Wellington mayoral race: Who's in and who's out as candidates confirmed
Alex Baker
Independent
Alex Baker is running for Wellington Mayor. Photo / alexbakerwellington.nz
Baker is a former KPMG chartered accountant and most recently worked as a sustainability director at Kāinga Ora. He is also running in the Motukairangi Eastern Ward where he lives with his young family.
What are your top three priorities for Wellington if elected?
'Affordability, jobs and sustainability.'
How would you describe your politics in one sentence?
'I want to deliver the positive, social outcomes Wellingtonians want, while applying the strong, pragmatic financial management we need.'
What do you make of the Wellington mayoral race so far?
'Fairly negative and a beatdown on the city, I want my campaign to bring some positivity to how Wellingtonians feel about the future.'
Baker said he is 'largely self-funding' his campaign with some financial support from friends and family. He plans to spend $40,000 on the campaign.
Andrew Little
Labour Party
Former Labour Party leader Andrew Little is running for the Wellington mayoralty. Photo / supplied.
Little is a former Labour Party leader and Cabinet Minister. He left Parliament in 2023 and is currently working as a lawyer. He is a long-time Island Bay resident and is not running for a ward seat.
What are your top three priorities for Wellington if elected?
'Getting a firmer grip on council spending to keep rates down and free up money to invest in community facilities such as swimming pools and libraries.
'Making our city more affordable by accelerating housing development and making public transport cheaper and more reliable.
'Making the council more transparent and accountable, with community feedback front and centre when decisions are made.'
How would you describe your politics in one sentence?
'Progressive, pragmatic left.'
What do you make of the Wellington mayoral race so far?
'My campaign so far has been about connecting with Wellingtonians at a grassroots level through stakeholder meetings, one-on-one meetings with community and business leaders and meeting with people in their communities and on their doorsteps. I am hearing incredible stories, dreams and ambitions from people who want a council to listen and work with them.'
Little said he plans to spend close to the $60,000 limit in place during the three months leading up to the election. He has committed to releasing a full account of all donations over the $1500 disclosure limit before voting begins. Candidates are only required to do this after voting.
He has not publicly disclosed any major backers but a spokesman for his campaign confirmed that Jacinda Ardern had been in touch and 'wished him well'.
Ardern would not comment on Little's run.
Diane Calvert
Independent
Wellington City councillor Diane Calvert. Photo / Mark Mitchell
Calvert is a third-term Wellington City councillor standing again for a Wharangi Onslow Western ward seat. Born in Liverpool, Britain, she previously ran for the mayoralty in 2019, placing third with 13.8% of the vote. This term, she has advocated for the Khandallah swimming pool to be saved and spoken out against the cycleway rollout.
What are your top three priorities for Wellington if elected?
'Reset the Budget, Respect the Ratepayer – get spending under control.
'Get the Basics Right—fix our roads, rubbish, and public spaces.
'Rebuild Trust—a Council that listens, engages, and delivers.
'Backing local business, building and bold ideas -cut the red tape and streamline processes.
'Restoring a Council that listens, engages, and delivers – build back public confidence in the council's ability to deliver what Wellingtonians want."
How would you describe your politics in one sentence?
'I'm a pragmatic moderate and not aligned with any party or political group.'
What do you make of the Wellington mayoral race so far?
'It's a crowded and diverse field, but with my entry, I hope we shift the focus of the debate to real workable solutions for the city's challenges.'
Calvert said she plans to run a 'lean, no-frills campaign', spending only what she raises from donations. She said she would only declare donations after the election as required.
Donald McDonald
Mcdone waiting 2coming terms Passover
Donald McDonald is running for the Wellington mayoralty again.
McDonald, also known as Donald Newtown McDonald or Don Newt, has run for Wellington mayor a number of times. He is known in the capital for his cryptic social media posts on community Facebook page Vic Deals and is said to hold the record for filing the most complaints with the Broadcasting Standards Authority.
He did not respond to the Herald's questions about his campaign.
Joan Shi
Independent
Joan Shi. Photo / Wellington City Council.
Shi ran unsuccessfully in the council's Pukehīnau Lambton Ward by-election last year. She describes herself as an immigrant single mum of two.
What are your top three priorities for Wellington if elected?
'Prioritise council spending on core infrastructure and essential services for the community, especially repairing and replacing aging, leaking pipes.
'Provide better and more affordable public transportation.
'Nurturing a business-friendly environment so that Wellington's business can thrive.'
How would you describe your politics in one sentence?
'I am listening and ready to solve the problems facing our city.'
What do you make of the Wellington mayoral race so far?
'Surprise, surprise, surprise!'
Shi said she is her own backer and doesn't intend to spend much on her campaign as she is currently unemployed.
Josh Harford
Silly Hat Party
Josh Harford of the Silly Hat Party is running for the Wellington mayoralty.
Harford says he has lived in Wellington all his life and believes the council 'needs less jesting and more Joshing'.
What are your top three priorities for Wellington if elected?
'Urgently improving Wellington's weather; Mandating optimism throughout the City Council; Installing a lazy river on Courtney Place.'
How would you describe your politics in one sentence?
'Neither left nor right wing, but rather highly serious with two wings.'
What do you make of the Wellington mayoral race so far?
'Unfortunately, there are a number of very silly candidates clogging up this race. Serious contenders such as myself and William Pennywize are often drowned out by the bizarre ramblings of Ray Chung, Andrew Little, Karl Teifenbacher and the others.'
Harford plans to spend no more than a few hundred dollars on his campaign as he has not received any donations.
Karl Tiefenbacher
Independent
Karl Tiefenbacher serving an ice cream at Kaffee Eis on the Wellington waterfront. Photo / Mark Mitchel
Karl Tiefenbacher owns the Wellington coffee and gelato chain Kaffee Eis. Tiefenbacher lives in the CBD but is also running for a Motukairangi Eastern Ward seat. He has previously run for a council seat twice and lost.
What are your top three priorities for Wellington if elected?
'Better value from council for Wellingtonians.
'A 'yes' council that supports businesses and drives employment opportunities and vibrancy.
'Rebuilding confidence and pride in our city by ensuring transparency in everything the council does.'
How would you describe your politics in one sentence?
'I believe in commonsense centrist policies that support the majority and allows the city to thrive.'
What do you make of the Wellington mayoral race so far?
'There has been too much focus on political game playing and not enough on the policies that will turn our city around.'
Tiefenbacher is boasting several anonymous 'passionate Wellingtonian backers' who have financially supported his campaign, although he said it is 'largely self-funded'. He plans to spend about $40,000.
Kelvin Hastie
Independent
Wellington mayoral candidate Kelvin Hastie speaking at an event.
Kelvin Hastie describes himself as a 'predator free champion' for his conservation work. He ran for the mayoralty in 2022 and placed sixth with 2208 votes.
What are your top three priorities for Wellington if elected?
'Pausing High‑Impact Projects & Re-Consulting Infrastructure Plans- pausing major projects—including the Golden Mile redevelopment, the city composting scheme, and the City-to-Sea bridge demolition—so they can be reassessed with fresh consultation.
'Rate Relief via Governance Reform and Regional Amalgamation - reducing rates by amalgamating Wellington with nearby councils (Porirua, Hutt City, Upper Hutt), aiming to eliminate duplication, streamline services, and bring down the cost burden on ratepayers.
'Strategic Social Housing Renewal - a partnership with central government to radically modernise Wellington's social housing stock. Rather than pouring money into aging homes, I want to demolish obsolete properties, offer viable units to first-home buyers, and use proceeds from surplus land for building new, energy-efficient, resilient public housing tailored to today's standards.'
How would you describe your politics in one sentence?
'My political outlook is independent, grounded in inclusivity, and oriented toward sustainable, forward-thinking progress.'
What do you make of the Wellington mayoral race so far?
'A contest of ideas, pitting bold, community-led innovation (my platform) against more established institutional politics.'
Hastie said he has not yet received any donations exceeding $5,000.
Ray Chung
Independent Together
Councillor Ray Chung during a Wellington City Council meeting. Photo / Mark Mitchell
Ray Chung is a first-term city councillor running for the mayoralty under a group of independent candidates titled Independent Together. He ran for the mayoralty in 2022 placing fourth with 12,670 votes. He has come under fire for a sexual gossip-filled email he sent about Tory Whanau in 2023. Chung is also running for re-election in the Wharangi Onslow-Western Ward.
What are your top three priorities for Wellington if elected?
'A council led by me will work with the other INDEPENDENT TOGETHER and like-minded Councillors to deliver on Zero Rates Increases to make Wellington affordable for all.
'We will make the hard, adult decisions to refocus Council resources towards core priorities and basics, reducing duplicated services, unnecessary gold plating and ensuring residents get value for money.
'We will restore access to the city for all and focus on making it easier for businesses to flourish. Businesses generate jobs for residents and students, and this will bring people back to the city to contribute to prosperity and growth.'
How would you describe your politics in one sentence?
'My goal is to get central government Party politics out of council governance and to refocus everyone on the core priorities and basics that only Council can deliver to its residents.'
What do you make of the Wellington mayoral race so far?
'I began my campaign early because I understood that to take back the city from the political parties in favour of truly independent councillors required a long runway. The political parties, Labour and Greens in particular, don't want to relinquish their hold on the city's treasury, and that's evident by the number of candidates they're running.'
Chung said he has the backing of residents 'across all political, cultural, economy, age, and sex demographics'.
He will not proactively disclose donations but has previously said his campaign group had raised between $150,000 - $200,000. He was previously backed by high-profile philanthropist Sir Mark Dunajtschik but he withdrew his support following the email scandal.
Rob Goulden
Independent
Wellington mayoral candidate and former city councillor Rob Goulden.
A former police officer and territorial soldier, Rob Goulden served as a Wellington City councillor between 1998 and 2010. Mayor Kerry Prendergast said at the time his aggressive behaviour had become a problem at the council. He now works as a Metlink bus driver and runs a security and protective services company.
What are your top three priorities for Wellington if elected?
'Grow the Cities economy by focusing on the things we are good at eg. Film Industry, Arts Culture and Entertainment, Developing Wellington as an IT hub, Tourism and Wellington as a centre of education with our two Universities and potentially other centres of learning.
'Focus on priorities and cut wasteful spending. core business and infrastructure on projects we can afford. Reduce debt and rates to an affordable level. Rates increases will be no greater than the level of inflation.
'Provide Leadership to a City that desperately needs it, scrutinise all expenditure, do things smarter and enhance input from the public with better decision making and better processes and bring back the Vibe Confidence and Investment to Wellington.'
How would you describe your politics in one sentence?
'Centrist.'
What do you make of the Wellington mayoral race so far?
'It's been a challenge with lack of access to media. Its definitely the dirtiest campaign I have ever been involved with.'
Goulden said 'The Campaign Manager and a couple of the team are running the Campaign fund and account' and he has 'nothing to do with it'.
Scott Caldwell
Scott Caldwell
Scott 'Scoot' Caldwell, who lives in Auckland, is running for the Wellington Mayoralty.
Caldwell, who also goes by Scoot, lives in Auckland working as a software engineer. He is an advocate for housing intensification.
What are your top three priorities for Wellington if elected?
'To be unafraid of growth and change. This is the only way that Wellington can become a city that everyone can enjoy living in.
'To grow our rates base without asking Wellingtonians to dig even deeper into their pockets. This will mean taking on the Beehive. Government buildings do not pay any commercial rates, which impacts the city's bottom line. If you own buildings and run your operation in this city, you have to contribute to the coffers like everyone else.
'To be unapologetic in the rejection of curtain twitchers trapped in the 1980s who hold the city back. We have to embrace affordable housing, great infrastructure and thriving businesses.'
How would you describe your politics in one sentence?
'I don't play politics - the Mayor of Wellington needs to be for all Wellingtonians, not just for Wellingtonians with the same political views.'
What do you make of the Wellington mayoral race so far?
'It's a pretty poor showing. The city deserves better than yet another former minister looking for a cushy retirement gig.'
Caldwell said he is not yet convinced he needs donations to win the mayoralty.
William Pennywize
Pennywize the Rewilding Clown
James Barber is running as William Pennywize in the Wellington Mayoral race.
James Barber is running as William Pennywize, a reference to Pennywise the Dancing Clown from the movie adaptations of Stephen King's novel 'It'. The campaign is a satirical jab at Chung's campaign group Independent Together, also called IT. Pennywize recently attended one of the groups events in Newtown.
What are your top three priorities for Wellington if elected?
'Make the Basin Swamp Again, daylight all awa as well as genetically engineering giant tuna and moa as part of our new public transport scheme. You will no longer slowly rumble down Adelaide rd on a double decker and be stuck in traffic on Courtney Place you will instead fly along the back of a giant tuna or a resurrected moa.'
How would you describe your politics in one sentence?
'Rewilding Wellington will tackle the water crisis, the climate crisis and the wellbeing crisis at the same time; while also just being really cool!'
What do you make of the Wellington mayoral race so far?
'The Wellington mayoral race has been a desolate wasteland of visionless moaning about how infrastructure costs money. The Pennywize campaign is a bright oasis of opportunity and aspiration in an otherwise boring and depressing landscape.'
Barber said he has received $750.70 in donations and plans to spend every cent.
Voting and results
Today is the last day to enrol to cast an ordinary vote, those not enrolled after today will have to cast a special vote.
Voting opens on 9 September and closes at noon Saturday 11 October. Provisional results will be released the same day with the final results declared Thursday October 16.
Ethan Manera is a New Zealand Herald journalist based in Wellington. He joined NZME in 2023 as a broadcast journalist with Newstalk ZB and is interested in local issues, politics, and property in the capital. He can be emailed at ethan.manera@nzme.co.nz.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
13 hours ago
- NZ Herald
NZ corporate bond issuance shifts overseas, local market slows
That's partly down to banks being better positioned, so corporate treasurers are skewing their funding mix more towards bank lending, he says. The New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency (LGFA), which raises funds for councils, has recently begun issuing offshore debt, which has added another 'swing factor' away from the local market, he says. 'But it's not just LGFA. There is a kind of dynamic where treasurers are getting better pricing landed back into Kiwi dollars if they issue offshore,' he said. 'That's something we would see as being likely to persist, so it's a bit of a change.' Kāinga Ora (formerly the Housing Corporation) is absent from the corporate debt market after the Government in 2022 announced that future funding would be through New Zealand Debt Management – part of the Treasury. He said corporates are hedging funds raised overseas back into New Zealand dollars on quite favourable terms. 'In previous years, typically there is more issuance done domestically than offshore, but this year, a multiple of what's been done onshore has been done offshore. 'Borrowers probably see it as being reasonably positive, but from a fund manager's perspective, we would like to see more issuance in New Zealand,' Pannett said. 'Typically they will get a bit more tenor [longer duration] offshore, and price is a pretty significant motivator also.' But Pannett said it's too early to say if the local market risked becoming a backwater for corporate bond issuance. 'I would need to see a bit more evidence of that first, because it may just be that pricing has moved so much that that is where we are at this point. 'But to call it a real trend, you might need some more evidence.' Overseas bond issuance has been split between Australian, US, Swiss and European markets, with smaller deals done in Japan. Pannett said the trend of raising funds in overseas markets was 'strikingly different' from previous years, when domestic issuance came out on top. The trend means more fund managers, including those managing KiwiSaver funds, are looking overseas for opportunities. 'It's fair to say that they [fund managers] have been looking offshore to fill the void left by limited domestic corporate bond issuance,' Pannett said. Simon Eckhoff, director for syndicate and debt capital markets at ANZ Markets, Institutional, said hedging costs have been favourable throughout this year, which has resulted in New Zealand issuers tapping overseas markets. For corporate issuers in the year to date, ANZ estimates that for every $1 raised in New Zealand dollars, there has been the equivalent of $2 raised in overseas markets – in sharp contrast with history. 'There have been several factors touted as key drivers for the current dynamics, such as the comparative value of the likes of New Zealand government bonds to that of corporate bonds as well as prevailing hedging levels. 'These factors could be perceived as effectively shrinking the investible universe in New Zealand dollar debt,' Eckhoff said. 'While the New Zealand debt market has faced some challenges recently, markets typically normalise,' he said. 'In the interim, offshore debt offers New Zealand issuers an opportunity to enhance their funding diversification,' Eckhoff said. Jamie Gray is an Auckland-based journalist, covering the financial markets and the primary sector. He joined the Herald in 2011.
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
How Wellington Council's spending is derailing the city
The cost of living and doing business in Wellington Calls for rates restraint are dismissed by some as miserly grumblings of privileged homeowners. They're wrong. We are not strangers to the city or its needs; we're Wellingtonians who've invested decades of our lives helping to shape this place. We've walked the streets and talked to the people and business and the message is clear – it's become progressively too expensive to live and do business here. It's particularly unfair on businesses – large and small – who pay 3.7 times the level of rates compared to homeowners, the largest differential in the country. Some simple numbers illustrate the strain: if the council had limited its rates increases to match inflation since 2020, every household would be $1200 better off this year. That money matters, especially for first-home buyers, low- and fixed-income families and those with mortgages. It's money that could have circulated in the local economy, helping sustain shops, cafes and jobs. In the five years to 2025, inflation was 22%, but rates surged 83%. Worse, the council's 2024 Long-Term Plan shows rates more than doubling between 2024 and 2034 (including water infrastructure expenditure). Water services are now being transferred to a new entity, with households reportedly facing similarly significant and challenging increases in their water costs. For many, rates are the second biggest expense after their mortgage. For businesses, rates trail only rent and staff costs. The results are predictable: growth sputters, new housing and jobs don't materialise, and the boast that Wellington can 'grow its way to prosperity' rings hollow. Paul Ridley-Smith Debt: Mortgaging the future for the present From 2019 to 2024, total council spending (operating plus capital) grew 63%. Staff costs alone grew 48% (nearly three times wage inflation), with the number earning over $200,000 almost doubling. Such escalation is unheard of in the private sector and yet the promised infrastructure gains have been modest at best. Debt has also soared. Council gross debt was $0.6 billion in 2019 and it's now over $2 billion, and growing. In 2019, $1 in every $12 of rates serviced the council's debt interest, today it's $1 in $6. We are mortgaging our city's future; coming generations will pay the bill. Where has all this money gone? It hasn't flowed into suburbs like Newlands, Strathmore, Newtown, or Karori. Instead, nearly $1 billion has been lavished in and around Civic Square: the Town Hall, the rebuilt library, purchase of a parking building, the Takina convention centre, a $40 million fit-out of council offices (in a prime location), demolition of buildings, and modest city centre upgrades. Going forward there's around $600 million on social housing upgrades and completion of a $400 million project building the planet's most sophisticated sludge plant to reduce human waste to dry pellets. Nice. This might have been bearable if the money was spent on the 'bones' of the city —water pipes, streets, parks - the infrastructure that truly underpins public and economic wellbeing. But too little has. The pipes are still leaking profusely – 44.3 million litres per day. That's more than 17 Olympic-size swimming pools of precious, treated water being wasted every day. How did we get here? The drift from infrastructure to ideology Much of the increase in spending — past and projected — has been disproportionately directed toward initiatives aligned with the 'four wellbeings' (social, cultural, environmental, and economic). These priorities relate to the 2019 amendments to the Local Government Act, which shifted councils' focus from the delivery of 'good quality local infrastructure and services' to a much broader and more ambiguous mandate. Wellington City Council embraced this with unbridled and well-meaning enthusiasm. See the projects above and the continuing commitments to cycleways, the Golden Mile, organic waste collection, a huge expansion in the parks and reserves budget to take on running Crown - iwi land on Miramar peninsula, commitments to the living wage for employees, contractors and employees of contractors. All earnest, but all expensive — and all paid for, ultimately, by the same number of ratepayers. A new vision So what now? First, Wellington must axe poor-value spending. Every dollar spent by the council must deliver measurable public value. Too often, this hasn't happened: from a $3m purchase of EV chargers languishing in a warehouse, a $0.6m bike rack hardly used, $2m on golf club subsidies, to poorly evaluated mega-projects whose business cases look shakier year by year. Second, the core must come first. That means pipes, parks, roads, lighting, litter, and keeping our city clean and tidy must be at the very centre of council's mission. Distractions, no matter how fashionable or well-intentioned, must not be allowed to take precedence. Third, we need a 'course correction' on future spending, targeting large savings that enable genuinely lower rates. Options could include a sinking lid on staff numbers, deferring non-essential capital projects until business cases and central government guidance are clear, and pitting every dollar of planned expenditure against an ironclad test: does this build basic infrastructure, or support a well-maintained, safe, attractive city? Some big questions must be asked: What are the 'wellbeing' consequences to all ratepayers of our Long-Term Plan expenditure: $152 million funding Takina's losses? over $900 million on social housing? Can a city of 75,000 households afford to subsidise a zoo by $120 million? Do our ratepayers have the financial capacity to spend a further $173 million maintaining and building new cycleways? The council must also pursue new revenue and efficiencies. There are plenty of opportunities: selling surplus road reserve to residents, revisiting unduly generous rates remissions, rethinking unprofitable venues, and abdicating strategies, like social housing that duplicate central government's role. A different future is possible — our modelling suggests $2.8 billion could be saved out to 2034, if all levers are pulled. This could help freeze or even roll back rates, giving households, businesses and those looking to make Wellington their home, much-needed breathing room. This is not about mindless austerity, its about restoring trust, accountability and efficiency. Importantly, leaving more money in ratepayers' pockets is key to restoring confidence. Infrastructure is not glamorous, but it's (almost) everything Cities thrive or falter on their infrastructure. The pipes, roads, lighting, and public facilities are the quiet enablers of everything else we call wellbeing: jobs, affordable housing, a vibrant arts and cultural life, hospitality, and above all, a sense of safety and pride. Neglect infrastructure, and everything else starts to fray and becomes unaffordable. Focusing on the basics isn't nostalgic conservatism - it's a radical act of care and hope. It says to existing and future residents, business owners, and investors: Wellington is a place that works, a city where the fundamentals are solid and reliable. Wellington can be a place to establish a life and family, pursue meaningful work, and build a business with confidence. Only with the essentials secure can 'wellbeing' be more than an empty slogan. Opportunity through affordability Wellington's unique blend of natural beauty, creativity, and accessibility remains its greatest asset. But none of it can be leveraged if costs chase away the next generation, if businesses decide expansion is too risky, or if the basics become unaffordable. By fiercely refocusing on infrastructure and reigning in spending, the council can set Wellington back on a path to prosperity — a city where 'live, work, play' is not just a catchphrase, but a genuine, affordable possibility for all. It's about unlocking our potential. A vibrant Wellington cannot be built on affordable rates alone - but affordability unlocks opportunity. Wellington must actively foster a business-friendly environment. Our businesses are engines of growth, innovation, and employment. Reducing the punitive commercial rates differential is critical — Wellington's future depends on a council that anticipates and supports business needs through sensible policy, efficient consents, robust infrastructure, and openness to innovation. As the capital city, Wellington's greatest strength should be its close connection to the Government - the region's largest employer and economic driver. It is vital, therefore, that the council cultivates a strong, collaborative relationship with ministers of all stripes. Wellington is uniquely positioned to capitalise on national initiatives aimed at boosting investment, productivity, and infrastructure development. Recent reforms and Budget 2025 measures, including tax incentives for capital investment and streamlined business compliance, demonstrate a clear commitment to economic growth. The current seismic review is particularly pertinent to our city's future and affordability. The council must actively leverage these policies, advocate for fair and adequate funding — particularly for social housing and key infrastructure — and avoid duplicating functions that drain resources or hinder private sector dynamism. Why does Wellington not have, as a city and a region, a deal in front of the Government for discussion? By aligning with Government priorities and making the city hospitable to business growth, Wellington can spark new jobs, stimulate housing development, and elevate living standards. A productive, respectful partnership between local and central government, alongside a council that values economic vibrancy as a means to social wellbeing, can reverse our drift and secure Wellington's reputation as a sustainable, livable, and prosperous capital. No one loves Wellington more than Wellingtonians*. It is that deep-rooted passion and pride that fuels our collective courage to demand better — better leadership, better stewardship, and a better city where affordability, infrastructure, and opportunity come together to create a thriving home for all who live, work, and build our futures here. * Paul Ridley-Smith and Louise Tong are two such fervent Wellingtonians. This article was written in a personal, not professional capacity and crafted on a best-efforts basis with regard to the accuracy of the facts and figures presented. This article is a synthesis of content from presentations at the Vision for Wellington event 'A Capital Challenge', available here.
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Why Wellington's council must learn to listen
Jazz began in the 1920s as a response to its times — loose, unpredictable, alive. It challenged the idea that music should be 'correct'. Jazz musicians treated music as dialogue, not monologue. They listened and responded — to each other, to the moment, and to the audience. The act of listening was what made the music work. Good decision-making starts with listening, too. It's how you understand the problem, weigh the trade-offs, and build trust in the path ahead — especially when the decisions are complex, long-term and expensive. Luke Pierson, Vision for Wellington That's the point of local government: to let communities shape their own future. Decisions made closer to those affected by them are more likely to be in tune with local needs and values. Communities know what matters most to them, and should have the power to act. It's also the promise of local democracy: proximity, accountability and responsiveness. Councils are entrusted with planning, infrastructure, transport, libraries and more — not because they're expected to be perfect, but because they're expected to listen. What we're seeing in Wellington at the moment is what happens when they don't. While the symptoms may be failing finances and leaking pipes, the real problem runs deeper. Trust is at an all-time low: just 27% of Wellingtonians trust the council, and only 24% feel listened to. It's not hard to see why. Despite widespread public concern, controversial projects keep moving ahead because the council believes it knows best. That might have washed occasionally if it had shown it could deliver. But after years of delays and hundreds of millions in cost blowouts, a handful of infrastructure projects — once full of promise — have become symbols of a council that can't be trusted with complex decisions. The consequences are both practical and political. Take the failed proposal to sell the city's stake in Wellington Airport. There may well have been good financial arguments but by that point it wasn't about whether selling the airport was the right thing to do. It was about whether we trusted the council to do the right thing. After years of delays and hundreds of millions in cost blowouts, a handful of infrastructure projects — once full of promise — have become symbols of a council that can't be trusted with complex decisions. Luke Pierson That failure derailed the entire long-term planning process, a statutory requirement laying out spending priorities for the next decade. Something previous councils have delivered like clockwork every three years took this one an extra 12 months and a Crown observer to complete. But here's the brighter note: people haven't given up. The thing about not being listened to is that it leaves Wellingtonians with two choices — stop complaining or do something about it. Vision for Wellington is an attempt to do the latter: help the city find its rhythm again. The group was set up with a simple purpose: to listen. It's deliberately apolitical, aiming to build consensus across backgrounds and beliefs — something that's near impossible if you're backing candidates. In a few short months, we've hosted 2000 Wellingtonians at eight public panels featuring 35 local experts, from transport engineers and housing advocates to entrepreneurs and economists. Thousands more have streamed the conversations online, and hundreds have written in with ideas, feedback and fully formed proposals. Crucially, we haven't put forward any ideas of our own. This isn't about telling Wellington what to do. It's about understanding what Wellington wants. What we're building isn't a political platform, but a shared set of priorities that reflect the aspirations of the people who live here. And we're backing that with robust, representative research so it speaks for the city, not just the loudest voices in the room. One thing is already clear: Wellingtonians want change. Every serious mayoral candidate has heard that loud and clear, promising a reset with tighter control of spending, lower pressure on rates, better scrutiny of big projects and greater transparency. The question now is whether they can deliver. With Wellington playing musical mayors for the third election in a row, and at least five councillors standing down, change is clearly coming — for better or worse. For a progressive city, a style of leadership that says 'we're right, you're wrong' is about as conservative as it gets. What we need now is the opposite: leaders who can listen, adapt and build consensus across differences. Leaders who treat governing not as a monologue but as a conversation. Because what we're facing isn't just a failure of pipes or projects. It's a failure of decision-making. Until we change that tune, the outcomes won't change — no matter who's in charge.
