coming decades due to its ageing population and high government debt, according to reports. High government debt raises interest costs and leaves less fiscal room to respond to shocks, just as ageing populations push up pension and health outlays, according to a report in Newsweek. The Chinese and US governments are among the most indebted in the world. The US government's gross debt at 123 per cent is equal to the country's GDP, according to International Monetary Fund data. China's stands at 84 per cent, buoyed by debt-driven growth in the 2010s and a housing market crunch that has heavily indebted local governments. London-based global advisory firm Oxford Economics estimates the Chinese economy's potential growth could be cut roughly in half by the 2050s. According to the Newsweek report: "Soaring pension and healthcare expenses are the biggest policy challenge of the 2020s in all advanced economies and most emerging ones." As per a United Nations report, China currently has a median age of around 40, which is well above the global average, and is projected to reach 52 by 2050. This would be much higher than even the US median age, which is expected to stay around 41 years. China's old-age dependency ratio, or the share of people aged 65 and older, is projected to rise by more than 50 percentage points by 2026 compared to 2010, versus roughly 8-10 points in the United States. This will strain China's modest safety net. And unless the country is able to reverse its flagging birth rate, this will shift the burden onto a smaller pool of workers, according to the report in Newsweek. Jed Cartledge, an economist and one of the authors of the Oxford Economics report, said this better positions the US demographically. China's fertility rate of 1.2 births expected per woman is among the world's lowest. While higher, the US rate of 1.6 births remains well below the rate of 2.1 necessary to sustain a population naturally. Cartledge pointed out, however, that historically, immigration has largely offset declining births and averted demographic problems in the U.S. "Admittedly, US immigration is taking a hit under the second Trump presidency, but we're expecting the reduction in net immigration to only last through the remainder of his second term before reverting to a 1.1 million per annum, which was the typical pace prior to the pandemic," Cartledge told Newsweek.
Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Putin's ‘jelly legs' in Alaska meeting with Trump spark conspiracy theories online
As Russian President Vladimir Putin met US President Donald Trump in Alaska, a video of their conversation after their joint press conference has gone viral. It showed the Russian leader's legs 'twitching suspiciously' as he bid farewell to Trump. In the clip, the Russian leader kept dipping one knee as he stood beside Trump, making his legs appear wobbly.(X/ghostofRoc) The Kremlin footage showed Putin's knee jolting repeatedly as he stood in a corner talking to his US counterpart, along with a translator, flanked by security teams and aides. In the clip, the Russian leader kept dipping one knee as he stood beside Trump, making his legs appear wobbly, as he continued to raise his left toe and heel. Ukrainian social media users and news outlets were quick to float conspiracy theories to explain the Russian leader's actions. While some accused him of wearing "hidden platforms" in his shoes due to a 'Napoleon complex', others claimed that he donned an "exoskeleton' to better his posture. On X, many began theorising that the twitching and 'jelly legs' were caused by a "mysterious" health condition. "Putin may be suffering from a mysterious illness. The 72-year-old Putin with a swollen face is suffering from jelly legs (uncontrollable leg twitching)," claimed one user. Another remarked, 'What the heck is wrong with Putin? Look at his body, almost convulsing, unable to stand still.' Others theorised that the Russian leader never landed in Alaska and a body double was sent in his place to meet Trump. "I don't think a KGB Master Spy would shake his legs so much when standing. This guy ain't Putin," said one of them. Many also pointed to Putin's absence of his usual 'gunslinger gait.' The Russian leader usually walks with one arm still by his side and the other swinging, likely due to his KGB training, in which agents hold a gun close to themselves when walking.
