New EU Carbon Market Set To Hammer Households And Small Businesses
The European Union's (EU) new emissions trading system, expected to take effect in 2027, is set to hike prices for home heating and transportation, research firm BloombergNEF says in a new report.
The new EU Emissions Trading System for buildings, road transport, and small industry, dubbed ETS2, is scheduled to become fully operational in 2027.
ETS2 will cover and address the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fuel combustion in buildings, road transport, and additional sectors, mainly small industry not covered by the existing Emissions Trading System – EU ETS.
'So far, emission reductions in those sectors have been insufficient to put the EU on a firm path towards its 2050 climate neutrality goal. The carbon price set by the ETS2 will provide a market incentive for investments in building renovations and low-emissions mobility,' the European Commission says.
Although it will be a 'cap and trade' system like the existing EU ETS, the ETS2 will cover emissions upstream.
This means that it will be fuel suppliers, rather than end consumers such as households or car users, that will be required to monitor and report their emissions.
User may not pay directly, but fuel suppliers are likely to pass on the higher costs due to the carbon emissions trading.
Two years after the 2027 launch, the price of CO2 could jump to as much as $161 (149 euros) per metric ton in 2029, according to BloombergNEF's analysis. This would be more than double the current price of CO2 under the existing EU ETS trading system for emissions from industry and power plants.
Click here to read more.. .
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Tribune
3 days ago
- Daily Tribune
Court blocks Trump tariffs
AFP | Washington A US federal court blocked most of President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs, boosting markets yesterday with a ruling that could derail his trade strategy. The opinion marks a significant setback to Trump as he bids to redraw the US trading relationship with the world by forcing governments to the negotiating table through tough new tariffs. Trump's global trade war has roiled financial markets with a stop-start rollout of import levies aimed at punishing economies that sell more to the United States than they buy. Trump argued that the resulting trade deficits and the threat posed by the influx of drugs constituted a 'national emergency' that justified widespread tariffs. But the three-judge Court of International Trade ruled Wednesday that Trump had overstepped his authority, and barred most of the duties announced since he took office in January. Attorneys for the Trump administration promptly filed an appeal against the ruling, which gave the White House 10 days to complete the bureaucratic process of halting the tariffs. 'It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement. 'President Trump pledged to put America first, and the administration is committed to using every lever of executive power to address this crisis and restore American greatness,' Desai said. The ruling comes as Trump was using the tariffs as leverage in trade negotiations with friends and foes, including the European Union and China. Beijing -- which was hit by 145 percent tariffs before they were sharply reduced to give space for negotiations -- reacted to the court ruling by saying the United States should scrap the levies.
Daily Tribune
3 days ago
- Daily Tribune
U.S. Trade Court Blocks Trump's Sweeping Global Tariffs
The U.S. Court of International Trade has blocked his administration's sweeping global tariffs, ruling that the president overstepped constitutional limits. The three-judge panel in New York determined that the White House's use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) did not grant the president authority to unilaterally impose broad import duties on nearly every U.S. trading partner. The court reaffirmed that the Constitution assigns Congress— not the president, the sole power to regulate international commerce. The ruling halts tariffs that impacted dozens of nations, including key allies like the EU, UK, Canada, Mexico, and China. However, it does not apply to specific tariffs on cars, steel, and aluminum, which were enacted under a different statute. Who Filed the Legal Challenge? Two separate lawsuits sparked the court's decision. The nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center filed one on behalf of small businesses affected by the tariffs. The second challenge came from a coalition of 12 U.S. state governments, including New York, which challenged the constitutionality of the policy. 📜 The Court's Key Findings The IEEPA does not authorize blanket tariffs for non-emergency trade policy. The 'Liberation Day' tariffs— Trump's term for his economic reset— violated the separation of powers. Additional levies on Canada, Mexico, and China were also invalidated, having been justified on grounds of immigration and drug enforcement. Reactions Pour In The White House, now under appeal, has criticized the ruling. 'It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency,' said Deputy Press Secretary Kush Desai. By contrast, New York Attorney General Letitia James praised the decision: 'The law is clear: no president has the power to single-handedly raise taxes whenever they like.' Following the announcement, stock markets in Asia and the U.S. saw gains, while European indexes remained steady. What Happens Next? The court gave the White House 10 days to begin the administrative process to lift the tariffs. However, the administration has requested a temporary hold on the ruling while it prepares an appeal, which could ultimately reach the Supreme Court. Even if the appeal fails, Trump retains the option to reintroduce tariffs under different provisions, including Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows temporary tariffs of up to 15% for balance-of-payment issues. Analysts at Goldman Sachs suggest this route could be enacted within days. Another possible path involves invoking the rarely used 1930 Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, allowing tariffs of up to 50% on nations deemed discriminatory toward the U.S. What This Means for Businesses According to former U.S. Customs official John Leonard, for now, importers must continue paying tariffs at the border. If the White House loses on appeal, Customs and Border Protection would be required to refund payments retroactively. The ruling also throws uncertainty into ongoing U.S. trade negotiations. Experts believe many international partners may now delay deals until the legal battle is resolved. Earlier this month, the UK and U.S. agreed to reduce tariffs on certain key goods, such as steel, aluminum, and vehicles. While those sector-specific reductions remain unaffected, the blanket 10% tariff on other UK imports now appears legally vulnerable. The UK government has not yet issued a formal statement but affirmed its commitment to ensuring British firms benefit from the deal 'as quickly as possible.'
Daily Tribune
5 days ago
- Daily Tribune
Stocks climb as US-EU trade tensions ease
Wall Street shares bounced yesterday, catching up to a European rally after US President Donald Trump delayed huge tariffs on imports from the EU over the long holiday weekend. New York's main stock markets all rebounded as trading resumed in New York after the Memorial Day weekend, with the broad-based S&P 500 gaining more than one% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq up 1.4%. The Frankfurt stock market rose 0.6% while Paris was flat in afternoon deals following Monday's rally in Europe. Trump sent markets into a tailspin Friday when he threatened to hit EU goods with a 50% tariff from June 1, saying talks were 'going nowhere'. But after a phone call Sunday with EU chief Ursula von der Leyen, Trump delayed the levies until July 9 to give more time for negotiations. EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic said Monday following calls with top US officials that the bloc remains 'fully committed' to reaching a trade agreement with the United States. 'This postponement has helped soothe tensions following last week's turbulence and is widely viewed as a temporary de-escalation in the ongoing trade dispute,' said David Morrison, senior market analyst at financial services firm Trade Nation. Analysts cautioned, however, that Trump's trade policies have been erratic.
